Curious case of convicted BJP MLA Kanwarlal Meena—denied SC relief, in jail, but yet to be disqualified
In the previous Lok Sabha, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was disqualified as a member on 23 March 2023, just a day after his conviction and sentencing by a Gujarat court in a defamation case. Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan was disqualified as a member of the Uttar Pradesh assembly a day after an MP-MLA court in Rampur sentenced him to three years in jail in hate speech cases.
Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, 1951 provides for disqualification of a lawmaker if he or she is convicted for an offence that entails a minimum sentence of two years.
New Delhi: Nearly three weeks after the Rajasthan High Court upheld his conviction and three-year prison sentence in a 2005 case—and two weeks after the Supreme Court denied him relief—BJP leader Kanwarlal Meena continues to be a member of the state assembly. The Congress has slammed this as a 'murder of the Constitution'.
So, Kanwarlal Meena being able to keep his house membership despite 19 days since his conviction was upheld has raised eyebrows. A court in Aklera of Jhalawar district held Meena guilty of threatening a civil servant in 2005 and sentenced him to three years in jail in 2020.
The decision was later upheld by the Rajasthan High Court 2 May. The BJP MLA moved the Supreme Court which directed him to surrender in trial court in two weeks. The deadline ended Wednesday. He has surrendered before a court. Meanwhile, he has also filed a review petition in the SC.
While hearing Meena's Special Leave Petition 8 May, the Supreme Court observed, 'Elected representatives need to discipline themselves. This is one of rare cases where somebody has been convicted, otherwise you do everything and get away with it without any action against you.'
The Rajasthan Congress moved Speaker Vasudev Devnani and Governor Haribhau Kisanrao Bagde seeking Meena's disqualification under the provisions of the RP Act, 1951.
State Congress president Govind Singh Dotasra Monday resigned from one of the assembly standing committees in protest. A Congress delegation also met the governor Monday.
'There cannot be two sets of laws in one country,' Dotsra told ThePrint. 'Rahul Gandhi's membership was terminated within 24 hours and an MLA in Rajasthan has been sentenced to three years. The bench of three judges of the Supreme Court also did not give him relief. Yet, the Speaker has not disqualified him in 19 days.'
He added: 'In the Lily Thomas case (2013), the Supreme Court said the day the punishment is passed, the membership will be cancelled immediately. Now, even after 19 days, why is Meena's membership not being terminated? The Speaker is sitting on the file and it is being moved here and there.'
Dotasra claimed efforts are being made to pardon the MLA through the governor under Article 161. 'But rule 161 does not apply in the Meena case. The chief minister also went to the governor in this regard. The Supreme Court has also said the MLA will have to surrender in two weeks. Now two weeks have also been completed. They have made a mockery of law.'
Also Read: In Rahul Gandhi's disqualification, Modi-Shah lay an electoral trap for Congress
The 2005 case
On February 3, 2005, Meena threatened then SDM Ram Niwas Mehta at gunpoint, pressuring him to recommend re-polling for the post of deputy sarpanch in the Khatakhedi village near Manohar Thana.
Meena took out a revolver and asked Mehta to announce a repoll within two minutes. The SDM told Meena a revolver can kill but not enforce a repoll.
While the trial court initially acquitted Meena, the additional district judge (ADJ) court in Aklera convicted him in 2020, imposing a three-year sentence and a fine of ₹3 lakh.
Meena was in the news also in 2023 in connection with the abduction case of BJP MLA Lalit Meena allegedly at the behest of Vasundhara Raje's son Dushyant Singh, at a time when hectic political activities were going on in the state for picking a chief minister.
Rahul to Azam: Leaders disqualified under RP Act
Gandhi was found guilty of criminal defamation by a Surat court for his remark on PM Narendra Modi's surname at an election rally in 2019 and was sentenced to two years in jail 23 March 2023. He got bail and was given 30 days to appeal, but the court did not suspend his conviction.
The Lok Sabha secretariat issued the Wayanad MP's disqualification notice 24 March.
In a note issued 13 October 2015, the Election Commission asked state chief secretaries to direct departments concerned to ensure cases of convictions of sitting MPs or MLAs were brought to the notice of the speaker or the house chairperson.
More than a dozen lawmakers have been disqualified under the act since 2013 when the Supreme Court struck down relief under section 8(4) of RP Act which gave convicted MPs and MLA three months time to appeal and save their memberships.
Senior leaders like Lalu Prasad (fodder scam), the late Jayalalithaa (disproportionate assets case) and NCP MP Mohd Faizal (attempt to murder case) were among the lawmakers disqualified under the act. Gandhi and Faizal's suspensions were later revoked.
'No provision in Constitution about time-frame'
Sources close to Meena told ThePrint he surrendered Wednesday per the Supreme Court deadline. 'Now the ball is in the court of the governor and the court. There is no provision in Constitution about time-frame when the Speaker will act.'
Meena's aides also denied the MLA has requested the governor to grant him pardon. They claimed the MLA was waiting for the Supreme Court's decision.
Rajasthan BJP spokesperson Laxmikant Bhardwaj said the issue of disqualification is between the speaker and the MLA concerned. 'And the speaker has to make a decision on his disqualification. Maybe the MLA is exploring his last legal options.'
Sources close to Speaker Vasudev Devnani told ThePrint, 'The speaker has consulted legal minds and is waiting for the Supreme Court decision on this matter. This has delayed the decision.'
But Congress spokesperson Swarnim Chaturvedi asked, 'Why is he being given so much time to explore legal options? Why was he not disqualified immediately? Why is the Speaker waiting for his Supreme Court review petition? It's a murder of the Constitution. There can't be separate laws for BJP leaders and opposition leaders.'
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Read: 'Should have been more careful' — Surat court order rejecting Rahul Gandhi's plea for stay on conviction
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Tharoor on fresh diplomatic push, leaves for Russia
NEW DELHI: Days after wrapping up a multi-nation tour on Operation Sindoor, the Centre has assigned Congress MP Shashi Tharoor a second round of diplomatic outreach to countries such as Russia, the UK and possibly Greece, said sources. The Thiruvananthapuram MP, who left for Moscow on Friday, is on a two-week mission, said sources familiar with the developments. The mission aims to further bolster India's position among all-weather allies and to amplify the country's voice, said sources. During the two-week trip, Tharoor will be liaising with Indian diplomatic missions in various countries. His visit to Russia assumes significance amid the softening of the ties between the US and Pakistan. India has reasons to worry after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, recently held a one-on-one meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House for more than two hours. Sources said that the government was keen on sending Tharoor for another round of diplomatic push as the all-party delegation led by him was considered as one of the most impactful ones.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Habeas corpus untenable for tracing missing person: Telangana HC
H YDERABAD: The Telangana high court recently dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a woman seeking directions to the police to trace her missing father, who is an advocate. The court ruled that a habeas corpus petition is not maintainable merely for locating a missing person. A division bench comprising Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao observed that the petition failed to establish sufficient grounds for invoking the extraordinary remedy of habeas corpus. The bench clarified that the purpose of a habeas corpus writ is to secure the release of a person from illegal detention, not to trace individuals who are unaccounted for without evidence of unlawful custody. The order was passed in response to a plea by the woman, a resident of Chilkalguda, who claimed her father had been missing for the past year. She alleged that he disappeared while in Kerala, and sought the court's intervention to direct the authorities to trace him. The bench said that the petitioner had previously filed a similar writ petition, which was dismissed for default in April this year due to non-prosecution. Importantly, she had not filed any application to restore the earlier petition. In conclusion, the court held that the present writ was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution and dismissed the petition.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Before going to court, Telangana willing to talk with AP CM Chandrababu Naidu, says CM Revanth Reddy; seeks cordial ties like with Karnataka
HYDERABAD: A day after submitting a strong objection with the Centre against the Banakacherla project of Andhra Pradesh govt, chief minister A Revanth Reddy on Friday said the state cabinet meeting on June 23 will discuss inviting AP chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu , ministers and officials for talks on the contentious issue between the two Telugu riparian states. In a chat with media in New Delhi before returning to Hyderabad after his two-day tour, Revanth said the Telangana govt did not want to continue controversies which can be resolved through talks. "There will be no compromise on river water interests of Telangana, but before availing the option of going to court, we are willing to hold talks with Chandrababu Naidu. A solution can be found between the two states only through talks. We do not want unnecessary disputes. Our policy is to continue cordial relations with AP like we are doing so with Karnataka. Like AP is claiming that it has certain rights being a downstream state, even Telangana has similar rights," he said. He said that Chandrababu Naidu first approached the central govt for the project without consulting Telangana. "That is our objection. We have already formed committees at ministerial level to resolve issues arising out of AP State Reorganisation Act between the two states. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like USDJPY đang đi lên không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo BRS MLA and former irrigation minister T Harish Rao is accusing Congress govt out of frustration as both he and former CM KCR stand exposed for compromising with AP govt on river water interests of Telangana," Revanth said. 'No mention in Act' The CM also pointed out that only Polavaram project is mentioned in the Reorganisation Act. Banakacherla is an ancillary project of Polavaram, which has no mention in the Act, Revanth said. "I am seeking a blanket NOC for 500 TMC share in Krishna river water, whereas Harish Rao, in his letter to the Centre, sought only 405 TMC. The AP state should think about taking up projects only after Telangana state completes all its projects and utilises its rightful share of water. The BRS came to power on the plank of water, funds and jobs. It is now trying to use the water sentiment again as a Sanjeevini (lifeline) to revive the party ," Revanth said, adding he will visit New Delhi again on July 6 and 7. He further said: "A day before I met Union ministers, including CR Patil, BJP state president and Union minister G Kishan Reddy also met them. He is working as a liaison officer for KT Rama Rao. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and home minister Amit Shah said the Kaleshwaram was like an ATM for previous BRS govt. Now, BJP MP Eatala Rajender is claiming that Kaleshwaram was taken with the approval of KCR cabinet. Kishan Reddy should clarify whether Modi and Shah are speaking the truth or Eatala is correct. "
