Sarah Harte: Surrogacy situation threatens to end up like the Handmaid's Tale
I watched the movie Private Life at the weekend, a brilliant film on Netflix about the complications of assisted parenthood. Rachel and Richard, played by Kathryn Hahn and Paul Giamatti, are desperate to have a much-longed-for child. This poignant, sometimes hilarious comedy drama makes astute yet non-judgmental observations about the deep biological urge to have a child and the lengths to which a couple failing at expensive $10,000- a-pop IVF may go.
Rachel and Richard enlist the services of Richard's stepniece, Sadie, a floundering college dropout who agrees to act as an egg donor, but lacks the emotional maturity to understand the implications of this decision.
The film is particularly good on the ethics of the fertility industry, which may profit from people desperate to have a baby. It also subtly raises points about the quagmire of ethical issues around egg donation and, in an indirect way, surrogacy, which is back in the news here.
This month, health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill announced in the Dáil that there is no fixed timeline for the commencement of the Assisted Reproduction Act (AHR), due to concerns of a clash between the act and an EU Directive aimed at preventing human trafficking involving surrogacy which must be transposed into Irish law by 2026.
The act was passed in 2023 but has not yet come into force.
This will be incredibly disappointing to surrogacy campaigners and to parents of around 1,000 children, neither of whom has legal rights to their children until legislation retrospectively amends the situation
The lack of legislation affects children regarding birth registration, citizenship entitlements, and access to health care. Apparently, a new piece of legislation is being worked on to take account of the EU directive, and it is clear to me that there is still much to work out due to inconsistencies and deficits in the AHR.
The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission has expressed concerns about the 'highly unusual' approach taken by Irish legislators to commercial global surrogacy. Many European countries have a complete ban on surrogacy.
Surrogacy allows either a couple or an individual to have a child using a surrogate mother who agrees to carry a child to term with the intention that the intended parents (or parent) become the legal parents after the child is born.
The medical possibilities vary depending on whether a surrogate carries the baby to full gestation using the couple's sperm and ova, the surrogate donates the ova, and the biological father's sperm is used, or both donor ova and donor sperm are used, with the surrogate carrying the child.
In many ways, the law, which is by its nature slow to develop, has not kept pace with lightning speed changes in medical and reproductive advances and perhaps social attitudes.
In a 2014 case, the then Chief Justice Susan Denham said nothing in the Constitution prevented the Oireachtas from legislating for surrogacy. She noted that surrogacy laws 'affect the status and rights of persons, especially those of the children.'
We are obliged to protect Irish children's rights under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which includes guaranteeing rights to all without discrimination of any kind. This affects the 1000 children with a right to identity from birth, which arguably includes the interpretation of the right to your birth family.
Last year, the Office of the Ombudsman for Children asked legislators to incorporate the 'best interest of the child' principles into the act to avoid sidelining children's rights. Unfortunately, this has not happened.
Whether it's a human right to have a child is a thorny question. It's not an explicitly named right. Yet, even if it is like all rights, it can be curtailed and limited by other rights. Culturally, we've evolved from seeing children as property whom we can raise as we wish to viewing them as independent beings within their own set of distinct rights.
With the current lack of legislation, some Irish children are effectively legally left stateless and parentless, with the intended parents often seen as legal strangers to their children. This is to nobody's benefit
Imagine a situation where a child was hospitalised, then the intended parents would not be legally entitled or able to give medical consent for a life-saving procedure or care.
Surrogacy, however, is a highly complex area both legally and ethically. Under the new act, an Assisted Human Reproduction Regulatory Authority is proposed to be established, which will regulate a wide range of complex reproductive practices within Ireland and potentially surrogacy and donor-assisted decisions undertaken in other jurisdictions.
One of the functions presumably of the authority would be to ensure that Irish couples or individuals do not become involved even indirectly in surrogacy arrangements involving human trafficking, which is key when an increasing number of Irish people are availing of surrogacy arrangements abroad, in countries such as Ukraine and India.
It's evident that we need to set up a functioning framework as quickly as possible for properly regulated legal arrangements. Currently, most commercial surrogacy remains unregulated, underregulated or wrongly regulated, and it's always better to face up to reality.
Concerns around surrogacy at the EU level, with a widened EU Directive introducing new penalties next year for those who participate in the exploitation of surrogacy, centre on the vast potential for the exploitation of poorer women as surrogates as well as the commodification and trafficking of children.
As in many countries, you cannot pay for surrogacy in Ireland beyond a surrogate's reasonable expenses, but the new AHR, when it comes into force, will allow Irish parents to engage in commercial surrogacy abroad, provided they do so within the terms of the Act.
First, there seems to be an ideological lack of cohesion here. Why should commercial surrogacy be domestically prohibited while allowing Irish couples to engage in commercial international surrogacy?
It reminds me of the Irish solution to the Irish problem approach we once took to abortion. We had no abortion here, but we turned a blind eye to the thousands of women forced to go abroad for an abortion. It was a deep-seated form of hypocrisy.
Secondly, if you drill into the details, while commercial surrogacy is allowed abroad under the act, only reasonable expenses to the surrogates are permitted, although many other payments are permissible, including payments of intermediaries' fees, which I would have thought is potentially red-flag territory where trafficking and exploitation are concerned.
The categorisation of surrogacy as either 'altruistic' or 'commercial' is interesting. Often, only the surrogate is expected to act altruistically, while doctors and lawyers (and presumably shadowy others in some instances) involved in the process can legally be paid. Why should surrogates not be properly compensated?
Naturally, altruistic surrogacy is often something by another name, in that altruism is a façade with actual compensation concealed within 'reasonable expenses.' But how on earth are you protecting a surrogate by making it a criminal offence for her to accept more than reasonable expenses, while other professionals and third-party intermediaries involved in the chain between intended parents and surrogate can profit handsomely? I would have thought regulating these parties was precisely where the focus should be.
One stomach-churning development has been high-profile, vastly wealthy celebrities turning to surrogacy, like Kim Kardashian, who effectively rented another woman's womb.
We live in a crazy world where, increasingly, the rich can buy anything they want. Outsourcing gestation requires careful legal and ethical consideration if we are to avoid a scenario like The Handmaid's Tale.
Children's rights should be paramount in this debate, and that includes the 1000 children effectively in legal limbo. However, the murky international surrogacy racket needs to be spotlighted so that poor women are not used and abused, and children are not bought and sold.
Read More
Terry Prone: We recall Ronald Reagan fondly but he was every bit as bad as Donald Trump
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
How does Dublin's new AI city guide compare to a real walking tour? We tried them both out
But if that odd and slightly concerning thought did cross your mind, then Dublin City Council has an answer. Introducing Brendan, the Dublin-flavoured, snood-donning twenty-something made of pure pixels and infused with pride in his beloved fair city. 'It's grand to see ya. Brendan here, and I'm absolutely buzzing to take you on a journey through my hometown,' he says, carp-eyed, when you select Dublin in the CityMe smartphone app. 'From lively Temple Bar and the old city, to buzzing Stoneybatter and cool Portobello, we'll discover a wide range of historical, cultural and iconic spots.' Besides calling Oscar Wilde 'the Goat himself' (greatest of all time), there isn't much of the promised Dublin wit on show. Brendan is what your granny might refer to as a 'lovely young fella' (if she doesn't mind the bovine stare), but I'd rather someone a bit more engaging to guide me around the madhouse that is Dublin. In fact, you might even go so far as to call him a bit of a dry shite. The city that spawned business names such as 'Knobs and Knockers' and 'Angela's Rashers' deserves a far more engaging voice to bring it to life. So, I decided to pit Brendan against the ultimate foe: a Dublin walking tour with the renowned Pat Liddy's tour company. After brief introductions, myself and two American tourists, Deirdre Pleasure and Rebecca Nolan, set off with our guide Harry Pender, another twenty-something Dubliner, albeit a non-electronic one. We started out at Barnardo Square on Dame Street, and immediately I was drawn in by Mr Pender's personality as he answered questions, and even managed to summarise Irish history in a lively 15-minute back and forth – not an easy task. We then made our way down to Dublin Castle, where we learnt the origin of the word boycott, chatted about the lies embedded in Irish history (St Patrick was neither a saint or named Patrick) and joked about suncream. We were having such a raucous time, one of the other tours asked us to move along. On we went through Ship Street (which should apparently be called Sheep Street, but was mistranslated) to Christ Church Cathedral, where we heard of the robbery and return of patron saint Laurence O'Toole's heart. Crossing Grattan Bridge, we gazed over at the Ha'penny, officially known as Liffey Bridge (who knew?), where Mr Pender pointed out the spot that the River Poddle, now a mere stream, enters the Liffey through a syphon at Wellington Quay. It went on much like this for the rest of the tour through to the GPO and Trinity College, questions, banter and stories aplenty. An experience of more than three hours mentally shrunk down to what felt like an hour. I want somebody I can ask questions of, and I want somebody to interact with It was engaging, informative and great to get to know our charming tour guide, who also teaches drama to children and partakes in pro wrestling. As the walk went on, it became increasingly difficult to see how any AI character, no matter how swooshy his hair, could live up to the interactivity and humanity of a real human tour guide, and my companions agreed. 'I want somebody I can ask questions of, and I want somebody to interact with,' Ms Pleasure said. 'If I'm like, I've got a few hours and I just, spur of the moment, roam around, then the AI would suffice, but it just gives me an overview. 'But to actually learn, and to be able to have my questions answered and all that kind of stuff, I would rather people,' she added. As for Mr Pender, he was doubtful AI was currently capable of providing the same kind of tour experience as a human. 'I'm not opposed to innovation and stuff, and you know, going forward with different new ideas, but at the same time I would be very surprised if [AI] could do the same thing that a person can do,' he said. 'I'm interested in the idea of it, and you know, no one ever thought Deep Blue, for example, was ever going to beat Garry Kasparov with AI chess bots or something, but now we know AI is very, very strong, so in that sense it's good. 'In another sense, I think people want something that is an experience. It's always about making an experience for someone, and if the AI can do that, great. 'But I think there's a lot more to tour guiding than just giving people the facts of what you're talking about, because it's how you put the facts together and how you tell the story'. So much for Dublin slang. He keeps calling things awesome. Why not deadly? Heading around Dublin with Bland Brendan as company, it's hard not to agree. The AI guide definitely leans more on the artificial side of things than the intelligence. For instance, he correctly says that the old name for O'Connell Street is Drogheda Street but then pronounces it 'Dro-geeda'. And so much for Dublin slang. He keeps calling things awesome. Why not deadly? The more you scratch, the more paper-thin Brendan's persona appears. He will simply repeat the same information verbatim each time you click on an individual city landmark. One of the defining traits of AI is that it comes up with slightly different phrasings and sentences each time you speak to it – that's what makes it appear intelligent. Otherwise, it's a glorified Fisher-Price telephone that says a phrase when you press a button. So, is this simply a toy, crafted by tech bros that want to inject AI into your toaster? In fairness, it's not. Brendan definitely does a convincing Dublin accent and sounds like a local for much of his dialogue, which I'm not sure has been done before using AI. Also, the app is free of charge, so maybe I'm being too harsh. It offers a unique experience, like getting your dinner from a vending machine would. But vending machines have their place – sometimes all you want is a Kinder Bueno or a Fulfil bar. I can imagine a scenario where Brendan is all you need to get a quick overview of the city, if you're tight on time or just curious about one specific spot (and you haven't heard of Google). If you can get past the stilted Dublin dialogue and misaligned teeth, there's a reasonably interesting proposition here. For no money at all, you can see Dublin in a way quite unlike any other, so try it out and see what you think. After all, sometimes even adults enjoy Fisher-Price toys.
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Today's top TV and streaming choices: Death in the Desert, The Bourne Identity and The Buccaneers
An Ghig Mhór RTÉ One, 8pm Songwriter and musician Rónán Ó Snodaigh steps up to help five-piece band Leevy from the Múscraí Gaeltacht organise a major gig. In 1979, British nurse Helen Smith was found dead in suspicious circumstances after falling from a balcony in Saudi Arabia. Here, director Keely Winstone uses previously classified government documents to explore whether the truth was covered up at the time. Hell for Leather: The Story of Gaelic Football RTÉ One, 9.35pm The legendary Mick O'Connell takes centre stage this week, expounding his own legacy as well as the future of Gaelic football. Also profiled is Sister Pauline Gibbons, whose pioneering spirit in the 1970s helped pave the way for female stars such as Louise Ní Mhuircheartaigh, Juliet Murphy and Noelle Healy. The Bourne Identity TG4, 9.30pm Smash-hit adaptation of Robert Ludlum's novel, the first in a blockbusting franchise. Matt Damon stars as a mysterious assassin who is suffering from amnesia. Murderer Behind The Mask Prime Video, streaming now True crime isn't just the purview of Netflix, you know, and this Prime Video offering about Elaine O'Hara and Graham Dwyer hits particularly close to home. It highlights how An Garda Síochana meticulously pieced together the truth, turning an overlooked case into one of Ireland's most haunting murder trials. Back in September 2013, the remains of childcare worker O'Hara were discovered in the Dublin mountains. Initially believed to be a suicide, her case took a twisted tangent when fishermen stumbled upon crucial evidence leading to Dwyer, a respected architect who lived in Foxrock with his wife and kids. Beneath his carefully crafted facade lurked a secret life fuelled by a dark stabbing obsession, revealed through his disturbing text exchanges with O'Hara. Over the course of two 45-minute instalments, this Wag Entertainment-produced series purports to uncover how the investigation unfolded and the tragic story behind Elaine's murder. The Waterfront Netflix, streaming now From the makers of Dawson's Creek and Scream, we have this deliciously ridiculous number inspired by true events. It centres on the Buckley family, who have ruled Havenport, North Carolina, for decades. Now, with their patriarch, Harlan (Holt McCallany), recovering from multiple heart attacks (not helped by his predilection for impromptu punching sessions with his son), they resort to drug smuggling courtesy of a surprising face (belonging to Topher Grace). For more glossy, far-fetched US drama, season three of Manifest is now streaming. The Buccaneers AppleTV+, streaming now Apple's answer to Bridgerton (but with bonus Americans) is here with its second season. Exploring the events leading up to the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire, this heart-rendering documentary reveals decisions by businesses and government that contributed to the tragedy. Somebody Feed Phil Netflix, streaming now This time, Phil visits Amsterdam, Tbilisi, Sydney, Adelaide, Manila, Vegas, Guatemala, San Sebastián and Boston, while enjoying a spot of bone gnawing with Ray Romano and Brad Garrett along the way. The Many Deaths of Nora Dalmasso Netflix, streaming now
The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
Quiz: How well do you know the support acts of Slane's biggest concerts?
LORD HENRY MOUNT Charles, best known for staging huge concerts at his home at Slane Castle in Meath , died on Wednesday aged 74. The driving force behind turning the Meath estate into the location that played host to acts such as U2, Queen, David Bowie and the Rolling Stones died following a long battle with cancer. Advertisement Slane has become a byword for iconic Irish concerts over the past four decades thanks to Mount Charles – and as such, many of the concerts have boasted some very well-known and talented support acts. So, we wanted to ask you – how well do you know these support acts of Slane Castle's biggest concerts? The first Slane Castle concert was held in 1981, headlined by Thin Lizzy. What other Irish band famously featured as a support act? Alamy Stock Photo The Undertones U2 The Boomtown Rats The Waterboys A 1982 Rolling Stones concert at Slane featured three support acts - including the J. Geils Band and the Chieftains. What was the name of the other support band? Alamy Stock Photo George Thorogood and the Destroyers Jack Cannon and the Reckoners Ricky Wooledge and the Outlaws Danny Brugos and the Wildfires Who was the main support for Queen's 80,000 sellout performance at Slane? Alamy Stock Photo Eric Clapton Mark Knopfler Chris de Burgh Chris Rea Neil Young's 1993 concert at Slane Castle boasted an all-star support line-up. Which of these bands was NOT a support act? Alamy Stock Photo Pearl Jam Van Morrison Saw Doctors The Cranberries Sharon Shannon and Spearhead joined REM for their Slane gig in 1993. What burgeoning British band also featured as a support act? Alamy Stock Photo Oasis Blur Radiohead The Stone Roses The Verve played the popular Meath location in 1998. Which of their support acts would go on to headline Slane the following year? Alamy Stock Photo Manic Street Preachers Finley Quaye Robbie Williams James U2 headlined the iconic venue twice in the space of a week in 2001. Who was their support act for the first gig? Alamy Stock Photo The White Stripes Red Hot Chili Peppers The Strokes Backstreet Boys ... and who was the support for their second gig? Faithless Groove Armada Air Moby Which singer did not feature any support acts at their 2005 concert? Rolling News Madonna Kylie Minogue Britney Spears Mariah Carey In 2011, Kings of Leon graced the Slane stage. Which previous headliner returned to feature as a support act for them? Alamy Stock Photo U2 Thin Lizzy Red Hot Chilli Peppers Stereophonics Bon Jovi played there in June 2013. Which of these food-themed bands played support? Alamy Stock Photo Smashing Pumpkins The Cranberries Ham Sandwich Bowling for Soup Metallica played Slane in 2019 - who was their main support act? Alamy Stock Photo Mastodon Ghost Rammstein Volbeat The most recent concert to grace the historic location was headlined by British pop icon Harry Styles. Which Irish DJ featured among the support acts? Alamy Stock Photo Annie Mac Shane Codd Krystal Klear ELLLL Answer all the questions to see your result! Rolling News You scored out of ! Slane veteran You've been to your fair share of gigs Share your result: Share Tweet Rolling News You scored out of ! You know your stuff You've definitely been to Slane Castle before Share your result: Share Tweet Rolling News You scored out of ! A decent attempt Time to get to more gigs! Share your result: Share Tweet Rolling News You scored out of ! Concert newbie You've heard of Slane, right? Share your result: Share Tweet Rolling News You scored out of ! You got nothing Concerts aren't for everyone Share your result: Share Tweet Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
