Beleaguered Hammersmith Bridge reopens for cyclists after £2.9million refurb - but still no decision on when drivers can use it

London 's long-beleaguered Hammersmith Bridge has reopened to cyclists following a £2.9million refurbishment, but there is still no decision on when drivers can use it.
The 138-year-old bridge, which links Hammersmith to Barnes, has been closed off to cars since April 2019 after engineers discovered issues in its construction.
The wrought-iron structure was found to be riddled with cracks, leading the Labour-run Hammersmith and Fulham Council to deem it unsafe for traffic - and it has been closed to motorists ever since.
But over the Easter Weekend, the council reopened the listed bridge's main carriageway to cyclists.
The council said the new decking, which was installed in the refurb, would help users of eco-friendly transport such as e-scooters and bikes on the crossing.
The bridge is also now open to pedestrians, after some of the near £3million costs were used install wider pathways to help wheelchair users.
The council added that e-cargo bikes would be trialled on the refurbished carriageways to transport disabled residents and young children across the structure.
Despite the new announcements, there is yet again no information for drivers who have been unable to cross the bridge for more than six years.
MailOnline reported last month that a government-led taskforce is even considering a permanent car-free bridge, with only pedestrians and cyclists allowed.
Minutes from a closed-door meeting revealed that the taskforce were exploring the possibility of banning cars because it would be cheaper and more environmentally friendly.
Meanwhile another proposal, among an original six, would have turned it into an inaccessible monument. Another would have seen the bridge demolished and replaced by a new river crossing. These were both rejected.
The shutdown of the Thames crossing has worsened congestion to much of west London as well as isolating residents in Barnes on the south side of the river, leaving thousands of drivers frustrated.
And the estimated cost of making the creaking infrastructure safe for cars and buses has ballooned to £250million despite initial estimates being less than half of that.
The bill is so far being footed by Hammersmith and Fulham Council, Transport for London (TfL), and the Department for Transport (DfT).
The DfT had intially suggested the council and TfL each pay a third of the repair costs, with the taxpayer funding the rest.
Repair work on Hammersmith Bridge was previously paused in December 2023, when a boat carrying West Ham fans to a match at Fulham collided with the gantry that provides access for workers to the bridge's underside.
The bridge, which survived three IRA attacks, is one of the world's oldest mechanical suspension bridges and Grade-II listed.
Designed by the noted 19th century civil engineer, Sir Joseph Bazalgette, it was built in 1887 and opened by then Prince of Wales, Albert Edward.
It is London's lowest bridge, with a water clearance of just 12 feet at high tide, and one of the capital's weakest, which is why weight restrictions have been in place since 2015.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Wales Online

3 days ago

• Wales Online

North Wales council praised for 'getting it right' on 20mph limits

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info North Wales Live readers have been engaging in heated discussions about the contentious reduction of speed limits from 30mph to 20mph on Welsh roads and the impending reversal on some roads. This follows announcements from two Welsh councils that no alterations will be made on their 20mph roads. Councils across Wales are currently assessing which 20mph roads could potentially return to a 30mph limit. In a divisive move back in September 2023, the Welsh Government lowered the default speed limit on restricted roads in Wales from 30mph to 20mph. This decision sparked widespread public outrage, leading to a petition signed by hundreds of thousands of individuals. Despite early indications of a decrease in accidents and fatalities on our roads, there remains a strong demand for changes to be implemented. Councils have always retained the authority to maintain some roads at 30mph - with some, such as Cyngor Gwynedd, fully utilising this prior to the 2023 change. However, under Transport Minister Ken Skates, the Welsh Government revised the guidance last year, anticipating that this would result in more roads reverting to 30mph. This has indeed been the case in certain areas, with Wrexham, Flintshire and Anglesey well into the process of implementing changes. However, just last week, Denbighshire and Ceredigion both announced they have no plans to make any changes after reviewing their 20mph roads. The full list of roads set to revert back to 30mph can be viewed here. One reader, Kthd, comments: "Denbighshire County Council at its finest yet again." Outofhere says: "Absolutely a joke and a con! Conwy CBC as usual done nothing but make statements!" Yes-cymru questions: "Why did Gwynedd need a public consultation? They received 83 responses from population of over 125,000, waste of money." Damojo asks: "Where was the change of speed limit survey response document displayed. I never saw one." Co Dre comments: "Gwynedd working at a speed of 20 miles per year." While Ofcourseitis suggests: "Just get the people from Gwynedd to visit each council area and sort out which roads should revert, and which ones should stay at 20mph, they are the only ones who have shown that they understand what the new law should look like, all others have failed miserably and have probably lost Labour the next Senned election." Tinnybasher says: "Well at least it clears up and makes things consistent throughout Wales, need to copy and print the list for my dashboard." Tjr42 believes: "What a huge mistake it was. Money down the drain. Those who vote Labour next year need to think again. Shambles." Cymrucyw pleads: "C'mon Conwy, hurry up and revert please." Totemlad1 asks: "How come Denbighshire County Council seems to be anti car when some areas have no alternatives, reverse the 20 limit." Butterfly1722 adds: "It was no surprise that Denbighshire was one of the counties that wouldn't change course, even before reading the article. The reason is clear: they simply lack the funds to do so." Tometoyou replies: "Not a single road reversal from Denbighshire County Council. It's unrealistic to expect the removal of 20 mph limits near estates, schools, and hospitals. I won't be voting for my current councillor again." Forestdragon says: "Recall the initial rollout when 20 mph signs had 30 mph stickers that were ripped off overnight on 17th September 2023? Why not reapply 30 mph stickers as a temporary fix until permanent signs are installed? On a separate note, kudos to Gwynedd for getting it right from the start and saving taxpayers' money by correctly interpreting the guidelines." Toxteth O'Grady answers: "The real motive is to continue generating revenue by catching drivers struggling to adhere to the speed limit." Do you believe that the full 20mph speed limit should be fully scrapped? Comment below or HERE to join in the conversation.

Daily Mirror

4 days ago

• Daily Mirror

Chaos for learner drivers as £122 fee slapped on 'impossible' to book tests

Learner drivers desperate to take their test are being forced to pay nearly double the standard fee just to secure a booking as Labour announces plans to try and cut waiting times Almost a third of learner drivers have reported using unofficial booking services to secure a practical test slot, new research has revealed. It comes as concerns over the DVSA booking process continue to be raised. Learners have admitted to paying an average of £122 for a test through unauthorised services - which is almost double the standard fee. ‌ The government has launched a consultation to try to review and improve the rules for booking tests which aims to make the process 'easier and fairer for everyone while preventing excessive charges for learner drivers'. ‌ In information provided by the DVSA, a consultation on how improvements can be made to car driving test booking rules opened on May 23. The consultative period will close on July 23. The DVSA is seeking views on who should be allowed to book and manage driving tests, and whether there should be a limit on the ability to swap tests between different learners or change test locations. They say that rather than creating new laws specifically banning the reselling of tests, the consultation focuses on proposals to change how the system works to help prevent reselling. An analysis of almost 27,000 responses from learners and instructors following a call to evidence found that learners felt they needed to use unofficial booking services to get earlier test days, while some said they were even recommended to do so by their instructor. The current booking system allows learners to change a test date or location up to six times, and allows test appointments to be swapped between learners. However, learners have reported having to wait months for a test which has forced them to turn to unofficial booking services or one of the dozens of Facebook groups for test-swapping. There are also people using the official DVSA booking service to make money off of others looking for tests, it's claimed. To do this, they book tests using a learner's provisional licence details, then find another - often desperate - learner who will pay extra for the test, and use the swap feature on the DVSA website to transfer the test to them. This essentially creates a secondary of test resales and means that learners who are unable to book a test due to high demand are able to be exploited. ‌ 'I've paid more than £500 to take my test' One learner, Laura Carr, told The Mirror that she has found the test booking system 'incredibly stressful' due to the long wait times. She said that she has 'even considered going out of the county in order to get a test in an unfamiliar area' .Laura lives in Essex and said it was 'almost impossible to get one there unless you're extremely lucky'. The 32-year-old also said she has been tempted to pay more for a test through an unofficial booking service, explaining: 'Not being able to drive is restricting the jobs I can apply for or get. The unofficial sources seem to have a lot more availability than the DVSA website.' Meanwhile, 18-year-old Layla Nihat described the process as 'absolutely awful'. 'Using the DVSA website I haven't seen a single test date come up for my area so I have had to use unofficial booking services and with booking three tests in total, I have paid over £500.' ‌ She said the government needed to 'crack down on all of the scammers', and added that her driving instructor 'feels the same way', with the majority of his students having to use unofficial websites to book their tests. Carr agreed, adding: 'I feel that something has to change as at the moment it is easier to buy concert tickets than it is to obtain a driving test.' Labour's plans to cut waiting times In April, transport secretary Heidi Alexander acknowledged the demand problems, and called upon the DVSA to work to reduce wait times. DVSA workers in other roles who are qualified to examine will be asked to return to the frontline to provide tests, the government announced, and the number of permanent trainers to skill up new driving examiners is set to be doubled. ‌ Alexander said that the government had 'inherited an enormous backlog of learners ready to ditch their L-Plates but being forced to endure record waiting time for their tests'. She added: 'I am instructing DVSA to take further action immediately to reduce waiting times which will see thousands of additional tests made available every month. We're acting fast to get Britain's drivers moving.' The high demand has resulted in learners and driving instructors misusing the online booking services, the government said. It explained that, as a result, placeholder tests were being booked in locations where learners did not intend to take their test - purely so they could be swapped with someone reselling a test at their local centre. The DVSA also noticed that there are commercial websites offering to search for tests on behalf of learners, and tests being resold with extra fees, which it said is making it harder for the agency 'to offer test slots fairly'. ‌ DVSA to 'make booking a driving test easier and fairer' Loveday Ryder, DVSA chief executive, told The Mirror that the DVSA's goal is to "make booking a driving test easier and fairer for everyone while preventing excessive charges for learner drivers." She said in a statement: 'We've been working tirelessly to bring down the driving test waiting times. To help tackle this, in December 2024 we announced a new plan, on which we're making good progress. DVSA is currently running a consultation on improvements we can make to the test booking system, which will help us plan our next steps.' Some of the government's potential solutions include removing or limiting the ability to swap tests or change test locations, and making it so that only learner drivers can book and manage tests. Seb Goldin, CEO of RED Driver Training, said the company was 'very concerned by the rise of unofficial test booking services'. He told The Mirror: 'With reports that students are often paying an average of £122, which is almost double the official fee for test slots, many are unaware that these services offer no guarantee. Once money changes hands, particularly through third-party apps or bank transfers, it's incredibly difficult to get it back if something goes wrong.' Goldin said that thousands of RED's students are currently waiting to book a test, and that for many, driving is essential for work, education, or caring responsibilities. He pointed out that the system therefore must 'prioritise access for real people over profit-seeking parties'. The government's consultation to tackle these issues is a 'step in the right direction', Goldin acknowledged. 'We support any efforts that genuinely increase test availability and help students access tests fairly, and I will be an active part of these discussions.'

Metro

4 days ago

• Metro

Another e-bike brand is set to launch in London this summer

A new e-bike brand is launching in London this summer, promising not to 'add to the problem' around e-bike parking. Whether you love them or hate them, e-bikes are here to stay,and you will be hard pressed to find a street in central London without a single e-bike in sight. Soon there will be more of them after ride-hailing app Bolt revealed it will launch e-bikes in London soon. They will be available on the same app as its cars when the e-bikes launch in August, the taxi app said. E-bikes have become controversial in London after reports of blocked pavements and erratic riding. The capital already boasts 50,000 e-bikes, Bolt said. The company said its fleet will be different Lime and Forest bikes as riders can opt for distance-based pricing instead of being charged by time. This will make rides 'safer as people don't feel they need to rush from A to B to save money,' according to Bolt. Bolt said it will ensure responsible parking by educating users, with AI and enforcement. People who don't park correctly, 'will be fined,' the operator said. 'Users will also have a score that will go up or down depending on how well they park,' it said. The operator admitted there is a 'problem' in London around e-bike parking. 'Bolt's AI powered parking system and geofencing will ensure users cannot park outside mandatory parking zones. The Bolt app will also direct users to the nearest available parking spot, and if they have not parked appropriately, they will be provided with relevant instructions. 'These measures aim to keep pavements clear and ensure Bolt contributes positively to the urban landscape, and doesn't add to the problem.' Bolt's testing shows that users charged on distance ride 9% slower than those charged on time, which reduces 'the risk of falls and collisions.' It vowed the new pricing model will reduce collisions by 90%. Will Norman, London's Walking and Cycling Commissioner, said: 'I'm pleased Bolt will be launching e-bikes in our city this summer, providing Londoners with even more sustainable and convenient ways to get around. 'Integrating e-bikes with ride hailing in a single app will give people more choice and flexibility when choosing how to get around, strengthening our network and helping to reduce congestion. 'I'm also pleased to see that Bolt will be prioritising responsible parking and safety, to ensure the scheme works for everyone. The Mayor and I welcome Government plans to give cities powers to better manage dockless e-bike schemes. It is vital improved safety sits at the heart of any future regulation so these schemes work well for everyone and the industry thrives.' Some London boroughs have taken action to target irresponsible e-bike parking, which has caused grey hairs to disabled people and pedestrians across the capital. More Trending More painted parking bays and docking areas have been introduced in response to the backlash. TfL said it has issued hundreds of fines to Lime and Forest after abandoned bikes. London Mayor Sadiq Khan told the London Assembly last week that TfL began issuing warning letters to the operators, and as of May 15, it had sent out 190 such letters. By mid-May, it had issued 333 FPNs to Lime and Forest, each fine worth £100 or reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Dad left 'in misery' after ceiling collapses three times in London home MORE: Traffic delays on M25 after multi-vehicle crash MORE: Mum suing Cineworld after horror film trailers played before Lilo & Stitch