Palestinian children sent back to war-ravaged Gaza after medical treatment in Jordan
Family reunions are normally times of happiness and joy. For Palestinian mother Enas Abu Daqqa, any relief in seeing her children after more than two months away has been tempered with deep anxiety.
Earlier this year she was evacuated from Gaza to Jordan along with her baby daughter Niveen, who desperately needed open-heart surgery.
"The treatment was excellent, she underwent surgery and the preparation was thorough," Enas told the ABC.
"The doctors in Jordan, at a specialised hospital, were highly dedicated."
Enas and Niveen left Gaza in March, while a ceasefire was in force. They have returned to an intense bombardment, with the family now living in a tent in "suffocating heat".
"We were deeply afraid of returning, coming back to war and fear," Enas said.
"We would have preferred not to come back at this time — a ceasefire would have made things easier."
Enas also said her daughter, who was born with a hole in her heart, had been sent back to Gaza before her treatment was completed — a claim Jordanian authorities have denied.
"I was not able to obtain her medical records, which are essential for continuing her care," she said.
"Of course I missed my children, my family, my parents and the ones I love in Gaza — yet … I fear for my daughter.
"I am afraid that her health deteriorates — she is not gaining weight, I fear she'll experience heart failure."
Niveen was among the first of a planned 2,000 Gazan children to be evacuated from the enclave and taken to Jordan for medical treatment.
Now those children have started being sent back to the war-ravaged strip, despite protests from their families. Some parents, such as Enas, also claim their children have been sent back to Gaza before their medical treatment was finished.
The ABC first met Enas and Niveen when they were brought into Jordan in early March.
It had taken the ambulances a full day's travel cross-country from the European Hospital in southern Gaza before arriving at the King Hussein border crossing in the West Bank.
But relief was etched across the young mother's face, despite the arduous journey. Her daughter, then just five months old, was finally getting help.
The return trip in mid-May was very different.
"The situation was terrifying as we made our way back," she said.
"We had to stop constantly along the road, I had no diapers, no milk for her, and not even water to keep her hydrated."
Along the way, Enas received distressing news. Her husband and their other children were injured in an attack while waiting for their return to the European Hospital.
Then they arrived at the Gaza border and were searched by Israelis, who confiscated personal belongings before letting them cross.
The Jordanian government said it was "unfortunately true" that Gazans had been searched.
Enas and Niveen were not the only ones sent back into a war zone.
Mohammed Qatoush and his nine-year-old son, Abdul, were in the same convoy that returned to Gaza from Jordan in mid-May.
Abdul lost a leg in an Israeli air strike and needed a prosthesis fitted by doctors in Jordan.
But Mohammed said Abdul's new prosthetic leg was too big for him.
"When we fit a prosthetic leg, it's meant to avoid causing any damage to his remaining limb," Mohammed said.
"However, this prosthetic is 2 centimetres longer than it should be.
"We informed the doctors about the issue, but they gave the excuse that he would grow taller."
Mohammed said the doctors insisted the larger prosthetic would last four to five years without needing to be replaced.
"This means he's essentially stuck with it for four years, which could lead to additional problems with his hips," he said.
"They address one issue, only to create another that will need treatment."
Worried about his son's wellbeing, Mohammed sought other medical opinions in Jordan.
"I met with Belgian doctors who examined the prosthetic — they informed me that using this particular prosthetic could cause long-term damage to his joint," he said.
"We were deceived — instead of allowing us to complete our treatment, they brought us back to Gaza where the European Hospital was bombed.
"I am truly grateful to the people of Jordan for their kindness, but the government did not provide any support for our expenses."
Mohammed and Abdul's journey back from Jordan was also scarring.
Israeli security contractors searched them when they were re-entering Gaza, Mohammed said.
"We were freaking out," he said.
"My son was under the seat in the bus.
"They stopped the Jordanian bus that was taking us — 10 Jeeps surrounded us, they were pointing their guns at us, the children were terrorised."
Israel's defense ministry confirmed searches were carried out.
"During the security check of Gaza residents returning from medical treatment in Jordan, some individuals were found carrying undeclared cash amounts exceeding normal limits," it said in a statement.
"The funds, suspected of being intended for terrorist use within Gaza, are being held while the circumstances are investigated."
Jordanian officials said it was made clear to Palestinians being evacuated that they would have to return after completing their medical treatment "to allow Jordan to bring more patients".
Seventeen children and their escorts were returned in mid-May, and another 10 Palestinian children needing cancer treatment have been evacuated from Gaza since.
"Jordan's policy is to support Palestinians' steadfastness on their homeland, and not to contribute in any way to their displacement," Minister of Government Communication and Government spokesperson Mohammad Momani said in a statement.
"These patients were brought to Jordan and returned to Gaza under the same circumstances."
Mr Momani said it was "completely false" to suggest the children were returned to Gaza without finishing their medical treatment, and were not appropriately supported in Jordan.
"They all received the best medical care at Jordan's top hospitals, and their families were provided with the best possible accommodations," he said.
"Some of these patients underwent delicate surgeries, and they are all in good health now."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
40 minutes ago
- ABC News
Satellite images show impact craters, building damage at Iranian nuclear sites
New satellite imagery shows US stealth bombers appear to have targeted a vulnerable spot in one of Iran's key nuclear sites, buried deep in a mountain. Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, located near the city of Qom, is a once-secret facility that has recently been enriching uranium to levels high above the minimum needed for civilian use. "If your goal is to eliminate [Iran's] nuclear program, you have to eliminate Fordow," one expert told ABC NEWS Verify. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the bombers had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear ambitions, in a press conference following the mission. New imagery from the site shows six visible craters on the mountain that shields Fordow's underground structure, thought to be about 90 metres below. They were caused by several of the 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs dropped on two Iranian nuclear sites during the attack. The images have been analysed by experts from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) — a think-tank led by David Albright, a leading American physicist and nuclear weapons expert, who is also a former weapons inspector. The impacts at the bottom of the image appear to exploit one of the facility's vulnerabilities — a ventilation shaft, according to the ISIS analysis. "This set of holes [is] near the ventilation shaft of the underground complex, enabling an easier pathway for the MOPS to the deeply buried halls," it reads. "It is highly likely that the enrichment halls were severely damaged or even destroyed in the attack. Debris from the explosions can be seen on the side of the mountain," it concludes. The ventilation shaft had been identified as a weak spot in the structure — after Fordow's early blueprints were stolen in a 2018 raid by Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence service. "We were surprised by this, there's only one ventilation shaft for the building," David Albright said in a 2024 podcast interview. "You see it in the drawings. We went back and looked at historical imagery and we could see it being built, and then [camouflaged]. "You know exactly where it is … you can destroy that shaft deeply, that could potentially cause damage mostly through temperature effects. "You could put the facility out of commission for quite a long time, measured probably in a few years rather than a few months," he told Arms Control Poseur. The ISIS analysis also notes that Fordow's entrances were backfilled by Iran ahead of the attack. Evidence of this can be seen in imagery from June 20, where trucks and what appear to be bulldozers were captured near the facility's entrances. Natanz and Isfahan The new imagery also shows Natanz — Iran's largest enrichment facility — has been impacted by at least one "bunker-buster". An image from its construction in 2003 shows large structures in the middle of the site, which are not present in more recent imagery and were likely buried. The new imagery shows at least one GBU-57 impact point above what is thought to be a buried enrichment hall, according to ISIS analysis. "This explosion likely destroyed the facility," it concludes. The high-resolution imagery shows at least one other likely impact crater. Previous Israeli strikes had hit an electrical substation, gas turbine generators, a power supply support building and a pilot fuel enrichment plant. The Isfahan nuclear site had also been hit by Israeli strikes prior to America's involvement. But a US submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at the site as the attack was unfolding. ISIS analysis said the Isfahan complex sustained heavy damage, including to its main uranium conversion facility and nearby tunnel entrances. Bombers fly east B-2 Spirit Stealth Bombers were used to drop the GBU-57s — marking the first time the bombs have been used in an operation. The bombs reach depths of up to 60 metres before exploding. The US's entire fleet of B-2s operates out of Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. It took 18 hours for the bombers to reach their target, according to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine. Including the flight back to the US, it was the longest B-2 mission since 2001. The mission included flying a number of bombers west over the Pacific as decoys — which were able to be tracked by some aviation enthusiasts. General Caine said more than 125 aircraft were involved in the mission — including fourth- and fifth-generation fighter jets.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Iran's closure of Strait of Hormuz could drive up petrol prices by 70 cents per litre
You may want to fill up your tank today. Iran's threatened closure of the Strait of Hormuz could send petrol prices soaring by up to 70 cents per litre, putting pressure on the RBA to delay further interest rate cuts and driving a sharp fall in global share markets. However, any prolonged disruption would also drag down economic growth and consumer spending, trimming underlying inflation and potentially putting the Reserve Bank in wait-and-see mode, according to AMP chief economist Shane Oliver, who is still leaning towards three more rate cuts this year in July, August and November. 'It's increasingly looking likely we might go into that worst-case scenario and the debate then goes into how long it lasts,' said Dr Oliver, who previously put a closure of the Strait of Hormuz as his 35 per cent 'risk case'. The narrow stretch of water in the Middle East, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, is one of the world's most vital shipping channels where 20 per cent of the world's oil and 25 per cent of liquefied natural gas (LNG) flows through daily. The waters are divided between Oman and Iran. At its narrowest, the strait is just 34 kilometres wide. Following US President Donald Trump's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday, Iran's parliament voted on Sunday to close the Strait, as the country's President said the US 'must receive response to their aggression'. While Iranian state media reported that the parliament had agreed to endorse blocking the Strait, the decision ultimately belongs to Iran's Supreme National Security Council — which is expected to make a final decision overnight on Sunday local time, according to Iran's state-run Press TV. 'Suicidal move' The move could block more than $US1 billion in oil shipments per day. Iran's major escalation in response to the US strikes 'will be done whenever necessary', Email Kosari, Commander in the Revolutionary Guards, said on Sunday. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned against closing the strait, calling such a decision an escalation of conflict. 'That would be a suicidal move on their part, because I think the whole world would come against them if they did that,' Mr Rubio told CBS. He earlier called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the strategic channel after Washington carried out strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine said in a press conference the US was now on 'high alert' for retaliation from Tehran. 'You could face a situation where the US could quickly disable Iran's ability to block the Strait of Hormuz [but] that could still be weeks,' said Dr Oliver. 'It's not actually putting a rope across — they could put mines in it, use missiles and drones to attack shipping, use small speedboats to attack bigger boats, that sort of stuff. They've only got to do it once, just like the Houthis [attacking shipping in the Gulf of Aden]. All you've got to do is do it once, you threaten to do it and ships stay away.' As of Monday morning the Strait remains open and in commercial use, public vessel tracking data show, but shipping organisations and government organisations have urged caution. At least one Chinese oil tanker was observed making a U-turn at the Strait. Chinese are turning around as well.... this is something — Oil Bandit 🛢ï¸� (@OilCfd) June 22, 2025 The Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO), one of the largest international shipping associations, has urged caution in the Middle East including the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, after the Houthis announced renewed targeting of American vessels. 'The Houthi threat against shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden has also gone up,' BIMCO security chief Jakob Larsen told Bloomberg. 'The Houthis now threaten merchant ships with affiliation to Israel or the US, but attacks against merchant ships with other affiliations cannot be ruled out.' Greece's Shipping Ministry has also advised shipowners to 'reassess their transit through the Strait of Hormuz', the outlet reports. '70 cents per litre' Sustained disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could send the global oil price soaring to $US150 a barrel from around $US70 on Friday, according to Dr Oliver. 'Roughly speaking each $US1 a barrel equals one cent a litre,' he said. 'If you go to $US150 you're potentially adding another 60-70 cents a litre.' That would significantly increase headline inflation. Petrol accounts for about 3.5 per cent of the consumer price index (CPI), which rose 2.4 per cent in the 12 months to the March quarter. 'If you push up towards $US100 a barrel and beyond, it will easily add 1 per cent to headline inflation,' Dr Oliver said. 'But it then becomes a question of what the RBA does.' The current cash rate is 3.85 per cent, after a 25 basis point cut by the RBA in May. Three more cuts had been tipped this year to bring the cash rate down to 3.1 per cent. As of Friday, petrol prices had already risen by 10-12 cents per litre amid the Israel-Iran conflict. Dr Oliver said if the impact remained at that level, 'you could get a bit of a boost' to headline inflation but the RBA 'would probably look through that' and likely cut again in July. 'If alternatively we see a clear disruption to trade which goes on for more than few days, then oil prices spike and the RBA could conceivably wait a bit longer,' he said. 'The RBA would also be looking at underlying inflation and may want to wait through. It would be keeping an eye on the impact on the economy. Higher oil prices are effectively a tax on consumer spending and economic growth. Ultimately that could outweigh the impact of higher petrol prices alone and drag down underlying inflation.' Dr Oliver pointed out that while higher oil prices flowing from the war could drag on Australian economic growth via weaker global growth, Australia was relatively well placed as a net energy exporter and so may benefit from higher prices for gas exports. There are also 'lots of issues around that what the Australian dollar does'. 'China, being the largest customer for this oil stands to be the most affected,' Alex Moffatt, director of Melbourne investment firm Joseph Palmer & Sons, said in a note on Monday. 'We can expect our energy stocks to enjoy a hearty rally today and the Aussie dollar to rally on 'safe-haven' buying.' As of Monday morning oil futures were trading at around $US77 a barrel, up around 4 per cent from Friday. 'The risks are obviously increasing, but it's just a lot of noise at the moment,' Dr Oliver said.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
'Very concerning': US challenges 'international norms' with Iran strike
In the lead up to the Iraq War in 2003, United States Secretary of State Colin Powell went to the UN Security Council to present evidence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, which required the US to take military action. The evidence, of course, turned out to be false. But the US was at least going through the motions of following the UN charter: seeking international approval, and making the case for war, before firing a shot. Donald Trump didn't bother with either. In fact, he openly rejected the assessment of his own security agencies that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, nor planned to. "My intelligence community is wrong," he said. But Trump presented no evidence to support his own, differing assessment. Nor has he made the case as to why the threat of a nuclear armed Iran needed to be solved right now by military, rather than diplomatic, means. There is general agreement in the international community that Iran should not become a nuclear power. Not just because of the immediate threat an Iranian nuclear weapon would pose to Israel and other countries but because it would almost certainly spark a new nuclear arms race in the Gulf and beyond. And there are important questions Iran needs to answer about its nuclear program. Why, for example, does it possess a stockpile of uranium enriched to around 60 per cent, when a domestic nuclear program only requires around 3 per cent enrichment? And why did the International Atomic energy Agency (IAEA) recently find that Iran has not been fully cooperating with nuclear inspectors since 2019? These are important facts. But they are not evidence that Iran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon, resulting in the kind of imminent, unavoidable threat that would justify a military strike under the UN charter of self defence. "I can't really find a firm basis for this US action," Don Rothwell, a professor of international law at the Australian National University, said. "The United States has not been subject to an Iranian armed attack, so that removes its right under the UN charter." It puts American allies like Australia in a difficult position. Like other major countries, Australia did not call for the US to enter this war; instead it called for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy. Now that the strike has happened, Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Australia does support the US bombing raid. "The world has agreed Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, so yes, we support action to prevent that, and that is what this is," she told the ABC's AM program. At an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council this morning, the US representative Dorothy Shea said the US attack was justified and legal. "This operation sought to eliminate a long standing but rapidly escalating source of global insecurity and to aid our ally Israel in our inherent right of collective self-defence, consistent with the UN Charter," she said. "The time finally came for the United States in the defence of its ally [Israel], and in the defence of our own citizens and interests, to act decisively." Rothwell worries about the precedent that has been set by the US action. "We've seen an erosion of some of these international norms, especially when it comes to the use of force [in] pre-emptive self-defence," he said. "It's very concerning. Because if these states are interpreting their right to exercise self-defence in this way, of course other states will look on and say, 'If the United States can do this, why can't we also use this right of self-defence to disarm our enemies in this way?'"
