Trump asked for 2 weeks to decide, struck in 2 days: US ditches diplomacy, hits Iran's nuke sites; MAGA rift grows

President Donald Trump said he would wait two weeks to decide whether to launch a military strike on Iran. Instead, he acted within 48 hours, plunging the United States into direct participation in Israel's war against Iran and setting off fears of a broader regional conflict.
Speaking from the White House on early Sunday, just hours after American forces struck Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Trump declared the mission a 'spectacular success.' But the decision to strike came fast, two days after the President told reporters on Thursday he would wait: 'I'm giving them (Iran) a period of time and I would say two weeks would be the maximum.'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had reinforced the point, saying, 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, the President will make his decision… within the next two weeks.'
Instead, on Saturday evening, Trump confirmed a full military operation was underway. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran,' he wrote online. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space… All planes are safely on their way home.' He added: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR.'
A familiar 'two-week' promise
Trump's abrupt pivot is not unprecedented.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness
Luxeartisanship
Shop Now
Undo
Over the years, he has routinely invoked a two-week timeline when faced with difficult decisions or contentious announcements. From tax reform and healthcare to Russia and North Korea, the former and current president has repeatedly promised action 'in two weeks' often without follow-through.
In recent months, he has used the same line in reference to trade deals, tariffs, and foreign policy decisions, including his response to the Russia-Ukraine war.
Eight weeks ago, when asked if he trusted Russian President Vladimir Putin, he responded, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.'
This recurring pattern has raised questions about whether the 'two-week' window is meant as a negotiating tactic or a delay mechanism. In this case, it appears to have served as a smokescreen.
No longer peacemaker?
Trump once campaigned as the man who would bring America out of endless foreign entanglements. But six months into his second term, he has now led the United States directly into Israel's military campaign against Iran, ordering the strikes on three key nuclear sites.
Speaking from the White House, flanked by Vice-President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump warned Iran of more attacks if it failed to abandon its nuclear ambitions. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he declared, moments after confirming that American forces had targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan with bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles.
Trump's move marks a dramatic shift from his long-standing rhetoric. On the campaign trail and throughout his first term, he had vowed to end 'ridiculous endless wars' and reject the interventionism of past administrations. His 2024 campaign platform, dubbed 'Agenda 47', touted him as 'the only president who rejected the catastrophic advice of Washington's generals.'
MAGA backlash, Israeli praise
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from key figures in Trump's own 'America First' movement.
Many accuse him of abandoning his non-interventionist roots.
Steve Bannon said Israel had 'essentially forced President Trump's hand,' while right-wing podcaster Theo Von expressed disillusionment: 'It just feels like we're working for Israel.' Tucker Carlson said there was 'zero credible intelligence' justifying an attack on Iran's nuclear programme.
Critics also pointed to the political inconsistency.
Trump had repeatedly pledged to end 'endless wars' and called himself 'the only president in generations who didn't start a war.' As a candidate and in office, he derided America's foreign entanglements and claimed 'great nations do not fight endless wars.'
But with US B-2 bombers and submarines now involved, and Iran promising retaliation, his position as a 'peacemaker' is under strain.
'President Trump has clearly signalled, as he has all along, that he opposes a regime change war in Iran,' said media personality Jack Posobiec, attempting to frame the strike as narrowly targeted.
Yet many observers fear it may spark further escalation. The White House has not ruled out additional military action if Iran retaliates.
Fallout and what's next?
In his address, Trump warned that if Iran struck back, it would face 'force far greater than what was witnessed tonight.' Hours later, Iranian missiles were reported to have struck areas in Israel. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi vowed the US attacks 'will have everlasting consequences.'
Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed no radiation leaks at the sites and said assessments were ongoing.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' and warned of 'catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region and the world.' The Israeli military, too, announced it was preparing for a protracted war.
Trump, who left the G7 summit early to consult with advisers in Washington, now faces the challenge of containing the fallout. His swift decision has exposed deep divides within his base, invited international condemnation, and risked American lives in a volatile theatre.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

22 minutes ago

• Mint

Israel-Iran conflict effect? India ramps up crude oil imports from Russia, US in June 2025

India has increased its crude oil purchases from Russia and the United States in June 2025, as the import volumes from the two nations exceed the combined volumes from Middle Eastern suppliers amid the market volatility due to the Israel-Iran conflict, reported the news agency PTI. India's primary suppliers for crude oil in the Middle East are nations like Saudi Arabia and Iraq. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's announcement that America had carried out coordinated airstrikes targeting three nuclear facilities in Iran. Indian refiners are expected to import 2 million to 2.2 million barrels of crude oil per day in June 2025, marking the highest level of russian oil imports in the last two years, according to the agency report citing Kpler data. The crude oil imports from Russia were at 1.96 million barrels per day in May 2025. This expected hike in volumes is also set to beat the total volumes bought from Gulf nations like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, as per the report. On the crude imports on the US front, Indian refiners' crude oil imports from the United States' also jumped to 4,39,000 barrels per day in June 2025, compared to their 2,80,000 barrels per day levels in the previous month. The data report also showed how the full-month projects from crude oil imports from the Middle East into India stood at 2 million barrels per day, lower than the May 2025 levels, according to the agency report. India started importing cheaper oil from Russia soon after the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022 due to the higher discounted rates post the economic sanctions from the United States. India buys nearly 5.1 million barrels of crude oil, which is then refined to be converted into fossil fuels like petrol and diesel However, so far in the Israel-Iran conflict, there have been no crude oil supply cuts or disruptions in the oil trade, which can potentially drive up oil prices around the world. 'While supplies remain unaffected so far, vessel activity suggests a decline in crude loadings from the Middle East in the coming days,' Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining & Modeling at Kpler, told the news agency. 'Shipowners are hesitant to send empty tankers (ballasters) into the Gulf, with the number of such vessels dropping from 69 to just 40, and (Middle East and Gulf) MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman halving,' he said. The global situation of uncertainty caused by the raging Israel-Iran war now risks Tehran retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically important trade passage for global crude oil as the strait links the Gulf of Oman, the Arabian Sea, and the Persian Gulf. According to multiple media reports, the Strait of Hormuz handles nearly a quarter of the world's oil trade. Hence, any potential move to close the passage will result in the escalation of the already raging war. Experts cited in media reports indicate that if there is an oil supply disruption, crude prices can jump to $400 per barrel. 'Yet, Kpler analysis assigns a very low probability to a full blockade, citing strong disincentives for Iran,' Ritolia told the news agency. The route serves as a major route for world oil and LNG export transit, and agency reports show that India imports nearly 40 per cent of all its crude oil and nearly 50 per cent of its gas imports from the Strait of Hormuz, which links to many Gulf nations. The Kpler data cited in the agency report also estimates that in case any disruption happens, it will result in 24 to 48 hours of isolation before major nations like the US step in to counter the retaliation. Meanwhile, the agency also highlighted that Russian oil imports are detached from Hormuz and are imported via the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or the Pacific Ocean. 'If conflict deepens or there is any short-term disruption in Hormuz, Russian barrels will rise in share, offering both physical availability and pricing relief. India may pivot harder toward the US, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, albeit at higher freight costs,' said the expert cited in the agency report. As of 19 June 2025, Russian crude oil accounted for 35 per cent of India's total crude imports. The Indian refiners are watching the geopolitical landscape and are likely to adjust procurement strategies to prioritise energy security, supply stability, and commercial viability if risks in the Middle East escalate, according to the agency report.

Business Standard

24 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Stealth frigate INS Tamal to join Indian Navy's western fleet on July 1

Indian Navy's Russian-manufactured guided missile frigate INS Tamal that carries an array of missiles and surveillance systems will be commissioned into the force at Russia's coastal city of Kaliningrad on July 1. The ship has 26 per cent indigenous components, including the BrahMos long-range cruise missile for targeting both at sea and land, officials said. The 125m long, 3900-tonne warship, packs a lethal punch as it features an impressive blend of Indian and Russian cutting-edge technologies and best practices in warship construction, according to the Indian Navy. Upon commissioning, Tamal will join the 'Sword Arm' of the Indian Navy, the Western Fleet. It will not only be a symbol of Indian Navy's growing capabilities, but also exemplifying collaborative strength of the India-Russia partnership, Indian Navy spokesperson Commander Vivek Madhwal said. INS Tamal would be the eighth Krivak class frigates to be inducted from Russia over the past two decades. The warship has been built at Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad, and is the last such platform to be inducted from a foreign source, the officials said. The commissioning ceremony will be presided over by Vice Admiral Sanjay J Singh, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command. Several high-ranking Indian and Russian defence officials will attend the event. INS Tamal is the second ship of the Tushil Class, which are the upgraded versions of their predecessors, Talwar and Teg classes. India as part of the broader contract for Tushil class is also building two similar frigates called the INS Triput class at Goa Shipyard Ltd with transfer of technology and design assistance from the Russian side. By the conclusion of this series of ships, Indian Navy will be operating 10 ships with similar capabilities and commonality in equipment, weapon and sensor fit over four different classes, the officials said. Tamal's construction was closely overseen by an Indian team of specialists from the Warship Overseeing Team stationed at Kaliningrad. At the Naval headquarters, the project was steered by the Directorate of Ship Production under the Controller of Warship Production and Acquisition. The ship has significant upgrades in its arsenal in comparison to its predecessors, such as vertical launched surface-to-air missiles, improved 100 MM gun, heavyweight torpedoes, urgent-attack anti-submarine rockets, and a host of surveillance and fire control radars and systems. The combat capability of the ship is augmented by a host of network-centric warfare capabilities and advanced electronic warfare suite, Madhwal said. "Tamal punches well above its weight with a very high tonnage to firepower ratio, extended endurance, and a top speed in excess of 30 knots," he said. The crew, comprising of over 250 personnel, has undergone rigorous ashore as well as afloat training in extremely challenging winter conditions of St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad, he said. Tamal has successively completed extensive sea trials undertaken over three months. The ship's name, Tamal, symbolises the mythical sword used for combat by Indra, the king of the gods. The ship's mascot is inspired by the congruence of the 'Jambavant' -- the immortal bear king of Indian mythology and the Russian national animal, the Eurasian brown bear. Tamal's design provides it with enhanced stealth features and greater stability characteristics. "It is equipped with the latest technology in warfighting, including the BrahMos supersonic missile system for anti-ship and land-attack capabilities, surface surveillance radar complex and HUMSA NG Mk II sonar with the anti-submarine weapon firing complex amongst a host of cutting-edge weapon and sensors of Indian origin," Madhwal said.

Business Standard

24 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Putin has no plans to talk to Trump after US strikes on Iran: Kremlin

Russian President Vladimir Putin has no immediate plans to dial his US counterpart Donald Trump after the US bombardment of Iranian nuclear facilities, the Kremlin said on Sunday. There are no such plans, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. However, he added that a call can be quickly arranged in case of need. His remarks came when asked about the possibility of a phone call between Trump and Putin after US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday. The US attacked Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites, aiming to destroy the country's nuclear programme. US President Donald Trump warned of additional strikes if Iran retaliates. Chair of Duma, Committee of Foreign Affairs, lawmaker Leonid Slutsky believes that from a military point, Trump's strike on Iran had no ground or justification. Trump has been dragged into the regime change scenario in Tehran just like in Iraq, Slutsky told reporters. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said that Iran will continue its nuclear programme because he believes the US strikes have not crippled its critical structure. What the Americans have achieved by hitting three sites in Iran? It seems the critical infrastructure of the nuclear cycle has not suffered at all or slightly, Medvedev, currently deputy chair of the National Security Council, wrote on his Telegram channel.