Senate passes GENIUS stablecoin bill in a win for the crypto industry
In a 68-30 vote on Tuesday evening, the Senate overwhelmingly passed the GENIUS Act with bipartisan support. Eighteen Democrats joined the majority of Republicans in passing the bill, which is the first to establish a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, crypto tokens that are pegged to the value of the US dollar.
In the past year, and after the crypto industry funneled over $131 million into Donald Trump's presidential campaign, the Republican Party has embraced the crypto industry with enthusiasm, voting overwhelmingly for the bill's passage. There were two GOP holdouts: Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky and Josh Hawley of Missouri, both ardent critics of Big Tech. The bill now goes to the House of Representatives, which is working on its own companion legislation, the STABLE Act.
Its passage had not always been assured. Back in May, nine Democrats who'd previously supported the GENIUS Act suddenly reversed course, asking to revise the bill's text, and days later, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Ron Wyden (D-WA) successfully killed an attempt to bring the bill to a floor vote by citing several current events involving the Trump family's crypto ventures, including a controversial dinner for people holding large amounts of their memecoin $TRUMP.
Warren, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee and a longtime consumer protection hawk, ultimately voted against the final version of the GENIUS Act. During a June 11th floor speech, she stated that the bill did not have adequate regulatory guardrails in place to prevent corruption: 'It would make Trump the regulator of his own financial company and, importantly, the regulator of his competitors.'
It's a win, however, for the burgeoning digital assets industry, which has poured hundreds of millions into the political influence game in Washington, hiring political consultants and even a few Members of Congress on their behalf. In an interview prior to Tuesday's vote, Seth Hertline, Head of Global Policy at the crypto wallet company Ledger, described the GENIUS Act as a political bellwether for the industry as a whole. 'If the GENIUS Act derails, everything behind it derails,' he told The Verge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
From Obscure To Iconic: Dennis Olympios And Emily Pappas On Using A.I. To Get Noticed Now
Let's cut to the chase. A.I. has changed our lives, whether we want to admit it or not. A former colleague of mine recently called me. He had been laid off. And, he wanted advice. Okay… 'It's a new world out there,' my friend told me. 'I just keep applying to all these jobs on LinkedIn, and I don't get any responses. Seriously, most employers don't even send me rejection letters. I think I'm being filtered by A.I.' Another friend of mine owns a small business. He's a consultant, a public speaker, and an author. 'Todd, I'm trying to grow my LinkedIn presence, and I'm getting quite a bit of traffic, but very little of it converts into new customers,' he told me. 'I didn't struggle online like this before A.I.' What's happening right now? Is there something I could, or should, know that could help these people? Is A.I. changing everything about how we build online reputation? And, if we're not using A.I. properly, will our online reputations suffer? I literally thought about my friend's situations for a couple weeks. I thought, 'If these people are struggling—two highly-accomplished individuals—then, I'm guessing this issue is much bigger than I understand.' Curious, I wanted to ask the experts. Seriously, what do I know? Let's find the experts who truly know how to help. This is why I reached out to Dennis Olympios and Emily Pappas. Who are they? They're the backbone, and masterminds behind a company called LinkedSuperPowers. If you want to understand LinkedIn, from any angle, these are the experts—because they've been studying it, and making a business from it, for more than 20 years. These two founders are literally the go-to experts in online reputation building. How to use A.I., LinkedIn, and other platforms to boost your online reputation. I called the power couple to find out their secrets. With more than five million social media followers, they must be doing something right. 'The world has dramatically changed,' said LinkedSuperPowers Co-Founder Dennis Olympios. 'And, it's about to start changing even more rapidly.' Olympios explained the back-story of the company. He explained how when the company was first founded, their primary focus was on helping individuals improve their LinkedIn profiles. 'When we started, I guess we were really in the business of helping people improve their online resume. And, that was great. We've helped tens of thousands of people improve their profile so they were noticed by recruiters. But, we quickly realized there was so much more we could do…' Olympios then began telling me about the evolution of the company. He said, 'We started studying why people were truly using LinkedIn. And, although I could break that down into countless detailed categories, it's easier simplify it down to four.' Online Reputation and A.I. 'What about A.I.?' I asked. 'How can we leverage A.I. to improve our online reputation? Doesn't it just make us more generic?' 'Yes, and No,' Olympios replied. 'It depends on how you use it, and/or how much thought, experience, and insight your A.I. provider has invested.' 'What does that mean?' I asked. 'Most people don't realize this…' replied Dennis. 'You can feed ChatGPT the smartest prompt in the world—and still end up with something that sounds like everyone else. That's the problem with generic AI.' 'You did something different,' I asked. 'We did something totally different,' he responded. 'We took 11 years of hands-on experience optimizing LinkedIn profiles—working with C-level execs, entrepreneurs, coaches, job seekers, founders, consultants—and we poured it all into one custom-built AI tool called LinkedIn Profile Optimizer 2.0. This isn't just another AI gimmick. It knows what works—because we taught it.' 'It's all your expertise in one tool,' I asked. 'Yes, my friend. And, it's 100% free for everyone,' said Dennis. 'And, our results have been mind-blowing.' I finally asked the question you all are probably curious about. 'If you're giving away all your experience, knowledge, and insight through a FREE A.I. tool, how are you making money?' 'This is where we need to revisit the concept of 'online reputation.' At LinkedSuperPowers, we're not just focused on LinkedIn anymore. Yes, it's a start. It's a phenomenal start. But, we can build an online brand and identity for people that is much bigger. Forbes, CBS, Inc., CNN, Entrepreneur, Fortune, Harvard Business Review, FOX, Us Weekly, USA Today, The New York Times, TED, and People are only few of the outlets we've assisted our clients to get featured in through our exclusive PR services. We help people and companies build stronger online reputations. Yes, we created a free online A.I. tool. It's impressive. But, reputation is the key. Trust is the key. Transparency is the key. A.I. should be used to make us all a little smarter, and us all a little more transparent.' 'So, for someone (from any of the four categories) who wants to get noticed NOW, what's your advice?' 'Start with our free tool,' said Olympios. 'Start with LinkedIn. It's the anchor of any online reputation. If you want to go bigger, contact us.' By the way, I tried the tool myself. And, it was extremely impressive.
7 minutes ago
New Texas law will require Ten Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom
AUSTIN, Texas -- Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
MAGA largely falls in line on Trump's Iran strikes
President Donald Trump's sudden announcement Saturday night that he bombed three Iranian nuclear sites has skeptics of U.S. military action against Iran largely falling in line. The prospect of strikes against Iran had sparked backlash from Democrats and days of infighting within Trump's MAGA coalition, but after the president posted on Truth Social that the U.S. has bombed Iran, several GOP critics cheered the strikes as a limited action. Several top Democrats denounced the strikes as illegal and warned they could drag the U.S. into another Middle East war. The prospect of U.S. strikes on Iran had sparked debate between Republicans pressing for the U.S. to aid in regime change and isolationist voices who warned a full-scale war would betray Trump's 'America First' approach. 'Iran gave President Trump no choice,' Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and critic of GOP war hawks, said on X. 'For a decade he has been adamant that Iran will never get a nuclear weapon. Iran decided to forego diplomacy in pursuit of a bomb. This is a surgical strike, operated perfectly. President Trump acted with prudence and decisiveness.' Former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, Trump's one-time pick for the attorney general post who had warned of the Middle East conflict turning into another drawn out war for the U.S., said on X that the president's strike didn't necessarily portend a larger conflict, and likened it to the strike of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani during Trump's first term 'President Trump basically wants this to be like the Solimani strike — one and done,' Gaetz wrote. 'No regime change war. Trump the Peacemaker! Some Republicans had expressed doubts that bombing Fordow (also known as Fordo) would end the threats, including Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. But after the strikes, Sheehy called Saturday's military action the 'right decision.' 'To the naysayers out there, this isn't starting a war, this is ending one,' he said. 'Iran has been at war with America for 46 years. The Iranian people should rise up and put an end to this murderous regime.' Democrats, meanwhile, were largely unified in opposition to the strikes, arguing Trump lacks the legal authority even if the destruction of Iran's nuclear program is a positive goal. Trump shocked Washington and the country with a post revealing that U.S. aircraft had already bombed three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The move drew recriminations from critics — and even some allies — who argued Trump had no legal authority to launch the offensive strikes against Iran's nuclear program. Top Democrats on the House and Senate Intel Committees — Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), both members of Gang of Eight — were reportedly not briefed before the attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. 'According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop,' Himes said on X. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries slammed Trump's strikes as reckless and unauthorized, demanding a full classified briefing for Congress and warning it risks 'a disastrous war in the Middle East.''Donald Trump shoulders complete and total responsibility for any adverse consequences that flow from his unilateral military action,' Jeffries said in a statement. But Trump's fellow Republicans who'd pressed for the president to join Israel's military operations against Tehran quickly cheered the decision. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of the Senate's most hawkish Republicans, said the bombing was 'the right call,' and that 'The regime deserves it.' Some hawkish Republicans argued ahead of the strikes that Trump had a historic opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear program despite potential retaliation from Iran against America's bases and allies in the Middle East. 'Iran has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years,' Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.). 'We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. God bless our brave troops. President Trump made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans.' House Speaker Mike Johnson was briefed on the strikes ahead of time, a person with direct knowledge of the matter told POLITICO. In a post on X, Johnson called it 'America First policy in action.' 'The President's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,' he wrote. Still, the attack left some MAGA isolationists distressed. And it could ramp up pressure for votes in the House and Senate on war powers legislation on Iran when Congress returns next week. Longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon, who has been wary of U.S. military involvement, was livestreaming on his show as the president made the announcement. Bannon argued that Trump should use his address Saturday evening to 'talk to MAGA' to explain why he opted to attack Iran. 'This is not Constitutional,' said Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) on X following the president's post. The Kentucky lawmaker has clashed with Trump and is one of the most vocal Republican detractors of U.S. involvement in Iran. This week, Massie, along with several House Democrats filed a House resolution seeking to block U.S. involvement in the conflict. 'While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional,' conservative Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) tweeted. 'I look forward to his remarks tonight.' Progressive Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), one of the Democrats who teamed with Massie, said lawmakers should 'immediately return to DC' to approve their resolution 'to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war.' It's unclear what legal justification the administration is using to support its attack on Iran, an ambiguity that could fuel attempts to rein Trump in. Across the Capitol, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has planned to force a vote on his own resolution to block action against Iran without congressional authorization and could do so as soon as this week.'The American public is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran,' Kaine said on X. 'And the Israeli Foreign Minister admitted yesterday that Israeli bombing had set the Iranian nuclear program back 'at least 2 or 3 years.' So what made Trump recklessly decide to rush and bomb today? Horrible judgment.' Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is pushing his own Iran legislation, slammed Trump's strike in a stop at his 'Fight Oligarchy' tour in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The crowd chanted 'No more war' in unison with raised fists as Sanders passionately called into question the president's legal authority for hitting Iran. 'Not only is this news that I've just heard this second alarming, that all of you have just heard, but it is so grossly unconstitutional,' Sanders said. 'All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right.'
