Stunning 'Solar Curtains' Phenomenon Revealed on The Sun in New Images
Upgrades to the National Science Foundation's Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope have delivered stunning new images of the Sun's surface containing structures a mere 20 kilometers (about 12 miles) across.
The radiant 'curtains' are only about as thick as Manhattan is long, driven across the solar landscape by fluctuations in magnetic fields that emerge from within the broiling plasma that surrounds the Sun.
"In this work, we investigate the fine-scale structure of the solar surface for the first time with an unprecedented spatial resolution of just about 20 kilometers, or the length of Manhattan Island," says astronomer David Kuridze, from the NSO.
"These striations are the fingerprints of fine-scale magnetic field variations."
The new research, led by a team from the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in the US, gives us fresh insight into what's happening on the surface of the Sun, as well as once again demonstrating the optical power of the Inouye telescope.
Let's not forget that the Sun is around 150 million kilometers away from Earth, so being able to spot distinctive features at this kind of resolution is a triumph of science and engineering.
The striations appear at the edges of larger solar convection bubbles (or granules) previously observed by Inouye, caused by the heating and cooling of plasma.
The brightness and darkness of the stripes is controlled by the strength of the magnetic field, and very slight variations in these fields can shift the properties of the plasma. When the field is weaker than its surroundings, the curtains dim with respect to its glowing background.
The research team followed its observations with simulations of the physics of the phenomenon, finding a match that explained what the telescope was showing – although this wasn't something the astronomers had expected to see.
"Magnetism is a fundamental phenomenon in the Universe, and similar magnetically induced stripes have also been observed in more distant astrophysical objects, such as molecular clouds," says NSO astronomer Han Uitenbroek.
"Inouye's high resolution, in combination with simulations, allows us to better characterize the behavior of magnetic fields in a broad astrophysical context."
There's a lot of incredibly complex physics behind the Sun's surface weather, and being able to view it in more detail will reveal the interactions of heat, magnetism, and movement – and how they might be playing out elsewhere in the Universe.
And there's going to be plenty more to come from the Inouye telescope, which only started making scientific observations in earnest in 2022. The information we've already gleaned from its imagery will help us better understand events like sunspots and solar eruptions, which can have repercussions on Earth.
"This is just one of many firsts for the Inouye, demonstrating how it continues to push the frontier of solar research," says NSO astronomer David Boboltz.
"It also underscores Inouye's vital role in understanding the small-scale physics that drive space weather events that impact our increasingly technological society here on Earth."
The research has been published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
The Sun's Fury Is Making SpaceX Satellites Plummet From The Sky
Astronomers Just Discovered The Biggest Explosions Since The Big Bang
Titan's Atmosphere 'Wobbles Like a Gyroscope' – And No One Knows Why
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts blocked by judge
A federal judge has blocked President Trump's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email by the Associated Press on Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are "indirect" costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as "overhead" and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health. In a recent interview on "CBS Mornings Plus," Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors — whose organization sued the Trump administration over federal funding cuts to Columbia University — said examples of research that has been cut includes a research project that looks at discerning when AI is making fake videos or a project that examines when people start to believe lies that are repeatedly told. "We are losing all the critical research that helps us understand truth and fiction in our social media platforms, whether it's Facebook or X or any other platform," he said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
US judge blocks slashing of universities' federal funding from National Science Foundation
By Nate Raymond and Blake Brittain (Reuters) -A federal judge on Friday prevented the National Science Foundation from sharply cutting research funding provided to universities in the latest legal setback to efforts by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to slash government support of research at major academic institutions. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston invalidated a policy NSF adopted in May that limited the ability of universities to be reimbursed for administrative and facility costs that indirectly support grant-funded research, ruling that it was "arbitrary and capricious." Spokespeople for NSF and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling. NSF, a $9 billion agency that funds scientific research, adopted the policy after having already canceled hundreds of grants out of step with the Republican president's priorities. His administration has also been freezing billions of dollars in government funding for numerous universities, including Harvard. NSF's policy, which was announced on May 2, set a cap on how much grant funding could go to cover indirect costs. NSF said funding for such costs could equal no more than 15% of the funding for direct research costs, regardless of what the costs actually were at universities. Historically, universities had negotiated with NSF and other agencies over the rate at which indirect costs could be reimbursed. The cap meant that for every $100 in funding going directly to a research grant award, universities would receive just $15 to cover overhead, such as the costs of maintaining lab space and paying for electricity and staff. The Trump administration said it sought through the policy to rein in spending on administrative overhead, which had grown to consume $1.07 billion of NSF's annual $4.22 billion grant-making budget for higher education institutions. That rate, though, is significantly lower than the indirect cost that many of the 69 research universities belonging to Association of American Universities had negotiated, which was often in the 50% to 65% range, the group's lawyers said. Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said in her Friday decision that the administration's 15% rate was unlawful. The association along with two other academic trade groups and 13 schools sued in May to block the policy, after earlier convincing judges in Boston to block similar funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Energy. The association did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Friday decision. Among the schools that challenged NSF's funding cuts were the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Brown University, the University of California, Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell University, the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania. They argued that NSF's action, if allowed to stand, "will badly undermine scientific research at America's universities and erode our nation's enviable status as a global leader in scientific research and innovation." The U.S. Department of Defense has since also adopted a 15% cap, which a judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked pending a hearing on July 2. He did so a day after a different judge in Boston ordered NIH to reinstate hundreds of grants for research on diversity-related topics nixed as part of the administration's purge of initiatives viewed as supporting "diversity, equity and inclusion."
E&E News
4 days ago
- E&E News
Groups sue science agency over grant terminations
A coalition of groups representing teachers, researchers and educators is suing the National Science Foundation for terminating scientific grants. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, contends that the science agency's moves to terminate more than $1 billion of scientific grants, cooperative agreements and other financial awards at the direction of the Trump administration and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency operation 'violates the separation of powers and is unlawful.' The science agency — whose broad research funding includes projects at universities, nonprofits and industry — announced earlier this year that it had begun terminating awards 'that are not aligned with NSF's priorities.' Advertisement That change in priorities preceded the termination of 'numerous active grants for projects that seek to expand participation of women and underrepresented groups in STEM as mandated by Congress, along with other basic research projects,' the lawsuit says.
