US court lets Trump retain control of California National Guard for now
FILE PHOTO: A demonstrator raises his hand holding flowers as members of the National Guard stand in formation outside a federal building during the No Kings protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies, in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/Daniel Cole/File Photo
WASHINGTON - A U.S. appeals court let Donald Trump on Thursday retain control over California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests and unrest in Los Angeles.
A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended a pause it placed on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that Trump had called the National Guard into federal service unlawfully.
Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by Governor Gavin Newsom.
Breyer ruled that Trump violated the U.S. law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor, and also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist.
Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel put the judge's move on hold temporarily.
Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on June 7 took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops against the wishes of Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps mobilization.
At a court hearing on Tuesday on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops.
The law sets out three conditions under which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws.
The Justice Department has said that once the president determines that an emergency that warrants the use of the National Guard exists, no court or state governor can review that decision.
Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second most-populous U.S. city.
The protests in Los Angeles lasted for more than a week, but subsequently ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed.
California argued in its June 9 lawsuit that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement.
The lawsuit stated the situation in Los Angeles was nothing like a "rebellion." The protests involved sporadic acts of violence that state and local law enforcement were capable of handling without military involvement, according to the lawsuit.
The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Iran rules out nuclear talks under fire, sources say Qatar met energy majors
Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS DUBAI/JERUSALEM - Iran said on June 20 it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations and the US considers whether to get involved in the conflict. A week into its campaign, Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets overnight, including missile production sites, a research body involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran. Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on June 20, striking near residential apartments, office buildings and industrial facilities in the southern city of Beersheba. After air raid warnings later that day, Israeli media said initial reports pointed to missile impacts in Tel Aviv, the Negev and Haifa. World oil markets are on high alert for any strikes that hit energy facilities in Iran or elsewhere in the Gulf which affect supplies. Qatar held crisis talks this week with energy majors after Israeli strikes on Iran's huge gas field, which it shares with Qatar, an industry source and a diplomat in the region told Reuters. Doha was asking firms to raise US, UK and European governments' awareness of increasing risks to global gas supply, they said. QatarEnergy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House said on June 19 that President Donald Trump would decide on US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks, citing the possibility of negotiations involving Iran in the near future. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the US 'until Israeli aggression stops'. But he was due to meet European foreign ministers in Geneva for talks at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy over Iran's nuclear programme. Two diplomats said before the meeting with France, Britain, Germany and the European Union's foreign policy chief that Mr Araqchi would be told the US is still open to direct talks. Expectations for a breakthrough are low, diplomats say. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran was ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment and that the European's role was now more prominent because Iran is unwilling to engage with the US while under fire from Israel. But any proposal for zero enrichment - not being able to enrich uranium at all - will be rejected 'especially now under Israel's strikes', the official said. Israel began attacking Iran on June 13, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this. Israeli air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a US-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, according to authorities. Both sides say they are attacking military and defence-related targets. An Iranian news website said a drone had struck an apartment in a residential building in central Tehran on June 20, but did not give details. Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear installations so far pose only limited risks of contamination, experts say. But they warn that any attack on the nuclear power station at Bushehr could cause a nuclear disaster. Israel says it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities but that it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster in a region that is inhabited by tens of millions of people and produces much of the world's oil. The meeting in Geneva was due to start on the afternoon of June 20. The Swiss city is where an initial accord was struck in 2013 to curb Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions being lifted. A comprehensive deal followed in 2015. Mr Trump pulled the US out of the agreement in 2018. A new series of talks between Iran and the US collapsed when Israel started attacking Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 12. Mr Trump has alternated between threatening Tehran and urging it to resume nuclear talks. His special envoy to the region, Steve Witkoff, has spoken to Mr Araqchi several times since last week, sources say. Western and regional officials say Israel is trying to shatter the government of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Katz said he had instructed the military to intensify attacks on 'symbols of the regime' in the Iranian capital Tehran, aiming to destabilise it. Iran has arrested an 'agent' of Israel's foreign spy agency Mossad who was sending information on Iranian air defence installations to Israel using WhatsApp messaging, Iran's state broadcaster said. Iranian opposition groups think their time may be near, but activists involved in previous protests say they are unwilling to unleash mass unrest with their nation under attack, and Iranian authorities have cracked down hard on dissent. Iranian state media reported rallies in several cities, describing them as rallies of 'rage and victory,' and 'solidarity and resistance.' REUTERS Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forced to wait for Trump, Israel faces strategic dilemma in Iran
Protesters rallying in New York on June 18. US President Donald Trump says he will wait up to two weeks before deciding on a US attack on Iran. PHOTO: REUTERS JERUSALEM – President Donald Trump's decision to defer a US attack on Iran has left Israel in a strategic bind. Israel's main remaining war goal is to wipe out a nuclear enrichment site at Fordo in northern Iran, which is buried so deep underground that Israeli bombs will struggle to damage it. For days, Israeli officials hoped Mr Trump would send US warplanes armed with the only munitions in the world that are deemed powerful enough to destroy Fordo. Now, Mr Trump says he will wait up to two weeks before deciding whether to make such an intervention, a delay that imposes a dilemma on Israel. The longer Israel waits for Trump, the greater the strain on its air defence system. To keep out Iran's ballistic missile barrages, Israel is burning through its stocks of missile interceptors, forcing it to prioritise the protection of some areas over others. As time goes on, that raises the risk of more missiles hitting both civilian neighbourhoods and strategic security sites. With Israel's airspace closed and much of its economic life suspended, the war's protraction will also come at an economic cost. The sooner the war ends, the faster commercial flights will return and businesses can resume full operations. Rather than wait for US help, Israel could decide to attack Fordo alone, taking a chance with the planes and munitions it has at its disposal. Some analysts say Israel could even send commandos to enter and sabotage the site. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at going it alone June 19, saying in a television interview that Israel would 'achieve all of our objectives, all of their nuclear facilities. We have the power to do so'. But experts say this route is fraught with risk and that its effect may be limited. 'It probably won't be on the scale of what the US can achieve,' said Mr Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to Washington. 'If we could do what the US can, we would have already done it.' Another option is for Israel to wind down the war unilaterally, without attacking Fordo. But that approach would leave at least a significant part of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme intact, leaving open the possibility that Iran might create a nuclear bomb that could be used against Israel. For now, Israel does not seem set to take that route. Israel's political leadership has begun to speak explicitly about prompting the collapse of the Iranian regime and assassinating its leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Even if Israel has no real way of toppling his government, the tone of the comments suggest that Israel, at the very least, intends to continue with its strikes for several days. The tone of the Israeli news media on June 20 also indicated continued domestic support for the Israeli campaign, as did new opinion polling. After Israel's attack on Iran, Mr Netanyahu's party is in its strongest polling position since October 2023, when Hamas carried out the deadliest attack in Israel's history. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Netanyahu's other battle: Swinging Trump and US behind Iran war
Mr Benjamin Netanyahu's lobbying for US President Donald Trump's support against Iran could succeed. PHOTO: REUTERS Netanyahu's other battle: Swinging Trump and US behind Iran war JERUSALEM - Since launching air strikes on Iran last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been working to pull US President Donald Trump into the war, and sway a skeptical American public. In his daily calls and public statements, Israel's longest-serving prime minister has mixed praise and deference for the US leader, while also arguing that the strikes on Iran benefit Americans. 'Do you want these people to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to you?' he asked during an interview on Fox News on June 15. 'Today, it's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow, it's New York,' he told ABC News a day later, arguing that Iran was working on longer-range missiles that would be able to reach US shores in the future. His media blitz came after intensive and not always harmonious exchanges between Mr Netanyahu and Mr Trump this year, with the Israeli leader welcomed twice to the White House since the Republican's return to power in January. The New York Times, citing unnamed US administration sources, reported on June 17 that Mr Netanyahu had asked Mr Trump for US-made bunker-busting bombs capable of reaching Iran's underground Iranian nuclear facilities in an April meeting – but had been refused. Having been elected in opposition to US entanglements overseas and supposed 'war-mongers' in the Democratic party, Mr Trump was seen as reluctant to commit Washington to another unpopular war in the Middle East. Much of his right-wing Make America Great Again (MAGA) coalition is staunchly anti-interventionist, including Vice-President JD Vance, his head of national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard, and influential media figures such as Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson. But speaking on June 18, the former tycoon stated clearly that he was considering joining the Israeli campaign directly, raising the possibility of the bunker-busting GBU-57 bombs being deployed against Iran's main underground uranium stockpile facility in Fordo. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House when asked if he had decided on US air strikes. His final decision will come 'within the next two weeks', he said on June 19. Professor Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at the London-based Chatham House think-tank, said Mr Netanyahu had been clever in his dealings with Mr Trump, appealing to his 'vanity' with charm as well 'using his weaknesses'. Once he had received an 'amber light' in private from the US leader to launch the attacks on June 13, 'he knew Trump's personality and knew that Trump might come on board if there was a chance of claiming glory in some way or claiming some sort of credit,' he told AFP. Mr Trump has openly praised the success of the Israeli military campaign which has combined targeted assassinations of key military personnel, destruction of Iran's air defences and repeated strikes on nuclear sites. Professor Eliot A. Cohen, a veteran former US State Department advisor and international relations expert at Johns Hopkins University in Washington, cautioned against overstating Netanyahu's personal influence, however. 'I suspect this is much less about Netanyahu's influence than Trump's own view of the Iranian nuclear programme, his memory of the assassination plot against him in 2024 by Iranian agents and the success of the initial Israeli operations,' he told AFP. An Iranian man has been charged in connection with an alleged plot to kill Mr Trump before his election last November. Prof Cohen said Mr Netanyahu's lobbying could succeed for several reasons. 'They are not asking for anything other than the bombing of Fordo,' he said, referring to the deeply buried underground uranium enrichment facility. 'Nobody is talking about an invasion or anything like that.' 'Many if not most Americans understand that a nuclear Iran is particularly dangerous, and that the regime is deeply hostile to the US,' he added. A poll by the survey group YouGov for The Economist magazine conducted last weekend found half of Americans viewed Iran as an 'enemy' and another quarter said it was 'unfriendly.' But it found that only 16 per cent of Americans 'think the US military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran'. It found that majorities of Democrats (65 per cent), independents (61 per cent) and Republicans (53 per cent) opposed military intervention. Speaking on his War Room podcast Wednesday, former Trump strategist Bannon seethed that Mr Netanyahu had 'lectured' America and started a war he couldn't end on his own. 'Quit coming to us to finish it,' he said. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
