Why I Played the Kennedy Center

I'm nerves on nerves, fizzy, breathing through preshow jitters. A voice crackles in the speakers backstage at the Kennedy Center: 'Five minutes to showtime.'
Though my band, Guster, has more than 2,000 performances behind us, this one is a real humdinger. Tonight we will be accompanied by the 60-member National Symphony Orchestra, which, on its own, is emotional and exhilarating; very few moments compare to fronting a world-class orchestra and, together, playing songs that are a part of you. There's also the venue itself, the historic Kennedy Center, which has served as a national cultural hub for more than half a century. But momentous events from beyond the stage hovered, too: In February, well after all 5,000 tickets had been sold for our two-night stand, Donald Trump dismissed multiple members of the Kennedy Center board and installed himself as the institution's chairman. The president, who said he wants programming to be less 'wokey,' gleefully promised a 'Golden Age in Arts and Culture' under his leadership.
[Read: America's cultural revolution]
In the weeks that followed, everything was chaos. Long-serving staff resigned, artists canceled their appearances in protest—including the actor Issa Rae and the rock band Low Cut Connie—and every ticket buyer had a new question to answer, a fresh moral quandary. Our band, too, found ourselves on a prickly path to one of the most revered venues in the country. We asked ourselves: What was the best way to use our voices in defiance of an administration that doesn't share our values? How could we support our fans, who have sustained us for decades, and many of whom were now deeply conflicted about being in a building that was at the center of a culture war?
It was a mess. Immediately after Trump's announcement, direct messages from fans began to stream in, and comment sections on our Facebook and Instagram pages swelled. Some had practical questions (were we going to cancel the performances?) while others discussed the ethics of simply attending a show at Kennedy Center in light of its freshly altered mission. Three factions coalesced: those who thought we should cancel in solidarity with other protesting artists; those saying we should save our protest for the stage; and a small but vocal 'shut up and dribble' contingent proclaiming that a new administration was a non-event. Not everything has to be about politics, the latter noted.
Thankfully, the four of us in the band are mostly aligned politically, which is a gift when our individual personalities are often reduced to a single, public entity. We immediately huddled and, though we all had our individual opinions, agreed that our voice as a band would be loudest from the Kennedy Center stage. That space was given to us by the venue's previous curators, and we were united in our desire to own it. We wanted to support the staff at the Kennedy Center who were caught in this political crossfire; the fans who had bought tickets, flights, and hotel rooms; and the musicians we would be performing with. Our challenge, beyond putting on an indelible show, was to find a way to make our dissension clear, with dignity and creativity. No one in the band was interested in hosting a rally on F Street, but neither could we just shut up and dribble this time. We had been given a microphone and we intended to use it.
Getting this messaging right was crucial for Guster. Touring bands that play three-and-a-half-minute pop songs don't find themselves in their fourth decade without an incredibly strong connection to their fans. We have never had a hit song on pop radio or been fawned over by the music press. The major engine in our career—and the reason it continues to thrive—is the relationship of our four personalities with the people who listen to our music. Certainly for some, we're the guys who played their college campus in the '90s or sang that 'Satellite' song. But many of our current fans have seen us dozens, if not hundreds, of times. They refer to other fans as their 'Guster Fam' and organize meetups before shows. Our annual festival in Portland, Maine, brings 4,000 people into a community that rivals the depth of Phish fans and Deadheads. Fans have tattoos with Guster lyrics, they name their pets after characters in our songs, and use our music at weddings and funerals. As we move through artistic and personal milestones, we do so alongside many of them, our evolving albums a soundtrack for our fans' evolving lives. It's a position we hold with deep honor and gratitude.
[Read: I performed a career-highlight show. Then Delta hit.]
Initially by circumstance and now by design, in the Guster universe, there is very little space between art and artist. The implication here is that many of our fans want to know that we have their backs, and we demonstrate these alliances on occasion. My bandmate Adam Gardner co-founded the environmental nonprofit Reverb, which aims to reduce concert and tour footprints. And we dipped a toe into wry activism when I wore a dress onstage in Ponte Vedra, Florida, coinciding with the state's anti-drag law in 2023. But in an ever more polarized world, solidarity becomes a more difficult assignment. As algorithms and politics herd us into narrower and narrower silos, the pressure increases on artists (as well as comedians, actors, and even brands) to mirror their fans' core beliefs. For some, every consumption choice is a reflection of their values. There is opportunity here, to strengthen the bond we already have with our fans; but there is also significant risk in alienating those with whom we may disagree. We must also be judicious and know when to speak and when to let the music speak on our behalf.
We had a test run straight into this volatility earlier this year. Following the presidential inauguration, we launched a three-week tour across the United States, including several shows in red states such as Iowa, Nebraska, and Utah. Initially, there was some unease: How would it feel to play these venues, which would almost certainly bring out audiences who were diverse in their politics? During that tour, just as now, America was raw and explosive, a powder keg. But these evenings proved transformative. Songs are time machines that, at their best, reduce and expose us. And this level of safely shared vulnerability, in a room of thousands, can verge on the spiritual. The knowledge that our fans could catch a glance of one another and think, Oh, we're actually all in this together offered us some assurance that our performances, even if just for a moment, actually mattered.
As our Kennedy Center dates approached, the headlines stayed tumultuous. The juggernaut musical Hamilton announced that it was canceling its 2026 run at the venue. Others remained steadfast. Conan O'Brien received the Mark Twain Prize at the Kennedy Center and gave a moving speech that toed the line of defiance, humor, and poignance. 'Twain hated bullies,' he said, 'and he deeply, deeply empathized with the weak.' The comic W. Kamau Bell, who performed at the venue shortly after Trump announced his takeover, wrote about the experience, noting that it was his job to 'speak truth to power.' And like Bell, my bandmates and I understood why other artists were continuing to cancel their performances. But he, O'Brien, and others demonstrated that there is more than one way to stand up for what you believe.
On Friday night, the first of the two shows, we played an incredibly moving set, flanked by the National Symphony Orchestra. The arrangements soared; the dynamics were rich and powerful. Lyrics that would normally slip through me on autopilot were now barbed and heavy. I choked up on our new song, 'Maybe We're Alright,' the words 'the lies we tell ourselves just to fall asleep' landing like a gut punch. As the evening continued, I could sense something expectant in the room; our fans, many wearing rainbow attire, Pride pins, and T-shirts with anti-facist slogans, were waiting for a declaration of some kind.
Near the end of the show, we invited some surprise guests to the stage. 'My friend Michael wrote the songs for a musical called Finn,' I said, reading from a statement. 'In the before times, they were booked to play here, but as you all know, things happened, and the show is no longer being presented by the Kennedy Center.' The musical, whose planned tour had been canceled, told a story of self-discovery, as a young shark realizes that he may, in fact, be a fish; its creators have said it can be read as reflective of the queer experience. We, as a band, have always felt connected to our queer fans, and our bond has deepened in this moment when diversity is under attack. The world we want to live in needs all kinds of fish.
'As the new administration has made abundantly clear, Finn's themes of inclusivity, love, and self-acceptance aren't going to be welcome in this building while they are in control,' I continued. 'So tonight our band is here to say 'Our stage is your stage. We are your allies, we stand with the LGBTQ community, and we want you to sing with us.' Please welcome the cast of Finn and composer Michael Kooman. They belong here.'
Michael and the five cast members of Finn joined us onstage to what I am certain will be among the loudest and longest ovations of our career. They accompanied us on our song 'Hard Times': 'I'm breathing in / the oxygen / I'm holding it / through hard times.' There were tears onstage and off.
Tonight, our final night, we once again invite Michael and the Finn cast to sing—and, this time, to say a few words. He takes a deep breath, waits for silence, and addresses the audience with confidence and heart: Finn is 'a show about growing up, feeling like you don't fit in. It's a show about finding your chosen family. And, most importantly, it's a show about being yourself and standing up for what you believe in, even if it's really scary. The message itself is more important now than whenever we began to write the show.'
As the last notes of our encore disappear into the theater, we collectively applaud the National Symphony Orchestra and our conductor, Enrico Lopez-Yañez. We turn toward the audience, huddle for a final bow, and look out at thousands of beaming faces. This is our chosen family, sharks and fishes—multicolored, vibrant, and most assuredly not welcome back to the Kennedy Center anytime soon.
Article originally published at The Atlantic

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

26 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Critics Point Out Glaring Contradiction In Trump's Iran ‘Regime Change' Post

President Donald Trump sparked incredulity on social media Sunday — including from Republicans ― after appearing to call for regime change in Iran. In a post on his Truth Social platform, the president wrote: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' The post stunned critics, especially given that top Trump administration officials — including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — had earlier dismissed the idea of ousting Iran's leaders. Instead, they had spun U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites as aimed at solely stopping the development of nukes. Conservative attorney George Conway, a vocal critic of Trump, sarcastically summed it up: 'Pretending to be an ignorant and impulsive sociopath by appearing to make shit up as he goes along is just @realDonaldTrump's way of playing 7,822-dimensional chess.' Pretending to be an ignorant and impulsive sociopath by appearing to make shit up as he goes along is just @realDonaldTrump's way of playing 7,822-dimensional chess — George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway3d) June 22, 2025 I swear it was just like 8 hours ago when Pete Hegseth said "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," to reporters at the Pentagon. That's weird. — Fred Wellman (@FPWellman) June 22, 2025 And less than 24 hours ago, Sec. of Defense Pete "Jaeger Bomb" Hegseth specifically stated it was not about regime change. — Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) June 22, 2025 Miga Taco anyone? — Mike Palmer, CFP® (@dfa_advisor) June 23, 2025 Just wondering if my MAGA friends have to change the color of their hats now that Trump is all about Making Iran Great Again. You know he has that Trump Tower Tehran in his head - lots of great business opportunities for Trump Org from a Trump-installed regime! — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 22, 2025 You cannot believe a thing any of them ever say. — Blowhard (@AmeetSampat) June 23, 2025 In other words,no one knows what they are doing — Erica Murdoch (@ericamurdoch) June 22, 2025 VANCE: "Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change."HEGSETH: "This mission was not and has not been about regime change."RUBIO: Regime change is "certainly not the goal of what we're working on here."TRUMP: — Megan Cassella (@mmcassella) June 22, 2025 It's like a tariff negotiation but with bunker busting bombs and nuclear holocaust instead of maple syrup. — Mike Madrid (@madrid_mike) June 22, 2025 Kayleigh McEnany's 'Every Dictator' Take On Trump Iran Strike Draws Online Fire CNN Panel Recoils At Conservative Guest's Comment To Friend's Undocumented Wife U.S. Soccer Star Dishes On 'Weird' Oval Office Moment With Trump

News24

27 minutes ago

• News24

‘Why wouldn't there be a regime change?‘ Trump raises Iran government collapse after strikes

Israel and Iran resumed their war on Monday. Iran has yet to respond to US strikes on its nuclear facilities. US President Donald Trump raised the idea of regime change in Iran. Iran and Israel traded air and missile strikes as the world braced on Monday for Tehran's response to the US attack on its nuclear sites and US President Donald Trump raised the idea of regime change in the Islamic republic. Iran vowed to defend itself on Sunday, a day after the US joined Israel in the biggest Western military action against the country since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, despite calls for restraint and a return to diplomacy from around the world. Commercial satellite imagery indicated the US attack on Saturday on Iran's subterranean Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged or destroyed the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but the status of the site remained unconfirmed, experts said. In his latest social media comments on the US strikes, Trump said: 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran.' 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. Trump earlier called on Iran to forgo any retaliation and said the government 'must now make peace' or 'future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier'. The US launched 75 precision-guided munitions including bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles against three Iranian nuclear sites, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, told reporters. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes. Rafael Grossi, the agency's director general, told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim. Tehran, which denies its nuclear programme is for anything other than peaceful purposes, sent a volley of missiles at Israel in the aftermath of the US attack, wounding scores of people and destroying buildings in Tel Aviv. But it had not acted on its main threats of retaliation, to target US bases or choke off the global oil shipments that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Attempting to strangle the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet based in the Gulf. Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January. Brent crude futures were up $1.52 or 1.97% to $78.53 a barrel as of 05:03 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude advanced $1.51 or 2.04% to $75.35. Iran's parliament has approved a move to close the strait, which Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said any such move would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The US State Department issued a security alert for all US citizens abroad, calling on them to 'exercise increased caution'. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the strait, telling Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo show it would be a 'terrible mistake'. 'It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours,' he said. The Israeli military said on Monday about 20 jets had conducted a wave of strikes against military targets in western Iran and Tehran overnight. ⁠ In Kermanshah, in western Iran, missile and radar infrastructure was targeted, and in Tehran a surface-to-air missile launcher was struck, it said. A missile launched from Iran in the early hours of Monday was intercepted by Israeli defences, it said. Air raid sirens blared overnight in Tel Aviv and other parts of central Israel. Iranian news agencies reported air defences were activated in central Tehran districts to counter 'enemy targets', and that Israeli air strikes hit Parchin, the location of a military complex southeast of the capital. Israel's state broadcaster reported that an Israeli Hermes drone was shot down in Iranian territory, the fourth to be shot down in the area since the start of the campaign. In a post to the Truth Social platform on Sunday, Trump raised the idea of regime change in Iran. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' he wrote. Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including US Vice President JD Vance and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. Israeli Police/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on 13 June, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment. As Tehran weighed its options, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is expected to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday. The Kremlin has a strategic partnership with Iran, but also close links with Israel. Speaking in Istanbul on Sunday, Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses and there would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated. Russia's foreign ministry condemned the US attacks which it said had undermined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and warned of conflict spreading in the Middle East. The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss the US strikes as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council the US bombings in Iran marked a perilous turn in the region and urged a return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme. Commercial airlines were weighing how long to suspend Middle East flights after the US struck Iran. The Middle East route has become more important for flights between Europe and Asia but flight tracking website FlightRadar24 showed empty space on Sunday over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel.

CNBC

32 minutes ago

• CNBC

Russia watches on as ally Iran is pummeled — and it's unlikely to go to Tehran's rescue

Russia's response to Iran's call for help is being closely watched on Monday after the U.S. bombed Tehran's nuclear facilities over the weekend — but Moscow might not be quick to offer its ally a hand. The attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, which President Donald Trump described as an "obliteration," has left the Islamic Republic scrambling for support from the few friends it has on the global stage. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi headed to Moscow on Monday for "serious consultations" with Russian President Vladimir Putin over how to answer the assaults. Iran has helped Russia with military drones throughout the war in Ukraine, but analysts now say there might be very little Moscow can or will to do to reciprocate. "Iran has massively supported Putin's war against Ukraine with weapons and technology. On his trip to Moscow, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi may now ask Moscow to return the favour," Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank, said in a note Monday. "However, Putin has probably little to offer beyond some words. He needs his weapons himself for his continued aggression against Ukraine," he noted. Russia also has to tread a fine line between placating and assisting ally Iran and keeping the U.S. sweet, as it looks to re-establish ties with Donald Trump's Russia-friendlier administration. "If Putin were to annoy Trump over Iran in any significant way, Trump may change tack and impose new heavy sanctions on Russia and/or weaken Putin's position in other ways," Schmieding said. So far, Moscow's response to the escalating crisis has been muted, with Russia calling on Iran and Israel to negotiate a peaceful end to the crisis. The Iranian conflict could strengthen Russia's position in Ukraine modestly, analysts say, as it distracts Western attention — and potentially resources — away from Ukraine. Higher oil prices could also mean more export revenue for oil producer Russia's war coffers. At the same time, Russia is watching on as another Middle Eastern ally is weakened, eroding its own foothold in the region in the process. Russia has already seen one valuable alliance crumble recently by way of last year's ousting of Bashar al Assad's regime in Syria putting, which put the future of Moscow's air and naval bases in the country in doubt. Russia stands to further lose out on potentially lucrative investments and infrastructure projects, if Iran is severely destabilized. The issue for Moscow is to now gauge how much it has to win or lose by helping or abandoning Iran. "Moscow itself appears to be undecided what to make of a new war in the Middle East," Nikita Smagin, an expert on Iranian foreign and domestic policies at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, said in analysis. "On the one hand, Russia has invested heavily in various projects in Iran over the past three years, all of which could now go to waste. At the same time, Moscow hopes to benefit from Middle Eastern instability through rising oil prices and declining interest in Ukraine." Ruling out the possibility of Russia giving Iran any military assistance, Smagin said the bigger issue for Moscow is the threat to all the Iranian ventures it has actively invested in recently, including oil and gas projects, infrastructure and transit routes. "A few days before the start of the Israeli operation, the Iranian ambassador to Moscow said that Russia was the country's largest foreign investor in 2024. The ambassador did not specify any investment volumes, but Russian investments were estimated at $2.76 billion the previous year. Moscow planned to invest about $8 billion in oil and gas projects alone," Smagin said. "Now the future of those projects is in doubt."