logo
EU chief says pressure off for lower Russia oil price cap

EU chief says pressure off for lower Russia oil price cap

France 245 days ago

The European Commission, the EU's executive arm, had suggested cutting the current oil price cap from $60 to $45 as Moscow drags its feet on a ceasefire in Ukraine.
The measure would have been a major component of a fresh wave of sanctions against Russia planned by the EU, with hopes that the United States would also commit.
The EU had said it would make its case at the G7 summit being held at a wooded resort in Alberta, Canada, but the gathering was overshadowed by the conflict between Israel and Iran that sent US President Donald Trump home early to handle the crisis.
The current $60 cap "had little effect, but in the last days, we have seen that the oil price has risen [and] the cap in place does serve its function," von der Leyen told reporters on the sidelines of the G7 meeting.
"So for the moment, there's little pressure on lowering the oil price cap," she added.
The existing cap was a G7 initiative aimed at limiting the amount of money Russia makes by exporting oil to countries across the world.
It was designed to limit the price Moscow can get for oil by banning shipping firms and insurance companies from dealing with Russia to export above that amount.
Under the leadership of the previous Biden administration, it was set at $60 by the G7 in late 2022, months after the invasion of Ukraine.
To have the most impact, the EU and other G7 partners need to get the United States to follow suit and agree to the price cut.
But Trump so far has frustrated Western allies by refusing to impose new sanctions on Russia despite President Vladimir Putin's failure to agree to a Ukraine ceasefire.
Von der Leyen said the G7 leaders, with Trump still present, on Monday discussed coordinating on sanctions against Russia "to put more pressure" on Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The EU's latest proposal for an 18th round of sanctions since Russia's invasion also includes measures to stop the defunct Baltic Sea gas pipelines Nord Stream 1 and 2 from being brought back online.
"The fact that we have just put another hardened, biting package of sanctions on Russia is proof" of the EU's continued support for Ukraine, von der Leyen said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO prepares for summit uneasily, as US pressures fellow members
NATO prepares for summit uneasily, as US pressures fellow members

LeMonde

time21 minutes ago

  • LeMonde

NATO prepares for summit uneasily, as US pressures fellow members

The traditional family photo of the representatives of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's member states, standing shoulder to shoulder in front of the alliance's blue and white logo, will have to hide the discomfort. Yet, as NATO prepares to convene its annual summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday, June 24, and Wednesday, June 25, the diplomatic choreography among the 32 participating heads of state and government, including US President Donald Trump, promises to be a delicate balancing act. Indeed, in the background, a crisis is brewing within NATO, particularly over how to approach Russia. Since taking office, the Trump administration has exerted intense pressure on US allies, demanding that they dedicate 5% of their gross domestic products (GDP) to defense spending, up from the current 2% benchmark, or face the risk of US withdrawal from Europe. This will be a central issue at the summit. Yet, for many heavily indebted countries, the effort demanded of them is impossible. In the days leading up to the summit, European representatives also engaged in tough negotiations to have Russia classified as a "threat," contrary to the Trump administration's position. The unease is likely to be reflected, at the very least, in the summit's final statement, which has already been described as "short" and "concise."

Iran says US will 'receive a response' after strikes on nuclear sites
Iran says US will 'receive a response' after strikes on nuclear sites

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Iran says US will 'receive a response' after strikes on nuclear sites

Iran on Sunday threatened US bases in the Middle East after massive air strikes that Washington said had destroyed Tehran's nuclear program, though some officials cautioned that the extent of damage was unclear. International concern focused on fears that the unprecedented US attacks would deepen conflict in the volatile region after Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran earlier this month. Ali Akbar Velayati, an advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said bases used by US forces could be attacked in retaliation. "Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces," he said in a message carried by the official IRNA news agency. "America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences." 03:37 President Donald Trump urged Iran to end the conflict after he launched surprise strikes on a key underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, along with nuclear facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. "We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)" he said on social media. And while the US president did not directly advocate regime change in the Islamic republic, he openly played with the idea -- even after his aides stressed that was not a goal of American intervention. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. "But if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told a Pentagon press briefing earlier that Iran's nuclear program had been "devastated," adding the operation "did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people." Standing beside Hegseth, top US general Dan Caine said that while it would be "way too early" for him to determine the level of destruction, "initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction." Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meanwhile said his country's military strikes will "finish" once the stated objectives of destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities have been achieved. "We are very, very close to completing them," he told reporters. Tehran protests As Iran's leaders struck defiant tones, President Masoud Pezeshkian also vowed that the United States would "receive a response" to the attacks. People gathered Sunday in central Tehran to protest against US and Israeli attacks, waving flags and chanting slogans. 07:43 In the province of Semnan east of the capital, 46-year-old housewife Samireh told AFP she was "truly shocked" by the strikes. "Semnan province is very far from the nuclear facilities targeted, but I'm very concerned for the people who live near," she said. In an address to the nation hours after the attack, Trump claimed success for the operation, and Vice President JD Vance followed up Sunday morning. "We know that we set the Iranian nuclear program back substantially last night," Vance told ABC. But he also suggested Iran still had its highly enriched uranium. "We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel," he said. "They no longer have the capacity to turn that stockpile of highly enriched uranium to weapons-grade uranium." Another Khamenei advisor, Ali Shamkhani, said in a post on X that "even if nuclear sites are destroyed, game isn't over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, political will remain." Rafael Grossi, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council that craters were visible at the Fordo facility, but no one had been able to assess the underground damage. He added that attacks on nuclear facilities could cause radiation leaks, but the IAEA had not detected any. Retaliation risk Israel's military was checking results of the US raid on the deeply buried nuclear facility in Fordo, with a spokesman saying it was uncertain if Iran had already removed enriched uranium from the site. The main US strike group was seven B-2 Spirit bombers that flew 18 hours from the American mainland to Iran. Trump said Sunday the planes had landed safely on US soil after the marathon mission. 01:49 In response to the attack, which used over a dozen massive "bunker buster" bombs, Iran's armed forces targeted sites in Israel including Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv, with at least 23 people wounded. Nine members of the Revolutionary Guards were killed Sunday in Israeli attacks on central Iran, local media reported, while three people were killed after an ambulance was also struck. Israeli strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people so far, Iran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 24 people, according to official figures. The United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman, which had been mediating Iran-US nuclear talks, criticized the US strikes and called for de-escalation. French President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday warned against an "uncontrolled escalation" in the Middle East, as he and his German and British counterparts called on Tehran "not to take any further action that could destabilize the region."

Trump mentions regime change in Iran, after his administration said that wasn't the goal
Trump mentions regime change in Iran, after his administration said that wasn't the goal

LeMonde

time3 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Trump mentions regime change in Iran, after his administration said that wasn't the goal

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a news conference that America "does not seek war" with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth said. But Trump's post later on Sunday on his Truth Social page marked something of a reversal from Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump posted on social media. "MIGA!!!" However, the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings that could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack US bases in the region, engage in cyber attacks or double down on a nuclear program that might seem like more of a necessity after the US strike. All of that raises the question of whether the strikes will open up a far more brutal phase of fighting or revive negotiations out of an abundance of caution. Inside the US, the attack quickly spilled over into domestic politics with Trump choosing to spend part of his Sunday going after his critics. 'Spectacular military success' The US president, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to lambaste Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. "We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)" Trump said as part of the post on Truth Social. At their joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that "Operation Midnight Hammer" involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance. Caine indicated that the goal of the operation – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan – had been achieved. "Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said. Vance said in a television interview that while he would not discuss "sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground," he felt "very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon." Pressed further, he told NBC's Meet the Press that "I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon." The vice president said the US had "negotiated aggressively" with Iran to try to find a peaceful settlement and that Trump made his decision after assessing the Iranians were not acting "in good faith." Partner service Learn French with Gymglish Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day. "I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship, reset these negotiations and get us in a place where Iran can decide not to be a threat to its neighbors, not to be a threat to the United States, and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears," Vance said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on CBS's "Face the Nation" that "there are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless, unless they mess around and they attack" US interests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store