
Trump mentions regime change in Iran, after his administration said that wasn't the goal
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a news conference that America "does not seek war" with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth said. But Trump's post later on Sunday on his Truth Social page marked something of a reversal from Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference.
"It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump posted on social media. "MIGA!!!"
However, the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings that could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack US bases in the region, engage in cyber attacks or double down on a nuclear program that might seem like more of a necessity after the US strike.
All of that raises the question of whether the strikes will open up a far more brutal phase of fighting or revive negotiations out of an abundance of caution. Inside the US, the attack quickly spilled over into domestic politics with Trump choosing to spend part of his Sunday going after his critics.
'Spectacular military success'
The US president, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to lambaste Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval.
"We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)" Trump said as part of the post on Truth Social.
At their joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that "Operation Midnight Hammer" involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance. Caine indicated that the goal of the operation – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan – had been achieved. "Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said.
Vance said in a television interview that while he would not discuss "sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground," he felt "very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon." Pressed further, he told NBC's Meet the Press that "I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon."
The vice president said the US had "negotiated aggressively" with Iran to try to find a peaceful settlement and that Trump made his decision after assessing the Iranians were not acting "in good faith."
Partner service
Learn French with Gymglish
Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day.
"I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship, reset these negotiations and get us in a place where Iran can decide not to be a threat to its neighbors, not to be a threat to the United States, and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears," Vance said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on CBS's "Face the Nation" that "there are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless, unless they mess around and they attack" US interests.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
20 minutes ago
- Euronews
Trump hints at possibiity of regime change in Iran
US President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, questioning the future of Iran's ruling theocracy. Trump's social media jab at the regime in Iran came after he ordered a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, raising the risk of a wider war in the Middle East amid warnings from his MAGA base and allies and foes from abroad. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' His comments seemingly contradicted an earlier call to Iran for negotiations and de-escalation in Tehran's war with Israel. Trump's words also marked something of a reversal from his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. Trump's aides play down US involvement in conflict Speaking on Fox News on Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the Iranian regime at risk.' Rubio explained that what the US administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons. But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace. Vice President JD Vance also spoke at news outlets. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance said on NBC. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' According to him, the strike offers a chance to restart stalled talks on reducing Iran's nuclear program. Despite the efforts of Trump's senior aides to clarify the situation and put out a coordinated message and strategy on the US involvement or plan, Trump himself has made a series of intimidating statements even as he has simultaneously called to restart negotiations. Analysts believe the messaging makes it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month. Before Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging from Trump's secretary of state, top military adviser, vice president, and head of the Pentagon indicated a belief that any fallout would be controlled. The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June when Israel attacked Iran's military infrastructure, killing 10 of Tehran's nuclear scientists. Iran responded with ballistic missiles and drone attacks on Israel, but Iran's military capabilities are believed to have been severely decimated after Israel's aerial campaign that took out much of Tehran's air defences and missile launchers. At least 950 people have been killed by Israel's strikes on Iran, and 27 people have died from Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel.


AFP
31 minutes ago
- AFP
Video shows fire at power plant in Yemen, not Israel refinery hit by Iran
on a Yemeni power plant has resurfaced in posts falsely linking it to the Iran-Israel war. The posts circulated after Israel confirmed an oil refinery in Haifa was struck by an Iranian missile, but the clip was geolocated to a power plant south of Yemen's capital Sanaa and was shared weeks before arch foes Iran and Israel traded waves of devastating strikes. "Bazan's power plant in Haifa was completely destroyed by an Iranian missile attack on June 16," reads a Thai-language X post shared on June 18, 2025. An attached clip shows an industrial facility engulfed in flames and blanketed by thick black smoke. It circulated after Israeli officials confirmed an oil refinery in the coastal city of Haifa was struck by an Iranian missile on June 15 (archived here and here). The arch foes have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military facilities with a barrage of missiles on June 13, killing several top officials and prompting a counter-attack by Tehran (archived here and here). In a flashpoint moment for the Middle EastPresident Donald Trump said US air strikes on June 22 had "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites and warned more targets would be hit if Iran did not make peace quickly (archived link). Hours later, Iran launched two waves of attacks against long-time foe Israel. Image Screenshot of the false X post captured on June 19, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same footage also circulated in other Thai-language posts as well as English, Burmese, Japanese, Hindi and Bengali posts. But the video does not show an Iranian strike on Israel. Sanaa power plant A reverse image search using keyframes from the falsely shared video led to the same clip posted on Instagram on May 7 (archived link). According to an archive captured on June 19, its Arabic-language caption said it showed a power plant in Sanaa. The caption was later changed to say Tel Aviv. The Instagram user did not respond to an AFP request for comment. Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared clip (left) and the May 7 Instagram video (right) Elements in the video also correspond to south of Sanaa (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared clip (left) and Google Maps imagery of the Haziz power plant (right), with similar elements highlighted by AFP Media reports from May 6 and a post on the Israel Defense Forces' official X account say Yemen's capital Sanaa was hit by a series of airstrikes that targeted infrastructure including power stations (archived here, here and here). Among the sites struck was the . AFP has previously debunked other misinformation related to the Iran-Israel conflict.


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
US and Israel defend military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites at UN
The United States and Israel on Sunday at the United Nations Security Council strongly defended their military action targeting Iran's nuclear sites, saying the regime in Tehran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Their remarks came at the UN emergency meeting called by Iran in the wake of US-led strikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday, prompting reactions from several UN member states. "The time finally came for the United States in the defence of its ally and in the defence of our own citizens and interests, to act decisively", Dorothy Shea, the US representative to the UN Security Council. "The Iranian regime cannot have a nuclear weapon", she stressed. While Israel's envoy, in his remarks, praised the US for the targeted strikes on the Iranian facilities in Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, warning that a nuclear-armed Iran spelt danger to the world. "Make no mistake, the cost of inaction would have been catastrophic. A nuclear Iran would have been a death sentence, just as much for you as it would have been for us", Danny Danon said. Iran vowed retaliation for the US strikes on its nuclear facilities. "The timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response will be decided by its armed forces", Amir Saeid Iravani told the Security Council. Iravani accused Israel and the US of destroying diplomacy. Tehran's key allies, Russia and China, alongside Pakistan, strongly condemned the US military action. They proposed that the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. Council members are expected to respond by Monday night, but for a resolution to pass, it must have at least nine votes and not be vetoed by the United States, France, Britain, Russia, or China. UN chief calls for a peaceful solution At the session, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a peaceful solution and diplomacy, saying, 'We cannot – and must not – give up on peace.' He urged immediate and decisive action to halt the fighting and return to 'serious, sustained negotiations' on Iran's nuclear program. He called for talks to find a verifiable solution with full access by U.N. nuclear inspectors and a restoration of trust. In urging a return to diplomacy and a peaceful solution, Guterres stressed Sunday that one path leads to wider war and the other to de-escalation and dialogue. 'We know which path is right,' he said. The US military struck three sites in Iran early Sunday, entering into Israel's effort to destroy Iran's nuclear program in a risky gambit to weaken a longtime adversary. The decision to directly involve the US comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities.