North Korea appears to have stopped loudspeakers blasting noise, Seoul says
FILE PHOTO: South Korean soldiers work on a loudspeaker that is set up for propaganda broadcasts during a military drill near the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas in Paju, South Korea, in this handout picture provided by the Defense Ministry and released on June 9, 2024. The Defense Ministry/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY./File Photo
SEOUL (Reuters) -North Korea appears to have stopped loudspeakers near the border targeting South Korea, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said on Thursday.
The JCS said that North Korean loudspeaker broadcasts were not heard on Thursday, and the South Korean military was monitoring Pyongyang's activities.
Seoul suspended its own loudspeaker broadcasts near the border targeting North Korea on Wednesday, after having resumed propaganda and K-pop blasts last year during a time of growing tension with its neighbour.
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, who took office this month vowing to resume dialogue with the North, ordered the move to ease tension, a presidential spokesperson said.
Those living near the heavily fortified border have opposed the loudspeaker broadcasts, which they blame for severe noise nuisance.
(Reporting by Hyunsu Yim; Editing by Kim Coghill and Sonali Paul)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Hague NATO summit protest shifts focus to Iran
Demonstrators hold 'ROOD Socialistische Jongeren' (RED socialist youth) flags during a march against the upcoming NATO leaders' summit, at The Hague, Netherlands, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw THE HAGUE (Reuters) -An anti-NATO protest in The Hague on Sunday shifted its focus to Iran after overnight U.S. strikes hit key nuclear sites there. The peaceful demonstration took place days before The Hague hosts a NATO summit. The planned protest against NATO's military policies pivoted to condemnation of the U.S. attacks on Iran, with participants voicing concern about rising tensions in the Middle East. Thousands marched toward the Peace Palace, home to the International Court of Justice, a Reuters witness said. Organizers estimated the crowd at 5,000, while police said they do not track attendance numbers. Protesters carried banners calling for de-escalation, diplomacy, and for NATO to be disbanded, with some saying "No Iran War" and "Hands off Iran". Iranian protester Nikita Shahbazi told Reuters it was "heartbreaking" to see what is going on in her home country. "I feel devastated. (The U.S. attacks) can trigger a wider war. It has opened the paths for illegal attacks on nuclear installations everywhere in the world." Protesters also opposed a proposed 5% defence spending target pushed by U.S. President Donald Trump and backed by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who hopes to secure consensus at the summit, beginning on Wednesday. "There's no need for this provocation, this 5% of GDP spending on weapons, that will benefit the military-industrial complex. This has nothing to do with the needs of people," said British protester Pippa Bartolotti. (Reporting by Yiming Woo, Writing by Charlotte Van Campenhout, Editing by Giles Elgood)
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
US bombing of Iran started with a fake-out
A satellite view shows an overview of Fordow underground complex, after the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran June 22, 2025. MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES/Handout via REUTERS WASHINGTON (Reuters) -As Operation "Midnight Hammer" got underway on Saturday, a group of B-2 bombers took off from their base in Missouri and were noticed heading out toward the Pacific island of Guam, in what experts saw as possible pre-positioning for any U.S. decision to strike Iran. But they were a decoy. The real group of seven bat-winged, B-2 stealth bombers flew east undetected for 18 hours, keeping communications to a minimum, refueling in mid-air, the U.S. military revealed on Sunday. As the bombers neared Iranian airspace, a U.S. submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. U.S. fighter jets flew as decoys in front of the bombers to sweep for any Iranian fighter jets and missiles. The attack on Iran's three main nuclear sites was the largest operational strike ever by B-2 stealth bombers, and the second-longest B-2 operation ever flown, surpassed only by those following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States by al Qaeda. The B-2 bombers dropped 14 bunker-busting GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 30,000 pounds. The operation involved over 125 U.S. military aircraft, according to the Pentagon. From the U.S. military's perspective, the operation was a resounding tactical success. The Iranians were unable to get off a single round at the American aircraft and were caught completely flat-footed, General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday. "Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface to air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission," Caine said. "We retained the element of surprise." Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites targeted sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was more confident. "It was clear we devastated the Iranian nuclear program," he said, standing alongside Caine in the Pentagon briefing room. Midnight Hammer was highly classified, Caine said, "with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of the plan." Many senior officials in the United States only learned of it on Saturday night from President Donald Trump's first post on social media. Hegseth said it took months of preparations to ensure the U.S. military would be ready if Trump ordered the strikes. Caine said the mission itself, however, came together in just a matter of weeks. What happens next is unclear. Gulf states, home to multiple U.S. military bases, were on high alert on Sunday as they weighed the risks of a widening conflict in the region. Guarding against blowback, the U.S. military also dispersed U.S. military assets in the Middle East and heightened force protection for U.S. troops. Hegseth said the U.S. military was positioned to defend itself in the Middle East, but also to respond against Iran if it goes through with longstanding threats to retaliate. The Trump administration said it is not looking for a wider war with Iran, with Hegseth saying private messages had been sent to Tehran encouraging them to negotiate. But Trump has also warned Iran that the U.S. is prepared to hit additional targets if needed, using far greater force. "Iran would be smart to heed those words. He said it before, and he means it," Hegseth said. (Reporting by Phil Stewart and Idrees AliEditing by Colleen Jenkins and Nia Williams)
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
E&E growth spurs call for stronger R&D
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia has enjoyed strong investment growth in the electrical and electronics (E&E) sector over the past four years, but more needs to be done to strengthen its research and development (R&D) capabilities – particularly in product innovation – to move up the value chain. Malaysia Semiconductor Industry Association (MSIA) executive director Andrew Chan Yik Hong said Malaysia continues to be the preferred investment destination for the E&E sector. 'The proof is in the pudding. Approved investments for the E&E sector in Malaysia from 2021 to 2024 total RM319bil. 'This is more than the investments secured in the past 41 years, from 1980 to 2020, of RM289bil,' he said during a panel discussion titled 'From Production Hub to Innovation Powerhouse: Strengthening Malaysia's E&E Industry' at Bank Negara's Sasana Symposium 2025 yesterday. STMicroelectronics Malaysia group vice- president and general manager Tan Chun Sheng described R&D as the 'crown jewel' of the semiconductor business and stressed the need for a change in the types of incentives offered, moving away from merely tax incentives. He believes the government should redirect support toward firms' R&D efforts in the form of grants and wage supplements. 'We are very good at manufacturing-related R&D. However, let us move up the value chain in terms of R&D, because that is what makes the country an attractive and vital part of the supply chain,' he said. Tan suggested the government consider taxing multinational corporations and ploughing back the revenue into R&D grants and incentives. 'We have always talked about the need for higher wages in the the government needs to do is declare that anyone involved in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics or R&D will receive wage supplements. Instantly, the wages will go up. 'But where will the money come from for this? Taxation,' he added. Citing South Korea, Kolon Industries senior technology adviser Sung Han said the government there offers significant tax incentives to firms across various industrial sectors based on their R&D investments. 'I think this is critically important because it incentivises talent development and drives the innovation that must happen within the R&D space, rather than just on the manufacturing floor,' he said. He also highlighted the strong public-private partnerships in Korea, where much of the R&D is government-funded, creating an environment that continuously fuels innovation across industries like semiconductors and automotive. 'What South Korean companies like Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and SK Hynix Inc have done to move up the value chain is not just developing semiconductor-related materials needed for production – because companies can't decouple material characteristics from IC (integrated circuit) design – but they have also built up local suppliers for materials and production tools. 'Today, for a few critical tools in leading-edge nodes, local Korean companies can supply many of those tools and materials. This creates the infrastructure necessary for the sector to become independent in developing and conducting its own R&D on new next-generation products. 'I think this is what Malaysia may be missing today,' Sung Han added. That said, Tan opined that Malaysia's semiconductor sector does not necessarily have to rely solely on financial incentives such as subsidies or grants from the government to attract investment. In fact, the country already holds several key advantages, chief among them being experience. 'The most important advantage that we have as a country is experience, given that the semiconductor industry has been here for more than 50 years.' He said the second advantage that Malaysia has is talent. 'Our engineers are very talented, with strong technical skills.' When asked why Malaysia has not been successful in attracting leading foundry companies, MSIA's Chan said much of the recent investment surge occurred before the National Semiconductor Strategy (NSS) was introduced. 'I believe that the Malaysian Investment Development Authority had received enquiries on this back then, but somehow the equation did not stack up. 'However, I am optimistic that if we continue to double down on the NSS – the upcycle for semiconductor fabrication plants (fabs) is not now, it is in a couple of years – we will see more fabs, hopefully, in Malaysia,' he said.
