Romsons International: Pioneering Indian medical device manufacturing

The category winner of the ET MSME Awards 2024 has evolved from being a humble lab equipment maker in the 1950s to becoming an exporter par excellence. Here's a look at its journey.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Catheters, surgical gloves, and anaesthesia products
Disposable syringes, IV cannulas, and infusion sets
Mother and baby care products such as breast pumps and baby wipes
Incontinence care products like adult diapers
Diagnostic and monitoring devices, including glucometers and blood pressure monitors
PPE kits and face masks
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
(This article is generated and published by ET Spotlight team. You can get in touch with them on etspotlight@timesinternet.in)
Manipal Hospitals, Fortis, Max Healthcare, Medanta, Apollo Hospitals. When your clients are some of India's most prestigious medical institutions, it's a given that you are at the forefront of healthcare innovation.Romsons International has pioneered medical device manufacturing in India since 1952. Established as 'Romsons Scientific and Surgical Industries' by Ram Lal Khanna in Amritsar, the company began with laboratory and scientific equipment before expanding into disposable medical equipment, producing its first non-sterile Nelaton catheter in 1967. This marked the beginning of Romsons' journey into the medical device industry.In 1994, the company founded Romsons International in Agra, a wholly export-oriented unit. The following years saw significant milestones, including ISO 9002:1994 certification in 1999 and CE mark accreditation, enabling exports to European countries. In 2003, Romsons achieved ISO 9001:2000 certification, and by 2007, it had also obtained ISO 13485:2003 certification, underscoring its commitment to quality and regulatory compliance.Romsons International has a portfolio exceeding 200 products across:Romsons' major international markets are the United States, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Maldives, Oman, and Bangladesh. It also participates in prestigious international trade fairs such as FIME in Miami, MEDICA in Germany, and Arab Health in Dubai. All in all, its distributor network is over 1,500-strong in more than 80 countries, which is no small feat: in FY24, export sales accounted for around 96% of company revenue.Romsons has earned numerous accolades for excellence, including awards from FICCI, CII, the Chamber of Commerce in India, and special recognition from the Ministry of MSME, Government of India. It won the Top Exporter of the Year (Manufacturing) category at the ET MSME Awards 2024, standing out from a pool of over 15,000 entries at India's largest, most credible MSME awards.Recognition such as this exemplifies Romsons' leadership, and by extension, India's growing prowess in the global medical device industry. Through continuous innovation, adherence to stringent quality standards, and a robust global presence, Romsons has solidified its position as a trusted name in indigenous medical equipment manufacturing.For more winner vignettes of the ET MSME Awards , keep an eye on this space.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

an hour ago

• Mint

Europe Frets About US Pullout After NATO Allies Bolster Spending

NATO's European allies are focused on getting through this week's summit unscathed. But even if President Donald Trump is satisfied with fresh pledges to ramp up spending, anxiety is growing about the US military presence in the region. Only after the June 24-25 summit meeting in The Hague – where North Atlantic Treaty Organization members will pledge to spend 5% of GDP on defense – will the US present its military review, which will spell out the scope of what are likely significant reductions in Europe. With some 80,000 US troops in Europe, governments in the region have factored in at least a reversal of the military surge under former President Joe Biden of about 20,000 troops. Europeans have been kept in the dark on the Trump administration's plans. But officials in the region are bracing potentially for a far bigger withdrawal that could present a dangerous security risk, according to officials familiar with the discussions who declined to be identified as closed-door talks take place before the review. Up until early June, no official from the US had come to NATO to talk about the US force posture review, spurring concern among allies that this could be done at very short notice, according to a person familiar with the matter. It's unclear whether European nations have started planning to fill any potential gaps left by US forces. Withdrawing the aforementioned 20,000 troops could also have an even greater impact if other NATO allies follow the US lead and remove their troops from the east. The worry with even deeper cuts impacting US bases in Germany and Italy is they could encourage Russia to test NATO's Article 5 of collective defense with hybrid attacks across the alliance, the person familiar also said. Since returning to the White House, Trump and his allies have warned European capitals that – despite the mounting threat from Russia – they need to take charge of their security as the US turns its military and diplomatic focus to the Indo-Pacific region. Contacted by Bloomberg, NATO declined to respond to questions but referred to a statement by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in early June. When asked about a US drawdown from Europe, he said it was normal they would pivot to Asia. 'I'm not worried about that, but I'm absolutely convinced we will do that in a step-by-step approach,' Rutte said then. 'There will be no capability gaps in Europe because of this.' The White House referred questions to the Pentagon. 'The U.S. constantly evaluates force posture to ensure it aligns with America's strategic interests,' a defense official responded. The geopolitical shift is likely to have enormous consequences for the 32-member alliance, which is weathering its greatest challenge since it became the bulwark against Soviet power in the decades after World War II. European militaries long reliant on American hard power will have to fill the gap as Washington scales back. If a troop reduction focuses on efficiency, it would be far less problematic for Europeans than one that hits critical assets and personnel that Europe couldn't replace immediately, according to one European diplomat. The nature of a withdrawal would be more important than the troop numbers, the person said. A dramatic pullout announcement is likely to trigger an instant reaction from eastern member states, with those closer to Russia immediately requesting deployments from Western European allies. The holistic review of the US military, which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says should focus on threats facing the US, is meant to reflect the tilt in the global power dynamic, bringing potentially large-scale redeployment of weapons and troops. But European diplomats have bristled at the timing of the review, taking place only after NATO signs off on its most ambitious new weapons targets since the Cold War — with member states agreeing to foot the bill. A withdrawal that is more dramatic than anticipated will mean that, after acceding to Trump's ramp-up in defense spending, they still may be left with a heavy burden to respond to a rapidly growing Russian military. 'We would be remiss in not reviewing force posture everywhere, but it would be the wrong planning assumption to say, 'America is abandoning'' or leaving Europe, Hegseth said in Stuttgart in February. 'No, America is smart to observe, plan, prioritize and project power to deter conflict.' After the Trump administration balked at providing a backstop to European security guarantees to Ukraine, a pullout of more US troops could embolden Russia's Vladimir Putin, according to people familiar with the matter. 'The question is when pressure is on for a greater focus on the Indo-Pacific, what capabilities do they need to think about moving,' said Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at RUSI, a defense think tank. 'I don't get an impression that they have yet decided what that means for force levels in specific terms.' Germany, Europe's richest and most populous nation, is positioning itself to take on the largest share of the redistribution. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius is taking the lead in building out the military after the country scrapped constitutional debt restrictions when it comes to security. Berlin will do the 'heavy lifting,' he's said. Pistorius recently unveiled a new battle tank brigade in Lithuania and has said the country is committed to boosting its armed forces by as many as 60,000 soldiers. The military currently has about 182,000 active-duty troops. European governments are pushing Washington to communicate its plans clearly and space out any troop draw-downs to give them time to step up with their own forces. 'There are some capabilities, like deep precision strikes, where we Europeans need some time to catch up,' said Stefan Schulz, a senior official in the German Defense Ministry. He called for any US reduction to be done in an orderly fashion, 'so that this process of US reduction is matched with the uplift of European capabilities.' The ideal scenario would be an orderly shift within NATO toward a stronger Europe that would take about a decade, said Camille Grand, distinguished policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations and a former NATO assistant secretary general. A more dire scenario would involve a US administration acting out of frustration with European progress and drastically reducing troop presence. Grand said a 'plausible' scenario would be a cut to about 65,000 US troops, matching a low-point figure before Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 — a level that NATO could manage. 'But if we go below that, we are entering uncharted waters, a different world,' Grand said. With assistance from Courtney McBride and Milda Seputyte.

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

Renault, Volkswagen, Skoda continue to struggle to boost sales in India

European mass market automotive brands Renault, Volkswagen, and Skoda continue to struggle to enhance presence in the Indian market, witnessing sales decline in the last three financial years, industry data showed. According to data by JATO Dynamics, a leading provider of data and analytics to the global automotive industry, Renault saw the biggest sales dip in India to 37,900 units in 2024-2025 from 45,439 units in 2023-2024, and 78,926 units in 2022-2023. Similarly, Skoda's sales in India in 2024-2025 were at 44,866 units, marginally higher from 44,522 units in 2023-2024, but down from 52,269 units in 2022-2023. On the other hand, the Volkswagen brand posted sales of 42,230 units in 2024-25, down from 43,197 units in 2023-2024. The brand had clocked sales of 41,263 units in 2022-2023. "Renault, Skoda, and Volkswagen faced several headwinds in India despite their tenure," JATO Dynamics India President Ravi G Bhatia told PTI. Explaining why these brands have struggled in India, he said, "Initially, these brands focused heavily on sedans -- Vento, Rapid, and Scala -- which limited their exposure to the fast-expanding SUV segment." Simultaneously, Bhatia said, "They were slower in refreshing product lines, with many models remaining unchanged over extended periods. Network reach has also remained narrow, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets, restricting access to a broader audience." Adding to the woes of these brands is "India's unique tax structure, where sub-4-metre vehicles benefit from significantly lower levies". "This has favoured Japanese and Korean OEMs known for cost-effective compact cars. European brands, by contrast, traditionally build larger models and have struggled to deliver competitive offerings within this constraint," Bhatia noted. Under the current policy, passenger vehicles (petrol, CNG, LPG) up to 4 metres in length and up to 1200cc engine attract GST of 28 per cent and 1 per cent compensation cess. Passenger vehicles (diesel) up to 4 metres in length and up to 1500 cc engine is levied 28 per cent GST and 3 per cent compensation cess. Passenger vehicles of length above 4 metre and engine capacity 1500 cc attract 28 per cent GST and cess of 17 per cent, while those above 1500 cc engine size attract 28 per cent GST and cess of 17 per cent. On the other hand, passenger vehicles, popularly known as SUVs -- above 4 metres in length, above 1,500cc engine and more than 170 mm in ground clearance -- attract 28 per cent GST with 22 per cent compensation cess. Bhatia noted that while domestic OEMs like Tata and Mahindra lead by Japanese Maruti Suzuki have captured market share through high localisation, frequent product launches, and early adoption of alternative fuel engines including CNG, hybrids and BEVs, the European players have lagged in electric and hybrid offerings. However, he said, "There are signs of course correction. Skoda, for instance, recently launched the Kylaq, a subcompact SUV tailored for India." On the path forward for these European brands, he said it "may lie in leveraging India for exports and R&D while focusing on under-4-metre, cost-competitive platforms". With such realignments, sustainable growth is possible, he added.

NDTV

an hour ago

• NDTV

How Iran Threat On Strait Of Hormuz Could Affect Global, Indian Oil Supplies

Amid its escalating conflict with Israel, in which the US has also now taken part by bombing three key nuclear installations, Iran has warned that it may take the unprecedented step of closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most critical oil corridor. Nearly 20% of global oil exports flow through the narrow waterway between Oman and Iran, and the closure of the Strait could put the transit of about 18 million barrels per day of oil and other fuels at risk. Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz several times but has never followed through because the country also relies on it to export most of its crude oil, along with other Organisation of Petroleum Export Countries (OPEC) members like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq. With the conflict on an upward trajectory, however, if Iran does carry out its threat this time, India will also suffer a hit as roughly 40% of the oil and over 50% of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) that it imports flow through this route. Qatar alone accounts for approximately 80% of India's LNG imports, with another significant chunk coming from the UAE - and both countries rely on the Strait for shipping the fuel. The width of the Strait is roughly 33km at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 3 km wide, which makes it vulnerable. Iran sees the Strait as a means of exerting pressure, and it can do so because of its location and its control of key islands like Qeshm and Hengam. Alternatives And Recent Events According to a report by news agency Reuters, the UAE and Saudi Arabia have tried to find other routes to bypass the Strait. Around 2.6 million barrels per day of unused capacity from existing UAE and Saudi Arabian pipelines could be available to bypass Hormuz, the US Energy Information Administration said in June 2024 In January 2012, Iran had threatened to block the Strait in retaliation for US and European sanctions, but eventually refrained from doing so. In May 2019, four vessels, including two Saudi oil tankers, were attacked near the Strait of Hormuz, off the UAE coast. In July 2021, an Israeli-managed oil tanker was attacked off the Oman coast, killing two crew members. Israel blamed Iran, but Tehran denied the charge, the Reuters report said. Three vessels, two in 2023 and one last year, were also seized by Iran near or in the Strait of Hormuz. Over 1,000 shipping vessels have also been affected by GPS interference since the escalation between Israel and Iran began last week. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area.