How Iran Threat On Strait Of Hormuz Could Affect Global, Indian Oil Supplies

Amid its escalating conflict with Israel, in which the US has also now taken part by bombing three key nuclear installations, Iran has warned that it may take the unprecedented step of closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most critical oil corridor.
Nearly 20% of global oil exports flow through the narrow waterway between Oman and Iran, and the closure of the Strait could put the transit of about 18 million barrels per day of oil and other fuels at risk.
Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz several times but has never followed through because the country also relies on it to export most of its crude oil, along with other Organisation of Petroleum Export Countries (OPEC) members like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq.
With the conflict on an upward trajectory, however, if Iran does carry out its threat this time, India will also suffer a hit as roughly 40% of the oil and over 50% of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) that it imports flow through this route. Qatar alone accounts for approximately 80% of India's LNG imports, with another significant chunk coming from the UAE - and both countries rely on the Strait for shipping the fuel.
The width of the Strait is roughly 33km at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 3 km wide, which makes it vulnerable. Iran sees the Strait as a means of exerting pressure, and it can do so because of its location and its control of key islands like Qeshm and Hengam.
Alternatives And Recent Events
According to a report by news agency Reuters, the UAE and Saudi Arabia have tried to find other routes to bypass the Strait. Around 2.6 million barrels per day of unused capacity from existing UAE and Saudi Arabian pipelines could be available to bypass Hormuz, the US Energy Information Administration said in June 2024
In January 2012, Iran had threatened to block the Strait in retaliation for US and European sanctions, but eventually refrained from doing so. In May 2019, four vessels, including two Saudi oil tankers, were attacked near the Strait of Hormuz, off the UAE coast.
In July 2021, an Israeli-managed oil tanker was attacked off the Oman coast, killing two crew members. Israel blamed Iran, but Tehran denied the charge, the Reuters report said.
Three vessels, two in 2023 and one last year, were also seized by Iran near or in the Strait of Hormuz.
Over 1,000 shipping vessels have also been affected by GPS interference since the escalation between Israel and Iran began last week.
The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

25 minutes ago

• News18

Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In

Last Updated: While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. After airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, the Trump administration on Sunday signalled openness to renewed diplomacy while maintaining that the US does not seek a wider war. While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly on Sunday after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. Trump's top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shared their views on the Iran conflict. Their unified message highlighted that the US aims to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions, not pursue regime change. At a Pentagon briefing, Hegseth stated, 'America does not seek war," while Vice President Vance told reporters the strikes offered Iran an opportunity to return to negotiations. 'Operation Midnight Hammer," he said, used 'decoys and deception," and encountered no Iranian military resistance, according to Hegseth and Gen. Caine. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth emphasised. Caine confirmed that the US had struck Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, and that all three sites sustained significant damage. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," he said. In a TV interview, Vance refrained from discussing classified intelligence but said he was confident the operation had 'substantially delayed" Iran's nuclear weapons program. 'I think it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon," he added. Vance also noted that the US had negotiated seriously with Iran before resorting to military action. 'I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship… and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears." Secretary of State Rubio told Face the Nation that while there are 'no planned military operations right now against Iran," the US would respond if attacked. 'Unless they mess around and they attack US interests," he warned. Despite President Trump's past promises to avoid extended conflicts, it's uncertain whether Iran views avoiding escalation as in its own best interest. Meanwhile, global reaction has been mixed, with some nations fearing the strikes could further destabilise the Middle East, particularly amid an ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Earlier this month, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure and military leadership, prompting Iranian retaliation and ultimately leading to the US intervention. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, condemned the US strikes, calling them a violation of sovereignty and international law. 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said. 'I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy." China and Russia both condemned the attacks, urging a return to political dialogue. Russia called the strikes 'a gross violation of international law," while Turkey warned of the risk of escalation to a 'global level." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the UK was relocating military assets to safeguard its interests, while leaders of Canada, Germany, Italy, and France all supported a swift return to diplomacy. The attacks have also raised concerns about potential disruptions to the global oil supply, with Iran hinting at closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key channel for global energy trade. Oil prices have surged over 20 per cent in the past month as tensions in the region escalated. The Pentagon did not provide new details on Iran's current nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the operation followed a 60-day window Trump gave Iran to engage in talks. 'Iran found out that when Trump says 60 days… he means it," Hegseth said. 'Otherwise, that nuclear program… will not exist." Caine and Hegseth added that B-2 bombers launched from Missouri, supported by a deception plan involving decoy aircraft, executed the strikes using 14 bunker-buster bombs. The mission ran from 6:40 p.m. to 7:05 p.m. ET on Saturday — approximately 2:10 a.m. in Iran on Sunday. tags : donald trump iran us Location : United States of America (USA) First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:30 IST News world Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In

Economic Times

26 minutes ago

• Economic Times

The regime must go: Iranians hope for a new dawn

Let us first be clear: for most Iranians, this is not our war. This is a war between Israel and the Islamic Republic, which has held Iranians hostage for more than four decades, and which has put them in harm's way with its reckless ambition. The regime has always declared its determination to destroy Israel, and it was drawing perilously close to carrying out that aim. Anyone who has passed through the Islamic Republic's education system, anyone who has witnessed its relentless destabilising of Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, knows just how sincerely the regime is committed to destruction, and exactly why it has continued to push its uranium enrichment programme. Like other Iranians, my heart breaks at the spectacle of bombs falling on my country. But the principal threat to our safety and well-being remains the regime itself. Over the past week, with the internet shut down, large numbers of citizens in Tehran and other cities have been arrested by the regime's security forces-supposedly for collaborating with Israel. Leading clerics have called for waves of killings as a solution to the state's military humiliation: 'I request the head of the judiciary to try these traitors in a field court,' said one last Friday, 'and execute them in public'. Declaring that executions had already begun, Amnesty International the same day condemned 'official calls for expedited trials and executions' designed to 'assert control and instil fear among the people of Iran.' The Islamic Republic is not a 'normal' government, which acts to protect the nation and its people in times of trouble. It is more like a hostile occupying force, from which most Iranians dream of liberation. That is why, for many millions, the present moment, terrifying as it is, feels like a historic opportunity. We know by now that peaceful protest is not sufficient to bring down one of the most violent and entrenched regimes in modern history. The Israeli strikes have accomplished what years of protest could not-the dismantling of key pillars of the regime's machinery of oppression. But as if the Islamic Republic were not enough, we Iranians have to deal with another obstacle, potentially mightier still: the immense cynicism of international opinion. Foreign leaders and newspapers pour scorn on our democratic hopes, telling us that we should make peace with our brutal government for fear it be replaced by something worse. I want to correct this twisted and heartless who wish to preserve the current regime usually offer Iraq as a cautionary tale-look what happened there, they warn, as a result of 'regime change'. Thanks to Iran's ancient civilisation and deep political tradition, it enjoys a unified national identity and deep internal cohesion. Not only that, but Iranians have already spent years anticipating just this moment: designing the post-regime reality and planning the political and social is an alternative in place. This explains the overwhelming popularity of Iran's crown prince Reza Pahlavi, who has become the symbol of that transition. He offers himself as a unifying figure during Iran's shift from totalitarian rule to secular democracy. As the heir to Iran's oldest political institution, the monarchy, he remains the most trusted and recognisable figure among Iranians both inside and outside the country. Many of those who do not desire a monarchy for the future Iran, also recognise him as a stabilising figure capable of leading the country through this pivotal moment, and safeguarding Iran's territorial integrity. Beyond Iran, Pahlavi has also advanced a regional vision for peace. His proposed Cyrus Accords-grounded in secular governance, mutual recognition and non-intervention-draw on Iran's venerable tradition of political tolerance. With the Islamic Republic removed, it is far easier to imagine a stable, peaceful and mutually cooperative West Asia. The best option for the international community is to give its full support to this vision, which is the democratic hope of the Iranian people, and which will bring immense advantages to millions outside Iran. The best way to avoid Iran falling into chaos is to back a figure who is able to command trust across political lines. Iran's crown prince is the only figure capable, for instance, of securing the loyalty of those who are defecting from the Islamic Republic is at its weakest. Having lost control of Iranian airspace, it is unable to protect itself, let alone the Iranian people. Its leader is hiding in a bunker. And Iranians are ready to take over where Israel's military assault finishes, to expel the regime, and to implement their plans. That is what the international community should support. This is what will ensure the end of this out of fear or complacency, however, many foreign leaders wish to preserve the present regime, albeit in chastened form. If such cowardice prevails, and the Islamic Republic endures, the consequences for Iranians will be catastrophic. As in the past, humiliation abroad is compensated by brutality at home. The regime now has the perfect pretext for a new wave of repression under the guise of 'national security'.But the danger is not only internal. The wounded regime will not retreat -it will retaliate. It will double down on regional aggression and accelerate its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Its obsession with Israel's destruction will intensify. If the regime survives, in other words, it will be emboldened to new levels of aggression, internal and external. Whether rightly or wrongly, foreign military action has brought about an important opportunity. But this opportunity will vanish if the West repeats the mistakes of the past. The most dangerous course now would be to throw the regime a lifeline-through quiet diplomacy, sanctions relief, or rhetorical 'balance' that legitimises the illegitimate. Iranians are not asking to be rescued. They are asking to be recognised. What they need is space to determine their own destiny-and acknowledgement of the leadership they have already chosen. Other countries should realise the folly of imposing frameworks of their own or manipulating Iran's hope on the horizon is not just the collapse of a regime. It is the end of an occupation. And with the right support, it can mark the rebirth of a sovereign, secular, democratic and peaceful Iran. And an end to the nightmare the Islamic Republic has caused to all around it. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Looking for quick buck in unlisted shares? Better think twice! Small finance banks struggle with perception. Will numbers turn the tide? Aadit Palicha on Zepto dark store raid, dark patterns, and IPO China rare earths blockade: Will electric vehicles assembly lines fall silent? Flames below deck: The silent threat lurking in cargo holds Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? For medium- to long-term investors with moderate risk appetite: 6 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 40% Sin goods, but not sin stocks from a long-term perspective: 6 stocks from liquor industry with an upside potential of up to 34%

First Post

26 minutes ago

• First Post

At least 20 killed in suicide bombing at Damascus church; first major attack since Assad's fall

Syria's interior ministry said a member of the Islamic State group was behind Sunday's attack on a church in Damascus, which civil defence reported had killed at least 20 people. read more Syrian citizens and security forces inspect the damage inside Mar Elias church where a suicide bomber detonated himself in Dweil'a in the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, Sunday June 22, 2025. (AP Photo) At least 20 people were killed and many more wounded on Sunday when a suicide bomber targeted the Mar Elias Church in Damascus's Dweila neighbourhood, according to health officials and security sources. The attack was the first suicide bombing in the Syrian capital since President Bashar al-Assad was ousted in December by an Islamist-led rebel uprising. Syria's interior ministry confirmed the attacker was affiliated with the Islamic State group. 'A suicide attacker affiliated with the Daesh (IS) terrorist group entered the Saint Elias church… opened fire then blew himself up with an explosive belt,' the ministry said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A security official, speaking anonymously with Reuters said two men were involved in the incident, including the suicide bomber himself. Islamic State has been behind several attempted attacks on churches in Syria since Assad's fall, but this was the first to succeed, another security source told Reuters. Syria's state news agency cited the health ministry as saying that 52 people were also injured in the blast. A livestream from the site by Syria's civil defence, the White Helmets, showed scenes of destruction from inside the church, including a bloodied floor and shattered pews and masonry. Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who led the offensive against Assad before taking over in January for a transitional phase, has repeatedly said he will protect minorities. 'We unequivocally condemn the abhorrent terrorist suicide bombing at the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church in Damascus, Syria,' the Greek foreign ministry said in a statement. 'We demand that the Syrian transitional authorities take immediate action to hold those involved accountable and implement measures to guarantee the safety of Christian communities and all religious groups, allowing them to live without fear.' Islamic State had previously targeted religious minorities, including a major attack on Shiite pilgrims in Sayeda Zainab in 2016 — one of the most notorious bombings during Assad's rule. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The latest assault underscores the group's continued ability to exploit security gaps despite the collapse of its territorial control and years of counterterrorism efforts. With inputs from agencies