New US remittance tax proposal: What it means for NRIs sending money to India
A significant tax development is on the horizon for non-resident Indians in the US. The US government's House Ways and Means Committee has advanced a sweeping bill titled the 'One Big Beautiful" Tax Act, aimed at extending several provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and introducing new tax measures.
Among these proposals is the introduction of a 5% tax on remittances sent abroad, a measure that could directly impact thousands of NRIs who regularly transfer funds to their families in India.
While the bill is subject to a Senate review and further debate, a majority of US Republican Party leaders aim to finalize it by 4 July. If passed in its current form, the remittance transfer tax will take effect on transfers made after 31 December 2025.
Let's break down what this proposed tax means, especially for NRIs on H1B, L1, or F1 visas and Green Card holders.
What is remittance transfer tax?
Under the proposed Chapter 36C, Section 4475 of the US's Internal Revenue Code, a 5% tax will be levied on remittance transfers—that is, money sent by individuals from the US to recipients in other countries, including India.
This tax is not based on income but on the amount being transferred abroad. For example, if you send $10,000 to India, you could be required to pay an additional $500 in tax.
When will this tax apply?
If enacted, the remittance transfer tax would apply to all qualifying transfers made on or after 1 January 2026. The accompanying refund and reporting provisions will apply to tax years ending after that date.
Also read | How the India-UK Double Contribution Convention benefits employers and employees
Who will be affected?
This tax primarily affects non-citizen residents in the US, including NRIs on H1B, L1, or F1 visas, Green Card holders, and any individual who is not a verified US citizen or national. If you fall into any of these categories and send money to India, you could soon be required to pay this new tax.
The proposed legislation provides a narrow exemption for verified US citizens and nationals and transfers made through 'qualified remittance providers" who have agreements with the US's Internal Revenue Service department to verify a sender's citizenship status.
If a US citizen ends up paying the tax, they can claim a refundable tax credit, but only if they provide a valid social security number and supporting documentation.
How will the tax be collected?
The tax is collected at the point of transfer by the remittance provider, such as as bank or a money transfer service. The service provider will collect the 5% tax from the sender and deposit the tax with the US treasury department on a quarterly basis.
If a provider fails to collect the tax at the time of transfer, they will become liable for the payment instead.
Also read | ITR filing: Why you shouldn't rush to file taxes as soon as the portal opens
Anti-abuse provisions
To prevent circumvention of the remittance transfer tax, the proposal includes anti-conduit and anti-abuse rules. This means any indirect or creative structure used to avoid paying the remittance tax—such as funnelling money through third parties or shell accounts—could trigger enforcement actions and penalties.
Let's say you are an H1B visa holder in the US and you send $20,000 to your parents in India in February 2026. Under the proposed law:
This is over and above any other fees or charges that may already apply to international remittances.
Also read | BluSmart lessons: Investors must look beyond high-growth stories
What should NRIs start preparing for?
Here are a few practical steps NRIs can consider:
Final thoughts
While this tax is not yet law, it represents a significant shift in US tax policy on foreign remittances. If passed, it will increase the cost of sending money abroad for a large segment of the NRI community, particularly those who are not US citizens.
NRIs in the US should closely monitor legislative developments and consider speaking with a cross-border tax specialist to understand the full implications. What begins as a small percentage today can lead to a meaningful cumulative impact over time, especially for those with ongoing financial obligations in India.
Ajay R. Vaswani is the founder of ARAS and Company, Chartered Accountants. This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Please consult a licenced professional.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Brother vs sister fight in Democratic primary in Florida state Senate race
AP Former state Sen. Randolph Bracy, a candidate in the Democratic primary for state Senate District 15 (Ricardo Ramirez Buxeda/Orlando Sentinel via AP) The candidates Randolph Bracy: The elder sibling, 48, is a former Florida state senator with a background that includes professional basketball overseas in Turkey. He announced his candidacy shortly after Thompson's death and has expressed disappointment over his sister's decision to run against him, calling it 'disappointing and hurtful'. LaVon Bracy Davis: At 45, she is an attorney by training and a current Florida state representative. She announced her candidacy in March 2025, flanked by her mother, Lavon Wright Bracy, and members of Thompson's family. Davis emphasizes that her campaign is focused on serving the people of District 15 rather than targeting her brother or other candidates. Alan Grayson: A notable contender is the former Democratic U.S. congressman known for his combative style and national notoriety, including his 2009 House speech criticizing the Republican health care plan. Grayson has served multiple terms in Congress but lost a Senate bid in 2016. His presence adds a high-profile element to the primary. Coretta Anthony-Smith: A personal injury attorney, also running in the Democratic primary, adding further competition. Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In an extraordinary political contest that blends family dynamics with public service, brother and sister Randolph Bracy and LaVon Bracy Davis are competing against each other in the Democratic primary for Florida's State Senate District 15 seat. This rare sibling showdown is unfolding in adistrict that includes parts of metro Orlando such as Ocoee, Oakland, Windermere, Dr. Phillips, Apopka, Eatonville, and sections of Orlando race is to fill the seat formerly held by Geraldine Thompson, a pioneering and veteran lawmaker who passed away earlier this year due to complications from knee-replacement was highly respected for her advocacy on civil rights and education, and her legacy is a significant point of reference in this election. LaVon Bracy Davis has received the endorsement of Thompson's family, underscoring her commitment to continue that legacy, particularly in advancing voters' rights and increasing pay for public school is not the first time family endorsements have split along sibling lines. In 2024, when Randolph Bracy ran against Geraldine Thompson in a Democratic primary, LaVon Bracy Davis endorsed Thompson over her brother, illustrating the complex political and personal dynamics at 15 is a Democratic stronghold where Black voters constitute more than half of the registered Democrats, making the primary the decisive contest ahead of the general election against Republican Willie Montague in September. The district's demographics and political leanings set the stage for a vigorous Democratic primary.
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Trump ignites debate on Presidential authority with Iran strikes and wins praise from Republicans
U.S. President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Mr. Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'Well done, President Trump,' Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on X. Alabama Sen. Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical.' The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate — and correct — decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.' The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorization from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first U.S. president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Democrats, and a few Republicans, said the strikes were unconstitutional, and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson. Also Read | Donald Trump says Iran nuclear sites 'obliterated,' threatens more strikes 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity.' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that Mr. Trump 'misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' Follow the Israel-Iran conflict LIVE updates The quick GOP endorsements of stepped-up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Mr. Trump publicly considered the strikes for days, and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. The party's schism over Iran could complicate the GOP's efforts to boost Pentagon spending as part of a $350 billion national security package in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax breaks bill, which is speeding toward votes next week. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,' Wicker posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Mr. Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Mr. Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes." Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran, including some of Trump's most ardent supporters who share his criticism of America's 'forever wars.' Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio posted that 'while President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional." Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, also posted on X that 'This is not Constitutional.' 'This is not our fight,' said Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Most Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say, even as presidents in both parties have ignored the legislative branch's constitutional authority. The Senate was scheduled to vote soon on a resolution from Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine that would require congressional approval before the U.S. declares war on Iran or takes specific military action. Mr. Kaine said the bombings were 'horrible judgment." 'I will push for all senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' Mr. Kaine said. Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also called on Congress to immediately pass a war powers resolution. He said politicians had always promised that 'new wars in the Middle East would be quick and easy.' 'Then they sent other people's children to fight and die endlessly,' Mr. Casar said. "Enough.'
India.com
6 hours ago
- India.com
Why is so much money suddenly coming to India from THESE countries, and who is sending it?
Image for representational purposes New Delhi: Due to the depreciation of the Indian rupee, the Indians living in the Gulf countries like the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia have increased remittances back to India. It is important to note that the rupee has weakened against the AED (UAE's currency), with one AED now valued at approximately Rs 23.5 — the lowest since the beginning of April. The fall in the rupee's value has prompted Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) to quickly send money home. There has been an increase in AED-INR transactions since June 19. Officials at currency exchange houses say NRIs are no longer waiting for further depreciation. Those who have even a small amount of money are remitting it immediately. A senior official at a UAE exchange house told Gulf News, 'Last Thursday was the best day in recent weeks to send money through AED-INR.' He also mentioned that although the rupee briefly strengthened to 23.46, most NRIs continued to remit funds. Remittances Usually Dip in June Remittances generally decrease in June. This is because many Indians spend on travel and other expenses during the summer holidays. However, this year, the pattern has changed due to decrease in the value of rupee. Remittance volumes remained steady even over the weekend and are expected to stay strong through Monday. Officials from exchange houses say that if the rupee remains weak or falls further in July, it will benefit those sending money. One official said, 'If the rates stay at this level or drop again, it will be a double advantage.' Growth Seen Despite Geopolitical Uncertainty It is important to note that the growth has come despite geopolitical uncertainty, including the conflict between Israel and Iran. Typically, such events lead investors to turn to the US dollar as a safe haven. However, this time, gold has played that role. In simple terms, the decline in the value of the rupee has proven beneficial for NRIs. They are able to send more rupees to India while spending fewer AED. As a result, they are taking advantage of this opportunity and remitting more money home.
