Prosecution must answer for lapse leading to Najib's DNAA in SRC case, says Rafizi
PETALING JAYA: The prosecution must confirm whether the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) will refile charges against Datuk Seri Najib Razak without delay in the SRC International money laundering case, says Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli.
The Pandan MP stressed that the necessary documentation must be prepared without delay to ensure the case proceeds promptly in court.
'In 2019, Najib was charged under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 for allegedly receiving RM27mil in illicit funds related to SRC.
'However, despite being charged since 2019, the trial has yet to begin as the prosecution has not completed the supporting documents needed for court proceedings.
'I urge the prosecution to confirm that the AGC will refile the charges as soon as possible and prepare the necessary documents accordingly, so that the case can proceed without further delay,' he said in a statement on Friday (June 20).
Rafizi said he respected Najib's right to apply for a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA), given the lengthy delay, and also respected the decision by High Court Judge K. Muniandy in granting the application.
'Yet I do not understand why the prosecution has taken so long, since 2019, to prepare the documents required to initiate the case,' he said.
He added that this was particularly troubling given the case's connection to SRC International, for which Najib is currently serving a prison sentence following a conviction in a separate but related trial.
'From my own experience studying and exposing the 1MDB and SRC scandals, the SRC case has among the clearest money trails,' Rafizi said.
He said the prosecution must answer for this lapse, adding that many Malaysians do not want to see the case fall apart due to the government's failure to submit the necessary documentation in court for a scandal that has already seen a guilty verdict.
Earlier today, the Kuala Lumpur High Court granted Najib a DNAA in the money laundering case involving government-owned entity SRC International.
'As an MP, I will continue to monitor the progress of this case closely to ensure it remains in the public eye,' Rafizi said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
Najib relieved after court grants DNAA
With this, he said Najib can now concentrate fully on the 1MDB case. By NOOR AZLIDA ALIMIN 20 Jun 2025 05:14pm Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak seen at the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex. - Bernama file photo KUALA LUMPUR – Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is relieved to be free from yet another legal burden after the High Court granted him a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. His lawyer, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, confirmed the development on Friday, stating Najib is relieved to have fewer cases weighing on him, particularly after multiple previous requests for a DNAA. The High Court here today granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. - Bernama file photo With this, he said Najib can now concentrate fully on the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case. The High Court allowed the DNAA application filed on June 11. The decision followed Najib's failed bid to have the charges dropped after the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) rejected his representation on July 31, 2023. Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Ashrof Adrin Kamarul had initially requested the court to set a new date for trial. However, Shafee again pressed for a DNAA, pointing out that the case had been ongoing since 2019 with over six years of delays. When asked about the possibility of an appeal, Shafee clarified that the deputy public prosecutor cannot challenge the decision, as the prosecution retains the option to pursue the case again once they are prepared. 'Of course, we hope they do not, because this case has already prejudiced against Najib. So I hope the Attorney General will use his discretion and authority to close the case,' he said. Najib was charged on Feb 3, 2019, with receiving RM27 million from illegal proceeds through his three AmPrivate Banking accounts at AmIslamic Bank, Jalan Raja Chulan, on July 8, 2014. The charges were brought under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, which carries a maximum of five years in prison, a RM5 million fine, or both, upon conviction. Despite this discharge, Najib continues to serve his sentence at Kajang Prison for misappropriating RM42 million from the same SRC International fund. He began serving his sentence on Aug 23, 2022. He was initially sentenced to 12 years in prison and a RM210 million fine, which were upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. However, a royal pardon petition filed on Sept 2, 2022, led to the Pardons Board reducing his sentence to six years and the fine to RM50 million.
BusinessToday
an hour ago
- BusinessToday
Govt Must Adopt Four Critical Measures To Safeguard The Public As Electricity Tariff Concerns Mount
As news heats up over impending electricity tariff hikes in the second half of the year, it's no surprise that many Malaysians feel uneasy. Recognising that rising costs confront energy companies, thanks to global price fluctuations, the worsening climate crisis and the need to invest more in renewable energy. But even so, any changes that directly affect people's daily lives must be handled with transparency, fairness and careful planning. While the short-term impact might not hit low-income families too hard straightaway, rising bills will eventually take a toll. For many households already struggling to make ends meet, higher electricity costs could be the tipping point, forcing them to cut back even more. That's not the kind of pressure families should be facing. Moreover, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) will bear the brunt of this increase. These 'economic giants in miniature' are the backbone of our national economy; hence, if their operating costs rise due to higher electricity charges, they will be forced to pass the burden onto consumers, triggering inflation and eroding the purchasing power of ordinary Malaysians. This, in turn, threatens the very foundation of our economy. It is irrefutable that energy reform is necessary and inevitable. But it shouldn't come at the expense of ordinary Malaysians. Hence, the government needs to take four key steps to help people and businesses manage these changes: Explain the rationale and intended use of the tariff increase: The public must be assured that the hike is not arbitrary but is directed towards upgrading infrastructure and accelerating the green transition. People need to see the value of this change. Expand electricity subsidies: While the bottom 40% income group must continue to be protected, support should also be extended to the middle 40% income group, who are increasingly feeling the pressure of the rising cost of living. Strengthen energy-saving and carbon reduction education: By cultivating a nationwide culture of energy efficiency, we can help Malaysians adjust their consumption habits and soften the blow of rising tariffs. Support SME transformation: Temporary subsidies or tax relief should be provided to help businesses through the transitional phase, preventing disruptions that could stall our economic engine. Switching to cleaner energy is a long journey, and we all have a role to play. But citizens shouldn't be left to bear the burden alone. Energy transition is a long-term battle that should not be fought on the backs of the people alone. The government needs to demonstrate greater empathy and forward-thinking leadership. As we pursue long-term national goals, we must not lose sight of the immediate need to protect the welfare and stability of our people. The above commentary is by MCA Deputy President Datuk Dr Mah Hang Soon Related
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
'Inexcusable': AGC must answer for repeated DNAAs in high-profile corruption cases, says C4
PETALING JAYA: The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) must be held accountable for its repeated failures in a number of high-profile court cases that have ended in a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA), says the Centre to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4). It said the recent pattern of flawed prosecutions involving political figures that ended in a DNAA showcased a possible significant deep-rooted institutional incompetence within the prosecutorial office. 'These are not normal criminal cases; they implicate corruption involving some of the most powerful political figures in the country, and as such, should be treated with the highest priority. 'It is inexcusable that DNAAs keep being granted on the basis that the AGC had failed to adhere to basic procedures, which are part of any criminal prosecution. 'Not only were they simply not prepared for this case that has been in progress for 6 years, they did not even object to the DNAA,' it said in a press statement on Friday (June 20). This comes after former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was granted a DNAA for three counts of money laundering involving RM27mil linked to SRC International Sdn Bhd by the High Court on Friday (June 20). C4 said Najib's newest DNAA joins a long list of recent similar failures by the AGC in court, including Najib and former treasury secretary-general Tan Sri Mohd Irwan Serigar Abdullah being granted a DNAA in the RM6.6bil criminal breach of trust case linked to payments to the International Petroleum Investment Company (Ipic) in November last year. Another recent high-profile case involved Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, who was granted a DNAA for all 47 graft charges involving Yayasan Akalbudi funds on Sept 4, 2023. C4 also questioned the lack of any attempts by the AGC to publicly address its repeated failures in high-profile court cases, adding that it was sowing public distrust in the government and judiciary. 'Why have there been no public attempts to remedy this or address these prosecutorial failures? 'This lack of accountability only serves to deepen public distrust, erode confidence in the rule of law, and reinforce the perception that justice in Malaysia is neither independent nor equal,' it added. It also called on the AGC to publicly commit to refiling the charges for all cases where political figures have received a DNAA as soon as possible.
