New Skoda trams launched in Frankfurt (Oder)

Skoda Group's new 46T trams have entered service in the city of Frankfurt (Oder) in Germany, following the granting of official authorisation for passenger operation.
Stadtverkehrsgesellschaft Frankfurt (Oder) is initiating the phase-out of its older KT4 tram fleet with the introduction of the Skoda 46T models.
Eight Skoda 46T vehicles have already arrived in the city, with two additional trams expected shortly. The final three are nearing completion.
These trams represent a new era for the city, which has relied on trams for more than 125 years.
The delivery of the trams is part of a joint agreement involving Frankfurt (Oder), Cottbus, and Brandenburg an der Havel.
Skoda Group has provided a customised vehicle platform to suit the unique requirements of each city's network.
While the design of the trams remains consistent, adaptations have been made to ensure they are fit for the distinct operational conditions of each city.
In Cottbus, six Skoda 47T trams have been delivered, with authorisation for passenger use currently underway, and a seventh tram is close to completion.
Following an option exercised in 2022 by Cottbusverkehr, 15 additional vehicles are on order, with seven already in the early stages of production.
Brandenburg an der Havel has received two trams, with two more in the final stages of assembly.
These vehicles, like those delivered to Frankfurt and Cottbus, offer enhanced accessibility, passenger comfort, and energy-efficient operation.
Over the coming months, all three cities anticipate the gradual integration of the new trams into service as deliveries continue and necessary approvals are obtained.
Skoda Group West & North Region president Jan Christoph Harder said: 'This contract brought together three cities with different technical requirements but a shared vision for modern, accessible transport. Meeting all those needs with one platform wasn't easy, but it's exactly the kind of challenge we're here to solve.'
Additionally, Skoda has placed an order for ABB's Pro Series Traction Battery packs for the battery-electric multiple units (BEMUs) that Skoda is manufacturing for České Dráhy, the state-owned railway company of Czechia.
The contract secured in the final quarter of 2024 represents the inaugural procurement of ABB's traction solutions by the Skoda Group.
"New Skoda trams launched in Frankfurt (Oder)" was originally created and published by Railway Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

26 minutes ago

• Forbes

A Tale Of Two Cities In Venture Capital

Like a desert and an oasis, there is a tale of two cities in venture capital 'It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.' On the heels of Super Venture & Super Return Berlin, and a LP/GP summit in Montreal organized by Inovia, I wanted to reflect on what felt like a panoramic view of the industry, across 1) managers of VC funds 2) startups raising capital and 3) incumbents in the public markets. What struck me most wasn't any one deal or datapoint, but the duality of two starkly different realities. The technology industry today, for startups and venture capital firms alike, is best described as a tale of two cities. In venture capital, the divergence could not be more stark. Research by Pitchbook demonstrated that nine firms collected 50% of all venture funding last year. The top 30 took the vast majority, across a few hundred firms that announced raises. At SuperReturn, partners from megafunds spoke about oversubscribed raises. Meanwhile, emerging managers are scraping to survive and define their edge. As Scott Hartley, co-founder and managing partner of Everywhere Ventures told me: 'For emerging managers differentiation is key, as venture returns heavily skew due to a long tail of large outcomes. While it may seem safer to get on-base at bats, median venture returns barely outpace other asset classes. The reason allocators look at VC is for asymmetric exposure, which means providing capital to yet undiscovered drivers of the future economy.' First-time and even second-time funds have faced arguably one of the hardest fundraising markets in history. Similar research from Pitchbook suggests a risk of certain emerging managers dying off. One panelist summed it up succinctly: 'Consolidation is the new diversification.' The gulf between the haves and have-nots is perhaps even more stark in startups, the companies VCs fund. Asaf Horresh of Vintage explained during his Super Venture keynote: 'if you're AI it's 2021'. Capital is flowing freely into foundation model startups, AI infrastructure plays, and workflow automation layers. Several venture firms have reoriented their entire sourcing around AI, and LPs are watching closely. But for nearly everyone else, Asaf put it perfectly: 'you're in the desert.' Even solid companies are seeing down rounds or resorting to insider-led bridges. The bar has never been higher. While I am nervous about nosebleed valuations and non-Camel strategies- the potential for AI justified. But the capital imbalance is striking. At SuperReturn, AI was on nearly every main stage. As Arpan Punyani, Co-Founder and General Partner at Garuda Ventures told me: 'Like the transistor, cloud, or mobile, AI is a foundational enabling technology. If you're not building an AI company at some level, the bar is just incredibly high to raise venture capital now.' Carta noted that seed deals are growing scarcer, demonstrating the growing scarcity. However, average valuations, pulled up by A.I. startups have increased. The other vector in startups was geography. Today, like it or not, capital is re-concentrating in the old capitals partially because of AI: San Francisco, London, Tel Aviv. Startups in non-central ecosystems are finding it that much harder to raise capital. From side conversations, there's a growing sense that global GPs need to 'earn the right' to go abroad again. The irony (and certainly central to my day job at Fluent Ventures) some of the best startups are being built in emerging ecosystems—with less burn, less competition, and lower valuations. The bifurcation is not limited to venture. In the public markets, the 'Magnificent Seven' (Nvidia, Meta, Apple, et al.) account for the lion's share of returns. Small caps and international equities remain underloved. It's the same pattern: consolidation of value, divergence of experience. In the technology industry, the power law is the rule of the game. But the magnitude of the power law is not. As exits increase, releasing DPI, market sentiment calms, and desire for diversification outside the U.S. grows, I expect much of this to normalize. But this will take time and there will certainly be collateral damage. But, as history tells us, sometimes, the revolution begins in the second city.

The Verge

2 hours ago

• The Verge

You sound like ChatGPT

Join any Zoom call, walk into any lecture hall, or watch any YouTube video, and listen carefully. Past the content and inside the linguistic patterns, you'll find the creeping uniformity of AI voice. Words like 'prowess' and 'tapestry,' which are favored by ChatGPT, are creeping into our vocabulary, while words like 'bolster,' 'unearth,' and 'nuance,' words less favored by ChatGPT, have declined in use. Researchers are already documenting shifts in the way we speak and communicate as a result of ChatGPT — and they see this linguistic influence accelerating into something much larger. In the 18 months after ChatGPT was released, speakers used words like 'meticulous,' 'delve,' 'realm,' and 'adept' up to 51 percent more frequently than in the three years prior, according to researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, who analyzed close to 280,000 YouTube videos from academic channels. The researchers ruled out other possible change points before ChatGPT's release and confirmed these words align with those the model favors, as established in an earlier study comparing 10,000 human- and AI-edited texts. The speakers don't realize their language is changing. That's exactly the point. One word, in particular, stood out to researchers as a kind of linguistic watermark. 'Delve' has become an academic shibboleth, a neon sign in the middle of every conversation flashing ChatGPT was here. 'We internalize this virtual vocabulary into daily communication,' says Hiromu Yakura, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development. ''Delve' is only the tip of the iceberg.' But it's not just that we're adopting AI language — it's about how we're starting to sound. Even though current studies mostly focus on vocabulary, researchers suspect that AI influence is starting to show up in tone, too — in the form of longer, more structured speech and muted emotional expression. As Levin Brinkmann, a research scientist at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development and a coauthor of the study, puts it, ''Delve' is only the tip of the iceberg.' AI shows up most obviously in functions like smart replies, autocorrect, and spellcheck. Research out of Cornell looks at our use of smart replies in chats, finding that use of smart replies increases overall cooperation and feelings of closeness between participants, since users end up selecting more positive emotional language. But if people believed their partner was using AI in the interaction, they rated their partner as less collaborative and more demanding. Crucially, it wasn't actual AI usage that turned them off — it was the suspicion of it. We form perceptions based on language cues, and it's really the language properties that drive those impressions, says Malte Jung, Associate Professor of Information Science at Cornell University and a co-author of the study. This paradox — AI improving communication while fostering suspicion — points to a deeper loss of trust, according to Mor Naaman, professor of Information Science at Cornell Tech. He has identified three levels of human signals that we've lost in adopting AI into our communication. The first level is that of basic humanity signals, cues that speak to our authenticity as a human being like moments of vulnerability or personal rituals, which say to others, 'This is me, I'm human.' The second level consists of attention and effort signals that prove 'I cared enough to write this myself.' And the third level is ability signals which show our sense of humor, our competence, and our real selves to others. It's the difference between texting someone, 'I'm sorry you're upset' versus 'Hey sorry I freaked at dinner, I probably shouldn't have skipped therapy this week.' One sounds flat; the other sounds human. For Naaman, figuring out how to bring back and elevate these signals is the path forward in AI-mediated communication, because AI is not only changing language — but what we think. 'Even on dating sites, what does it mean to be funny on your profile or in chat anymore where we know that AI can be funny for you?' Naaman asks. The loss of agency starting in our speech and moving into our thinking, in particular, is what he is worried about. 'Instead of articulating our own thoughts, we articulate whatever AI helps us to articulate…we become more persuaded.' Without these signals, Naaman warns, we'll only trust face-to-face communication — not even video calls. We lose the verbal stumbles, regional idioms, and off-kilter phrases that signal vulnerability, authenticity, and personhood The trust problem compounds when you consider that AI is quietly establishing who gets to sound 'legitimate' in the first place. University of California, Berkeley research found that AI responses often contained stereotypes or inaccurate approximations when prompted to use dialects other than Standard American English. Examples of this include ChatGPT repeating the prompt back to the non-Standard-American-English user due to lack of comprehension and exaggerating the input dialect significantly. One Singaporean English respondent commented, 'the super exaggerated Singlish in one of the responses was slightly cringeworthy.' The study revealed that AI doesn't just prefer Standard American English, it actively flattens other dialects in ways that can demean their speakers. This system perpetuates inaccuracies not only about communities but also about what 'correct' English is. So the stakes aren't just about preserving linguistic diversity — they're about protecting the imperfections that actually build trust. When everyone around us starts to sound 'correct,' we lose the verbal stumbles, regional idioms, and off-kilter phrases that signal vulnerability, authenticity, and personhood. We're approaching a splitting point, where AI's impacts on how we speak and write move between the poles of standardization, like templating professional emails or formal presentations, and authentic expression in personal and emotional spaces. Between those poles, there are three core tensions at play. Early backlash signals, like academics avoiding 'delve' and people actively trying not to sound like AI, suggests we may self-regulate against homogenization. AI systems themselves will likely become more expressive and personalized over time, potentially reducing the current AI voice problem. And the deepest risk of all, as Naaman pointed to, is not linguistic uniformity but losing conscious control over our own thinking and expression. The future isn't predetermined between homogenization and hyperpersonalization: it depends on whether we'll be conscious participants in that change. We're seeing early signs that people will push back when AI influence becomes too obvious, while technology may evolve to better mirror human diversity rather than flatten it. This isn't a question about whether AI will continue shaping how we speak — because it will — but whether we'll actively choose to preserve space for the verbal quirks and emotional messiness that make communication recognizably, irreplaceably human.

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

BofA lifts STOXX 600 annual target to 530 points

(Reuters) -BofA Global Research on Friday raised its year-end target for the STOXX 600 index to 530 from 500 on resilience in global growth following a U.S.-China trade truce. European equities remain close to all-time highs despite the global trade war and escalating tensions in the Israel-Iran conflict, the Wall Street brokerage said. "The main reason for the resilience, is that these events (Israel-Iran conflict, trade war) have not yet translated into a clear-cut weakening in global growth," BofA said, maintaining its "negative" stance on the region's equities. The brokerage's current target for the pan-European benchmark index still implies a nearly 1.1% downside to its Thursday close of 535.86. While a trade deal between the U.S. and China as well as a benign May U.S. inflation report have brought some relief to financial markets, pressures from tariffs and escalating tensions in the Middle East are expected to weigh on global economic growth. BofA upgraded the European mining sector to "overweight" from "marketweight", citing attractive valuations after significant underperformance, with support from a weaker dollar. The brokerage downgraded airlines to "underweight" from "marketweight", on potential risks from higher oil prices if Middle East tensions escalate.