logo
They planned to seek asylum. Trump's policies have left them stranded at the US-Mexico border

They planned to seek asylum. Trump's policies have left them stranded at the US-Mexico border

The Guardian2 days ago

Donald Trump's crackdown on immigration upended lives on inauguration day when he abruptly closed the border for many who were just on the Mexican side of the border planning to cross into the US legally. Five months on, some hold on to hope, others are giving up.
A family from El Salvador seeking asylum was left stranded at the border within sight of Texas only three days into the second Trump administration. A grandfather, his daughter, his niece, her husband and two of his grandchildren had done things 'the right way', by requesting one of the highly limited appointments with US Border Patrol, from the Mexican side using the Biden-era mobile phone app called CBPOne. But on January 20, Trump signed an executive order cancelling all scheduled appointments, including theirs on 23 January at noon.
Trump crushed the family's access to seek asylum, along with their dreams – and those of 30,000 other migrants who had been given prized appointments through the app. Many of them were fleeing combinations of extreme violence, authoritarianism and poverty in El Salvador, Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela or within Mexico.
The Salvadoran family was turned back by US officials on the international bridge connecting Reynosa in northern Mexico to McAllen in south Texas.
Bewildered and upset, they did not know where to turn.
That was when they ran into a local pastor, Hector Silva, who runs two migrant shelters in Reynosa, known as Senda de Vida 1 and 2, that together can hold up to 5,000 people. He took the family under his wing. Their names are being withheld so as not to jeopardize their safety.
'In El Salvador we will always be at risk since our brother was killed by gang members,' said one of the women. He was murdered back in 2014 when he was 18. 'My father recently worked as an Uber driver but he was being extorted,' she added. And she herself had been unemployed.
Shelters like Silva's were overcrowded a few years ago, but as centrist Democratic president Joe Biden swung further right on immigration and tightened access, numbers dropped. With Trump's even harder line, numbers have dwindled further. By April, only about 200 people were staying at Silva's shelters.
The pastor founded his first shelter on a landfill site in Reynosa almost 30 years ago. Over the years he has heard stories of husbands being murdered, daughters being raped, and extortion payments from criminal gangs in their home regions that were too expensive to pay. 'These families need to migrate to protect themselves and their loved ones,' he said.
While he respects the US's pledge to secure the border, he urges the administration to loosen its policies, especially for the right to request asylum. 'Many of these families are good people who deserve an opportunity,' he said.
Across the courtyard, Karina, a Mexican woman from the state of Chiapas mopped the floor in front of her dorm, while her eight-year-old son slurped on a bowl of Fruit Loops cereal. Together, they had crossed the entire country to escape threats of cartel violence and organ trafficking in their community. 'Everything was complicated. So we had to flee before anything happened to us,' she said when the Guardian visited in April. Karina had already been at the shelter for eight months waiting for a US appointment, trying the controversial app daily. Such a wait, or longer, was not uncommon, exposing those waiting to the dangers that stalk some parts of the border, particularly from cartel kidnappings for ransom. Waiting was better than nothing, however. But then the US government app stopped working before the authorities got back to her.
According to Gretchen Kuhner, the director of the Institute for Women in Migration (IMUMI), a Mexican non-profit that supports migrant women, Karina was far from alone in fleeing violence within Mexico, joining a growing number of people seeking safety elsewhere.
'Lots of people think Mexicans are economic migrants. But they don't realize the number of people from Mexico who were applying to CBPOne,' Kuhner said. 'The Mexican government does not want to talk about' the violence driving migration, she said.
Karina was racked with uncertainty. 'We don't know what will happen. Or if we will be able to cross,' she said when she talked to the Guardian in April.
She saw herself working in a US packaging warehouse or in a shop, making a new life. 'If God lets me cross to the United States, I know I will have the ability and intelligence to learn,' she said. The father of her child had been expecting them in Virginia, she said, dejectedly.
Immigration advocates clarify that the drop in migration and empty shelters have been created by US immigration policy, not because the risks and needs in countries of origin are any less dire.
Andrés Ramirez, the former coordinator of Mexico's Refugee Agency (COMAR), said the numbers of migrants entering Mexico from the south had already dropped considerably in 2024 as Panama cracked down on migration through the Darién Gap. From January to April 2025, a mere 73 people had made the treacherous journey across the jungle, down from 82,000 in August 2023.
The 30,000 people whose appointments with US immigration officers were cancelled are now hard to locate. Many are thought to have dispersed across Mexico. Some have been deported by the Mexican government. Others have flocked to cities such as Monterrey or Mexico City in search of work. Many are stuck in desperate conditions in the southern city of Tapachula, bordering Guatemala. And some are applying for asylum in Mexico. But an IMUMI report warns against the country being safe for many migrants seeking protection.
Others back at the Senda de Vida shelter have given up on the American dream for now. Wendy, a beautician in her 30s traveling with her son and sister-in-law from Honduras, felt out of options and planned to return home and hope for the best. She would probably turn herself in to Mexican immigration officials who have been busing migrants down south, she said.
'We have never had much financial stability. My son is in school now. I was hoping to have my own business and my own little house in the US,' she said.
Some cross without authorization after all. 'People are hiring smugglers at newly inflated rates', or taking more dangerous routes, said Kuhner.
Silva, meanwhile, is busy fixing up his shelters. Sooner or later, more migrants will return. 'This is not over. Nor will it end. Migration will continue,' he said.
Earlier this month, some who were at the shelter in April had gone back to their countries, some had crossed unlawfully into the US, others had taken off to try their luck in Mexico City.
The Salvadoran family was still in Reynosa. The grandfather may return to El Salvador with his grandson through a program with the International Organization for Migration (IOM), a United Nations body, despite the risk and having sold their house and car to fund the journey north. Some continued to hope and pray for better fortunes.
For those stuck, Silva opened his arms in the modest courtyard with a smile. 'Here you won't want for anything. Even if it is just a tortilla with salt,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Migrants turn from small boats to yachts
Migrants turn from small boats to yachts

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Migrants turn from small boats to yachts

Border Force is struggling to keep up with the increasing number of migrants entering the country by yacht, a leading union has claimed. People smugglers are coming up with new ways to get migrants across the English Channel into the UK ahead of a change to the maritime rules in France that will allow border police and gendarmes to stop boats from leaving waters within 300 metres of their coastline. Private boats and trawlers are growing in popularity as an ' easy and low-risk' route for bringing illegal migrants to the UK. Some 17,817 migrants have arrived so far this year, up 40 per cent on last year and the highest to this point in the year since the first arrivals in 2018. Lucy Moreton, from the ISU, which represents Border Force staff, said there simply is not enough resources to keep up with demand. 'It is a growing issue as the small-boat route becomes more challenged. It's something we have started monitoring more, but we simply do not have the staff to do everything,' she added. 'Most of the ports in the UK do not have a Border Force officer working at them so it comes down to the local police and the public. The system of boat ownership is very hard to monitor.' In April, Border Force officials intercepted a yacht off the Cornish coast and discovered 20 people hiding below deck. The 19 men and one woman, all thought to be Albanian nationals, were trying to enter the UK illegally. They were detained pending deportation, the Home Office said, and three men were arrested. About 437 migrants crossed the Channel on Friday in seven small boats, Home Office figures revealed. The number of migrants who have crossed the Channel this year now far surpasses that of previous years. By June 20 2024, 12,313 migrants had made the journey, compared to 10,518 in 2023 and 11,690 in 2022. The figures come after The Telegraph reported migrants had vowed they would 'never give up' trying to reach Britain, despite the stricter measures set to come into force in France. Jamal, a 24-year-old Sudanese man, said: 'If the police stop us in the water when we try to reach the boats, then we will go back to the beach the next day or the next week. We'll never give up.' Until now, the French have refused to intervene in the water because they claim maritime laws prevent them from taking action that could put lives at sea at risk. But the new strategy will see 'taxi boats' packed with migrants intercepted in shallow waters off Channel beaches. When The Telegraph visited Calais on Friday, there were signs that French police were taking a more interventionist approach in the migrant crisis, in response to criticism by the British Government. On Tuesday, No 10 admitted that the migrant crisis was 'deteriorating'. A spokesman said: 'Migration should be a key focus given the deteriorating situation in the Channel, they confirmed, adding that they should continue to work closely with other partners to find innovative ways to drive forward progress.'

More than 400 migrants arrive in the UK crossing the Channel in small boats
More than 400 migrants arrive in the UK crossing the Channel in small boats

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

More than 400 migrants arrive in the UK crossing the Channel in small boats

More than 400 further migrants have arrived in the UK having crossed the Channel in small boats despite the French police taking a tougher stance to control the departures. According to Home Office figures, 437 people made the crossing on Friday June 20 in seven boats, bringing the total for the year so far to 17,817. This compares to 12,313 by the same date in 2024 and 10,518 in 2023 while 11,690 had made the crossing by June 20 in 2022. The latest arrivals come after Sir Keir Starmer said the situation was 'deteriorating' and threatened a visa crackdown. The Prime Minister signalled that countries which did not do enough to tackle the irregular migration crisis, for example by taking back failed asylum seekers, could face repercussions in the numbers of visas issued to their citizens. Sir Keir's message came as French police were seen to employ more robust tactics on the beaches this week including using teargas. But they were also seen to stand by and watch once migrants had entered the water to board a dinghy in the hope of crossing the English Channel.

‘Authoritarian playbook': DHS accuses critics of assaulting officers when videos say otherwise
‘Authoritarian playbook': DHS accuses critics of assaulting officers when videos say otherwise

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘Authoritarian playbook': DHS accuses critics of assaulting officers when videos say otherwise

After New York City comptroller Brad Lander this week became the latest prominent Democrat to be arrested while monitoring and protesting US immigration authorities, the Trump administration trotted out a familiar refrain to justify his detention. The mayoral candidate had 'assaulted' law enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) asserted, warning 'if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will face consequences'. The accusation, which DHS has also recently leveled against a member of Congress and a high-profile union leader, have sparked consternation, particularly as videos of the incidents did not show the officials attacking officers and instead captured officers' aggressive behavior and manhandling of the officials. In several cases, DHS's public accusations of assault were not followed by criminal charges. Civil rights advocates and scholars on policing say the government's assault claims against well-known members of the opposing party, and the repetition of those accusations, nonetheless are troubling indicators of rising authoritarianism. They argued the US government is blatantly misrepresenting events captured on footage in an effort to intimidate powerful officials and ordinary citizens alike who seek to challenge the White House's policies. And Alec Karakatsanis, the founder of Civil Rights Corps, a nonprofit legal advocacy group, argued: 'By relentlessly telling the population that 'two plus two equals five', it helps determine who is willing to go along with 'two plus two equals five' and deny basic truths. 'It's also about a longer-term and more profound assault on the very notion of truth – to get people so confused that they don't know what is what,' said Karakatsanis, author of Copaganda, a book about false narratives promoted by police. 'This is the classic propaganda tactic of George Orwell's 1984,' he added Lander was arrested by federal agents inside an immigration court building on Tuesday, as he asked officers whether they had a judicial warrant to detain an immigrant he was accompanying. He was released after four hours, and so far, no charges have been filed against him. Video of the encounter shows plainclothes officers, some in masks, pinning Lander to a wall, handcuffing him and escorting him away. Lander had held on to the arm of the immigrant who was being targeted. Still, DHS assistant secretary, Tricia McLaughlin, said in a statement to the press and on social media soon after the incident that it was Lander who had assaulted officers. The accusations echo those against US congresswoman LaMonica McIver, a Democrat, who, DHS claims, assaulted and impeded law enforcement when she and two other representatives arrived at a privately run Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) detention center to inspect the facility on 9 May. Representatives are authorized to conduct this oversight without prior notice, and McIver said she wanted to ensure the facility was clean and safe and detainees had access to their attorneys. Shaky videos of the encounter, some released by DHS, showed a chaotic scrum where McIver and others were surrounded by officers, some masked, as law enforcement and the representative pushed against each other. Soon after, she was given a tour of the facility, but a month later was indicted for assault, a charge she has strongly denied. In Los Angeles, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) of California, was arrested on 6 June when he showed up to document an immigration raid at a garment factory. As he stood outside, blurry footage showed officers pushing him to the ground, with multiple agents on top of him as he was put in handcuffs. US attorneys charged him with conspiracy to impede an officer. He was not charged with assault, but even after the complaint was filed, DHS has continued to respond to questions about his case with a statement that says: 'Huerta assaulted Ice law enforcement.' Huerta was hospitalized after his arrest, before being transported to jail. And last week, California senator Alex Padilla was handcuffed and forcibly removed from a DHS press conference as he attempted to ask a question, with the FBI accusing him of 'resisting' law enforcement. He was not charged with a crime. In a statement to the Guardian on Thursday, McLaughlin said Democratic politicians were 'contributing to the surge in assaults of our Ice officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of Ice', adding: 'This violence against ICE must end.' DHS has repeatedly asserted in recent weeks that it has seen a major increase in assaults on its officers. Since May, the department has often cited the claim that Ice officers, who are part of DHS, are facing 'a 413% increase in assaults against them'. Spokespeople for DHS have repeatedly refused to respond to questions about the source of the statistic, how many assaults have occurred and what time periods it was comparing. In April, a press release had referred to a '300% surge in assaults'. McLaughlin, of DHS, said in an email late Thursday that Ice officers were 'now facing a 500% increase in assaults', but again did not respond to inquiries about the figure. Some experts on US law enforcement said DHS's narratives were rooted in a long legacy of law enforcement demonizing its critics, though the Trump administration's claims seemed increasingly brazen in their deviation from the truth. Andrea J Ritchie, co-founder of Interrupting Criminalization, a group of organizers that advocates against incarceration and other forms of criminalization, said US law enforcement has frequently prosecuted people who had been abused and injured by officers. 'How many videos exist of cops yelling, 'stop resisting', while someone has their hands up and the cops are beating them?' she said. Civil rights lawyers who take on police misconduct cases often refer to the 'trifecta' of charges – resisting arrest, assault on an officer and obstruction of justice, she said: 'The harder you get beaten, the more likely you'll get those charges.' What's new under Donald Trump, she said, was the frequency of these kinds of accusations against high-profile figures. Lauren Regan, an Oregon-based civil rights lawyer who has represented activists facing prosecution, said she saw arresting elected officials as part of an 'authoritarian playbook' designed to make people widely afraid that they, too, could be targeted, regardless of their backgrounds. 'You keep it chaotic and random so no one thinks they're safe,' said Regan. 'When elected officials with privilege, power, education and training get thrown to the ground and cuffed or jailed, then what is going to happen to us? Everyone is at risk.' It's a point that wasn't lost on Padilla, who said after his detention: 'If they can do this to a United States senator who has the audacity to ask a question, just imagine what they're doing to so many people across the country.' Indeed, since the recent protests against immigration raids began in LA, hundreds of demonstrators in southern California have been arrested by local police. Federal prosecutors have formally charged a handful of them assaulting officers – though soon after moved to dismiss two of the first cases they filed. In an incident of two protesters arrested at a 7 June demonstration, a video of the chaotic scuffle showed one of the protesters being shoved by an agent just before the arrests, and officers taking both protesters to the ground. US prosecutors charged both men with assaulting officers, but filed a motion to dismiss the charges a week later after one of them told the Guardian he had not attacked the agents, and was himself severely injured in the confrontation. Others have been blasted by DHS amid immigration enforcement actions in LA. Last week, the Los Angeles Times published video of border patrol agents detaining a 29-year-old US citizen outside his car repair shop. In the footage, the man repeatedly said he was an American citizen, but an agent pushed him into a metal gate. He was eventually released. After the LA Times published a story documenting rising 'fears of racial profiling', DHS sent out a press release calling it 'fake news', including a screenshot of video of the man's arrest, and saying: 'THE FACTS: 'The facts are a US citizen was arrested because he ASSAULTED US Customs and Border Protection Agents.' DHS did not respond to the Guardian's questions asking for clarification on what constituted assault in these incidents, instead re-sending the statements it had originally posted and shared on social media in the immediate aftermath of the arrests. Alex Vitale, sociology professor and coordinator of the Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College, said that while the public thinks of 'assault' as causing injury, in the context of arrests and prosecution, it can be a 'nebulous category' that includes 'unwanted physical conduct'. Cases can drag on for months, he added, no matter the strength of the evidence the government is presenting: 'Police understand that the arrest and the process is the penalty even if there's no conviction in the end.' Mike German, a former FBI agent and fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonprofit, said that the government's repeated misinformation about violence against officers risks backfiring: 'Officers do at times get assaulted, but if agencies continue to make patently false claims and suggest that any physical contact is an assault, you're going to undermine legitimate cases.' He said he was also concerned about the impacts of officers using heavy force in arrests that don't require it: 'Three or four agents tackling a US senator clearly isn't necessary. That kind of force compels resistance. It's hard to let yourself be violently attacked without your natural reaction of trying to defend yourself, and then if officers say that's assault, that undermines public trust.' Ritchie, author of Invisible No More, a book about police violence against women of color, said she was not surprised that out of the recent prominent arrests, the only politician who continues to be prosecuted for assault is McIver: 'Black women get punished for speaking up and it's framed as assault.' She said it was crucial that communities continue to forcefully reject law enforcement narratives: 'They are trying to manufacture reality. It is upon us to say the government is lying to us. This is a message they are trying to send and we're not accepting it and certainly not normalizing it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store