Gaza aid group halts distribution
GAZA: The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation did not give out any aid on Wednesday as it pressed Israel to boost civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its distribution sites, after dozens of Palestinians seeking aid were killed this week. The GHF said it has asked the Israeli military to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimises confusion or escalation risks" near military positions; develop clearer guidance for civilians; and enhance training to support civilian safety.
"Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," said a GHF spokesperson. An Israeli military spokesperson warned civilians against moving in areas leading to GHF sites on Wednesday, deeming them "combat zones". The new aid distribution process for Gaza's two million-plus population from just three sites was launched in the midst of a fierce new offensive by Israel since late last month. — Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
7 hours ago
- Times of Oman
His Majesty the Sultan holds phone call with King of Jordan
Muscat: His Majesty Sultan Haitham Bin Tarik and His Majesty the King of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan exchanged views over the phone on the worrying situation and its dangerous repercussions for the region, particularly following the US attacks on Iranian facilities. His Majesty the Sultan and the king of Jordan stressed the need for concerted regional and international efforts and intensified coordination and consultation to de-escalate and extinguish the flames of war, both in the Gaza Strip and in connection with the ongoing conflict resulting from the Israeli aggression against Iran.
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Trump's bombs on Iran blow up heat of Mideast war
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said US air strikes on Sunday "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, with Tehran later accusing Washington of "blowing up" talks aimed at a deal on its nuclear programme. Following the attack — the United States' first large-scale strikes on Iran — Trump warned Washington would hit more targets if Tehran did not make peace. Hours later, Iran launched two waves of attacks against long-time foe Israel. "Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success," Trump said, adding the key underground enrichment site at Fordo was hit, along with facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran the bully of the Middle East must now make peace," he said, warning future attacks would be "far greater" unless a diplomatic solution was reached. "Remember, there are many targets left." Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi speaks during a press conference at the Lutfi Kirdar Congress Center, in Istanbul. — AFP Trump's intervention — despite his past pledges to avoid another "forever war" — threatens to dramatically widen the conflict, after Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on Iran last week, with Tehran vowing to retaliate if Washington joined in. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the United States of sabotaging diplomacy after talks with European powers. "This week, we held talks with the E3/EU when the US decided to blow up that diplomacy," he wrote on X. Aragchi later told reporters in Istanbul the United States and Israel had "crossed a very big red line", asserting Iran would continue to defend itself "by all means necessary". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the US strikes, saying Trump's decision to "target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history". In response to the US attack, Iran's armed forces said they targeted multiple sites in Israel including Ben Gurion Airport, the country's main international gateway near Tel Aviv. Israeli rescuers said at least 23 people were wounded. Police said at least three impacts were reported. One of them was the Ramat Aviv area of Tel Aviv, tearing holes in the facades of apartment blocks. "Houses here were hit very, very badly," said Tel Aviv mayor Ron Huldai. "Fortunately, one of them was slated for demolition and reconstruction, so there were no residents inside." In Jerusalem, Claudio Hazan, a 62-year-old software engineer, said he hoped the US intervention would hasten an end to the Iran-Israel war. "Israel by itself would not stop... and it would take longer," he said. Protesters hold placards condemning the US attacks on Iran during a protest, in Seoul. — AFP Israel said it had launched fresh strikes on western Iran and in Qom, south of Tehran. Iran's official IRNA news agency reported four Revolutionary Guard members were killed in strikes on a military base in the city's north. The Israeli military said it had "struck missile launchers ready to launch towards Israeli territory, soldiers in the Iranian Armed Forces, and swiftly neutralised the launchers that launched missiles towards Israeli territory a short while ago". In Tehran, journalists said the roar of aircraft flying over the city could be heard repeatedly for the first time since Israel's initial attacks. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency said it had not detected any increase in radiation levels at key nuclear sites in Iran following the strikes and Tehran said on Sunday there were "no signs of contamination". The Iranian foreign minister said he would travel to Moscow for "serious consultations" with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday. US media reported the strikes were carried out by B-2 stealth bombers dropping bunker-buster bombs, as well as submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles. Following his address, Trump warned Iran against "any retaliation". Iran and its proxies have previously attacked US military bases in Iraq and elsewhere in the region. The US president had stepped up his rhetoric against Iran since Israel first struck Iran on June 13, repeating his insistence it could never have nuclear weapons. Israel and Iran have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since then. Tehran denies seeking an atomic bomb. On Saturday, President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran's right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme "cannot be taken away... by threats or war". — AFP
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
We have no idea where this war will go
After days of publicly mulling whether to join Israel in its military campaign against Iran, President Trump directed the US military on Saturday to execute a complex attack on three of the nation's nuclear sites with several American warplanes and submarines. Hours later, Trump declared the mission a 'spectacular military success," saying during a national address from the White House that US forces had 'completely and totally obliterated," Iran's nuclear programme. 'There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close,' he said, standing in front of Vice-President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. It may appear like a tactical victory less than four hours after the bombs began to fall, but projecting any sense of finality about this ordeal is wildly premature. The nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan may be lying in rubble. But whether Tehran will be unable to rehabilitate its nuclear programme remains an open question. And what will Iran do in return? If the more than 40,000 American troops and personnel in the Middle East are attacked, will the Trump administration try to topple the political establishment in Tehran? Any one of these questions could have complicated answers with disastrous consequences for the US and its allies throughout the Middle East. Trump doesn't see it that way. 'There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' he said, referring to Israeli air strikes. 'Remember, there are many targets left.' Trump's decision holds the potential to transform not only his presidency but US standing overseas as well. He was elected to the White House on a platform of turning away from foreign conflicts with nebulous goals. A little more than seven months later, he's brought the US military directly into conflict with Iran in an act of war that was meticulously planned and detailed but entirely unauthorised by Congress. The president chose to launch these attacks against Iran by choice, not necessity. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, testified in March that Iran had a stock of enriched material but had not decided to make a nuclear weapon. (She has since said her comments were taken out of context and estimated Iran was 'weeks to months' away from producing nuclear weapons.) In his speech, delivered after he told Americans via social media that he had entered the war, Trump applauded the bombing operation, which took place using B-2 Stealth bombers along with missiles launched from submarines. 'I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world is not seen in many, many decades,' he said. It's true that the US Air Force had never used Stealth bombers in such a highly orchestrated, overwhelming strike operation. At about $2.1 billion apiece, the B-2 is the world's most expensive aircraft because of its onboard technology. It was engineered to slip behind Soviet air defences and obliterate hardened targets and has seen limited use during the wars in the Middle East. The world's eyes now shift to the American troops inside Iran's range of fire via missiles, drones or other kind of attack. A response may not come for days. When Trump issued the drone strike in January 2020 that killed Qassim Suleimani, it was five days before Iran launched salvos of missile strikes on US forces stationed at bases in neighbouring Iraq. Trump said he hopes that 'we will no longer need' the American military's services. This is wishful thinking. It's almost certain we haven't seen the end of US military action in this war. It might very well have just begun. — The New York Times WJ Hennigan writes about national security issues for Opinion from Washington
