How counter-tariffs could make it harder to support Canadian books
The Canadian government is proposing additional counter-tariffs on U.S. goods. On the list of items that could be affected are U.S. books coming into Canada.
The thing is, Canada's publishing industry is more entwined with the States than many readers may realize.
Today on Commotion, The Globe and Mail's business & culture reporter Josh O'Kane joins host Elamin Abdelmahmoud to explain why this proposed policy has Canadian book stakeholders concerned.
We've included some highlights below, edited for length and clarity. For the full discussion, listen and follow Commotion with Elamin Abdelmahmoud on your favourite podcast player.
WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube:
Elamin: I think the obvious question is, how does a counter-tariff on books coming from the United States into Canada end up impacting the book economy here? And it just so happens that Liberal leader Mark Carney's book is maybe the perfect way to illustrate how that works. Do you want to tell people how it works?
Josh: Yeah. So last week, indie bookstores across the country started rapidly talking to each other about what's going to happen with the counter-tariffs. And Paul MacKay, the manager of King's Co-op Bookstore in Halifax, basically just put out a little tweet thread and then at the end of it he's like, "You want a really good example? Mark Carney." His 2021 book Value(s), the latest edition that Paul had at King's Co-op Bookstore, he opened it up and it said, "Printed in the United States." So what does that mean? It means that the sitting prime minister at that moment had a book printed in the United States — which if the federal government were to put counter-tariffs on books, as is currently on the proposed list, [then] even the prime minister's book would be subject to tariffs coming into the country.
Elamin: I have to imagine somebody listening to this going, "Wait, what do you mean it's printed in the United States?" Because I do think that is part of things that people maybe don't understand. I should say, we both have books out…. Mine was printed here in Canada, because I'm a patriot, and yours was printed in the United States, presumably because you're not. Do you want to maybe talk a little bit about how that works? Because we are both Canadian. We are both with Canadian publishers. And yet part of the supply chain of how large publishers work is some printers are in the U.S.
Josh: Yeah, and I know everyone tunes into Commotion because they want to hear about supply chains.
Elamin: They do today, baby. Let's go.
Josh: A lot of this has to do with the fact that, I think it's just under 95 per cent of English-language books sold in Canada are through the larger multinational companies, so Penguin Random House Canada, Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins in particular. The big three here in this country, they have integrated supply chains around the world. They also, because they have so much of the market, have a lot of Canadian authors, including both of us. And as a result, with these — again, I'm so hesitant to use this phrase — integrated supply chains around the world, of course they're going to print where it makes the most sense for those organizations. This is the result of globalization. Which is, again, I'm sure exactly why people want to tune in to this show.
Elamin: But this stuff really informs how you get the entertainment that you get and the books that you get.
Josh: Exactly. The same thing about record labels, radio stations across North America over the last 30 odd years; it isn't just books. So as a result, because so many different books are printed in the United States, including by Canadian authors, you are going to have books by Canadian authors who could be subject to this tariff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Oil rises and US stock futures, Asian shares slip after US strike on Iran nuclear sites
NEW YORK (AP) — The price of oil rose and U.S. stock futures fell as global markets react to the U.S. strike against nuclear targets in Iran. The price of Brent crude oil, the international standard, rose 2.6% to $79 a barrel. U.S. crude rose 2.6% to $75.76 a barrel. On Saturday, U.S. forces attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, further increasing the stakes in the war between Israel and Iran. Futures for the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.4%, while Nasdaq futures fell 0.5%. Treasury yields were little changed. The modest moves indicate markets are taking the latest development in stride. That was evident in early Asian trading. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index fell 0.6%. Other major regional markets also logged moderate declines. The conflict, which began with an Israeli attack against Iran on June 13, has sent oil prices yo-yoing, which has in turn caused see-saw moves for the U.S. stock market, because of rising and ebbing fears that the war could disrupt the global flow of crude. Iran is a major producer of oil and also sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes. 'The situation remains highly fluid, and much hinges on whether Tehran opts for a restrained reaction or a more aggressive course of action,' Kristian Kerr, head of macro strategy at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina, said in a commentary. An Iran retaliation that included closing off the waterway would be technically difficult to pull off but traders are afraid Iran could severely disrupt transit through it, sending insurance rates spiking and making shippers nervous to move without U.S. Navy escorts Some analysts think Iran is unlikely to close down the waterway because the country uses it to transport its own crude, mostly to China, and oil is a major revenue source for the regime. 'It's a scorched earth possibility, a Sherman-burning-Atlanta move,' said Tom Kloza, chief market analyst at Turner Mason & Co. "It's not probable.' Kloza thinks oil futures will ease back down after initial fears blow over. Ed Yardeni, a long-time analyst, agreed, writing in a report that Tehran leaders would likely hold back. 'They aren't crazy,' he wrote in a note to investors Sunday. 'The price of oil should fall and stock markets around the world should climb higher.' Other experts aren't so sure. Andy Lipow, a Houston analyst covering oil markets for 45 years, said countries are not always rational actors and that he wouldn't be surprised if Tehran lashed out for political or emotional reasons. 'If the Strait of Hormuz was completely shut down, oil prices would rise to $120 to $130 a barrel,' said Lipow, predicting that that would translate to about $4.50 a gallon at the pump and hurt consumers in other ways. 'It would mean higher prices for all those goods transported by truck, and it would be more difficult for the Fed to lower interest rates.' In Asian trading early Monday, Taiwan's Taiex fell 1.5% while the Kospi in South Korea lost 1%. Both Taiwan and South Korea rely heavily on oil imported through the Strait of Hormuz.
Japan Forward
4 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Immigration in Japan: So, You Want to Live Here?
このページを 日本語 で読む In Chitose, Hokkaido, Taki Kensetsu Kogyo is quietly reshaping what immigration can look like in Japan. Led by Yuichi Taki, the small construction firm employs workers from over ten countries and supports them with multilingual manuals and a practical, empathetic work culture. Taki believes that if Japan needs foreign labor, it must also create an environment where people can thrive. His company shows what's possible when both sides commit. Yet such examples remain rare. As Japan struggles to attract and retain foreign residents, the question remains: what's holding it back? This is exactly the question author and expert Fusako Yanase explores in part five of her series on immigration. In this installment, she examines the practical and social barriers facing immigrants in Japan, from language and licensing to education and long-term integration. Fifth in the series. Read the series Immigration in Japan Language remains one of the most significant barriers. In Japan, it's nearly impossible to find employment without Japanese proficiency, and most certification exams require it as well. Yet even after investing time and effort into learning the language, its utility beyond Japan can be minimal. A foreign friend of mine once joked, "I married a Japanese partner and learned the language to live with their family, but outside Japan, it's useless. Talk about a poor return on investment!" For someone who works entirely in English, it's natural to want to get started quickly using English rather than learn a local language from scratch. And even for non-native English speakers, if they're already used to the alphabet, countries that use it may feel more accessible and easier to adapt to. Is this barrier inevitable just because Japanese is the dominant language? Aspiring for jobs in Japan, Vietnamese students learn Japanese ( © Sankei) Not necessarily. Language barriers exist all over the world, but creative solutions can lower them. There are two main ways to lower Japan's language barrier: Increase support for Japanese language education for incoming foreigners and their families. Expand the number of workplaces in Japan where people can work in English (or other languages). Japan lacks both options. That is why it remains a less attractive destination for foreign workers. This isn't unique to Japan, but whether someone can utilize their career or qualifications from their home country can be a critical factor. Even those with advanced professional expertise often find that Japan is not a country where it's easy to qualify for their prior careers. For example, someone who is a doctor or nurse in their home country must pass Japan's national medical or nursing exam to practice. This is a common international challenge. However, a few countries have mutual recognition agreements for medical qualifications. Japan, though, has very few such agreements. Even experienced teachers with years in the classroom must obtain a Japanese teaching license to work in schools. Former business owners face similar hurdles. Without proficiency in reading, writing, and speaking Japanese, starting a business or securing financing can be a major challenge. Skilled professionals in fields like beauty or hairstyling also run into obstacles, as many national certification exams are conducted entirely in Japanese. For those who have fled their homeland to Japan, finding employment and achieving financial independence is an immediate priority. And for those planning to stay even temporarily, ensuring a supportive educational environment for their children becomes equally important. Japan provides free compulsory education. Children of refugee applicants working under a "Designated Activities – Work Permitted" visa are eligible to attend public kindergartens, nurseries, and elementary or junior high schools. In many cases, even those without legal status can enroll their children by applying directly to the educational institution. These services are funded by Japanese taxpayers. However, it's important to remember that foreign residents also contribute through taxes once they begin working. In recent years, despite problems in some areas, the idea of multicultural coexistence has gained broader acceptance. It has become increasingly rare for Japanese parents or students to view Japanese language instruction or supplemental support for foreign children as discriminatory. Many, in fact, now actively support and cooperate with these efforts. Foreign technical intern trainees have been working in caregiving in Japan. Hikone, Shiga Prefecture (©Sankei by Sarasa Shimizu) In urban daycare centers and schools, it is now entirely normal to see children from diverse backgrounds learning in Japanese, side by side with their Japanese peers. When people claim that "Japan accepts very few refugees," the focus is often limited to the small number of applicants who meet the officially recognized definition of refugee. This narrow view fuels the perception that "Japan rejects foreigners." And from there, the debate quickly turns to calls for reforming the immigration and refugee recognition system. While legal reforms are certainly worth discussing, a broader perspective reveals a deeper issue: Japan is increasingly not being chosen as a destination by refugees or by other would-be immigrants. Asking "Why isn't Japan being chosen?" prompts a closer look at the structural and social challenges that make life in Japan difficult for non-Japanese residents and those with foreign roots. What aspects of Japanese society are unwelcoming or inconvenient? What makes long-term settlement so difficult? Addressing these questions is essential — not only for supporting those who genuinely need protection, but also for helping Japan evolve into a more inclusive and multicultural society. A December 2, 2023, feature in Weekly Toyo Keizai titled "Foreign Workers Aren't Coming! Companies That Get Chosen, Companies That Are Abandoned" made the point starkly. Japan is no longer a "chosen country," and the day may soon come when foreign workers stop coming altogether. The next installment dives into this very topic. Japan was once a top destination for workers from emerging Asian nations, known for offering strong earning potential. But as of December 2023, South Korea had taken the lead, with Japan in second place and Taiwan rapidly closing in. Saddled with a weakened yen, Japan no longer held the same appeal it once did. Foreign residents serve as a mirror reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of Japanese society. Many of the challenges they face, whether in language education, skills training, or access to housing that accommodates religious and cultural needs, require more than policy tweaks. Real progress depends on sufficient government investment and broad support from the private sector. These are not issues that immigration reform alone can fix. So, how do you see it? Continues in Part Six: What Brings Refugees to a New Land? Author: Fusako Yanase In addition to being an expert on immigration, Yanase is a best-selling author and former Honorary Chair of the Certified NPO Association for Aid and Relief, Japan. このページを 日本語 で読む
Canada Standard
5 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Indian delegation in Ireland to attend 40th anniversary memorial of Kanishka bombing
Dublin [Ireland], June 23 (ANI): A high-level Indian delegation led by Union Housing and Urban Affairs Minister Hardeep Singh Puri along with BJP National General Secretary Tarun Chugh, and representatives from five states, has arrived in Ireland, to participate in the 40th anniversary memorial of the Air India Kanishka bombing. The commemoration will take place at the Ahakista Memorial in Cork on Sunday. The delegation includes prominent elected representatives, including Arvinder Singh Lovely (Delhi MLA), Baldev Singh Aulakh (Minister from Uttar Pradesh), Gurveer Singh Brar (MLA from Rajasthan), Trilok Singh Cheema (MLA from Uttarakhand), and Narinder Singh Raina (MLA from Jammu and Kashmir). The solemn memorial service will be attended by Ireland's Prime Minister, Micheal Martin, Canada's Minister of Public Safety, Gary Anandasangaree, and several other international dignitaries. This event not only commemorates the 329 innocent victims of the 1985 terror attack but also reinforces the global commitment against terrorism. In a post on X, Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said, 'On the way from Heathrow to dastardly mid air bombing of Air India Kanishka Flight 182 in 1985 which claimed 329 innocent lives off the Irish Coast remains one of the most inhuman acts of terror in aviation history.I was able to pay tribute to the victims at the Kanishka Memorial at Humber Bay Park in Toronto in September 2019 where I also met family members of several victims who had shared their pain and suffering.' 'On Monday, 23 June 2025, I will lead an Indian delegation comprising senior Punjab leader Sh@tarunchughbjpJi, legislators from several states Sdr@ArvinderLovelyJi, Sdr@BaldevAulakhJi, Sdr@GurveerBrarJi and Sdr Trilok Singh Cheema Ji, to join the Irish Prime Minister HE@MichealMartinTD, Canadian Minister of Public Safety HE Gary Anandasangaree@gary_srpand others, to pay homage to the victims at an event at the Ahakista Memorial in Cork, Ireland in a solemn moment of remembrance and unity, on the 40th anniversary of the reprehensible Kanishka Bombing,' he added. Speaking ahead of the ceremony, BJP National General Secretary Tarun Chugh said, 'The Kanishka bombing was a painful reminder of the brutal face of terrorism, which claimed innocent lives across nations. As I stand on Irish soil, I pay my heartfelt tribute to those who perished, and reaffirm our resolve to unite against terror in all its forms.' (ANI)
