Parliament defends 'inclusive' trans toilet ban after MSPs and staff complain
READ MORE:
Has Holyrood misinterpreted the Supreme Court ruling on sex?
MSPs express 'deep concern' over trans toilet ruling
Holyrood adds gender-neutral toilets after sex ruling
Mr Harvie is one of 17 MSPs to have signed an open letter criticising the recent change in policy.
The letter—also signed by 30 staff members, most of whom work for MSPs—was organised by the Good Law Project.
It described the new rules as 'transphobic', warning their implementation would be 'deeply invasive' and risk 'humiliation, harassment or worse'.
During an urgent question at Holyrood, Mr Harvie cited former Supreme Court judge Lord Sumption, who has said that organisations are permitted—but not obliged—to exclude trans people from single-sex spaces.
Mr Harvie told MSPs: 'In making the decision to take this exclusive, exclusionary approach, I am concerned that the SPCB is risking taking us back to the breach of human rights which existed prior to the creation of the Gender Recognition Act in 2004 and a position that just as little as 10 years ago was the obsession of the extremist fringe of the US Republican Party.
"It is not enough to use words like inclusive experience and welcoming environment."
He asked whether the corporate body recognised the impact the changes had already had on 'those who are being told that they are no longer permitted to use basic facilities like toilets on the same basis as everyone else, and who now feel unwelcome and demeaned in their own workplace'.
Holyrood adopted the policy following the Supreme Court ruling (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Responding on behalf of the SPCB, SNP MSP Christine Grahame said it was 'rather unfortunate' that Mr Harvie had used such language, and insisted the corporate body had acted 'in a tolerant and sensitive manner, in a very delicate and balanced manner'.
'The Scottish Parliament has always sought to reflect the founding principles and to be an open, accessible institution to promote participation and equal opportunities,' she said.
'We remain deeply committed to these principles and to provide—I know you do not like this word—an inclusive environment where all, including those in the trans and non-binary community, feel supported and welcome to work and visit.'
The changes, which came into effect earlier this month, follow the Supreme Court ruling that 'man' and 'woman' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex, not acquired gender.
An interim update from the Equality and Human Rights Commission advised that in most workplaces and public-facing services, trans women should not be permitted to use female-only facilities, and vice versa.
Under the new policy, all toilets and changing rooms marked 'male' or 'female' at Holyrood are now designated on the basis of biological sex. The Parliament has increased the number of gender-neutral facilities by redesignating three public toilets and two private facilities used by MSPs and staff.
Ms Grahame said Parliament would not 'police' toilet use, but a complaints process was available. 'We are certainly not monitoring the use of public facilities,' she said. 'This is not going to be policed by the corporate body.'
Several MSPs, including the SNP's Emma Roddick, questioned whether the decision had been made prematurely and whether it risked creating a hostile working environment.
Ms Roddick asked: 'Does [the SPCB] recognise that this unexpected and surprising policy change has put [trans and non-binary staff] in an impossible situation and potentially a hostile working environment?'
Ms Grahame replied: 'I certainly hope and expect that this will not put anyone in this Parliament in a hostile environment. That is not the culture within this building.'
READ MORE
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton asked that 'no parliamentary staff member will be put in the position of having to challenge a toilet user in the future'.
Green MSP Lorna Slater asked how trans people would be expected to 'prove' their right to use a facility.
'Members in this chamber may be aware of the lively internet conspiracy that I myself am a trans woman,' she said. 'If a complaint is made about me using a woman's toilet, how does the SPCB expect me to demonstrate or prove my ability to use this toilet? Should I bring my birth certificate? Should I subject myself to a medical examination?'
Ms Grahame replied: 'No one is asking anyone for any proof of anything, and I fully intend to use the gender neutral toilets myself.'
Scottish Conservative MSP Russell Findlay said the discussion was a 'farcical waste of time'.
'The people of Scotland expect politicians to focus on what matters—rising household bills, their children's education, getting a GP appointment, fixing the roads, keeping communities safe—yet the priority for out-of-touch SNP, Labour, LibDem and Green MSPs is an urgent debate about the Holyrood toilets.'
His colleague Craig Hoy questioned whether the decision had been unanimous, which would suggest Green MSP Maggie Chapman had 'both supported these measures and also wrote a letter in opposition to them'.
Ms Grahame responded: 'Decisions by the corporate body do not ever go to a vote—they are made by consent.'
A full consultation by the SPCB is expected later this year, once a revised statutory code from the Equality and Human Rights Commission has been finalised and approved by ministers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tony Blair to help Scottish Labour beat SNP
Sir Tony Blair has been enlisted to help Scottish Labour oust the SNP from power in next year's Holyrood election. The former prime minister's Institute for Global Change has been asked to help the party develop new health policies. They have been earmarked for Scottish Labour's manifesto for next May's Holyrood election, with the SNP's record on running the NHS expected to be one of the key issues. The Sunday Times reported that the institute is working for no fee on proposals for how to improve access to GPs and measures to prevent illness. It is also expected to make proposals about how 'more effective use of technology solutions' will help drive down record waiting lists for operations. Sir Tony's not-for-profit institute works in more than 40 countries and focusses on harnessing new technologies and artificial intelligence to reform how governments are run and public services delivered. But the former prime minister, who won three general elections, remains a controversial figure within and outside the Labour Party. A review by Audit Scotland has warned that 'difficult decisions' may be needed about whether some NHS services can continue, with major reform 'urgently needed' to cope with growing demand. First Minister John Swinney unveiled his NHS recovery blueprint in January and admitted there were crises in parts of the health service. But unions and professional bodies representing Scotland's NHS medics attacked the plan's lack of detail, and questioned where the funding and staff would come from. SNP ministers have also faced heavy criticism for failing to develop an NHS app, which has been available to patients in England since 2019. It is hoped that a trial of the Scottish app will be launched by the end of this year, but it will have limited functionality compared with its English equivalent. A Tony Blair Institute spokesman said: 'We are always happy to talk to any and all political parties who are interested in our work, all of which is published and publicly available. 'The conversations we have had with Scottish Labour are specifically around how our health policy proposals could apply to healthcare in Scotland. We intend to publish this work regardless of the outcome of the election.' Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health spokeswoman, said: 'Our NHS is stretched to breaking point and technology is a way to ease that pressure — but the SNP is squandering the opportunity. 'From GP practices using fax machines to doctors relying on pagers, the SNP is running an analogue health service in a digital age. GPs have been sounding the alarm about how a woeful lack of basic IT is holding them back — it's time we have a government that will listen. 'A Scottish Labour government will put Scotland on the cutting edge of medical innovation and modernise our NHS so it is fit for the future.' At the end of March, there were 63,403 people waiting for outpatient treatment that had been continuing for more than a year, an increase of 34 per cent compared with 12 months previously. They included 5,262 cases waiting two years or more for treatment, a record high. Angus Robertson, chair of the SNP's campaign committee, said: 'It speaks volumes that Scottish Labour are relying on the advice of the man to led us into a disastrous, illegal war in Iraq to tell them what is best for Scotland. 'Keir Starmer and Anas Sarwar have no vision for Scotland's future and rather than listening to the people of Scotland, they can only look backwards at a discredited, unpopular figure like Tony Blair. 'Only the SNP is offering people a positive, ambitious vision for Scotland's future — improving our NHS, tackling the cost of living and ensuring Scotland reaches its full potential with the powers of independence.'
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Scottish Parliament chief to stand down at next Holyrood election
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HOLYROOD presiding officer Alison Johnstone will stand down as an MSP next year. The former Scottish Greens politician has announced that she won't run in next May's election. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 Alison Johnstone is set to stand down as an MSP Credit: Alamy 2 She has been presiding officer at the Scottish Parliament since 2021 Credit: Alamy Ms Johnstone took on the non-partisan presiding officer position in 2021. Following the last Scottish Parliament election, the Lothians MSP emerged as the only candidate for the Holyrood chamber role. She was elected with 97 votes in favour, 28 against, two abstentions and one spoiled ballot. The job of presiding officer is equivalent to the Speaker of the House of Commons. They are responsible for overseeing business at Holyrood and chairing meetings in the debating chamber. Ms Johnstone, 59, said: 'I was elected in 2011 and it was always my intention that this would be my last term in Holyrood.' She said she did not come from a political background, adding: 'I was not in a political party but campaigned for the creation of a Scottish Parliament and I then worked as an assistant for Robin Harper, the first-ever Green parliamentarian in the UK elected to the first-ever Scottish Parliament.' Recent weeks have seen the Scottish Conservatives accuse Ms Johnstone of bias in her role, an allegation she has always denied. At the end of May, the presiding officer took the rare decision to kick former Tory leader Douglas Ross out of the chamber due to his interjections at First Minister's Questions. During her tenure, Ms Johnstone guided the parliament through the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions, which included implementing social distancing and remote working practices. John Swinney defends Gray's car use after minister was 'driven to pub' She was also heavily involved in the ceremony following the death of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022, when the King visited the Scottish Parliament to hear a special motion of condolence session. Before entering politics, she was a qualified athletics coach and previously held the east of Scotland titles for the 800m and 1,500m.
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump toy tariffs: Supreme Court won't speed decision on challenge
More: Hasbro layoffs: Toymaker restructures due to tariff struggles and weak demand The company, which makes educational toys, won a court ruling on May 29 that Trump cannot unilaterally impose tariffs using the emergency legal authority he had cited for them. That ruling is currently on hold, leaving the tariffs in place for now. Learning Resources asked the Supreme Court to take the rare step of immediately hearing the case to decide the legality of the tariffs, effectively leapfrogging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Washington, where the case is pending. More: 'Two dolls instead of 30': Trump acknowledges prices will force consumers to cut back More: Second federal court blocks Trump tariffs, this time for Illinois toy importers Two district courts have ruled that Trump's tariffs are not justified under the law he cited for them, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Both of those cases are on appeal. No court has yet backed the sweeping emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
