Reading surgeon suspended from duties after three deaths

A hospital consultant has been suspended from surgical duties after the deaths of three patients in three months.Colorectal consultant Daniel McGrath ceased surgery shortly after operating on 52-year-old Lorraine Parker at Royal Berkshire Hospital in Reading in January 2024.In a report on Mrs Parker's death, Senior Berkshire Coroner Heidi Connor said she had raised concerns about the surgeon with the General Medical Council (GMC).The hospital said Mr McGrath was still seeing outpatients under supervision, but had stopped surgical duties 10 months ago.
Mrs Parker, a childminder, died in March 2024 after a surgical join leaked and was not quickly diagnosed and managed, the inquest heard.Independent medical experts were critical of her aftercare rather than the surgery itself, the coroner said.In a Prevention of Future Deaths Report, Ms Connor said: "Lorraine Parker's death was the third in three months following surgery by the same consultant colorectal surgeon."She said one of Mr McGrath's previous patients, Michael Edwards, died in December 2023 following a "significant surgical error" when a healthy part of his bowel was removed instead of a cancerous area.However, an internal hospital review rated his care as either "good" or "excellent", the coroner said.In Mrs Parker's case, the hospital found "no learning points", she added.A third patient died in March 2024, Ms Connor said.
The coroner told Ms Parker's inquest: "Having conducted all three of these inquests and another earlier case back in 2018 [at a private hospital]... I am struck by the lack of reflection on the part of this surgeon."There has been throughout little acceptance of any of the issues and criticisms raised by different independent experts."I am concerned about the risk of future deaths should Mr McGrath continue to operate here or elsewhere."Ms Connor said the surgeon's case was her first ever referral to the GMC.She added: "It appears that the option to return to operating remains open for Mr McGrath, even after a GMC notification by the trust with certain caveats and requirements in place before he may do so."
A spokesperson for the Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, said: "The trust extends our sincerest condolences to Ms Parker's family."The consultant ceased surgical duties 10 months ago and we have worked closely with the Coroner and the GMC to provide them with assurance about measures put in place to oversee his work which has been restricted to outpatient work."We continue to monitor this arrangement and will implement any further recommendations made following this inquest."The provision of safe and high quality patient care is an absolute priority for the trust and all our clinicians work to rigorous protocols to ensure patient safety. "In 2024, Mr McGrath was ordered to pay £1.2m towards damages and costs following the death of his patient Simon Healey at Berkshire Independent Hospital in Reading.
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, and X.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BBC News

3 days ago

• BBC News

General Medical Council reviewing 35 Nottingham maternity cases

The body that regulates doctors says it is looking into complaints from 35 families who have shared concerns about Nottingham's maternity services.​The city's two NHS hospitals are at the centre of the largest inquiry into NHS failings since the health service was founded in 1948, being led by Donna Ockenden, after hundreds of babies died or suffered harm.​The General Medical Council (GMC) told the BBC it was also looking to talk to 33 other families about their maternity cases in organisation said investigations into the 35 family cases were at different stages. To begin with it "triages" cases with an initial assessment to check that allegations fall within the scope of the organisation's cases then move into the investigation stage where the GMC looks into cases further. This may involve gathering evidence, interviewing people and examining are a range of possible outcomes, including no further action, a warning or, where there is evidence of impaired fitness to practice, the case may be passed on to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) for a a case is proven, the tribunal can impose a range of sanctions, which can include ordering retraining or suspension from the medical register. The ultimate sanction is for someone to be removed from the register, sometimes described as being "struck off " which would bar someone from working as a doctor. Last weekend the GMC and the regulator of nurses and midwives, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) . apologised to harmed families for not responding quicker to the Nottingham maternity organisations plan to have surgeries in Nottingham where people can give information to both regulators about professional conduct they would like to be examined. The NMC told the BBC it currently has 12 family cases referred to it relating to Nottingham maternity cases mentioning 38 names of health professionals. Fourteen of those individuals were being investigated and would have been alerted to that, while the rest are concerns undergoing what are described as "screening checks" before a decision is made on whether to progress to a formal investigation. Harmed families in Nottingham have been pressing for greater individual accountability over maternity failings. A police investigation named Operation Perth is ongoing which will consider whether criminal charges should be brought against any individuals or whether there is a case of corporate manslaughter for Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (NUH) to answer. The Care Quality Commission has successfully prosecuted the trust twice over the deaths of four babies. NUH has said it has an ongoing maternity improvement programme and is co-operating with the police and regulators.

The Guardian

3 days ago

• The Guardian

Overseas-trained doctors ‘put off UK due to cost of living and low salaries'

Doctors are choosing not to come and work in the UK because they are put off by low salaries, the high cost of living and poor quality of life. Research by the General Medical Council (GMC) shows that doctors who shun the UK are opting to move instead to the United States, Australia and Canada to earn more and have a better life. Overall, 84% of doctors trained abroad surveyed by the GMC said that other countries were better than Britain at paying good salaries and only 5% felt the opposite was true. The UK was also seen as being very poor for the cost of living and quality of life, attracting scores of minus 44 and minus 43. Among doctors considering where to further their careers, the UK scored worse than competitor countries on 14 of the 15 issues the GMC asked them about. It also recorded negative ratings for being an advanced healthcare system (minus 26), doctors being treated with respect by patients and the public (minus 20), quality of patient care (minus 17) and having enough appropriately qualified staff (minus 17). The gloomy findings for the UK came as resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – in England were voting on whether to launch a renewed six-month campaign of strikes in pursuit of the 29% pay rise their union, the British Medical Association (BMA), claims they deserve. Consultant doctors will also take part in an indicative ballot to assess their willingness to stage walkouts over pay. Charlie Massey, the GMC's chief executive, said its findings were worrying and should spur the NHS to do more to welcome overseas-trained doctors and improve their working conditions, in order to avoid the shortages of medics which many hospitals and GP practices face. 'This research showed that issues of concern to doctors who are considering a move to the UK reflect much of what we hear from doctors who are working here now,' he said. 'It is concerning, as these factors impact on retention as well as recruitment. The UK is envied for the way it trains doctors, but there is room for improvement and we shouldn't assume that will always continue.' The NHS in England has recruited even larger numbers of doctors from elsewhere in recent years than usual. Last year 36% of all doctors there were non-UK nationals, up from 26.6% in 2016. The GMC, which regulates the medical profession in the UK, found that the UK scored highly among doctors from abroad because they find it easy to register to practise, navigate the immigration system and find a job compared with other places. Its findings are based on an online survey of 3,092 doctors in other countries. Of those, 2,556 came to the UK and joined the GMC's medical register and 536 opted to move elsewhere. The research, which probed what motivates doctors to choose which country to move to, found that some foreign doctors got disillusioned and quit the UK soon after moving there. 'Among doctors who have recently practised in the UK (since 2021) but have since left, many left sooner than they had intended to. Half of these doctors ended up practising in the UK for less than a year, when only 15% had this intention,' it said. 'Those who had left were disappointed with the UK in terms of colleagues and the friendliness of staff, adhering to different guidelines and standards, the bureaucracy and work culture/ethics.' Dr Latifa Patel, the BMA's workforce lead, said: 'The NHS is faced with a bizarre double-whammy of international medical graduates not wanting to work here due to low salaries, high cost of living, and poor quality of life, meanwhile UK trained doctors working in the NHS are feeling forced out the door to find roles in other countries where both their pay and quality of life are better.' Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has criticised the NHS for being too reliant on foreign doctors, nurses and midwives, and not hiring enough homegrown health professionals. He recently castigated as 'immoral' NHS recruitment of staff from World Health Organization-designated 'red list' countries, which are poor and have less developed health systems.

The Independent

4 days ago

• The Independent

Anger over ‘light touch' sanction for doctor who had sexual relationship with teenage patient

A vulnerable patient has hit out at the 'light touch' punishment given to a doctor who had an inappropriate sexual relationship with her while she was a teenager. Dr Cian Hughes met the girl in hospital in 2011 after observing her surgical procedure at Bristol Children's Hospital when she was aged just 13 and went on to start a sexual relationship with her four years later. Dr Hughes, a 23-year-old fourth-year medical student at the University of Bristol when the pair met, was last week suspended for misconduct. But the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service did not strike him off, despite pleas from the General Medical Council. The victim, patient A, has now hit out at the sanction and accused the panel of denying her a voice after she was not allowed to give oral evidence. She told The Independent: 'The penalty feels very light touch for the impact he's had and the things he has done to me. My confidence in the medical profession is pretty much non-existent. 'I think [the sanction] is too lax. This case isn't just about me and him. There's nothing you can do to undo what he did and what happened. The reason I followed through with this for the last five years has been about making sure that other doctors don't do it to other patients.' The woman, who suffers from PTSD, added that her physical disability was not highlighted by the tribunal panel as an aggravating factor, but she believes it should have been. '[This], along with the age gap, my mental health at the time, the way we met, how much I trusted him and my naivety around relationships contributed to a very unhealthy power imbalance,' she claimed. 'The long-term consequences of his actions for me are potentially going to be lifelong.' During the MPTS hearing, thousands of messages between Dr Hughes and the young woman were presented, as well as a written statement. Dr Hughes's defence said the relationship between the medic and Patient A was 'a very loving relationship'. Patient A, meanwhile, said he was 'a very capable and kind mannered medical professional' but claimed 'behind the bedroom door, he was a different person' which she said was not displayed in the text messages. Patient A told The Independent she was clear to the MPTS that she could and wanted to give evidence, but was denied this. According to MPTS rules, victims of doctors facing sexual misconduct claims are not always called to give oral evidence unless the panel or the doctor ask for them to be. Witnesses are only called to give live evidence where their evidence is disputed by a party of required by the tribunal. She added: 'I came away feeling more traumatised, especially since I had always said I wanted to give oral evidence. '[The MPTS's] process is victim-hostile. This process doesn't allow me to have a voice or even be treated as a victim by the MPTS.' In its determination of the sanction, the MPTS tribunal said that Dr Hughes' misconduct 'was serious and warranted a significant response to mark its gravity.' However, in determining that suspension was more appropriate than being banned from the profession, it highlighted mitigating factors including the medic's admissions, apology and 'well-developed insight, remediation and remorse'. It said it accepted Dr Hughes's lawyer's submissions that this was a 'nuanced' case and 'distinguished from other cases of sexual misconduct where erasure was required.' The panel also said that although Dr Hughes had 'abused his professional position' and started an 'improper relationship with a vulnerable patient', it was found that he did not exploit her vulnerability. In submissions, the GMC argued Dr Hughes had shown a 'blatant disregard' for the guidance around inappropriate relationships. However, the MPTS panel accepted the doctor's argument that he had 'persuaded himself' that the guidance 'permitted the relationship.' During the hearing, it was revealed the medic is also facing undertakings by the Irish Medical Council. The IMC would not confirm any details of the complaint; however, conditions listed on its register say: 'Dr Hughes is subject to an undertaking that he will, inter alia, not afford any treatment to certain patient groups except under specified conditions.' Rebecca Cox, co-founder of campaign group Surviving in Scrubs, which has campaigned against sexual assault within the NHS, said the group was 'dismayed' to see 'another weak sanction' from the MPTS. She added: 'Sadly, this fits with a trend of sanction decisions that do not reflect the severity of the case or distress caused to victims. The MPTS repeatedly fail victims of sexual misconduct and violence.' Dr Cox said the lack of opportunity for victims to voice their testimony is an issue that has been raised many times. Professor Carrie Newlands, consultant surgeon, co-lead for the working party on sexual misconduct in surgery at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, said: 'This is yet another case of misconduct by a doctor against someone vulnerable with a significant power imbalance, and where despite the GMC recommending erasure, the MPTS have again given a lesser sanction.' She said the suspension of a doctor for such 'egregious behaviour' is incompatible with the GMC's zero tolerance approach to sexual misconduct and incompatible with MPTS guidance, which states more serious action, such as being struck off, is likely to be appropriate in sexual misconduct cases. In 2020, Patient A made a report to the police; however, in April 2021, the investigation was closed with no further no further. Reacting to the tribunal's suspension, a spokesperson for the GMC said it would consider whether there are grounds for appeal against the MPTS decision, but said the 12-month suspension was still a 'significant sanction for Dr Hughes.' Dr Hughes was approached for comment through his lawyers.