US abortion clinics are closing even in states where abortion is legal. More cuts could be coming
The abortion funding system across the U.S. is battered three years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed states to enforce bans.
An initial surge of donations has subsided, scores of clinics have closed and advocates fear that federal policy changes will result in more shutting down.
'We're all collectively struggling,' said Ramsie Monk, director of development at the Women's Health Centers of West Virginia and Maryland, which opened a clinic in 2023 in western Maryland after abortion was banned in West Virginia .
'I honestly don't know if it's a sustainable model,' said Mercedes Sanchez, executive director at the Cedar River Clinics in Washington. 'Clinics, providers, funds are all very committed to making sure people can access care, but it is definitely going to be more of a challenge.'
Bans in some states mean travel has become a bigger part of obtaining an abortion, bring a host of costs.
A mitigating factor is that most abortions are now done with medications. They can be prescribed by telehealth, including to women in states where abortion is banned. But they can't be used in every case, some women prefer procedures, and there are challenges to the legality of pills and how they're prescribed.
Not all private insurance plans cover abortions. Federal taxpayer funds cannot be used for abortions, but state Medicaid funds cover them in some places. And a network of private funding helps cover procedures or travel and other costs.
The increase in contributions that followed the 2022 Supreme Court ruling has declined for most funds and clinics. 'The resources have not kept pace with demand continuing to surge,' Lynn McCann-Yeh, co-executive director of the Baltimore Abortion Fund.
With bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy now being enforced in 12 states and bans at about six weeks' gestation being enforced in four others, travel for abortion has become more frequent. Costs for each trip can include plane tickets or gas for long drives, meals, hotels and child care — all on top of clinic fees.
Last year, the National Abortion Federation's hotline fund reduced the portion of clinic costs it covers for people with financial needs to 30% from 50% so it could help more people as demand increased. The group's says travel costs now average over $1,000 per person.
Travel needs have made the job for abortion funds not only more expensive but more intricate.
Before the Texas ban started in 2021, Fund Texas Choice got about 40 calls a month, executive director Anna Rupani said. Now, it's over 200. And assisting each caller can take more time because they involve arranging flights and hotels, not just lining up rides to clinics in the state.
Some people cobble together money from a hodgepodge of groups to pay for an abortion. Grace McGarry, who manages the phone line for Whole Woman's Health, which operates five clinics across the U.S., said he talked to a patient who was getting aid from nine different groups.
Since the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, I Need An A, which operates a website dedicated to providing information about abortion options, has tallied 105 clinics closing.
Twenty-nine closures were in states where abortion is now banned at all stages of pregnancy. Eleven were in states where it's banned at about six weeks' gestation, before many women realize they're pregnant. But 65 of the closures were in other states.
At the same time, 34 clinics have opened anew or moved to states where abortion is legal.
'Each and every one of those has been a blow to that community that hasn't been refilled,' said Rebecca Nall, the founder of I Need An A.
Planned Parenthood North Central States announced in May that it would close eight locations in Iowa and Minnesota while expanding services at some other clinics.
Ruth Richardson, the CEO of that Planned Parenthood affiliate, said the reorganization recognizes that the number of abortions in Iowa plummeted after the state started enforcing its strict abortion law . It also reflects that the regional group's overall budget is down.
'We've got the compounded challenges of the fact that sexual and reproductive health care has been politicized in this environment,' she said.
Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA Pro-Life America, said in a statement that the closures are warranted: 'Planned Parenthood's focus is squarely on abortions, gender transitions and political spending.'
In March, the Department of Health and Human Services withheld $27.5 million that groups were expecting to provide family planning, contraception, cancer screening and sexually transmitted infection tests and treatment. Some of the groups also provide abortions and include at least 11 regional Planned Parenthood affiliates.
'We're absolutely in a public health crisis of epic proportions,' said Brittany Fonteno, president and CEO of the National Abortion Federation. 'We're in a situation where there are reproductive health care deserts, not just abortion care deserts.'
President Donald Trump's tax and budget bill that is up for consideration in the Senate after getting House approval would deliver more blows to abortion funding.
It would bar federally subsidized health insurance plans from covering abortion, except if it's necessary to save the life of the woman, or in cases of rape or incest.
The bill also would bar Medicaid funds from flowing to Planned Parenthood, the nation's biggest abortion provider.
Planned Parenthood said those provisions could lead to the closures of about half its clinics that provide abortion —- and about one-fourth of abortion clinics nationwide. The biggest impact on affiliate clinics would be in states where abortion is legal.
Alexis McGill-Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said it's almost been a challenge to fund abortion — and all health care — for low-income people.
'If the market could have figured it out,' she said, 'then we wouldn't exist.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
9 hours ago
- Business Wire
CCS Presents Four Peer-Reviewed Posters at American Diabetes Association's 85th Scientific Sessions
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- CCS, a leading provider of clinical solutions and home-delivered medical supplies for those living with chronic conditions, will present four peer-reviewed posters at the American Diabetes Association's (ADA) 85th Scientific Sessions, which will take place June 20–23 in Chicago. These latest poster presentations illustrate CCS's focus on delivering evidence-based approaches to diabetes care management that ensure patients have the education and coaching they need to thrive and cost-effectively stay adherent while managing their chronic condition. "At CCS, we meet patients where they are — with empathy, education, and evidence-based support..." Share The ADA Scientific Sessions is a globally recognized conference dedicated to advancing the field of diabetes. This annual meeting serves as a critical forum for presenting cutting-edge research, innovation, and new evidence-based approaches to diabetes prevention, management, and care. Presentation Highlights from CCS at the ADA Scientific Sessions CCS's clinical strategy and innovation vice president, Coni Dennis, DNP, RN, and NE-BC, will present findings for all four accepted poster presentations at the ADA's 85th Scientific Sessions, and she shared this insight leading into the event: 'At CCS, we meet patients where they are — with empathy, education, and evidence-based support. These poster presentations reflect our commitment to improving health outcomes for people with diabetes by combining data-driven clinical insight with hands-on, compassionate care.' All poster presentations will take place at the conference on Sunday, June 22, from 12:30–1:30 p.m. CT in West Hall F1. The following are the four specific posters that CCS will be presenting: Presentation Title: Evaluating the Impact of Multichannel Diabetes Care Coaching and Education in Patients New to Continuous Glucose Monitoring Abstract Number: 534 Summary: This study, part of an ongoing randomized control trial (RCT), evaluated whether adults with diabetes newly starting a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) achieve better outcomes when they receive diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) from a certified diabetes care and education specialist (CDCES), compared to using a CGM alone. Presentation Title: Examining the Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sourcing in Medicaid Patients — Adherence, Healthcare Costs, and Utilization Abstract Number: 1046 Summary: This study compared healthcare costs and utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries who received CGM supplies through a pharmacy or a durable medical equipment provider. Presentation Title: Healthcare Costs and Utilization Among Patients Eligible for Continuous Glucose Monitors — A Comparison of Users and Nonusers Abstract Number: 1049 Summary: This retrospective cohort study used claims data to compare glycemic control, healthcare utilization, and total cost of care over 12 months among individuals on bolus insulin who used CGMs versus those who did not. It also assessed the incidence of hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Presentation Title: Evaluating an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Initiative for Food Insecurity Screening and Referral in Adults with Diabetes Initiating Continuous Glucose Monitor Therapy Abstract Number: 1143 Summary: This study assessed food insecurity (FI) among adults with diabetes initiating CGM therapy, comparing rates to national averages and examining glycemic outcomes between food-insecure and food-secure individuals. These posters will be made available on the American Diabetes Association's website after August 25. About CCS CCS is the strategic partner addressing America's most pressing healthcare challenges through intelligent chronic care management, tackling the $412 billion annual diabetes burden and chronic conditions affecting over 133 million Americans. At the core of CCS's differentiated model is LivingConnected®, a human-led, digitally enabled clinical solution. PropheSee™ — an AI-powered predictive model that identifies nonadherence risk and delivers personalized interventions — is an integral part of this solution, creating a first-of-its-kind platform to improve adherence, enhance clinical outcomes, and help prevent costly hospitalizations. By combining data-driven insights with three decades of industry relationships, CCS is the smart choice for health plans, providers, employers, and manufacturers who believe that value-based care starts by keeping patients healthy and delivers benefits like lower cost of care, improved HEDIS scores, and alleviating provider burnout. CCS's approach extends clinical reach while supporting over 200,000 people nationwide with home-delivered medical supplies and pharmaceuticals annually. Recognized as a Great Place to Work® and with numerous peer-reviewed publications validating our care management approach, CCS is more than a trusted supplier — we're a partner in transforming chronic care delivery. To learn more about how CCS is addressing today's healthcare challenges, visit or connect with us on LinkedIn.
Politico
11 hours ago
- Politico
Senate megabill will strengthen Obamacare, says red state hospital CEO
A provision in a key Senate committee's version of the GOP megabill will backfire against Republicans by forcing red states to consider doing exactly what Republicans don't want them to: expand Medicaid, the CEO of the South Carolina Hospital Association told POLITICO. Republicans have sought to shelter the 10 conservative states that have declined to expand Medicaid to cover more low-income people, as Obamacare encourages with generous federal subsidies. But the Senate bill, in an effort to find the savings needed to extend President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, would still blow a hole in the budgets of Palmetto state hospitals by reducing what insurers who contract with the state to provide Medicaid services can pay them. States and Washington share the insurance program's costs. 'It affects the viability of the whole system,' said Thornton Kirby, chief executive of the South Carolina Hospital Association, which estimates the Senate proposal will cost the state over $2.3 billion annually. 'If you take away this alternative way to balance the budget, you leave us with only one path…Medicaid expansion,' Kirby said. The Senate is rushing to complete its version of a bill that would enact Trump's agenda using a procedure that requires only a simple majority vote. Trump wants it done by July 4, but with the slim margins in both houses of Congress, the industries affected by the bill are hoping to peel off votes to save themselves from cuts. Republicans can lose no more than three votes in either chamber as long as Democrats remain united in opposition. To make the case that the restrictions on so-called state-directed payments need to go, the hospital association is leaning on three home state Republicans with clout: Sen. Tim Scott, who has a seat on the Finance Committee that has proposed the restrictions; Rep. Russell Fry, who's on the Energy and Commerce Committee that drafted the Medicaid provisions of the megabill the House passed last month; and Henry McMaster, the governor of South Carolina and, Kirby said, a personal friend. 'I don't want to put him in the hot seat,' Kirby said of McMaster. 'He doesn't want to see [Medicaid] upended.' Of Scott, Kirby said he's in touch at least every other day and that the senator and Trump ally 'has been a champion.' 'He understands…he doesn't want to go down that path' of Medicaid expansion, Kirby added. The three Republicans did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Expanding Medicaid could help replace the revenue the Senate provision would take away because it would make many more people — South Carolina now has one of the nation's higher uninsured rates at 9 percent — eligible for the program. Under Obamacare, the federal government picks up 90 percent of the cost for the new enrollees. Under the Finance Committee proposal, state-directed payments to hospitals serving Medicaid patients would fall by 10 percent each year until the total payment rate is only 100-110 percent of the Medicare payment rate. In South Carolina, the current payment rate is more than twice the rate paid by Medicare, the federal health insurance program for elderly people. Hospitals in states that have expanded Medicaid would take an additional hit under the Senate proposal. The Finance Committee would lower the provider tax rate that the 40 states that have expanded Medicaid can levy on hospitals from 6 percent to 3.5 percent. States have used the taxes to boost their federal matching funds, which they have then sent back to hospitals in higher reimbursements. The Senate would freeze the tax rates in states like South Carolina that haven't expanded Medicaid, but would not require them to lower them. The version of the megabill the House passed would freeze the rates for all states, a plan Kirby was willing to accept. On Friday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) urged GOP leaders to strike the Finance Committee language on Medicaid, warning the crackdown won't clear the House. Republican senators hope to pass their version of the bill next week after which the House would need to pass it before Trump could sign it into law.
Axios
11 hours ago
- Axios
Vanderbilt University Medical Center announces up to 650 layoffs
Vanderbilt University Medical Center announced Friday that up to 650 people would be laid off as the institution scrambles to respond to the Trump administration's steep cuts to medical research. The big picture: The Trump administration is pursuing massive cuts to National Institutes of Health research grants and to the Department of Health and Human Services. The budget bill pending in Congress proposes deep cuts to Medicaid, which provides health insurance to 83 million low-income adults and their children. Aggressive cuts have put research hospitals across the country on their heels. VUMC president and CEO Jeff Balser previously warned that the federal cuts would lead to layoffs and hobbled research projects. Flashback: In March, VUMC announced plans to slash its budget by $250 million because of the Trump administration's spending cuts. At the time, Balser said more cuts and layoffs could be needed as the scope of the funding fallout became clear. The latest: In a new statement Friday, VUMC said operating costs would be cut by $300 million due to "budgetary actions in Washington, DC related to government-sponsored research and patient care." Layoffs will hit up to 650 employees "primarily in research, administrative and other support areas." That total includes employees who were already laid off earlier this year as well as a new round of reductions that began Friday. VUMC announced staffing reductions in a video message to employees. What they're saying:"While this is extremely difficult, the staffing loss represents less than 2% of VUMC's total workforce," the VUMC statement read. Laid off employees will get severance and "other assistance." "VUMC sees more than 3.5 million patient visits each year and remains committed to meeting the needs of all who depend on us for health care."
