NZ's Willis Criticizes RBNZ Handling of Orr Resignation
(Bloomberg) -- New Zealand Finance Minister Nicola Willis has criticized the Reserve Bank for its handling of former Governor Adrian Orr's resignation, saying it should have been more transparent about his reason for quitting.
'It's my expectation that all government agencies comply with their statutory obligations and wherever possible are open and transparent with New Zealanders,' Willis told reporters on Thursday. 'Of course they need to balance that against their legal obligations when it comes to employment discussions and agreements, but on this one I think they could have pulled their socks up.'
Orr resigned abruptly on March 5 without giving a reason, and RBNZ Board Chair Neil Quigley would only say that it was a personal decision. But documents released yesterday under the Official Information Act reveal that Orr quit because the board was willing to agree to considerably less money in a new five-year funding agreement with the government than he thought was necessary.
Willis said she had spoken to Quigley 'and expressed my view that they did not manage that Official Information Act request well and that I expect them to do better.' Quigley acknowledged 'they could have, and should have, done better,' she said.
The RBNZ acknowledges it was late in producing a response to some of the OIA requests it received, Quigley said in a statement following Willis's remarks.
'I regret that this delay occurred,' he said. 'The circumstances and the volume of information associated with the OIAs were complex, and we needed to be sure that our consideration of relevant information was comprehensive. As well as our obligations under the Official Information Act, we needed to take into careful consideration the former governor's exit agreement and privacy law.'
Quigley said the exit agreement and the ongoing work on the funding agreement had meant he was limited in what he could say about the resignation on March 5. That included the need to explain to staff any potential implications of a lower level of funding on staffing levels, he said.
'We are taking into account the feedback that we have received on our management of these OIA requests and looking carefully at how we can improve our response times in the future,' he said.
(Updates with RBNZ chair's comments in fifth paragraph)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Sensex crashes 900 points; why is Indian stock market falling after the US attack on Iran? Explained with key factors
Indian stock market witnessed significant losses in early trade on Monday, June 23, with the Sensex crashing over 900 points, and the Nifty 50 falling below 24,850 on a broad selloff amid weak global cues. The Sensex opened at 81,704.07 against its previous close of 82,408.17 and touched an intraday low of 81,476.76, falling over 900 points, or more than 1 per cent. The Nifty 50 opened at 24,939.75 against its previous close of 25,112.40 and dropped over 1 per cent to an intraday low of 24,824.85. The BSE Midcap and Smallcap indices also fell by almost a per cent each. The overall market capitalisation of BSE-listed firms dropped to nearly ₹ 445 lakh crore from about ₹ 448 lakh crore in the previous session, making investors poorer by about ₹ 3 lakh crore within the first 15 minutes of the session. Here are the five key factors that could be behind the market selloff: Fresh escalations in tensions between Israel and Iran have dealt a blow to market sentiment, shattering the belief that the war between Israel and Iran may not linger for a longer period. The US on Saturday struck Iran with a surprise assault on three of Iran's nuclear facilities, which added a new turn to the evolving situation in the Middle East. Experts highlight that the Iranian response to the US attack will hold the key to how the Israel-Iran episode shapes up. "Even though the US bombing of Iran's three nuclear facilities has worsened the crisis in West Asia, the impact on the market is likely to be limited. The uncertain factor now is the timing and nature of the Iranian response. If Iran targets and damages the US defence facilities in the region or seriously hurts US military personnel, the US response can be huge, and this might further worsen the crisis," said VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments Limited. According to media reports, Iran's Supreme National Security Council is exploring the possibility of closing the Strait of Hormuz, an important global energy route. According to Bloomberg, roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies pass through this route daily. A closure of the Hormuz Strait would significantly disrupt crude oil supplies, shoot up oil prices, and severely damage the economies of major oil importers like India. Experts believe that crude oil prices above $80 per barrel for an extended period will negatively impact India's fiscal math, distorting its trade deficit. Elevated crude oil prices can also raise inflation, weaken the rupee, increase companies' input costs, and dent their profitability. Brent crude jumped over 2 per cent to trade near $79 a barrel on Monday morning due to heightened concerns of global supply disruption after the US on Saturday attacked three nuclear facilities in Iran. Meanwhile, the Indian rupee declined 17 paise to 86.72 against the US dollar in early trade on Monday. The dollar index jumped nearly half a per cent, weighing on stock market sentiment. A stronger dollar increases the risk of foreign capital outflows, especially at a time when geopolitical tensions make riskier equities less appealing and investors flock to safe-haven assets. Even though the Indian economy is driven largely by domestic consumption, concerns are mounting that it cannot remain completely immune to global developments, and the country's growth dynamics could take a hit as a result. Jaspreet Singh Arora, Chief Investment Officer at Equentis Wealth Advisory Services, pointed out that geopolitical tensions increasingly appear to be the new normal. "It began with the Russia-Ukraine conflict, over two years ago, followed by the Israel-Hamas war. In between, there were flare-ups between India and Pakistan, and now tensions are escalating between Israel and Iran,' said Arora. Besides, tariff-related uncertainties persist. While several major economies have been engaged in negotiations with the US administration since President Donald Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on US trading partners, significant uncertainty remains about how these negotiations will ultimately unfold. Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Texas Law Requiring Warnings on Some Foods Signed by Governor
(Bloomberg) -- Texas legislation that will require warning labels on food and beverages such as M&Ms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch and Fanta will become law after Governor Greg Abbott signed the initiative. Abbott signed Senate Bill 25 on Sunday night — a victory for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, which is looking to remove ingredients such as synthetic dyes from the nation's food supply. Food companies, which have maintained that all of their ingredients are safe, now have until 2027 to eliminate more than 40 ingredients, including dyes and bleached flour, from their products sold in Texas. If they don't, they'll have to include a label on new packaging warning the product contains ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' by other countries. Many, but not all, of the additives are banned or require warnings in other countries. The law creates a new requirement for packaged-food companies in a state with more than 31 million residents — the second-most populous in the US. Historically, state regulations have triggered national changes as companies look to streamline production. Companies have already started to mobilize amid pressure from the government and activists to remove ingredients that officials have blamed for health problems including hyperactivity, obesity and diabetes in children. Kraft Heinz Co. and General Mills Inc. recently announced the removal of synthetic dyes from their US products by the end of 2027. Industry groups have said no formal agreement exists with the federal government, however. As currently formulated, products including Coca-Cola Co.'s Fanta, PepsiCo Inc.'s Cheetos Crunchy and Nacho Cheese Doritos and Mars Inc.'s Skittles and M&Ms would be subject to the warning labels. So would Kellanova's Frosted Strawberry Pop-Tarts. Companies can avoid the label requirements for the targeted ingredients if the FDA or USDA declare them safe after Sept. 1. Additionally, if the agencies restrict an ingredient's use, require a warning label, or ban it outright after that same date, then that action would supersede the Texas regulation. If the federal government mandates labeling for 'ultra-processed or processed foods,' that would also supersede Texas' required labels. Barring these conditions or new qualifications for the ingredients' use from the federal government, the warnings will be required on labels beginning in 2027. Questions remain in the industry about how the legislation will be implemented. The law applies for any food labeling copyrighted or developed beginning on Jan. 1, 2027, and under one interpretation, that means it only applies when a company next updates its packaging. Gary Huddleston, a grocery-industry consultant for the Texas Retailers Association, said companies will be able to wait until they reformulate a product or otherwise change their labels. Ingredients listed in the Texas law include BHT, a food additive, titanium dioxide, used for food coloring, and DATEM, an emulsifier. Lawsuits from packaged-food producers are expected. 'I don't expect that to be the end of the debate here,' said Smitha Stansbury, a partner at King & Spalding's FDA and Life Sciences practice, predicting the law will be 'subject to litigation.' 'There's precedent for food companies to challenge this law under First Amendment grounds,' said Seth Mailhot, a partner at Husch Blackwell and the leader of the law firm's FDA group. The food industry has argued that the legislation is too broad. It has also criticized the idea of making policy based on foreign governments' classification of ingredients, as opposed to US or Texas regulators. --With assistance from Deena Shanker. More stories like this are available on
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Thai Leader Defies Calls to Quit as Border Spat Escalates
(Bloomberg) -- Thai leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra looks poised to brazen out a political crisis engulfing her government, with a cabinet expansion to keep her coalition intact and a tougher stance in a simmering border dispute with Cambodia. The prime minister on Sunday made clear her intention to stay on, despite speculation that a key party in her ruling alliance was pushing for her resignation. Her Pheu Thai Party said she will neither resign nor dissolve parliament. The government will move forward with a focus on building political stability, handling national security threats and carrying out its policies, Paetongtarn said in a post on X, after meeting with leaders of her coalition partners. She urged the Thai people to unite behind the government and the army. 'The unity and solidarity of the coalition government will serve as a vital foundation for the Thai people to come together,' she said. 'It will help us navigate this sensitive moment with strength and succeed in defending our sovereignty and preserving the honor and dignity of our nation and its people.' The crisis was triggered by Paetongtarn's comments in a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen in which she appeared critical of the Thai army. The episode caused the conservative Bhumjaithai Party to quit her coalition, reducing its majority to about 255 seats in the 495-member parliament. Her resistance to the subsequent calls for her to resign signals that her strategists are confident of her administration's survival, at least for now. Part of the key to her survival would be to lock in support of smaller parties through a cabinet expansion that's been made possible by the exit of eight Bhumjaithai ministers. Their party, with 69 lawmakers, quit the government in the wake of the phone controversy after squabbling over policies for months. The smaller parties 'have not exited the alliance and have signaled willingness to remain if cabinet positions, which have been freed by Bhumjaithai's departure, are allocated to their satisfaction,' said Peter Mumford, Southeast Asia Practice Head at Eurasia Group. 'Pheu Thai will try to cling on in the very short term at least.' Paetongtarn could also be helped by an internal rift in the ultra-nationalist United Thai Nation Party that has been demanding her resignation. The meeting with coalition partners on Sunday suggests a cabinet reshuffle may be imminent. Even if the 38-year-old prime minister survives for now, it may only be a temporary reprieve. She faces a barrage of legal challenges that seek to oust her citing ethical standards or lack of qualifications. The prime minister's immediate predecessor was ejected through a court ruling and previous governments run by two of her family members were thrown out by military coups. While political upheavals are nothing new to Thailand — the army has staged about a dozen successful coups since the end of absolute monarchy in 1932 — Paetongtarn's troubles couldn't have come at a worse time. The trade-reliant economy is on course for its worst performance since the Covid pandemic, hobbled by the highest household debt in the region and the threat of steep tariffs on exports to the US. In addition, the US attack on Iran over the weekend threatens to further disrupt global energy markets. Prolonged political turmoil in the face of those headwinds, and rising street protests, are likely to keep foreign investors wary of the nation's already battered financial markets. Thai stocks are at a five-year low, having tumbled almost 25% since the start of the year — the worst performance among major equity markets. On Monday, UBS Group AG downgraded Thai stocks to neutral from overweight, citing recent political uncertainty. Still, further losses may be limited as the selloff 'already somewhat reflects subdued expectations for GDP and corporate earnings growth,' according to Christopher Leow, chief investment officer at Asia Principal Asset Management in Singapore. 'We are taking a longer-term view and looking for opportunities to buy high quality companies that have low linkages with political uncertainty, resilient earnings growth and high free cashflows, like healthcare and petrochemical companies,' Leow said. There are also lingering concerns that an extended political impasse or rising public unrest could prompt the military to step in, though the army chief said last week it was 'committed to democratic principles.' 'Military intervention risks will rise if there is sustained street demonstrations or prolonged parliamentary stalemate, so the emerging protest movement, with demonstrations planned for the coming days, will be a key watchpoint,' Eurasia's Mumford said. A public apology from Paetongtarn and a visit to troops to express solidarity last week have somewhat calmed public anger. And Paetongtarn has vowed to deal more firmly with Cambodia in the border standoff. Over the weekend, the Thai army closed a key border crossing, sparking a tit-for-tat move from Phnom Penh, restricting trade and mobility. Cambodia also announced a suspension of all fuel and gas imports from Thailand from Monday. Tensions between the two neighbors have simmered since a border clash in May in the disputed Chong Bok area that left a Cambodian soldier dead. Both sides have since reinforced troops, while Phnom Penh has imposed some trade curbs. Diplomatic efforts have so far failed. --With assistance from Eduard Gismatullin, Kevin Dharmawan and John Cheng. (Updates with UBS downgrade of stocks in 14th paragraph.) More stories like this are available on
