After the U.S. and China pause tariffs, rare mineral exports are now in the spotlight for future trade deals
The U.S. wants to maintain access to China's rare earth minerals. While China see its dominance of the market as a way to apply major pressure on the U.S. as the two negotiate a broader trade deal.
The U.S. and China reached a détente on what had been an escalating trade war. On Sunday, at the end of this weekend's trade summit in Geneva, both sides agreed to pause the tariffs they had placed on one another.
The U.S.'s tariffs on Chinese imports will be 30%, down from 145%, while China lowered its tariffs on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%, according to a joint statement. The agreement foreshadows the possibility of a future, much broader trade deal in the future. Both sides said there was a 'mechanism' in place for them to facilitate more talks. One of the key questions still left to address is China's export controls on its rare-earth minerals. China's outsize role in the global rare-earths market, and the U.S.'s desire to maintain a steady flow of the minerals, make the issue one of the most sensitive parts of the deal.
As the leading exporter of rare-earth minerals, China holds massive influence in the global market for these critical materials. 'Dominating this sector is probably one of their most important sources of leverage over the U.S. and over the world,' said Dexter Roberts, nonresident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank based in Washington, D.C.
For that reason, China will be unlikely to relent on its export controls.
'Now that they punished the U.S. with rare earth [export controls], they're not going to take away this economic part of their economic arsenal,' Roberts said.
Many of those minerals are key ingredients in advanced manufacturing of products like electric-vehicle batteries, smartphones, and for military applications such as missiles and radar systems. The fact that rare-earth minerals are used in the defense technologies means the exports have national-security implications for both countries, only adding to the complexity and urgency of finding a solution that suits both sides.
After the White House announced its global tariff policy on April 2, China ratcheted up its export controls on rare earths as retaliation. Included in those new policies was a requirement that foreign countries would have to apply for licenses to purchase rare-earth minerals.
While it does have a tense relationship with the U.S. at the moment, China does not want to close it off entirely from the rare-earth minerals market, according to Jeorg Wuttke, partner at the advisory firm DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group and an expert in Chinese trade.
'The Chinese don't want to cut off the U.S., but they want to threaten it,' he said.
Rare earths represent big business for Chinese firms. In 2024, its total exports of rare-earth minerals rose 6% to 55,431 metric tons, according to Reuters. Though, because they are commodities with fluctuating prices, the value of those exports fell 36% to $488 million.
During the height of the U.S.-China trade dispute last month, production came to a virtual standstill. The trade war both hit China's rare-earth industry on two fronts, making it both more expensive for foreign buyers and requiring them to get government approval for any purchases they did make.
Despite the mounting frustrations between the two countries, China is wary of giving off the appearance of politicizing its rare-earths business because doing so could put off the rest of the world from doing business with it, Wuttke said.
'The Chinese are very aware of the fact they want to come across as reliable supplies to American companies,' Wuttke said. 'As much as they dislike American policies, they still want to be engaged with U.S. companies.'
Part of China's additional export controls included a policy that required companies to apply for a license to purchase rare-earth minerals. One of the first companies to apply for such a license was Tesla, which uses them to make batteries for its cars, among other things. There are some indications that as relations thaw, U.S. companies will receive expedited approvals during the process, according to Reuters.
Others, however, see China as being unbothered about applying significant pressure to the U.S. over rare earths.
'I don't think China's really worried that if they play too much hardball, they're suddenly no longer going to be relevant in the rare-earth market,' said Dexter Roberts. 'I don't believe that.'
The U.S. has begun looking for other sources of rare-earth minerals—namely in Greenland and Ukraine. The U.S. does also have its own deposits of rare-earth minerals, but they are not mined to the extent they are in China. Mining these elements is expensive and bad for the environment, making it difficult work to undertake. Any effort by the U.S. to diversify its supply chains away from China would be considered a medium- or long-term goal. Agreements over minerals with allies would also take years to negotiate and then implement. And the construction of any new entirely new mines takes, on average, 18 years for them to become operational, according to S&P Global.
That means the most likely outcome is further reconciliation—however uneasy—with China. Experts said a deal with China over rare earths could be on the horizon.
'They could announce something on rare earths in the coming days,' Roberts said. 'I wouldn't be surprised.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump takes heat from Dems and GOPers over decision to bomb Iran: ‘Another foreign war'
A handful of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle fumed at President Trump's decision to bomb top nuclear facilities in Iran and accused him of violating the Constitution. On Sunday, Trump announced that he had ordered strikes to target Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. Trump noted that all planes successfully departed Iranian airspace and were 'safely on their way home.' 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war,' firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a top Trump ally, lamented. Advertisement Several lawmakers of both parties met President Trump with fuming responses to his decision to bomb nuclear facilities in Iran. REUTERS 'There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear-armed nation. This is not our fight.' Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who hasn't been shy about splitting with Trump in the past, simply declared: 'This is not Constitutional.' Advertisement Top Intel Committee Democrat Jim Himes (D-Conn.) similarly accused Trump of exceeding his presidential authorities with the strikes. 'According to the Constitution, we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop,' Himes fumed on X. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) simply declared: 'This is not Constitutional.' in response to the bombings. Getty Images Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) also called it an 'unambiguous impeachable offense.' Advertisement 'This is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress,' Casten said on X. 'I'm not saying we have the votes to impeach. I'm saying that you DO NOT do this without Congressional approval and if Johnson doesn't grow a spine and learn to be a real boy tomorrow we have a BFing problem that puts our very Republic at risk.'
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Huckabee: State Department is evacuating Americans from Israel amid Iran conflict
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee also posted actions people can take to remain safe including learning the location of the nearest bomb shelters. The State Department has begun evacuating American citizens and permanent residents from Israel and the West Bank, U.S Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee announced on social media as the Israel-Iran war enters a second week. 'The Department of State has begun assisted departure flights from Israel,' Huckabee wrote in a post on X on June 21 asking people seeking government assistance to fill out a form. Huckabee also posted actions people can take to remain safe including learning the location of the nearest bomb shelters, avoiding large gatherings and monitoring local media. The State Department did not immediately respond to questions asking about the number of Americans it expects to retrieve from Israel. The conflict started a week ago when Israel began conducting airstrikes against Iranian nuclear and military sites, primarily targeting uranium enrichment facilities to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The two countries have been engaged in aerial strikes while President Donald Trump is mulling over the possibility of U.S. involvement to help Israel destroy Iranian nuclear facilities. Hundreds of Americans have left Iran in the last week, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters. Trump is expected meet his national security team on the evening of June 21 to discuss possible U.S. involvement in the conflict .
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk says xAI will retrain Grok: 'Far too much garbage'
When you're Elon Musk, you don't have to rely on centuries of prevailing human understanding — you can create your own. "We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors," Musk wrote on X on Friday night. Then, he said he would retrain Grok's latest model on that new base of knowledge to be free of proverbial waste. "Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data," he added. Musk has for years endeavored to create products, like the rebranded Twitter and Grok, that are free from what he views as harmful mainstream constraints. Business Insider previously reported that Grok's army of "AI tutors" was training the bot on a host of dicey topics to compete with OpenAI's more "woke" ChatGPT. Musk on Saturday asked X users to respond to his post with examples of "divisive facts" that can be used in Grok's retraining. Gary Marcus, an AI hype critic and professor emeritus at New York University, compared Musk's effort to an Orwellian dystopia, which isn't the first time he's made the comparison. "Straight out of 1984. You couldn't get Grok to align with your own personal beliefs, so you are going to rewrite history to make it conform to your views," he wrote on X in response to Musk. A revamped Grok could have real-world impacts. In May, just as Musk was stepping back from his work in Washington, DC to refocus on his various companies, Reuters reported that DOGE was planning to expand its use of Grok to analyze government data. "They ask questions, get it to prepare reports, give data analysis," a source told Reuters, referring to how the bot was being used. Two other sources told the outlet that officials in the Department of Homeland Security had been encouraged to use it despite the fact that it hadn't been approved. A representative for the department told the New Republic that "DOGE hasn't pushed any employees to use any particular tools or products." Grok has also had security issues. In May, after what the company said was an "unauthorized modification" to its backend, the bot started to frequently refer to "white genocide" in South Africa. The company quickly resolved the issue and said it had conducted a "thorough investigation" and was "implementing measures to enhance Grok's transparency and reliability."
