REVEALED: Scandal of fat cats on first ever NHS rich list - nearly 300 health bosses are handed packages worth over £200,000
Hundreds of NHS bosses are pocketing salaries higher than the Prime Minister's, a report reveals today.
Despite failing to bring down waiting lists, nearly 1,700 fat-cat bureaucrats at NHS trusts were each handed more than £100,000 a year.
With record sums already being poured in by taxpayers, the first-ever NHS Rich List found that 512 managers banked salaries higher than Sir Keir Starmer (£172,153).
Nearly 300 received packages of £200,000 or more.
East Cheshire NHS Trust paid eight managers £100,000 or more despite being the worst-performing trust in percentage terms for seeing A&E patients within four hours.
It saw just 50.6 per cent within the target time, well below the 78 per cent expected.
Among the managers was the trust's 'director of people and culture' and deputy CEO Rachael Charlton, who raked in a package of £367,500.
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust also gave eight bosses £100,000 or more despite having the worst referral-to-treatment median waiting times. Chief medical director Catherine Walsh banked £387,500 in pay and perks.
The figures, covering more than 200 trusts for the 2023-24 financial year, will anger the millions of patients stuck on waiting lists.
Around 6.25 million patients, relating to 7.42 million cases, are languishing on them, with nearly 3 million waiting for more than 18 weeks.
The study by the TaxPayers' Alliance will also fuel suspicions that much of the money lavished on the health service is not making it to the front line and is instead helping to fund 'non-jobs' such as diversity roles.
Referring to Labour's plan to hand 10 per cent bonuses to NHS bosses whose trusts perform well, Tory health spokesman Edward Argar said: 'The Labour Government plans to hand generous bonuses to NHS managers for simply doing what they are already paid to do as part of their jobs.
'Patients will rightly be shocked, and asking why Labour aren't focusing instead on making sure those who are already very well paid are delivering the results taxpayers have a right to expect. Diverting public funds into executive bonus schemes, instead of investing that money in frontline care for patients, is simply wrong.'
Shimeon Lee, who compiled the report, said: 'Taxpayers will be appalled that while NHS patients face prolonged waiting lists and dismal A&E performance, hundreds of senior managers are pocketing six-figure pay packets.
'This rich list shows that there are sky-high salaries for senior bureaucrats... that are impossible to justify.
'If ministers are serious about getting the NHS back on track, they need to ensure that managers of poor-performing trusts aren't being rewarded for failure.'
The study found that 1,694 senior managers got £100,000 or more in total remuneration across 224 trusts. Of these, 1,557 included a salary over £100,000.
A further 296 got £200,000 or more while 17 got more than £300,000.
Ann James, the former CEO of University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, was paid a £382,500 salary.
Her trust was ranked 95th out of 136 in England for A&E waiting times.
Jonathan Brotherton, chief executive of University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, received a pay package of £427,500, including a £262,500 salary.
His trust was ranked 128th of 149 for referral-to-treatment waiting times and 119th of 136 for A&E waiting times in England.
George Findlay, the chief executive of University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, was handed a £32,500 bonus – on top of his £222,500 salary – despite it ranking 143th of 149 and 105th of 136 for the same targets.
By contrast, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust had the best referral-to-treatment waiting times.
Chief executive Joe Rafferty got a total pay package of £257,500.
Another eyebrow-raising salary was the £257,000 that North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust gave its 'chief people officer', Louise Tibbert.
In January, it emerged that the NHS was hiring diversity staff at a rate of one a week despite orders to cut back on the initiatives.
A recent poll found that nearly two-thirds of voters back the idea of a new US-style 'Department of Government Efficiency' to slash billions of pounds of wasteful spending on bureaucracy and 'non-jobs' such as diversity and inclusion officers.
The TaxPayers' Alliance study related to managerial roles at NHS trusts and not NHS England, the quango which runs the health service but which is being scrapped by the Government.
A Department of Health spokesman said: 'This Government is introducing tough new measures in relation to senior managers' pay, to drive progress on cutting waiting lists.
'The NHS should pay to attract top talent, but there can be no more rewards to failure.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK launches investigation into maternity care after multiple scandals
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) - British health minister Wes Streeting launched an investigation into maternity services in England on Monday, aimed at driving urgent improvements after a series of high-profile failures that have led to the deaths of babies and mothers. The investigation will aim to report back by December 2025, Streeting said in a statement, adding that it would look at up to ten of the worst-performing services in England as well as reviewing the entire maternity system. Over the past two decades, there have been a number of scandals in maternity care across the country including at Morecambe Bay, East Kent, Shrewsbury and Telford, and Nottingham. The local review of maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford, for example, found that failures in care over 20 years may have led to the deaths of more than 200 babies and nine mothers. Streeting said failures in maternity care provided by the state-run National Health Service had caused many families to lose babies or suffer serious harm and should never have been allowed to happen. "Maternity care should be the litmus test by which this government is judged on patient safety, and I will do everything in my power to ensure no family has to suffer like this again," he said in a statement. The aim is to create one set of actions to improve maternity care across the country, the statement said. The government will also establish a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce of experts and bereaved families.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Mum kept saying she wanted to go up in a firework': Why green burials are going mainstream
'I want to become a pearl when I die - or a reef,' said Madeleine Sutcliffe. Aged 80 and suffering from lung cancer, Sutcliffe was given six months to live in January. Adam, Sutcliffe's son, is enthusiastic. 'I don't think a pearl is possible but if mum's ashes are made into an artificial reef, I'll be able to dive to it,' he said. 'Given how I feel when I dive - serene, calm and meditative - a reef is the perfect environment to remember mum.' Until recently, wanting an environmental funeral was a radical concept. Now, it's increasingly mainstream: a recent report by the National Funeral Directors Association found over 60% of families said they would be interested in investigating green funeral options - up from 56% in 2021. Even local councils are responding: the Association for Public Service Excellence recently found that over 61% of councils across the UK already provide natural or woodland burial grounds, or plan to do so in the near future - up from 44% in 2018. There are now an almost bewildering number of options available for those who want their death celebrated in a sustainable way. Some are still under development, such as decomposers that turn the body into fertile soil, fungi bodysuits that decompose the body, and egg-shaped pods in which corpses are curled and a tree planted on top. Other methods are already available in other countries: resomation - a chemical process of alkaline hydrolysis, and human composting - which involves keeping a body in a controlled environment so that remains are broken down quicker than a burial. Other complex options, such as aquamation - which yields the same results as cremation by using pressurised water, is growing in popularity, as are biodegradable urns and tree pod burials - placing a deceased person's ashes into a biodegradable pod, buried under a tree. The world's first mushroom coffin - a 'living coffin' that helps to speed up the body's decomposition and enrich the surrounding earth - is as close as a funeral home in south London. Traditional funerals are losing popularity for a range of reasons, among them, the growing awareness of the damage they do. According to the Green Burial Council, traditional burials in the United States use an estimated 4.3 million gallons of embalming fluid, 20 million board feet of hardwood (including rainforest wood), 17,000 tons of copper and bronze, and 1.6 million tons of concrete each year - all of which use vast amounts of energy to source, manufacture, process and transport. Over time, these toxins leach into the surrounding soil. Even when filtered, cremations are also damaging; their fumes emitting carbon dioxide and toxic, mercury-laden gasses. Then there's the price: traditional funerals can cost upwards of £5,000. Green burials can cost as little as £700. The fall in religiosity is also a factor: while fewer than half Britons now believe in god, belief among those aged over 80 - like Sutcliffe - has fallen from 82% in 1981 to 59% in 2021. When people are freed to make their own funeral decisions, results are often exuberantly celebratory. 'My mum had cancer for five years and kept saying that she wanted to go up in a firework,' said Caroline Murphy, of her mother, Jeanne. 'I never even knew it was a thing but after she died, we discovered that it was.' Jeanne's ashes were divided into five fireworks - four of which have already been exploded in places significant to the family. Jeanne's 14 year old granddaughter, Gabriella, loved it. 'My grandmother always said she was going to watch over us and after seeing her explode in the night sky above us, I can believe that's true,' she said. 'Each time we let a firework off, it was really joyous and celebratory. It suited her character perfectly.' But with choice, comes risk: adverts for two funeral providers were banned a few years ago after they misleadingly implied their MDF coffins were more eco-friendly than other options. Then last year, the Green Burial Council had to review their own processes after removing certification from a company called Ovum Fungi. 'Their pods initially met our certification criteria but their messaging made additional claims that were not consistent with our mission,' said Christopher Doggett. Ovum Fungi have not responded to calls from the Guardian. Rosie Inman-Cook from The Natural Death Centre is conflicted by the rise in natural burial grounds in the UK: 'There are now over 300 in the country but only 70 that we certify,' she said. 'There are real cowboys out there,' she warned. 'We get far too many calls from families whose loved ones have been buried in the wrong grave, or their coffins improperly placed in the ground, or a space in the family plot filled with the coffin of a stranger.' The Law Commission is currently consulting on alternatives to established funerary methods. But in the absence of regulation, experts are concerned that families are being exploited. 'There is a lot of opportunity here for greenwashing by those, some perhaps with the best of intentions, who haven't done the right research,' said Oliver Towner, a member of the SAIF National Executive, the group supporting independent funeral directors. Towner points to the woven coffins that many funeral directors market as being a sustainable alternative to a wooden coffin. 'A lot of them are made in China and shipped to the UK. Are they still a more sustainable product than other options? The data at the moment just doesn't exist.' Towner also points out how important it is to take wider facts into account when judging what option is most sustainable. 'The carbon footprint of a cremation will obviously be more than a natural burial, but you're more likely to live closer to a crematorium than a natural burial ground and you're likely to scatter the ashes closer to home,' he said. Towner warns, however, that any interrogation of environmental claims has to cast its net even more widely. 'When looking at aquamation, for example, we need to factor in the the Environmental Agency's recent warning that London could run out of water in the next 25 years,' he said. 'If we start to rely on water cremation, what happens if London runs out of water in London?'
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Health secretary launches ‘rapid' probe to improve NHS maternity services
& Lily Shanager Health Secretary Wes Streeting has launched a rapid national investigation into NHS maternity services to provide truth to bereaved families and drive urgent improvements. The investigation aims to address systemic failures in maternity care, which have caused trauma, loss, and a lack of compassion for many families. Streeting acknowledged that maternity units are failing across the country and apologized on behalf of the NHS for the suffering families have endured. A National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce will also be launched, chaired by Streeting, with the investigation expected to report back by the end of the year. Professional bodies support the investigation, highlighting issues like workforce shortages and maternity units being at or beyond breaking point.
