Tusk and Duda clash over presidential election outcome

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and President Andrzej Duda on Saturday clashed publicly over the outcome of the country's recent presidential election amid reports of vote-counting irregularities.
Tusk addressed Duda, President-elect Karol Nawrocki and the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party leader Jaroslav Kaczynsky on X. He asked whether they were interested in learning the 'real vote count' and said 'the honest have nothing to fear.'
Duda responded that the ruling camp was unable to accept defeat.
'You believe you must win, and that's it,' he said, 'I am not curious about the result because I know them.'
The president defended the National Electoral Commission's (PKW) certification of the vote and called on the government to refrain from 'provocations, lies and pressure.' He added that the ballots remain under the authority of the Supreme Court and the PKW.
Kaczynski said a recount is not permitted under Polish law. Former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki criticized Tusk's remarks, questioning whether coalition leaders should endorse what he described as the prime minister's 'madness.'
According to the PKW, PiS backed Nawrocki won 10,606,877 votes in the runoff, narrowly defeating centrist Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, who received 10,237,286 votes.
The electoral commission confirmed the results on Monday but acknowledged that 'incidents that could have affected the outcome' occurred in the second round. It said the Supreme Court would assess the implications.
Local media have reported counting errors in several areas, including Krakow and Minsk Mazowiecki. Officials there admitted to misattributing votes cast for Trzaskowski to Nawrocki.
The Supreme Court last week ordered a review of ballots from 13 electoral commissions.
On Friday, Supreme Court spokesman Aleksander Stepkowski said about 4,300 electoral protests had been filed and the number could reach 50,000. He confirmed the court had begun receiving some submissions past the deadline and would soon assess how many were valid.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

France 24

4 hours ago

• France 24

Bukele's El Salvador: Popularity, power, and the price of security

Nayib Bukele came to power in El Salvador in 2019, winning outright in the first round of presidential elections. Since then, he has steadily consolidated his control. Bukele's party has dominated the National Assembly since 2021. In 2022, he declared a state of emergency, which remains in effect to this day. He also pressured the Supreme Court to allow him to run for a second term – previously prohibited by the Constitution. Despite concerns over his human rights record, Bukele enjoys overwhelming popularity, with polls showing over 80 percent approval. Since the start of the state of emergency, more than 400 inmates have died in jail. This year, he began constructing a new mega-prison to house hundreds of illegal migrants deported by the United States and labelled terrorists. Six years into his presidency, FRANCE 24 takes a look at the Bukele phenomenon. Laurence Cuvillier and Matthieu Comin report.

Euronews

10 hours ago

• Euronews

Tusk and Duda clash over presidential election outcome

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and President Andrzej Duda on Saturday clashed publicly over the outcome of the country's recent presidential election amid reports of vote-counting irregularities. Tusk addressed Duda, President-elect Karol Nawrocki and the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party leader Jaroslav Kaczynsky on X. He asked whether they were interested in learning the 'real vote count' and said 'the honest have nothing to fear.' Duda responded that the ruling camp was unable to accept defeat. 'You believe you must win, and that's it,' he said, 'I am not curious about the result because I know them.' The president defended the National Electoral Commission's (PKW) certification of the vote and called on the government to refrain from 'provocations, lies and pressure.' He added that the ballots remain under the authority of the Supreme Court and the PKW. Kaczynski said a recount is not permitted under Polish law. Former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki criticized Tusk's remarks, questioning whether coalition leaders should endorse what he described as the prime minister's 'madness.' According to the PKW, PiS backed Nawrocki won 10,606,877 votes in the runoff, narrowly defeating centrist Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, who received 10,237,286 votes. The electoral commission confirmed the results on Monday but acknowledged that 'incidents that could have affected the outcome' occurred in the second round. It said the Supreme Court would assess the implications. Local media have reported counting errors in several areas, including Krakow and Minsk Mazowiecki. Officials there admitted to misattributing votes cast for Trzaskowski to Nawrocki. The Supreme Court last week ordered a review of ballots from 13 electoral commissions. On Friday, Supreme Court spokesman Aleksander Stepkowski said about 4,300 electoral protests had been filed and the number could reach 50,000. He confirmed the court had begun receiving some submissions past the deadline and would soon assess how many were valid.

Euronews

2 days ago

• Euronews

Commission to withdraw greenwashing proposal in new blow to Green Deal

The European Commission intends to withdraw a proposal aimed at combating so-called "greenwashing" by ensuring companies' environmental claims are accurate, substantiated and independently verified, an EU executive spokesperson told reporters today. The proposal on Green Claims was initially presented in March 2023 as part of the broader European Green Deal legislative framework. This move marks the latest in a series of rollbacks of major Green Deal initiatives, after so-called "Omnibus" papers intended to simplify EU legislation effectively narrowed the scope of measures such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. The announcement on the Green Claims Directive came ahead of a final meeting between the Polish EU Council presidency and MEPs scheduled next Monday, which was expected to give the proposal the green light ahead of formal adoption. Its withdrawal at this late stage has taken many by surprise, including the negotiators. When questioned by reporters, Commission officials declined to provide detailed reasons for the decision, saying only that more information would follow. According to parliamentary sources close to the file, chief negotiators socialist MEP Delara Burkhardt and liberal MEP Sandro Gozi still intended to proceed with the trilogue negotiations on Monday, noting that the talks were nearing a successful conclusion. 'It is unacceptable that the Commission blatantly interferes with the progress made by co-legislators on this file,' a member of the Parliament's negotiating team told Euronews, expressing frustration at what they see as a unilateral and premature move. Likewise, Poland's presidency of the EU Council 'is ready to enter constructively into the trilogue and go ahead as planned until there is a clear decision from the Commission [on the withdrawal],' a Polish spokesperson tol Euronews. It remains unclear whether the decision to withdraw the proposal has been formally adopted by the Commission's College, the weekly meeting of the 26 Commissioners and EU President Ursula von der Leyen. Beyond the immediate legislative impact, the move raises broader questions about the Commission's authority to retract its own proposals. While EU treaties do not explicitly grant this power, a 2015 ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union affirmed that the Commission may withdraw proposals as part of its right of initiative. However, the Court also made clear that this power is limited and subject to both substantive and procedural constraints. The ruling emphasised that withdrawal should only occur in justified cases, such as institutional deadlock or the proposal becoming obsolete. Neither condition appears to apply in the case of the Green Claims Directive, prompting concerns that the Commission could be overstepping its role and upsetting the institutional balance by exercising a de facto veto over the legislative process.