
T.N. CM Stalin welcomes reconsideration of gold loan rules, urges Centre to consult States on key policy changes
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Friday (May 30, 2025) appreciated the Centre for considering his concerns regarding the proposed restrictions in the Reserve Bank of India's (Lending Against Gold Collateral) Directions, 2025. He added that such policies should be framed only after prior consultations with the States.
In a post on X, Mr. Stalin said: 'Glad to note that @FinMinIndia has responded to the concerns raised by me in my letter to the Hon'ble Union Finance Minister regarding @RBI's draft guidelines on gold loans. Protecting the interests of small borrowers, especially those seeking loans below ₹2 lakh, such as farmers and daily earners, and ensuring timely and accessible credit has been my consistent demand.'
'While appreciating the positive consideration given to this issue, we emphasise that such policies having significant impact on the poor should be arrived at after due prior consultation with States,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Centre Clears Major Road Projects In Nashik Ahead Of Simhastha Kumbh Mela
Mumbai: A meeting was held at the Chief Minister's Secretariat in Nagpur's Hyderabad House. The 2027 Sinhastha Kumbha Mela in Nashik was the top agenda. The meeting focused on improving the road infrastructure to handle the surge in pilgrims in the city. The meeting was attended by Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, and Water Resources Minister Girish Mahajan. Also present were Minister of State Shivendra Raje Bhosale, other public representatives, and senior government officials. Highway Approvals And Centre's Support "We had requested the central government - I had personally requested the Prime Minister - that the road network required for the Kumbh should be taken up by the Centre. Union Minister Nitin Gadkari held a meeting on that issue," Mr Fadnavis said. He added eight major roads, including those from Sambhajinagar, Nagpur, Gujarat, Mumbai, Dhule, and Palghar, which will be used heavily during the Kumbh, have been approved. "Some internal roads that fall under the Centre's purview were also discussed. Nitin Gadkari has approved almost all of these roads. The detailed project reports (DPRs) will be prepared soon, and the required funds will be allocated," the chief minister said. 🔸CM Devendra Fadnavis, along with Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, chaired a review meeting regarding road development works for the 'Simhastha Kumbh Mela', to be held in 2027 at Trimbakeshwar (Nashik). Minister Shivendra Raje Bhonsle, Minister Girish Mahajan, MP Smita Wagh, MLA... — CMO Maharashtra (@CMOMaharashtra) June 22, 2025 Major Road Projects in the Pipeline Highlighting the urgency of road upgrades, Mr Mahajan said, "This year, we are expecting a record crowd for the Kumbh. That's why road works on national highways are essential." Among the key projects discussed is the construction of a four-lane highway connecting Ghoti to Trimbakeshwar via Jawhar, with an estimated cost of Rs 3,700 crore. Additionally, there are plans to expand the Nashik-Sinnar stretch and upgrade national highways linking Nashik to other major cities, aiming to improve regional connectivity ahead of the 2027 Kumbh Mela. Dwarka Junction To Be Built In Two Phases "We are executing the project in two phases. The first will be completed before the Kumbh, and the second will begin afterward. This is to ensure no work remains unfinished during the event," Mr Fadnavis said, referring to the major bottleneck in Nashik. Mr Mahajan said the underpass at Dwarka is not being utilised efficiently. "We've directed MSRDC to come up with a new design. Work is expected to begin in the next three months," he added. Nashik Ring Road Update The Nashik Ring Road project, pending for years, has finally been cleared. "Instructions have been given to complete the project within 18 to 24 months," Mr Mahajan said. He said a new connection between Jalgaon and Sambhaji Nagar is under consideration, which will improve access to Mumbai. In addition, roads leading to pilgrimage hotspots like Shirdi and Shani Shingnapur will be upgraded to accommodate increased traffic.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Deve Gowda writes to PM seeking procurement of mangoes by NAFED to bail out Karnataka growers
Former Prime Minister H. D. Deve Gowda has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan seeking that the Centre instruct National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. (NAFED) to procure mangoes under the price deficiency payment (PDP) and market intervention scheme (MIS) to bail out Karnataka's mango growers who are in distress due to crash in prices of the produce. In separate, but similarly worded, letters dated June 22, Mr. Gowda brought the plight of mango growers to the knowledge of both Mr. Modi and Mr. Chouhan and said that mango was one of the major horticultural crops in Karnataka, cultivated over an area of 1.39 lakh hectares, particularly in Bengaluru Rural, Bengaluru Urban, Chickballapur, Kolar, and Bengaluru South (formerly Ramanagara) districts, with an estimated production of eight lakh to 10 lakh tonnes during the rabi season. However, due to weather vagaries and diseases, the mango yield has dropped to less than 30% this year, he pointed out. 'From May to June this year, heavy arrivals caused unsustainable price fluctuations. Prices fell from ₹12,000 per quintal to ₹3,000 per quintal, while the cultivation cost itself is ₹5,466 per quintal. This has financially stressed farmers, with many small and marginal mango growers unable to cover basic costs, leading to protests,' Mr. Gowda said. He expressed concern that Andhra Pradesh's ban on Totapuri mango varieties entering Chittoor district, adjacent to Karnataka, has disrupted the supply chain and resulted in a risk of post-harvest losses for Karnataka's border area mango growers. This has created tension among the mango growers, leading to protests in many districts, especially in Kolar and Chickballapur, he pointed out. The Chief Minister of Karnataka and the Chief Secretary have asked Andhra Pradesh to revoke this ban immediately. Additionally, the State government has requested the Centre to start procurement through Central agencies such as NAFED and the National Cooperative Consumers' Federation of India Ltd. to aid farmers and alleviate rural distress, he noted. 'I request the Central government to instruct NAFED to procure mangoes under the PDP and MIS. This will support farmers by ensuring fair prices through direct purchases from farmers and through farmer producer organisations (FPOs),' he said. 'I trust that the Central government will promptly take appropriate actions to support Karnataka's mango growers by providing adequate financial benefits under various schemes,' he said.


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Developments since June 6 decision show why we need to be cautious: MPC's Nagesh Kumar
The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) decision earlier this month to tighten its stance to 'netrual' from 'accommodative' even as it cut the policy repo rate by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points (bps) to 5.50 per cent caught markets off-guard. However, according to Nagesh Kumar, one of the three external members on the central bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), developments since the June 6 rate cut show why policymakers need to be cautious. 'Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious,' Kumar said. Global crude oil prices rose to around $75 per barrel after Israel attacked Iran on June 13. Investors are now anticipating another sharp increase in oil prices after the US said on June 21 it had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. Speculation is rife if Iran – which has called the US attack outrageous and said it reserves all options to defend its sovereignty – will look to retaliate by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway which handles almost a quarter of the global oil trade. In an interview with Siddharth Upasani, Kumar – Director and Chief Executive of New Delhi-based think-tank Institute for Studies in Industrial Development – also discussed how a consensus was finally achieved on his calls for a 50 bps rate cut and why growth numbers are not showing a broad-based revival, among other subjects. Edited excerpts: In the last meeting (in April) itself I had started making a case for a 50 bps cut. But at that time, trends were not very clear. There was uncertainty about the inflation number – it had begun to come down, but the drop was not significant enough. However, in June, we had numbers before us like 3.2 per cent in April. It has gone down even further in May. Looking ahead, the outlook seemed to be quite comfortable and benign because of the expectation of a better-than-normal monsoon, the declining prices of crude oil, and the softening of the US dollar. It was in that context and keeping in mind the continued concern about tariff-related uncertainties –the external economic environment had become very uncertain and volatile, with International Monetary Funds and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development downgrading the outlook very significantly, and World Trade Organization (WTO) projecting -1.5 per cent growth in world trade – and the need to support growth and the continued concerns about urban consumption and private investment not picking up that we cut the repo rate by 50 bps. In my view – and I articulated this in the April meeting – compared to two cuts of 25 bps each, one larger cut of 50 bps would be more effective. My reason was very common-sensical: if it is a quarter percentage point reduction, the banker might absorb a part of it as it is such a small change. But if it is 50 bps, the banker will have to pass it on with lower lending and deposit rates. We have seen the transmission of the 25 bps cuts being a bit slow. Of course, there will be a lag. But the stickiness of the deposit and lending rates was there. But 50 bps would be large enough to push the banks to take it into account. And if we feel confident that we will need another cut of 25 bps two months down the line, why not frontload it? That's why I made a case for a 50 bps cut. And this time, compared to April, the reason and policy space were much more solid. Seeing that, the consensus between us was easier to achieve. Well, at that time, inflation was high. And inflation targeting requires action when inflation is high. Even till October 2024, when the MPC was reconstituted, inflation was quite high around 6 per cent. The RBI's action also needs to be seen in the context of growth. We ended 2023-24 with a very robust 9.2 per cent growth. Growth was much less of a worry at that time. Yes, 7.4 per cent was a pleasant surprise and showed some kind of revival. However, it was not a broad-based revival; it was driven by rural consumption and government capex towards the end of the financial year. Because it was not broad-based and the external environment is becoming more challenging and uncertain – Liberation Day was in April – this is the time when you need to build policy actions which will protect the growth sentiment and build momentum. The change in the stance to neutral caught everyone off-guard, with the MPC saying there is very limited space to support growth going forward. Should we rule out rate cuts now? The way inflation outlook is shaping will determine the future course of action. The RBI Governor, in a recent interview, has clarified that. It depends upon what kind of inflation you have because you need to have a certain real rate of interest. If that becomes negative, then savings will not be incentivised. Assuming that 1.5 per cent is the real rate of interest you want to preserve, then the floor (for repo rate) with inflation rate would be 5.5 per cent. However, if inflation goes to 3 per cent, then you have additional room to manoeuvre. Therefore, it really depends on the dynamics of the inflation and growth numbers. I wouldn't say that. Strictly speaking, the stance is not within the purview of the MPC. But we, of course, make some observations. I think it was purely the fact that with the 50 bps rate cut, the room (to cut further) going forward is limited. In view of that, it was a step to manage expectations. The uncertainty surrounding us is another factor to keep the stance neutral, which gives you more freedom to go either way. Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious. When circumstances are uncertain and you want to promote growth, you try to reduce the cost of capital to make it easier for the entrepreneur who is sitting on the fence on whether to invest or not. That is what it does at the margin. Ultimately, investment decisions are a very complex process. But the cost of capital is one of the factors which is weighed by the entrepreneur, and policymakers try to assist the process. By lowering the cost of capital and trying to push demand, you are creating more favourable conditions for an investment decision than before. As I said, making an investment decision is a very complex process and cost of capital is only one of the factors. You can only exercise the levers which are within your control. You can't really do much about global uncertainty. What Mr Trump does on a day-to-day basis is something you have no control over. But holding other things constant, these (such as lowering the cost of capital) are some of the things which we can do something about. The other could be a fiscal stimulus which may be helpful to revive demand. The government has budgeted for a very substantial capex. So, frontloading the capex to keep the momentum up while things settle down in the international market could be another thing that could be done. Well, they are reacting to the changed times. We are now in a situation where the multilateral framework for trade has been completely put aside. MFN (Most Favoured Nation) – which has been the bedrock of multilateralism – has also been thrown out the window because Mr. Trump has X rate for China, Y rate for India, Z rate for Europe. The dispute settlement mechanism of WTO has been abandoned for some time because the Appellate Body was not renewed. In normal times, you don't have that urgency and you negotiate in a very relaxed manner. But when you need to, you find ways to expedite the process. That is what is happening. There is a realisation that we need to seize the moment and close these deals quickly before the damage is done, to protect and preserve our economic interests in the best possible manner. Sooner we do that, the better it is. Then the uncertainty that is prevailing is cleared. Yes, some of these are the early harvest type of arrangements, and they will continue to be negotiated. But normally in trade negotiations, you know what you can do for a large part of the agenda and only a small part, maybe 10-20 per cent, holds up progress. So, the best way forward is to move ahead with the part of the agenda on which you have no issues and find ways to address the red lines. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More