ELTA North America Completes Purchase of Mine Detection Product Line

ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, Md., June 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- ELTA North America Expands Life-Saving Defense Capabilities with Acquisition of Chemring Sensors and Electronic Systems' Explosive Hazard Detection Business.
ELTA North America (ENA), a U.S.-based defense industry leader specializing in advanced Air and Ground-Based Radar Systems, Airborne Electronic Warfare, and Integrated Counter-UAS solutions, proudly announces the acquisition of Chemring Sensors and Electronic Systems' (CSES) Explosive Hazard Detection line of business. This strategic acquisition reinforces ENA's commitment to providing cutting-edge technologies that protect warfighters and enhance operational mobility.
CSES has long been recognized as a global pioneer in explosive device detection, particularly in the development of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) systems designed to locate buried Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) and mines. The Husky Mounted Detection System (HMDS) and the MDS-10 handheld mine detector—key components of this expertise—will now integrate into ENA's portfolio, further strengthening the company's combat engineering and mobility solutions.
In response to evolving battlefield demands, ELTA North America is establishing a Combat Engineering Center of Excellence, dedicated to advancing life-saving technologies for U.S. and allied forces. Recent global conflicts have underscored the critical need for superior route and area clearance capabilities to ensure operational mobility. The integration of CSES's groundbreaking technologies positions ENA at the forefront of this essential mission.
The HMDS GPR system has been instrumental in saving thousands of lives throughout its operational history and remains the U.S. Army's Program of Record for Counter-IED (C-IED) route clearance. With this acquisition, ENA reinforces its ability to provide mission-critical solutions while operating under a U.S. Facility Clearance, ensuring seamless collaboration with defense entities.
"We are proud to take on this vital program of record for the U.S. Army as we further expand our footprint in the U.S. defense sector," said Joe Adams, President and CEO of ELTA North America. "ELTA North America remains committed to preserving CSES's legacy of innovation and life-saving technology. This acquisition strengthens our combat engineering capabilities and enhances our ability to support mission success in both combat operations and disaster response efforts."
With this strategic expansion, ELTA North America solidifies its role as a premier provider of advanced defense solutions, continuing its mission to safeguard those who serve.
ELTA North America is a global leader in the design, manufacturing, and support of innovative electronic systems for the United States Government.
Please contact Mr. Mike Hawn, MHawn@Elta-NA.com, for any questions regarding US production, manufacturing, test and repair services for vehicle integrated protection systems, radars, or integrated EW sensors across all-domains.
ELTA NA is a United States Company, Headquartered in Maryland. ELTA NA is capable of classified and unclassified work under the status of a US Government mitigated Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI).
Media Contact:Joe Adams5855768919396640@email4pr.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/elta-north-america-completes-purchase-of-mine-detection-product-line-302481270.html
SOURCE ELTA North America

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

33 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Canadians snapped up U.S. debt in April despite Trump's tariffs, but the bond selloff tanked its value

April's massive bond selloff didn't stop Canadians from buying Treasuries, but it weighed heavily on the value of their holdings. Higher interest rates in the U.S., where the Federal Reserve has been much more patient to cut interest rates than other central banks, have likely spurred demand. Canadians have been ditching all-things American after having enough of U.S. President Donald Trump's threats about tariffs and making their country the '51st state.' Boycotts of U.S. products from whiskey to dog food to Teslas—and a huge pullback in travel across the border—haven't stopped Canadian investors from buying Uncle Sam's debt, though. Trump's chaotic tariff rollout in April marked the high point of the 'Sell America' trade as stocks, bonds, and the dollar all sank. But despite the turmoil in fixed-income markets, Canadians purchased a net $9.2 billion of U.S. government bonds in April, the biggest monthly surge since November 2023. This embedded content is not available in your region. However, the value of Canada's overall holdings fell by roughly $58 billion that same month, according to the most recent data from the Treasury, by far the biggest swing for any of the top 20 foreign owners of U.S. debt. The drop likely reflects that month's massive bond selloff, which may have forced Trump to back off on his so-called reciprocal tariffs. Long-term yields, which spike when bond prices fall, have remained stubbornly elevated with the Federal Reserve—unlike other central banks around the world—patient to cut interest rates. 'You've got this gap emerging with the Fed on hold and the Bank of Canada cutting rates, along with everyone else,' Rob Haworth, a senior vice president and investment strategist at U.S. Bank, told Fortune. The Bank of Canada has slashed rates by 225 basis points over the past nine months, including 25-point cuts in January and March. The Fed, meanwhile, reduced rates by 100 points from September to December last year but has held rates steady so far in 2025. As a result, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield was 4.38% as markets closed on Friday, while Canada's was at 3.30%. Higher interest rates in the U.S. can make Treasuries appealing to Canadians and other foreign investors, Haworth said, provided they can effectively hedge the risk presented by a weakening U.S. dollar. At the end of January, Canada's private and public sector held a combined $351 billion worth of Treasury securities. That number surged to $426 billion at the end of March before falling to $368 billion in April, the most recent data available. As Federal Reserve economists explained last year, this type of data has long been used as a gauge of foreign demand for Treasuries, particularly among the top three holders: Japan, the U.K., and China. The example of Canada, the seventh-largest owner of U.S. debt, illustrates why this approach is shortsighted, however. After all, Canadian investors bought more Treasuries in April, even as the total value of their holdings declined after revaluing the bonds at current market prices. The big drop suggests America's northern neighbor has heavy exposure to long-dated Treasury notes and bonds, which are much more volatile than short-term Treasury bills. 'Valuation changes often move in the opposite direction of net U.S. sales/purchases and are often large enough to drive overall changes in holdings,' Fed economists wrote last year. 'As such, changes in holdings alone are an unreliable measure of cross-border demand for U.S. or foreign securities.' Foreign investors account for roughly 30% of the U.S. Treasury market, according to Apollo chief economist Torsten Sløk, and their behavior is being closely monitored as the Trump administration pushes for big shifts in global trade and international finance. The U.S. borrows at much better rates than its underlying finances would normally allow, thanks to the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency and confidence that America will always pay its bills. If foreign buyers sour on U.S. Treasuries, however, that could force the Treasury to pay higher yields to bring back buyers. Such a move would put upward pressure on interest rates for mortgages, small-business loans, and other common types of borrowing throughout the economy. Foreign investors held just over $9 trillion worth of Treasuries at the end of April, down only slightly from the record set in March. The decline in the dollar this year, Haworth said, has been much more pronounced than any offloading of Treasuries. That makes sense, he added, because a slowdown in trade affects the flow of dollars first as greenbacks are used in fewer transactions. Changes in the allocation of Treasuries, often held as investments or bank reserves, happen much more slowly. 'There's probably still some fundamental pressure as we suss out where trade and tariffs end up,' he said. The Treasury data from April showed foreign private investors were net sellers of long-term U.S. debt. Government institutions like central banks and sovereign wealth funds were net buyers. More current data suggests the latter trend may have reversed in the months since, though. Holdings by these official entities in the custody of the New York Federal Reserve have declined by $48 billion since late March, prompting Bank of America credit strategists to suggest that 'cracks' in demand from these investors are now visible. Still, it doesn't seem foreigners are dumping U.S. debt just yet. Even angry Canadians. This story was originally featured on

Yahoo

16 hours ago

• Yahoo

Opinion: We needed to get rid of the dairy cartel, not sanctify it in law

By Lawrence L. Herman It never ends. On June 5, Yves-François Blanchet, the Bloc leader in Parliament, tabled Bill C-202, a private member's bill that's yet another regrettable effort to enshrine Canada's Soviet-style supply management system in the statute books. It legislates against any increased imports of dairy products, eggs and poultry — sectors the system protects from foreign competition — under Canada's current or future trade agreements. The Senate fast-tracked the bill, passing it on June 17 after it sailed through the House with virtually unanimous support. It's an unprecedented piece of protectionist legislation that favours this one group of farmers. C-202 is virtually identical to Bill C-282, which a Bloc member tabled in 2021 during the past Parliament. It was passed by the Commons in June 2023 and was still being examined in the Senate last November when Donald Trump was elected. It had been stalled there for almost two years and — mercifully — died on the order paper when this spring's election was called. As well as preventing imports, supply management is a quintessential barrier to internal trade, designed to protect local producers against out-of-province competition, whether in dairy, eggs or poultry. Under the influence of the well-financed dairy lobby, the Trudeau government and all the other parties supported Bill C-282 as it made its way through the House. This time round, however, it's hard to see how the Liberals could have voted in favour of a blatantly protectionist bill completely at odds with the Carney government's core policy of dismantling interprovincial trade barriers — and doing so before July 1, no less. While Blanchet and his Bloc colleagues have remained focused on currying favour with Quebec dairy farmers, there has been a sea change in the geopolitical context, most notably a dramatic deterioration in the Canada-U.S. relationship, with Trump targeting dairy import restrictions among the many trade assaults he's been directing at Canada. For Parliament to raise this protectionist fence higher is downright foolish — as was emphasized by experts over and over again during the debate on C-282 — and would seriously jeopardize our relations with the U.S. at this very sensitive juncture. That alone should have consigned C-202 to the Parliamentary dustbin. But some other factors that are not always fully aired should outrage Canadians when the facts are better understood. Consider the dairy sector as an illustration. First, to make supply management work, over the past 50 years governments at both federal and provincial levels have layered complexities onto the system, creating a mind-numbing process run by vast bureaucracies from coast to coast. This newspaper explained it all in a report compiled by staff about a year ago. At the top of the structure is the Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) and its Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee (CMSMC). Each year, the CMSMC sets the allowable production volume for Canada as whole and the Commission then divides this up among the provinces, who parcel out the quota to their own producers, distributors, processors and consumers. The CDC then sets the farm-gate price for milk under what's called the National Pricing Formula. While consumers may think of milk as milk, under supply management milk is divided into five different classes and many sub-classes, based on what the milk is used for, whether as a consumer good or for further processing. The CDC applies the National Pricing Formula to set the annual farm-gate price in each class, with the price being different for each milk component — butter fat, proteins and solids. Provincial marketing boards then take all of this and, after even more consultations with industry players, determine who in their province is allowed to produce what, as well as where and to whom it can be sold, in what volume and at what price in that particular province. This goes on, year after year, involving scads of officials. Other industries, meanwhile, manage to decide prices and quantities without regulators' help. The point here isn't to go through all of these bureaucratic intricacies — details can be found in the FP report already referred to and on the CDC website — but to illustrate that in diary alone, the system is inordinately complex, difficult to penetrate, and run by large bureaucracies across the country. All this for the benefit of a few more than 9,000 dairy farms, compared, say, with Canada's 71,000 beef farms and 7,400 pig farms, which operate on the open market and receive no such guarantees. These numbers alone illustrate the inequities of this complex, over-staffed and costly system that exists to protect a small but highly favoured fraction of Canada's agricultural producers. When it comes to who runs the system, there's another set of issues that should outrage Canadians. It's run by insiders, persons with direct connections to the dairy industry, the same industry the system is supposed to regulate. For example, the CDC board is made up of persons with dairy industry connections, the chair being a dairy farmer himself. The Supply Management Committee is also weighted with industry players. At the provincial level, there's the same problem. All members of the Ontario Milk Marketing Board, for example, are dairy farmers, a pattern replicated in the other provinces. It's hard to see where the public interest comes in. Jack Mintz: Don't expect big economic gains from lower interprovincial barriers Bjorn Lomborg: Freer trade isn't dead yet, which is a good thing for all of us All of this should have led to a derailment of Bill C-202 and for the Carney government to start to phase out supply management as an outdated, discriminatory, protectionist system, contrary to the public interest. Though C-202 has passed, the government could hold up the proclamation needed to bring it into force pending further developments in our trading relations. In the meantime, Canadians should be concerned both about supply management itself and about the outsized influence its lobbyists have in Ottawa. Lawrence L. Herman, international counsel at Herman & Associates, is a senior fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute. Sign in to access your portfolio

UPI

20 hours ago

• UPI

Aflac health data, Social Security numbers hacked

"This attack, like many insurance companies are currently experiencing, was caused by a sophisticated cybercrime group," Aflac said. "This was part of a cybercrime campaign against the insurance industry." Photo by Sora Shimazak/ Pexels June 20 (UPI) -- Insurer Aflac said Friday customer health data and Social Security numbers were hacked, but that it stopped the cyber intrusion within hours and the attack did not include ransomware. Aflac is a U.S.-based company best known for its supplemental policies that help cover expenses that major medical insurance doesn't. It serves some 50 million people worldwide, largely in the United State and Japan. Aflac said the impacted files include "claims information, health information, Social Security numbers and/or other personal information, related to customers, beneficiaries, employees, agents and other individuals in our U.S. business." "This attack, like many insurance companies are currently experiencing, was caused by a sophisticated cybercrime group," Aflac said. "This was part of a cybercrime campaign against the insurance industry." Aflac said it has engaged third-party cybersecurity experts to help respond to the attack. Preliminary findings indicate that social engineering tactics were used to gain access to Aflac's network. Until its investigation is finished Aflac said it doesn't know the number of individual customers affected by the data breach. Aflac said it will offer customers free credit monitoring and identity theft protection and Medical Shield for two years. To get those benefits Aflac said people should call their call center at 1-855-361-0305. Erie Insurance and Philadelphia Insurance Compnaies also reported hacks in June. The three cyberattacks resemble techniques used by the hacking group Scattered Spider. That group was linked to Las Vegas hacks on MGM Resorts and Caesars Entertainment, both multimillion-dollar hacks.