NCBC raises questions on Bengal's revised OBC list
New Delhi: The National Commission for Backward Classes (
NCBC
) has raised questions over West Bengal government's new list of
Other Backward Classes
(OBCs) and has sought information within three days on the recommendations and survey conducted to include new communities in the state list.
West Bengal's state OBC list has been in the eye of a political storm since last year with the BJP accusing ruling
Trinamool Congress
of appeasing
Muslim communities
by including them in the state OBC list. The high court had scrapped 113 names from the list of OBCs, retaining 66, last year. This didn't deter Mamata Banerjee-led state government which added 76 castes in the state OBC list taking the total to 140 this month. Of the 113 castes scrapped by high court, 76 have now been added back, while two from the list of 66 retained by high court have been taken out.
NCBC has waded into the controversy now. NCBC chairman Hansraj Gangaram Ahir said the state government had not shared similar information the Commission had sought when it had prepared the earlier list. "We have sought information on three counts from the state within three days," said Ahir. In 2023, West Bengal had recommended inclusion of 87 castes, including 80 of Muslim community, in the Central List of OBCs. This had prompted NCBC to seek information from the state and details on what basis the government had made such a recommendation. NCBC has been red-flagging anomalies in implementation of reservation policy in West Bengal.
After a field visit in February 2023, NCBC had found Rohingyas and Bangladeshi immigrants had got OBC certificates and taken reservation benefits.
The state government has made a survey the basis of inclusion of castes in OBC list. Now, Ahir has raised the objection that if this information was available why was it not supplied to NCBC. Citing the notifications of the state government, Ahir has written, "These notifications provide that these exercises have been carried out on the detailed survey. A copy of the proforma for the survey is attached. The National Commission for Backward Classes desires that the recommendations of the West Bengal State Commission along with the Survey reports specifically the information relating to point No. 13(C), 13(D) & 19(A) of the proforma with all the supporting documents being provided. The above sought information may be furnished within 3 working days."
Points 13 (C) and 13 (D) pertain to the profession of people surveyed and how many are in government service. Point 19 (A) in the proforma asks respondents the level of education. NCBC says it has been seeking information on these counts from the state government and the reservation policy being followed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Iran Has Right To Self-Defence': Islamic Nations Shock America; Saudi, Qatar, Pak Back Khamenei
The U.S.-aligned Muslim countries have denounced the assault on Iran's nuclear installations. Concerns have been raised by Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Qatar, who fear significant repercussions in the Middle East. While denouncing US strikes, Pakistan, another US ally, asserted that Iran has the right to self-defense under the UN Charter. Iran was urged to resume talks with US President Donald Trump about its nuclear program by the UK, Germany, and EU. Watch this video to know more. Read More
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
50 years after Emergency: India confronts its sterilisation past, potential of demographic future
In 1976 alone, more than eight million sterilisations were conducted across India, most of them vasectomies. Many of these were not voluntary. As India marks the 50th anniversary of the Emergency imposed by then prime minister Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975, memories of mass sterilisation campaigns — many carried out under coercion — continue to haunt survivors and influence public health discourse even today. New Delhi, Jun 22 (PTI) In the 1970s, before the Emergency was officially imposed, children in some rural areas often ran around unclothed — until fear gripped families so tightly that even toddlers were dressed, not for modesty, but out of fear of forced sterilisation. 'It was a dark, dark period — no less than a war. We didn't know what would happen the next day. I remember being so afraid that my family didn't travel outside Delhi until the Emergency ended,' 78-year-old Ishrat Jahan, a resident of Okhla, Delhi said. Amina Hasan, now 83 and living in Aligarh, still shudders at the memory. 'We were poor but had dignity. They took that away. In our area, men started hiding in fields and wells when officials came around. We felt hunted,' she recalled. The pressure was relentless and indiscriminate. In 'Unsettling Memories', anthropologist Emma Tarlo documents how civil servants, factory workers and police personnel were often coerced into undergoing vasectomy. 'The officers said you could keep your job only if you got sterilised. I didn't have time to think,' a worker told her. 'I agreed because I had to save my job and bring up my family.' The stigma attached to male sterilisation was severe that in many communities, it was equated with emasculation. One anti-Emergency slogan scrawled across North India at the time summed up the sentiment: 'Nasbandi ke doot, Indira Gandhi ki loot' (Agents of sterilisation, Indira Gandhi's loot). One of the most violent episodes unfolded at Delhi's Turkman Gate, a historic Muslim locality. In April 1976, when residents resisted demolitions linked to urban 'beautification' drives and refused to undergo sterilisation, police opened fire. Entire families were displaced, homes were razed, but the area remains an enduring symbol of Emergency excesses. Poonam Muttreja, Executive Director of the Population Foundation of India, said coercive measures during the Emergency 'set back reproductive rights for both men and women'. 'India's population for a long time was viewed through the narrow lens of fear and scarcity. But today, there's growing recognition that our people are our greatest asset,' she said. 'India's strength lies in its youthful population — its demographic dividend. But being the most populous country also brings enormous responsibility. It's not just about numbers — it's about investing in every life through education, health and opportunity,' she added. Since the late 1970s, India has shifted from coercive family planning to voluntary participation and awareness. Today, female sterilisation accounts for the majority of procedures, although critics point out that the burden has disproportionately shifted to women. The past, however, still casts a long shadow. Some states have proposed limiting government benefits to families with only two children. 'Yes, we are seeing troubling signs on both extremes. On one hand, there are calls for coercive population control — such as punitive two-child policies or conditional welfare schemes,' Muttreja said, adding that on the other end there is growing pronatalist rhetoric driven by fear of long-term population decline, with some suggesting incentives for more births. Both approaches risk instrumentalising women's bodies for demographic goals, she said. As India seeks to harness its population as a source of economic strength, experts stress the need for caution. 'The way forward lies in ensuring choice, not control,' Muttreja said. 'India's fertility rate is already below replacement level. The focus should be on addressing unmet need for contraception, improving healthcare access and empowering women through education and economic opportunity,' she added. Population stabilisation will come not from pressure, but from trust, dignity and protecting reproductive rights, she said. As the country remembers the Emergency, it also stands at a demographic crossroads — between past trauma and future potential. PTI UZM OZ OZ This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Britain's Labour Party Needs to Listen to Its Social Conscience
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Progressives on both sides of the English-speaking Atlantic have focused much of their energy and attention on championing minority rights and indulging in identity politics. Standing up for groups who've suffered historic discrimination is laudable; removing barriers to Black employment and giving gay people the right to marry are hard-fought achievements. Transgender people deserve protections too, with trade-offs necessary given the clashes of biological sex and gender ideology. But whether by preference or distracted by such concerns, social evils which used to fire up the liberal-left conscience — class inequality, lack of economic opportunity and cohesive societies — have been in danger of being overlooked or even downgraded. In the UK, a horrific, decades-long scandal of grooming and rape gangs of mainly Pakistani Muslim men who preyed on young white women has revealed the pitfalls of this lopsided approach. The story is distressing enough in itself, but it has wider resonance for Britain's governing Labour Party, which prides itself on caring for the less fortunate in society but has failed them — both under Tony Blair's administration when the crimes first became apparent, and due to a sluggish response under Keir Starmer. This doesn't absolve the previous Conservative governments from carrying a large share of the blame. As the cross-party peer Baroness Louise Casey pointed out in an audit published this week, one of the main reasons for ducking the issue was oversensitivity about ethnic and religious groups from a Muslim background. Starmer, an alumnus of London's top human rights legal chambers, is an exemplar of the progressive mindset. He also successfully prosecuted grooming gangs in his former role as head of the crown prosecution service. So the appalling detail isn't unknown to him. And yet, in January, the prime minister accused opposition figures calling for a national inquiry into gangs who preyed on underage girls of 'jumping on the bandwagon of the far right,' Elon Musk had wrongly tweeted that millions of young women were being targeted by Asian gangs; in the social media echo chamber, the populists of Reform UK were taking up the cry. But that didn't invalidate the fact that the matter had been buried too quickly and with insufficient attention to the causes. The PM's words have returned to haunt him – but the underlying omission is far more important. Across the country and in the areas where the gangs operated for years with impunity under the noses of Labour councils and indolent police forces, men of Pakistani descent have been vastly overrepresented among the gangs. This mix undoubtedly requires sensitive handling — but not downright evasion. On Monday, however, the PM was forced to give way after Casey found that the authorities had 'shied away' from investigating the horrific crimes and avoided its ethnic and cultural character. The government finally agreed that a national inquiry was urgently required. The trouble is, it was urgently required a very long time ago. Even Starmer's U-turn was couched in flat, emotionless language; he would 'accept' Casey's recommendation. His Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was more forthcoming: These rapes were 'a stain on our society' and she would initiate a new round of criminal investigations. But, in truth, none of this would have happened if it wasn't for pressure from those on the right of the political spectrum — and in some case the far-right — on a center-left government. Many of the most notorious gangs operated in Labour-held areas, and the councils who 'shied away' were Labour too. Alarmed by the potential threat to a fragile social peace in areas where large groups of incomers are often living lives wholly separate to the White communities around them, Labour had another reason to downplay the matter — concern about the reaction of a substantial Muslim voting bloc. Local councils urged the police to play down the systematic nature of the abuse. Overindulging group rights has also cornered the PM in the fierce debate over the rights of trans people and protections for women's spaces. When the Supreme Court ruled this year that 'sex' in Britain's Equality Act unequivocally meant 'biological sex,' Starmer's bloodless response was to welcome 'the clarity' of the judgment. We are none the wiser about what he really thinks about the issue. I have firsthand experience as a journalist of this reluctance of a liberal mindset to face inconvenient truths. At the Sunday Times, we published a magazine article in 2007 by a feminist writer Julie Bindel, exclusively detailing the abuse of girls by groups of Pakistani-origin men in the northern counties of Lancashire and Yorkshire. The article had been offered first to the liberal-leaning Guardian newspaper, which turned it down. Andrew Norfolk, a journalist on our sister paper the Times, was also subsequently accused of racism when he investigated the ethnic gang phenomenon. A few brave Labour MPs, mostly women, also tried to bring the problem to the attention of a wider audience but initially found little support from male colleagues in Parliament and local parties. And while a degree of discipline is necessary in politics, lack of curiosity about opposing or challenging views leads to problems getting parked and evils left to fester. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington more than 60 years ago, Martin Luther King spoke of his dream that his children would 'one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.' There's an enduring lesson here for all: The implication of the declaration is that wise progressives should not be blind to good and evil among Whites, Blacks and Asians, and steadfast in their willingness to confront the consequences. The price of ignoring wrongdoing, whoever the culprit, is much higher — and more painful for all concerned. More from Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Martin Ivens is the editor of the Times Literary Supplement. Previously, he was editor of the Sunday Times of London and its chief political commentator. More stories like this are available on
