Reinvent Leadership At Universities: Devoted Students Hold The Future
Graduation students who are committed to learning, leading, and building what comes next.
Here we are, another graduation season. Once again, the national spotlight focuses on disruption, protests, and political controversy, overshadowing what truly matters: the devoted students who are quietly advancing their futures and embodying the mission of the universities they attend.
Today's effective leader is being forced to reinvent on the move. That reality presents a defining moment. It's time for university leadership to step back, recalibrate, and return their attention to the very people they are meant to serve, the students who are committed to learning, leading, and building what comes next.
When I worked in the political space, distraction was a daily battle. We faced headlines and noise intended to pull our focus from the work and results we were generating. To win, we had to reclaim the narrative every day and keep it focused on serving the people who elected us.
The same principle applies to America's universities. Leadership must now show a commitment to their students by refusing to let protestors, fears of lost government funding, and pundits dominate the story.
There are three ways administrators can do this.
University leaders must ask themselves: Are we reacting to noise, or are we creating momentum for the future? The cost of remaining reactive is high, not just in terms of reputation, but in missed opportunities to lead with authority and purpose.
This is not about putting all their energy into responding to protestors. It's about amplifying the mission-aligned students whose presence proves that your institution works.
The unsung heroes of your university are disciplined, innovative, and driven. They are not a PR strategy. They are the product of your core values in motion.
Give them the mic.
Host the conversations you want to be hosting. Make room for optimism grounded in data, direction, and demonstrated outcomes.
If you are an administrator, align your energy with the future. Start by shifting your presence. Invite devoted students into your communication strategy. They are already telling a powerful story, one of persistence, progress, and purpose.
They are your most credible advocates.
Bring attention back to the fact that education changes people and uncovers the deep value of their character and purpose. Your students are proof of that.
They are the living, breathing evidence of your mission fulfilled. The well-being of your university depends on this focus. It is a defining moment for direction.
Model what it means to believe in the future and all that is possible. In doing so, you not only signal strength and vision, but you also invite meaningful engagement from alumni, future students, donors, and faculty.
Revenue streams that reflect investment in people, not just programs, are yet to be fully realized. But they start here.
Let's return to the days when people traveled for miles to hear someone speak in person, not because it was convenient, but because it mattered. Human-to-human experiences create energy, conviction, and clarity.
Students make up most of the audience at sporting events and concerts, not behind screens, but in the seats, showing up in person because shared experience matters. They go in person because the connection moves them.
That same energy can and should exist in your classrooms, auditoriums, and campus centers. Leadership must not forget this.
Host the conversations that matter.
They have ideas. They have values. And they want to help shape a world that works better than the one they've inherited. Give them the authority to do so.
Extend the invitation to speak, lead, and co-create.
This is not about what's going wrong. It never has been. It's about what is working, who is thriving, and what future those students are already starting to build.
The conversation at universities must change. It's time to stop reacting and start leading with intention. Administrators must seize this defining moment for direction—one that prioritizes optimism, elevates student voices, and leans into the reality that students are your most valuable data point.
They are lifelong learners. They are already future-proofing their own paths. They're ready to take meaningful action if you let them.
Model reinvention.
Be deliberate in your presence.
Lead with calm confidence.
Align your voice with the mission, not the noise.
Good news can and must make the front page. Let that news be about the students who reflect your university's best work and brightest future.
That's leadership. That's devotion. That's the opportunity in front of you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students, delivering the Ivy League school another victory as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. The order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston preserves Harvard's ability to host foreign students while the case is decided, but it falls short of resolving all of Harvard's legal hurdles to hosting international students. Notably, Burroughs said the federal government still has authority to review Harvard's ability to host international students through normal processes outlined in law. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency abruptly withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas, skirting most of its usual procedures. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7,000 international students — about a quarter of its total enrollment — to transfer or risk being in the U.S. illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university said it was experiencing illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Burroughs temporarily had halted the government's action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, President Donald Trump tried a new strategy. He issued a proclamation to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move, saying the president was attempting an end-run around the temporary court order. Burroughs temporarily blocked Trump's proclamation as well. That emergency block remains in effect, and Burroughs did not address the proclamation in her order Friday. 'We expect the judge to issue a more enduring decision in the coming days,' Harvard said Friday in an email to international students. 'Our Schools will continue to make contingency plans toward ensuring that our international students and scholars can pursue their academic work to the fullest extent possible, should there be a change to student visa eligibility or their ability to enroll at Harvard.' Students in limbo The stops and starts of the legal battle have unsettled current students and left others around the world waiting to find out whether they will be able to attend America's oldest and wealthiest university. The Trump administration's efforts to stop Harvard from enrolling international students have created an environment of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion,' the university said in a court filing. Countless international students have asked about transferring from the university, Harvard immigration services director Maureen Martin said. Still, admissions consultants and students have indicated most current and prospective Harvard scholars are holding out hope they'll be able to attend the university. For one prospective graduate student, an admission to Harvard's Graduate School of Education had rescued her educational dreams. Huang, who asked to be identified only by her surname for fear of being targeted, had seen her original doctoral offer at Vanderbilt University rescinded after federal cuts to research and programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion. Harvard stepped in a few weeks later with a scholarship she couldn't refuse. She rushed to schedule her visa interview in Beijing. More than a month after the appointment, despite court orders against the Trump administration's policies, she still hasn't heard back. 'Your personal effort and capability means nothing in this era,' Huang said in a social media post. 'Why does it have to be so hard to go to school?' An ongoing battle Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after the university rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. On Friday, the president said in a post on Truth Social that the administration has been working with Harvard to address 'their largescale improprieties" and that a deal with Harvard could be announced within the next week. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right,' Trump's post said. Trump's administration first targeted Harvard's international students in April. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and on May 22 revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong. Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. ___ Collin Binkley has covered Harvard for nearly a decade — most of the time living half a mile from campus. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Collin Binkley And Albee Zhang, The Associated Press
Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Issa floats constitutional amendment to let Congress, SCOTUS remove president after Biden health 'cover-up'
Rep. Darrell Issa on Friday suggested that the House should consider taking up a constitutional amendment to make it easier to remove a president who is unable to perform the job in response to the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's declining mental state. Issa, R-Calif., who is a member of the House Judiciary Committee, said that actions taken by Biden administration officials to keep Americans in the dark about his health show that the provisions in the 25th Amendment may be insufficient. That amendment allows the Vice President and the Cabinet to remove a president from his role if he is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." "The initiation was always intended to be the vice president and the cabinet based on the assumption that they would take their oath and their observation seriously and that they were closest to the president to know if that event was needed," Issa told Fox News. "It now looks as though their impartiality can be questioned." Issa added: "If that's the case, the other two branches need to be brought in in some way into the process of asserting that the president may be unable to perform his duties and determining that in a fair and, if necessary, public way." The other two branches in this case would likely be Congress and the Supreme Court. Issa's comments come as the House Oversight Committee is set to interview three Biden administration officials next week about the former president's decline. Former Domestic Policy Council Director Neera Tanden will meet with the committee Tuesday. Former Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor to the First Lady Anthony Bernthal will meet with the committee Thursday. Former White House Physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor will testify under subpoena on Friday. The committee also has interviews scheduled with former administration officials Annie Tomasini and Ashley Williams. And it's seeking interviews with several officials in the Biden inner circle, including former Chief of Staff Ron Klain and former Senior Advisor to the President for Communications Anita Dunn. Also among the questions investigators will have is whether any Biden officials used the autopen to authorize executive actions without the president's permission. The results of that investigation, according to Issa, could help inform exactly how to write this potential constitutional amendment. "What Chairman Comer is doing is extremely important because he's basically doing the fact-finding for the Judiciary Committee, which is going to undoubtedly take up a possible amendment to the 25th Amendment," Issa said. There is a very high threshold to amend the Constitution – a two-thirds vote in each chamber and ratification by three-quarters of states. So, if an amendment does materialize from the Judiciary Committee, it would face a tough road to make it through Congress, even with unified Republican control. But Issa says it's worth making an effort to improve the system. "Since it didn't work, we have to ask, is there another way to make it work better in the future?" he asked.
Washington Post
34 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump says Gabbard was 'wrong' about Iran and Israeli strikes could be 'very hard to stop'
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Friday that his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard , was 'wrong' when she previously said that the U.S. believed Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon, and he suggested that it would be 'very hard to stop' Israel's strikes on Iran in order to negotiate a possible ceasefire.
