Teachers outraged as school district tells them innocent word is RACIST
A school district in Canada has defended a presentation which declared the use of the word 'family' problematic, due to its 'white supremacist' roots.
The Waterloo Region District School Board in Ontario held a professional training session in November 2023 during which the word was said to imply 'values positions of [male] authority and hierarchy,' and 'nuclear family structure.'
During the event, entitled Dismantling Whiteness at W-O: Words Matter, it claimed the word 'asks for obedience' with 'no room for questions or criticism,' and insinuates an 'expectation to prioritize family's needs and wants; sacrificing personal boundaries,' Juno News reported.
The session went on to discuss the 'concept of whiteness' which 'allows white supremacy to flourish.'
The Board, however, bizarrely defended the training in a statement this month - almost two years after the event - and said that the presentation had been taken out of context.
'The excerpts shared were part of a larger professional development session designed to deepen understanding around language, systemic bias, and how we can work together to ensure all students and families feel seen, respected and included,' a statement said.
Maedith Radlein, chair of the Waterloo Region District School Board, told CBC K-W's The Morning Edition that the board had since received many messages of concern regarding reports of the training session.
'That screenshot was interpreted to mean that what was being said was that we are against family. That screenshot was, in fact, part of a larger presentation that was a discussion about language,' she said.
'[People] are, of course, very upset because if that was indeed a message it would be something to be very concerned about.
'I would like to unequivocally state that that is not our message. We value families and we work with them every day as we seek to help their students achieve and enjoy their school experience.'
The statement said the information in the presentation was 'developed and informed by' Canada's Anti-Racism Strategy, the Ministry of Education's Anti-Black Racism Strategy, and the Ontario College of Teacher's Professional Advisory on Anti-Black Racism.
It furthered that the training sessions explored how differently public institutions can be experienced by different communities, and 'how educators an be thoughtful and inclusive in their communication.'
'Our continued learning and professional development is also informed by the Ontario Human Right's Commission's Tackling anti-Black racism and discrimination in education report,' the release said.
The report referenced by the board, Dreams Delayed: Addressing Systemic Anti-Black Racism and Discrimination in Ontario's Public Education System, detailed the role that public educational institutions can play in dismantling and correcting harmful practices, specifically for people of color within their communities.
A source told the outlet: 'Teachers just want to get on with their job of teaching. Ideology—if you will—is just something many teachers acknowledge as being present. They just want to get on with their jobs.'
Rebel News editor Tamara Ugolini said, in a video posted about the training: 'Putting a wedge between children and their families, and teaching people that that family unit, your social safety net, which lies inherently in a strong family unit, is harmful and racist is absolutely absurd.'
'When someone's telling you that the term 'family' is rooted in white supremacy and to dismantle the family unit because it's rooted in patriarchy, you can tell them where to go,' Ugolini added.
The board's defensive stance on the training session stirred outrage online, as users also condemned their vilification of the word.
One said: 'That is OFFENSIVE to the highest degree!!!! 'Family' is in no way harmful!! There are many types of families, but Family is the most important thing in our society!!!!!'
'I wouldn't even put it as high as ideology. It's destruction of the building block of society,' another wrote.
'Family is a unit fundamental to societies across religious systems and regions. Why is Canada destroying ALL values?'
Another commented: 'Calling 'family' harmful & rooted in white supremacy is troubling. Family is a core value in cultures worldwide, including Hinduism, part of one of the world's oldest civilizations. Why teach kids to question something so universally meaningful? This framing risks erasing cultural wisdom. What's the end goal here?'
The Waterloo Region District School Board did not immediately respond to DailyMail.com's request for comment.
The board further defended their position and said: 'WRDSB is committed to a quality public education system and to continuing the work of building a school district that centres student achievement, well-being and creating a sense of belonging in partnership with students and their parents, caregivers and families,' the statement furthered.
'We are committed to transparent, respectful dialogue and are always available to answer questions or discuss concerns.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Top headteacher's fury at politicians who 'delight in the demise of independent schools'
The head of one of the largest private schools in the UK has hit out at politicians who 'delight in the demise of independent schools' and says her school makes £45m a year for the Scottish economy. Lisa Kerr, who formerly led King Charles 's old school Gordonstoun, said those driven by their 'ideological beliefs' failed to recognise the massive economic benefits of private schools. Now Principal at prestigious George Watson's College in Edinburgh, where 1 in 4 pupils attend private schools, one of the highest numbers in the UK, said: 'Our school alone contributed £34.8 million in GVA (gross added value) to the Edinburgh economy, supporting 580 jobs in the city. 'Across Scotland, our impact rose to £44.7 million GVA and 680 jobs.' And Ms Kerr, who has previously slammed the government's VAT on fees tax raid as an 'existential threat' for private schools, said: 'The impact on Treasury coffers and state school places is only half the story. 'Those whose motivations are ideological and who delight in the demise of independent schools miss the significant economic impact we have on our communities and the benefits that are at stake as the sector shrinks.' Pointing out the huge savings City of Edinburgh Council had made because of children being educated outside the state sector, she explained: 'By educating nearly 2500 pupils, our school saved the public purse a staggering £18.9m with £15.7m of this directly relating to savings made by City of Edinburgh Council from us educating pupils in this area. 'In addition to the staff we employ directly, the school has a valuable and long term supply chain including catering, construction, engineering and cleaning, some for as long as 25 years.' The Labour-run council has been in the firing line since The Mail on Sunday first revealed its hardline anti private school policies such as charging sick kids on cancer wards at the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People in Edinburgh £115 an hour for tuition if they went to private schools while state school children received it free. Ms Kerr also warned the huge numbers quitting the independent sector – 'four times the government estimate at 13,000' – would have a devastating impact on the state sector. She said: 'Once numbers are in for the rest of the year, the Treasury sums will be further adrift. The numbers for this flawed policy just don't add up; not only will the government fail to raise the promised income but it will put serious strain on the public purse as more pupils are forced to move to already stretched state schools.' Ms Kerr has previously revealed admissions numbers are dropping at the historic college, originally founded in the 18th century, where fees have risen by up to £19,991 a year because of VAT on school fees. And she warned local partnerships which had delivered 'significant positive social impact' including work with the Edinburgh Food Project, an HIV education project and work with local primary schools were now under threat. 'As admissions and pupil numbers fall due to the introduction of the politically driven education tax, these benefits are at significant risk. This will not only damage Edinburgh's economy but will also increase the taxpayer burden. 'It is time for the government to go back to the calculator, be honest about the actual benefits that any school will ever see and to rethink this policy.' The UK Government has repeatedly defended its stance, stating that ending tax breaks for private schools will raise £1.8billion a year by 2029/30, to be spent 'supporting the 94 per cent of children in state schools'.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Keir Starmer accidentally admits his first year has been a failure
It is the sort of thing a backbencher who is trying to be loyal would say. Which is damning, and particularly so from the prime minister himself, because a core part of his job is communicating the government's 'story'. He was asked in Canada on Wednesday what his biggest mistake had been in his first year in government. 'We haven't always told our story as well as we should,' he said. Most politicians would have bristled at the obvious trap laid by Beth Rigby of Sky News, but Keir Starmer is a surprisingly low-ego politician. No other British prime minister would have bent down to pick up the trade deal papers that Donald Trump dropped. Most other prime ministers would have ignored Rigby's invitation to criticise themselves, especially as the second half of a two-part question, but Starmer came back to it willingly after answering the first part (what are you most proud of? 'Three million extra appointments in the NHS'). He is not self-important, which I admire about him, but he is ruthless and confident. Confident enough not to notice or care that the photographers are recording him scrabbling at the president's feet, and confident enough to give a serious answer to an obviously silly question. Unfortunately for him, it was a bad answer. Communication is not an optional add-on to democratic politics; it is the essence of it. Poor communication is usually an excuse not an explanation. It is the code to be used when a government becomes unpopular but people do not want to imply that the leader is the problem. Poor communications and bad advisers get the blame. It was ever thus: when parliament criticised Charles I's advisers; when Margaret Thatcher was told to get rid of Alan Walters, her economic adviser. Charles I was urged to get his message across better to MPs by denouncing popery; Thatcher was urged to sell the poll tax better by calling it the community charge. In both cases, it wasn't the advisers or the communications that were the problem. So it is with Starmer. MPs grumble about Morgan McSweeney, the prime minister's chief of staff. They blame him for the 'right-wing' policies that they don't like. They have all read Get In, the book about how Labour won the election by Patrick Maguire and Gabriel Pogrund, which portrays McSweeney as the mastermind and strategic genius behind a campaign for which Starmer is often the passive figurehead. This is often developed, by MPs who 'didn't come into politics to cut support for the disabled', into a fairytale in which Starmer, a proper socialist who shares Ed Miliband's politics (like them), has been taken prisoner by his Blairite chief of staff. If that is an attempt to avoid direct criticism of their leader, it fails, because it makes him look weak and dishonest. But it is also wrong. In the end, the leader always takes responsibility for decisions. Nor is Starmer simply McSweeney's puppet. A telling report in the Financial Times on Wednesday revealed that the plan to treat Nigel Farage even more publicly as the real leader of the opposition came from Starmer himself, and not McSweeney: it was the prime minister's idea to travel to St Helens to deliver a speech as a direct response to Farage's pitch for Labour votes. Farage is the main threat to Labour at the next election, but it may be that McSweeney has doubts about the prime minister himself saying so in public. The 'poor communications' line is just as bad – and it is a defence that Starmer deploys himself. What does he mean when he says 'we' could have 'explained our decisions in the way that might in retrospect have been better'? Could he have said to pensioners on modest incomes, 'We're going to take away your winter fuel payment, but don't worry, next year we will pretend that the economy is getting better and give it back to you'? The reason his government's decisions have not been explained better is that they were bad decisions. In retrospect, as he put it, he should have stopped Rachel Reeves cutting the winter fuel payment. Looking back, he shouldn't have promised to ' smash the gangs ' with no idea how to do it. Looking further back, he should have put someone with his full authority in charge of preparing for government. These are not examples of failing to tell the government's story 'as well as we should': they reveal a government with no story to tell, or even, quite often, with the wrong story to tell. Starmer has shown that he can learn, and he seems to have no fear of U-turning from the wrong policy to the right one. So maybe he can recover from the false start of his first year – but it will be achieved by making better decisions, not by 'telling a better story'.
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
National Theatre ‘discriminates' against private school pupils with ‘two-tier' pricing
The National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare company have been accused of 'two-tier' discrimination for charging private school children more than state school pupils. Britain's flagship theatre – whose new artistic director attended a fee-paying school – is charging privately educated pupils an extra 20pc for group bookings compared to state schools. A similar policy is employed by the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) which charges private school pupils 60pc more than children at state schools. Both theatre companies have charged the premium for several years, but the policy has come under renewed scrutiny amid fears Labour's VAT raid is encouraging discrimination against children who attend independent schools. It follows reports of an eight-year-old boy being turned away from the NHS because he went to private school. On Friday, senior MPs and campaigners urged the Charity Commission to investigate the two drama organisations, describing the charging policy as 'two-tier' and 'socio-economic social engineering'. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, told The Telegraph: 'This is disgusting discrimination and without a doubt is a form of two-tier pricing. This Labour government has launched an abhorrent class war against private schools, and policies like this should be reversed.' Stuart Andrews, shadow culture secretary, said: 'I have a huge amount of respect for the National Theatre, so this is particularly disappointing to see. 'Despite receiving tens of millions in public funding, this feels like clear price discrimination – penalising private school pupils based on crude assumptions about wealth. 'Publicly funded institutions have a duty to widen access, not reinforce stereotypes or engage in socio-economic social engineering.' Both theatres said the pricing policy was a longstanding practice, and that it was part of its commitment to widening access to the arts. Under its group booking system, the National Theatre offers discounted rates to school bookings for performances during term time between Monday and Thursday. The theatre charges £10 per ticket for a state school child, and £12 for those who attend private schools. The 20pc ticket price disparity comes despite the National Theatre's recent appointment of Indhu Rubasingham as artistic director. Ms Rubasingham grew up in Mansfield, and attended Nottingham Girls' High School – a fee-paying school. The prestigious all-girls private school counts The Archers actress, June Spencer, and the former director general of MI5, Stella Rimington, among its alumnae. Meanwhile, the RSC charges state school children £10 to attend performances, while private school pupils must pay £16.50. The Telegraph understands the policy was first introduced in June 2022. Previously, it did not discriminate between school children. Andrew Leveson, the RSC's executive director, was educated at University College School Hampstead, a fee-paying school. Data provided by the Independent Schools Council census, which measures the responses of its 1,400 members, found around a third of private school pupils receive financial support. A 2021 report by UCL also found among the wealthiest 5pc of families in the UK, 85pc do not send their children to private schools. A spokesman for Education Not Taxation, a group representing 25,000 private school parents, said: 'It is disappointing to see the National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare Company discriminate against children who attend independent schools. 'They should encourage all children to embrace the arts, rather than forcing children to pay the price for the biases of these charities. We also urge the Charity Commission to investigate and address this issue.' A spokesman for the National Theatre said: 'State school tickets are £2 less than for independent schools (£10 and £12), and both are considerably lower than the market rate. 'This is part of our commitment to widening access for young people to world class theatre. This enables us to welcome as many students as possible at a time when schools across the country face challenging financial pressures which limit extracurricular activity.' A spokesman for the Royal Shakespeare Company said: 'Prices for private schools are at a slightly higher rate due to the differences in budgets that are available between state-maintained schools and schools in the independent sector, a policy which we have maintained for several years. 'However, we also recognise that there are many different kinds of independent schools and for smaller schools, as well as for schools that focus on children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities. We are looking at how we can make appropriate adjustments, as part of our work to regularly review our pricing policies.'
