A lioness, a godfather, and a new elementary school: Why is Stoughton fighting with its cable access channel?
While voters eventually approved the new school in April, Lyons's shows leading up to the decision are part of a local controversy that continues to simmer. The local access station has sued the town and its leaders in federal court, alleging that they violated its civil rights and the
shared access agreement by trying to interfere with its operations because it dislikes critical programming.
Stoughton officials have denied the allegations, arguing that it's SMAC that violated the access agreement — a document that allows SMAC to record and air government meetings.
Advertisement
The town says the station exhibited an undue political bias against funding for the new school — including by airing programs such as 'A Lioness & You on the Watch' and 'The Stoughton Godfather,' a local talk show that begins with 90-year-old host Peter Ventresco photoshopped into iconic images from 'The Godfather.' Local officials also said the station has failed to provide the select board with updates as required in the agreement.
Advertisement
The lawsuit raises thorny First Amendment questions about the relationship between a public access channel and its local government at a time when such organizations are at greater risk of shutting down, thanks in large part to lost revenue as
Founded in 2009, SMAC is funded all but entirely by cable fees received by the town, thanks to laws that require cable companies such as Comcast and Verizon to pay for public access programming in exchange for operating in local communities. It is an independent nonprofit and is required by federal law to be apolitical and open to all viewpoints. SMAC had a budget of $467,000 last year.
The current feud traces back to an earlier, failed vote for the school proposal in June 2024. The new school is estimated to cost a total of $113 million — roughly $47 million of which will come from state grants — which required residents to vote on a debt exclusion.
Opponents said the project will put an even greater strain on residents who are already struggling to keep up, while supporters argued that the proposal is the best and cheapest option for its aging schools.
The real breaking point came after residents voted down the initial proposal, which prompted Town Manager Tom Calter to form a working group of residents. They produced a detailed report about the project ahead of the revote this year.
Advertisement
'I find it easy to get information out,' Calter said. 'The problem is that factual information has to compete with misinformation.'
Calter and other supporters of the school proposal said that opponents didn't characterize the project accurately, claiming, for instance, that the project did not include the costs of tearing down one of the existing elementary schools and building a new road and bridge.
Lyons, treasurer of the Stoughton No More Tax Hikes political committee that opposed the proposal, said that her critics were misunderstanding the group's arguments.
'Saying that I'm full of misinformation? It's preposterous,' Lyons said.
When SMAC tried to cover the second meeting of the Calter-appointed working group, a member told SMAC to leave, despite the meeting being open to the public. Calter said the meeting didn't have to be recorded because it wasn't subject to open meeting law.
'Video recording or live streaming the meetings would be contrary to the mission of the working group,' Calter wrote in a public letter at the time, adding that he was worried that clips without context would be released before the final report.
The move alarmed SMAC, which sued the town just days after residents approved the school proposal in April, alleging that Calter and Select Board members Steve Cavey, and Joseph Mokrisky were not just trying to hide opposition to the school project but also actively trying to steer SMAC's programming. The station also alleged that Select Board members intimidated SMAC staff and had previously tried to gain influence over the station's operations.
Advertisement
'SMAC is under a duty to be independent, and it is independent,' said Joseph Zoppo, an attorney representing the media organization.
Town officials denied that they tried to steer programming but argued that SMAC needs to remain unbiased.
'We want them to be able to broadcast ideas, even ones that we don't agree with,' Cavey said. 'But what we do need from them is to be able to take that role seriously.'
Turning SMAC away from the meeting also troubled some residents, other officials, and station hosts, including Lyons. She filed an open meeting law complaint with the state
attorney general's office, but the office did not find that Stoughton violated the law.
'How dare the town manager not allow SMAC to videotape those working groups so that the working public, or anyone for that matter, could then go to SMAC and watch it at their own convenience,' Lyons said in an interview. 'They're the ones spreading misinformation and outright lies.'
Crossover between local politics and SMAC helped fuel the town's concerns that the station has a political bent. Lyons and David Lurie, who up until last month was a SMAC board member, advocated
against the school proposal and serve on the town's finance committee. SMAC board chair Bob Mullen is the town moderator.
'I'll never argue what SMAC puts up there,' Calter said. 'But it's pretty easy to argue that they had their thumb on the public policy scale with respect to this project.'
Calter singled out the programs from Lyons and Ventresco, the latter of whom he called a 'cynic' who 'does no homework.'
Mullen and Lurie declined to comment and referred the Globe to SMAC's attorneys, who said SMAC board members don't make editorial decisions,
that the station aired plenty of pro-school programming, and that a lot of people in town hold positions at multiple institutions.
Advertisement
Ventresco said, 'I never lie, I put the truth out,' and said a lot of misinformation comes from the town. He added that he is supportive of the outgoing and incoming superintendents in town and supports a new school, just not the one voters passed.
The outsized attention on SMAC comes as there are few other sources of information in town.
The local newspaper, the Stoughton Journal, was combined with neighboring weekly papers in 2019, and the paper stopped printing in 2021, when its coverage went fully online at Gannett's Wicked Local website, a spokesperson said.
As the fight between SMAC and Stoughton charges on, some residents want permanent change to what they see as too much overlap and dysfunction in town government and at SMAC. Others point to the difficulty in getting independent and reliable information.
'It's not like it used to be back in the day. People could get information,' said Mark Hausseman, 77, a retired Stoughton resident who the SMAC board tapped in 2020 to evaluate a former station manager. 'I think that's one of the problems.'
Aidan Ryan can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Pixar's ‘Elio' Debut Topped by Returning ‘Dragon' at Box Office
How to Train Your Dragon, a live-action remake of the 2010 animated hit, topped the box office again in its second weekend, besting new releases 28 Years Later and Elio. Dragon, from Comcast Corp. 's Universal Pictures and DreamWorks units, took in $37 million in US and Canadian theaters over the weekend, according to market researcher Comscore Inc.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Portland ICE building being restored after riot, protests
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – After two days of , the block appears to be clear Monday afternoon. Several protesters camping outside of the ICE facility were ordered to move, and they are now set up down the street. Second man involved in Clackamas Town Center parking lot shooting gets 70-month sentence Meanwhile, the building itself is in the process of being restored with protective boards and the graffiti is being power washed away. Tensions were high over the weekend, with hundreds of people protesting outside the ICE building on Saturday. That number dwindled down to around a few dozen on Sunday. Portland police declared the protests a riot on Saturday night, saying they were going to make targeted arrests. That night, ICE agents also threw several rounds of tear gas into the crowd. KOIN 6 News reporters observed some of the protesters tossing the canisters back at the building along with water bottles and other materials. Crews also saw ICE agents use paintballs, rubber bullets and pepper bullets against protesters. Stabbing suspect at large after victim seriously injured in SW Portland Damage to the ICE building includes graffiti, smashed windows and doors, and trash. One protester, Blue, told KOIN 6 News there are greater things at stake than building damage. 'People are going to exercise their First Amendment right how they choose,' Blue said. 'It's a building. It has no rights. It has no importance to me. Compared to the human lives that are at stake here.' 'People are choosing to be in a location that they're not supposed to be, it seems like the protest is that's kind of, to begin with, their only crime. And then the police come out and get violent and then it becomes something else,' added a protestor named Casey. over the course of the weekend, and some face felony charges. Four appeared in court Monday. 'I grieve that there's the violent, or more demonstrative, type of stuff missing. I'll just making that statement about why this is what we're about,' said protestor Wayne Smith. 'I think maintaining social order is the responsibility of the police.' Portland Mayor Keith Wilson with the following statement: 'An estimated 50,000 Portlanders marched together in solidarity and protest yesterday, joining demonstrations from across the nation. We celebrate all those who peacefully and powerfully raised their voices against Federal overreach, which are deeply held values in both Portland and our nation. Miles from the planned demonstration, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility was damaged by fireworks and other materials. The Incident Command team learned of one federal officer being injured and sent resources to assist, but learned he did not require medical treatment. Later in the evening, PPB was notified that two additional officers received minor injuries and they, too, did not require treatment. The Portland Police Bureau responded swiftly, arrested one person, and cleared a path for a medical evacuation, which was ultimately not required. Later in the evening, a small group of demonstrators remained at the facility and the majority were exercising their constitutional right to free speech while remaining law abiding. However, PPB did step in to make targeted arrests when they had probable cause of criminal behavior. Portland is a sanctuary city within a sanctuary state, and the Portland Police Bureau serves and protects our community. We affirm the right to free speech and expression while emphasizing that violence, destruction, and obstruction carry consequences. Portland complies with all applicable federal and state laws and will not obstruct lawful federal enforcement operations. Our officers will not be used as agents of ICE, but will intervene when criminal acts occur. Accordingly, our officers have maintained a presence at the facility during demonstrations. It is important to note that just because arrests are not made at the scene, when tensions are high, that does not mean that people are not being charged with crimes later. Even when arrests do not happen in the moment, PPB members will continue to conduct follow-up investigations, make arrests, and forward cases to the Multnomah County District Attorney for prosecution. Portland has not requested and does not require the intervention of the National Guard. Deploying military troops to the heart of an American city, as the administration has in Los Angeles, is an unwarranted, unprecedented, and unconstitutional action. If we witness federal abuse following this incident or any other pretext, we will bring it to light, take legal action, and take the fight to federal courts, where we will prevail.' KOIN 6 News reached out to ICE officials, but we have yet to receive a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal lawsuit looks to halt Arkansas' Educational Freedom Account program; claims it violates US Constitution
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — Four Arkansans have filed a federal lawsuit against multiple state departments over the state's Educational Freedom Accounts, claiming it violates the United States Constitution. The lawsuit was filed in the Eastern District of Arkansas on June 13. The plaintiffs are Gwen Faulkenberry of Franklin County, Special Renee Sanders of Drew County, Anika Whitfield of Pulaski County and Kimberly Crutchfield of Pulaski County. The lawsuit names Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the Arkansas Department of Education, the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Education Secretary Jacob Oliva, Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration Jim Hudson and the nine-member state Board of Education, who are represented by state Attorney General Tim Griffin's office. The plaintiffs said in the 108-page complaint that the Education Freedom Accounts, or 'the Voucher Program', violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over others. Benton County employee fired after sexual misconduct investigation It also claims that the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment is violated, which mandates that people in similar circumstances receive the same treatment under the law. Article 2, Section 24 in the Arkansas Constitution is also reportedly violated. The article prohibits people from being compelled to attend any place of worship against their consent and bars the state from giving preference by law to religious establishments, denominations or modes of worship 'above any other.' 'The LEARNS Act is, through the use of public funds of the State of Arkansas, creating a separate and unequal dual school system of public and private schools, the latter of which, as a regular part of their curricula, teach the doctrines of particular religious, creeds and sects as a means of the establishment, encouragement, development and perpetuation of such religions, creeds and sects,' the complaint said. The plaintiffs say in the complaint that the EFA system 'denies the equal protection of the laws available and applicable to Arkansas school children based on economic, racial and physical characteristics and abilities.' It also allegedly creates a 'system of private schools that are not available to all school children in Arkansas because such private schools are not located in and accessible to school children in many rural areas' in the state. The Arkansas Department of Education's website reports that since the start of the 2023-24 school year, Arkansans have applied for more than 64,000 Education Freedom Accounts. Voucher recipients were given at least $6,856 each for the 2024-25 school year, and next year's will receive $6,864, the ADE previously told KNWA/FOX24. The EFA program was created by the LEARNS Act in 2023. It aims to provide state-funded accounts to approved families, helping them cover the costs of private school tuition, homeschooling, and other educational expenses. 5 Arkansas-based companies in Forbes' latest 'Global 2000' list A spokesperson for Governor Sanders' office gave the following statement to KNWA/FOX24 on Friday: 'This suit has no merit. More than 44,000 students have applied for EFAs for next school year and far-left activists are playing politics with those kids' futures to try and protect a failed status quo.' The Department of Finance and Administration said that as a policy, the department does not comment on any active litigation. 'The LEARNS Act has been a game-changer for Arkansas. Where previously there was stagnation, we now see progress. Where there was malaise, we now see hope. I have successfully defended the LEARNS Act and will eagerly do it again,' Attorney General Tim Griffin's office said in a statement. KNWA/FOX24 also reached out to the Arkansas Department of Education for comment, but has not heard back. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
