Donation centers overwhelmed after law causes massive surge in dropped-off items: 'It's a huge amount coming in every day'
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
The European Union took an eco-friendly step this year and outlawed throwing away textiles. As a result, tons of clothes are being recycled or donated instead.
Unfortunately, the recycling system and thrift stores in Sweden are struggling to manage the spike, according to an Agence France-Presse article shared on Phys.org.
What's happening?
Before the law was passed, trashed garments in the EU were burned, which can mean nasty things for the air we breathe.
More of the pile is now being sorted, reused, and recycled like glass or paper waste. In Stockholm, 60% more textiles were collected for recycling in the first two months of this year than in the same time frame last year, AFP reported.
However, Sweden lacks the necessary sorting facilities and resources to handle the uptick. Instead, the bulk of its overflow is sent to other countries, namely Lithuania, for processing and often incineration. Items are also still being burned in small Swedish towns without secondhand markets.
And thrift stores in cities are swamped.
"It's a huge amount coming in every day. It's been crazy, it's a huge increase," said Brian Kelly, secretary-general of a Stockholm charity shop, per AFP.
Why is keeping clothes out of landfills important?
Fast fashion is a notoriously polluting industry. Synthetic materials used in clothes are full of plastics, which are slow to biodegrade and dangerously worm their way into our food and bodies.
On top of that, making a single T-shirt can require 660 gallons of water and more than 2 pounds of chemicals, AFP reported.
Yet some people wear an article of clothing only a handful of times before tossing it and buying something new.
Indeed, the outlet reported that the average person discards nearly 42 pounds of clothes a year in the EU. That figure is almost twice as high in the United States, per Earth.org.
The industry also adds more than 1.3 billion tons of harmful carbon gas to the atmosphere each year, which is worse than air travel, the Carbon Literacy Project noted.
Put all that together, and you have a pretty convincing case for getting the most out of your clothes and keeping them out of landfills.
What's being done to improve textile recycling?
An improvement to the Swedish system is expected. As part of an EU agreement, fashion giants such as H&M and Zara will soon be required to help finance the increased recycling burdens.
As AFP explained, the hope is that this kind of incentive will encourage big companies to produce longer-lasting items that are less likely to end up in the garbage.
Consumers can also make a difference — and save cash — by cutting back on new clothes and thrifting used items whenever possible.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
12 hours ago
- CBS News
Plan for new Maryland recycling plant moves forward, despite pushback
The proposal for a controversial plastic recycling plant in Howard County's River Hill neighborhood is moving forward, despite community frustrations. The Maryland Department of the Environment recently approved a permit to construct the facility. The permit allows W.R. Grace & Co. to build a pilot plastic recycling plant for research. The plant will sit near residential communities including River Hill and Cedar Creek in Columbia. Over the past two years, neighbors pushed back against the proposal. A group called Stop the Grace Project has led much of the opposition. Hundreds signed an online petition calling on local leaders to stop the project. Residents fear the plant could bring pollution and increase health risks. Some worry about toxic leaks, fires and long-term damage to air and water quality. The Howard County Council previously considered a zoning change to prohibit plastic incineration in residential areas, but it was voted down in March. W.R. Grace has said the facility will not burn plastic. Instead, the company says it will focus on developing safer and more effective recycling methods. WJZ reached out to the Maryland Department of the Environment. The agency said the permit meets legal air emission standards. "Protecting the health of nearby residents is our top priority," MDE said in a statement. Howard County residents voice concerns of proposed recycling plant While W.R. Grace and Co. told WJZ that the plant will introduce a new and safe and more efficient way to recycle plastic, many residents still say they don't want the plant near their neighborhoods. In Nov. 2024, Howard County residents from Columbia's River Hill and Cedar Creek communities went before board members to plead for a recommendation that would require an 1,800-foot buffer in certain scenarios between new research and development facilities and residential areas. Again in February 2025 at a Howard County Council meeting, residents voiced their concerns about the plant. "There's still a danger of an explosion. And why is it so close to residential?" Boyd said. "So even if every case they are making is true, why not build it away from communities?," a resident told WJZ. Other residents are worried about the chemical emissions. W.R. Grace & Co. told WJZ that the plant will not burn plastic, but will be to study a potentially game-changing innovation for recycling plastic that is safe and effective. "With this new project, we will not burn plastic, as some who misunderstand our project and our intentions have asserted. Rather, we are studying a potentially game-changing innovation for recycling plastic – a safe and effective way to solve a problem facing us all," the company said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Builders hit with backlash after shocking act in public park: 'It's beyond unacceptable'
One of the great simple pleasures in life is a long stroll through the park, though encroachments by private property owners can make this increasingly difficult for local residents. Mardyke Open Space in the London Borough of Havering offers a wonderful area for kids to play, dogs to be walked, and anyone to enjoy the meadowy outdoors. That was until, in early May, a group of builders cut through the park's fencing and began cutting down the trees and bushes in the area. An article by The Havering Daily stated: "The workers … were seen using diggers to cut through metal fencing and drive along a public footpath. Residents estimate that approximately 40 feet of greenery was completely destroyed." Protecting communal spaces is a global concern. Recently, a property owner in Florida was penalized for filling in a protected waterway with rocks and dirt, adding to his land and harming the environment. Someone else in British Columbia illegally dredged a creek, detrimentally harming its salmon population. The Havering Daily reported that two nearby residents were called to observe the destruction. In the article, one resident said: "The land there is now completely flat, everything has gone. There are children playing, families walking — and now diggers are being driven over the public paths. It's beyond unacceptable." The outrage from Mardyke Open Space lovers is real, and it speaks to the locals' true appreciation of the area. While requests have been made for the destruction to stop until a proper investigation is launched, park visitors can only hope for a win, as well as for some rebuilding. Though situations like these can feel scary and out of control, the choice to bring in law enforcement and show public disapproval is a step in the right direction. By using their voice and taking local, immediate action, the hope is that public area destruction can be handled and that free, open spaces like this one can continue to thrive. Do you think America is in a housing crisis? Definitely Not sure No way Only in some cities Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Associated Press
2 days ago
- Associated Press
Greenpeace warns of potential environmental disaster as oil tankers collide near Strait of Hormuz
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — A collision between two oil tankers just east of the world's most critical oil choke point, the Strait of Hormuz , could bring about a potential environmental disaster, Greenpeace said on Thursday. The two giant tankers, ADALYNN and Front Eagle, crashed Tuesday in the Gulf of Oman and caught fire before the Emirati national guard intervened to evacuate crew members. No injuries were reported, according to Emirati authorities. Satellite data from NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System showed heat signatures in the area early Tuesday morning. Greenpeace said it had reviewed satellite imagery that showed a plume of oil stretching up to about 1,500 hectares (3,700 acres) from the crash site. The 23-year-old tanker ADALYNN belonged to a so-called Russian 'shadow fleet' – known to operate older ships below basic security standards – and may have been carrying around 70,000 tons of crude oil, the group said. 'This is just one of many dangerous incidents to take place in the past years,' said Farah Al Hattab of Greenpeace's Middle East and North Africa division, adding that such oil spills 'endanger marine life.' The United Arab Emirates Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure did not respond to a request for comment. It was not immediately clear what caused Tuesday's incident. British maritime security firm Ambrey said it was unrelated to fighting between Israel and nearby Iran. The Strait of Hormuz, near where the collision took place, is the strategic maritime entryway to the Persian Gulf and sees about a fifth of the world's oil pass through it, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. In 2024, an average of 20 million barrels of oil traveled through it daily. After Israel launched airstrikes against Iran on June 13, oil prices surged as worry mounted over whether the Islamic Republic might block the waterway. Maritime ship experts say shipowners are increasingly wary of using the waterway, with some ships having tightened security and others canceling routes there. As the Israel-Iran conflict intensified over the weekend, hundreds of ships in the strait saw spotty navigation signals and had to rely more on radar. The Financial Times reported on June 13 that the world's largest publicly listed oil tanker company, Frontline – which owns the Front Eagle oil tanker involved in Tuesday's crash – said it would turn down new contracts to sail into the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz.
