Treasury minister Emma Reynolds suffers live interview meltdown as she has no idea of cost or location of new £10bn River Thames crossing she is announcing
A Treasury minister suffered a meltdown in a live interview today as she struggled to answer basic questions about a new River Thames crossing.
Emma Reynolds was announcing a package of infrastructure spending on LBC when the toe-curling moment happened.
The £10billion Lower Thames Crossing will link Essex and Kent - but the economic secretary was unable to give the location or the total cost of the project.
She also mistakenly referred to the existing crossing being the 'Dartmouth Tunnel', apparently confusing the Devon town with Dartford.
'I meant Dartford, excuse me, I had a very early morning,' the minister told LBC Radio.
Asked by presenter Nick Ferrari about the proposed new crossing's location, Ms Reynolds frantically leafed through paperwork.
'You'll forgive me, I can't recall the landing zone,' she said.
Ferrari said: 'So the crossing that you're talking about, you don't know where it is?'
A floundering Ms Reynolds seeming resorted to reading out some text about how the crossing would connect the North with 'key ports in the South East'.
'It's almost as if you're reading from a piece of paper there, isn't it?' the presenter interjected.
Ferrari put the minister out of her misery by informing her that the crossing will involve two tunnels under the Thames to the east of Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent.
Pressed on the cost, an increasingly dejected-looking Ms Reynolds said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'.
But a clearly exasperated Ferrari said: 'You don't know that either, do you?'
He added: 'Is there much point continuing this conversation because you don't know where a bridge starts, where it ends and you don't know how much it costs?'
Ferrari then asked about the Hammersmith Bridge.
'I'm not here to talk about the Hammersmith Bridge. I'm not a transport minister,' Ms Reynolds said.
National Highways has estimated the cost will be between £9.2billion and £10.2billion depending on the funding model chosen.
It would connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel.
The funding for the Lower Thames Crossing will be part of the Government's 10-year plan for infrastructure.
A new structures fund will also invest in repairing bridges, flyovers, tunnels and other transport infrastructure such as roads.
The Lower Thames Crossing is aimed at reducing congestion at Dartford.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has said that the project is 'essential for improving the resilience of a key freight route and is critical to our long-term trade with Europe'.
Pressed on the cost, an increasingly dejected-looking Ms Reynolds said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'
'It will speed up the movement of goods from south-east England to the Midlands and the north, crucial to thousands of jobs and businesses,' she added.
Rachel Reeves has said ministers are 'going all in by going up against the painful disruption of closed bridges, crossings and flyovers'.
The Chancellor added: 'This is a turning point for our national infrastructure, and we're backing it with funding to support thousands of jobs and connect communities, delivering on our plan for change.'
It comes ahead of the Government's infrastructure strategy, expected this week, while public procurement rules are set to be overhauled so that public bodies will have to give more weight to firms which can prove they will boost British jobs when they are bidding for contracts.
The Chancellor outlined a range of infrastructure investments as part of last week's spending review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Lord Sugar: Amstrad-inspired firm led by grandson ‘not relying on past glory'
Lord Alan Sugar has said the digital marketing agency run by his grandson and named after his famous brand Amstrad is not 'relying on past glory', as it counts the latest winner of The Apprentice among its clientele. The business mogul announced last year that he had bought back the rights to the household brand name and was launching Amstrad Digital. The firm is headed by his grandson Joe Baron, and Tom D'Arcy, who both worked at a rival agency, Climb Online, which was set up by The Apprentice winner Mark Wright. A year since launching, Essex-based Amstrad Digital has generated a turnover of around £600,000. This has partly been possible through projects with a raft of businesses under Lord Sugar's own portfolio – many of which stem from the BBC One boardroom-based reality series. They include the latest winner of the programme, Dean Franklin, who secured £250,000 of investment from Lord Sugar into the air conditioning business that he set up during the pandemic. Lord Sugar said Amstrad Digital was 'not just treading water' but was making money and 'laying down a foundation for serious long-term growth'. 'The brand still carries weight, and they're using that smartly – not just relying on past glory but backing it up with a solid service offering,' he told the PA news agency. 'From day one, Amstrad's always been about giving people value for money. 'No fluff, no overpriced nonsense – just a solid, affordable product that actually does what it says on the tin. 'That was the principle back in the 1980s, and I made sure we kept that at the heart of Amstrad Digital.' The businessman founded electronics company Amstrad in 1968, at the age of 21, selling audio and computer equipment before making the first range of Sky receivers and dishes. It was eventually sold for £125 million to the broadcasting giant, which still uses the software but not the brand name. After handing over the reins to his grandson, Lord Sugar said Mr Baron has a 'strong appetite for success', adding: 'I expect nothing less.' 'Joe being my grandson has not meant that he gets any handouts and exceptions when things get difficult,' he told PA. Mr Baron acknowledged uncertainty in the wider industry amid businesses making cutbacks on marketing spending, and concerns over the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI). He said the uncertainty was 'difficult' but an 'opportunity for us to set ourselves apart, which has been the aim since day one'. Earlier this month, digital marketing firm S4 Capital, which was founded by the former boss of WPP, said clients were remaining cautious about spending due to tougher economic conditions and uncertainty about global trade.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
A5: Judge to rule on future of road scheme
A judge is due to deliver a decision on the future of the A5 road scheme later on 58-mile (94km) £1.2bn project was given the green light by Stormont ministers in October last the following month a group of residents and landowners began judicial review proceedings against the dual work had already started on parts of the long-delayed road scheme and in March this year the Infrastructure Minister visited a location where some advance works were underway. More than 50 people have died on the A5 since 2006 and campaigners have called for the road to be scheme was first announced back in 2007, but has been beset by a number of delays.A group of local residents, landowners and farmers mounted a fresh challenge against the decision to begin construction work. Long read: A5 crossroads The umbrella group, known as the Alternative A5 Alliance, contended it would breach legislative targets set out in the Climate Change (Northern Ireland) Act 2022 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by of the case centred on Planning Appeals Commission recommendations against proceeding with the scheme unless the department was satisfied it would not undermine those goals. What is the A5? The A5 is a vital artery of the Northern Ireland road network. More than 58 miles (94km) long, it has more than 200 side roads connecting to road is single carriageway for most of its length, with overtaking lanes in some links Londonderry with Aughnacloy in County Tyrone and passes through towns like Sion Mills, Omagh and is the main north-south route in the west of Northern Ireland, providing a link between County Donegal and Dublin, via the N2 in County road has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s, with the exception of some town bypasses, but there has been a huge rise in the number of cars, lorries and agricultural vehicles using it since it was first statistics show there has been about a 10% increase in traffic on the road in the last 10 years alone. An increase of about 30% is forecast over the next 25 years. Concerns A plan for a new A5 dual carriageway was first proposed nearly 20 years been at the centre of a raging debate ever since, between those who say a new, modernised road is needed to save lives - and others who worry about the impact on farmland and the 1,200 hectares of land, impacting more than 300 working farms would be required for the construction of the full 85km A5 like the Alternative A5 Alliance (AA5A) have repeatedly raised concerns about losing land that has been in their families for had called for the existing A5 road to be improved and pointed to the environmental impact of constructing such a large-scale project, as well as unresolved issues about building the new road near potential flood police figures have shed light on the cause of crashes on the A5, putting focus on driver error is the most common cause of fatal road traffic accidents on the A5, but it is also the most common cause of fatal accidents on the majority of roads across Northern Ireland. A previous investigation by BBC News NI found that between 2012 and 2024, the A5 had the highest rate of deaths per kilometre of any road in Northern April this year Justice McAlinden heard arguments at the High Court from barristers representing the AA5A as well as from bereaved families and the Department for judge had previously said it was important the case reached a conclusion "as quickly as possible".A decision is expected later on Monday morning.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
We need better paid and fewer MPs rather than preening power-hungry mayors
It's that most dangerous of political schemes, a legacy moment. Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London since 2016, is steam-rolling through his passion project to pedestrianise a large part of Oxford Street, a mile-long section of that ancient thoroughfare known in Roman times as Via Trinobantina. Once you could travel from Fishguard in Pembrokeshire to central London. Now, for the first time in some 1,500 years, your caravan, donkey or bike must stop at Marble Arch. At which point you can join a massive queue of traffic heading down Park Lane as taxis and buses on new, permanent diversion try to figure out how the hell to get to Tottenham Court Road. Sir Sadiq's renderings, his fantasy drawings doubtless etched at vast expense by one of a dozen architect firms commissioned to consult on this project, show a vast avenue of greenery. There are young trees in enormous plant pots and the old tarmac covered in triangles of different shades of green. And along this glorious, unpolluted thoroughfare walk Khan's happy, devoted people. Needless to say, moving down the street are the diverse multitude; men holding hands, people in wheelchairs and the blind. What is not rendered is the view of the surrounding streets, where it's a technical car park of buses, taxis, juggernauts and cyclists, the fuming hot air of the riders, drivers and passengers able to power a small city district. Yet here is Sir Sadiq's legacy. Not a reduction in knife crime nor an increase in arrests for burglary, but a dreamy, long walkway. Meanwhile, Soho, the area that could be successfully pedestrianised (if you insist on such things) becomes further blocked and clogged. Soho's alleyways and narrow streets, its cafes, restaurants and clubs would make a marvellous, local economy-generating island of wandering, mooching, dining and drinking. But no, it's the one straight road, a key artery of London through which buses and taxis and bicycles can freely flow (normal traffic having been banned during daylight hours and Saturdays since the 1970s) that is kiboshed. The opposition has been vociferous. Tim Lord, the chair of the Soho Society, says nothing came from the Mayor but a shoulder shrug when he raised concerns about 'the impact of moving 16 bus routes into narrow, congested one-way streets in Marylebone and Fitzrovia'. The Labour leader of Westminster city council has said, politely, that the plan 'was not the council's preferred outcome'. Yet Sir Sadiq says he's 'proud'. Indeed, releasing the results of a local consultation, he joked that he had received 'North Korean' levels of support from London, or from those who bothered to respond to his survey, doubtless hustled by the mayor's savvy electioneering team. Because the London Mayor appears to love power, and this is manifested in the mechanism that he has used to steamroll this process through, there is a magic lever in his office, deployed sparingly, (think, 'Break glass in case of emergency'), called the Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC). Originally developed to accelerate housebuilding after the Second World War, if you can argue the need for regeneration, it gives you the power to ignore local decisionmakers and accelerate your plans. Hence it being used, obviously, to implement the HS2 Crossrail intersection at Old Oak Common (where white elephant meets gazelle). Sir Sadiq revels in his power, imagining the high-fives he'll be getting from passersby as he sips his beloved flat white on his traffic-free Oxford Street. And quite why he loves Oxford Street is beyond me for, save the likes of Selfridges, it is actually, when it comes to retail brands, one of the grottiest streets in the capital. Perhaps he has a penchant for candy, the street being littered with those dodgy American-style sweet shops as well as homogenous global retail brands, the ubiquitous vape stores, not to mention the hoards of pickpockets and that new scourge, the electric bike-driven phone thieves. And if one makes the strange choice to shop on Sir Sadiq's Oxford Street of the future, how do you cope with lugging your purchases a mile up the road to the nearest bus stop? Yet Sir Sadiq's power-hungry zeal is not unique to London. We have become a nation in thrall to the powers of over-paid council officials. Reforms to local authorities over the decades have been what Sophie Stowers, of think tank More in Common calls, 'piecemeal [and] incoherent', so much so that most voters wishing to moan about a missing bin collection have no idea whether to moan to a councillor, local mayor, police and crime commissioner, metro mayor or MP. A letter of complaint, doubtless, being passed from one to another while they, eagerly, exercise what powers they have. And, as George Jones, emeritus professor of government at the LSE, has argued, this so-called innovation of George Osborne to introduce regional mayors concentrates power in a single person, which is 'unlikely to represent the diverse complexities of a large urban, metropolitan or county region area better than collective leadership'. There was the preening mayor of Bristol, Marvin Rees (2016 to 2024) who paraded his plans for an unaffordable underground mass transit system, a £132 million refit for the Colston Hall music venue, and who flew to Vancouver to deliver a 14-minute Ted Talk on the climate crisis. The people of Bristol saw sense and in 2022 voted to replace the mayoral system with a committee. Or there's the power-mad mayor of Leicester, Sir Peter Soulsby. He called for the abolition of the city's chief executive, flouted the Covid lockdown by visiting his girlfriend (he publicly apologised later), has been linked to accusations of bullying, intimidation and harassment (he denied knowledge of such behaviour and said he would never condone such an approach) and has faced criticism for plans to demolish a central car park and replace it with a public square. One local described the plan as 'delusional, considering that it rains 178 days a year'.
