A5: Judge to rule on future of road scheme

A judge is due to deliver a decision on the future of the A5 road scheme later on Monday.The 58-mile (94km) £1.2bn project was given the green light by Stormont ministers in October last year.However, the following month a group of residents and landowners began judicial review proceedings against the dual carriageway.Preparation work had already started on parts of the long-delayed road scheme and in March this year the Infrastructure Minister visited a location where some advance works were underway.
More than 50 people have died on the A5 since 2006 and campaigners have called for the road to be upgraded.The scheme was first announced back in 2007, but has been beset by a number of delays.A group of local residents, landowners and farmers mounted a fresh challenge against the decision to begin construction work.
Long read: A5 crossroads
The umbrella group, known as the Alternative A5 Alliance, contended it would breach legislative targets set out in the Climate Change (Northern Ireland) Act 2022 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.Part of the case centred on Planning Appeals Commission recommendations against proceeding with the scheme unless the department was satisfied it would not undermine those goals.
What is the A5?
The A5 is a vital artery of the Northern Ireland road network. More than 58 miles (94km) long, it has more than 200 side roads connecting to it.The road is single carriageway for most of its length, with overtaking lanes in some sections.It links Londonderry with Aughnacloy in County Tyrone and passes through towns like Sion Mills, Omagh and Strabane.It is the main north-south route in the west of Northern Ireland, providing a link between County Donegal and Dublin, via the N2 in County Monaghan.The road has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s, with the exception of some town bypasses, but there has been a huge rise in the number of cars, lorries and agricultural vehicles using it since it was first built.Official statistics show there has been about a 10% increase in traffic on the road in the last 10 years alone. An increase of about 30% is forecast over the next 25 years.
Concerns
A plan for a new A5 dual carriageway was first proposed nearly 20 years ago.It's been at the centre of a raging debate ever since, between those who say a new, modernised road is needed to save lives - and others who worry about the impact on farmland and the environment.Approximately 1,200 hectares of land, impacting more than 300 working farms would be required for the construction of the full 85km A5 carriageway.Groups like the Alternative A5 Alliance (AA5A) have repeatedly raised concerns about losing land that has been in their families for generations.They had called for the existing A5 road to be improved and pointed to the environmental impact of constructing such a large-scale project, as well as unresolved issues about building the new road near potential flood plains.Meanwhile, police figures have shed light on the cause of crashes on the A5, putting focus on driver responsibility.Driver error is the most common cause of fatal road traffic accidents on the A5, but it is also the most common cause of fatal accidents on the majority of roads across Northern Ireland.
A previous investigation by BBC News NI found that between 2012 and 2024, the A5 had the highest rate of deaths per kilometre of any road in Northern Ireland.In April this year Justice McAlinden heard arguments at the High Court from barristers representing the AA5A as well as from bereaved families and the Department for Infrastructure.The judge had previously said it was important the case reached a conclusion "as quickly as possible".A decision is expected later on Monday morning.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

23 minutes ago

• The Independent

David Lammy refuses to say whether US attack on Iran was ‘right' or ‘legal'

Foreign secretary David Lammy has refused to defend Donald Trump 's attack on Iran and confirm it was either legal or even 'the right thing to do'. In an awkward interview on BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, Mr Lammy was asked four times if the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities was legal. It comes after Donald Trump's regime conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, despite Sir Keir Starmer pushing for de-escalation in the preceding days. The questions followed reports that UK attorney general Lord Hermer has suggested it would not be legal for the UK to launch such attacks. Radio 4 Today presenter Justin Webb asked him four times if the attack was legal with the foreign secretary avoiding the answer. 'We were not involved, it is for the Americans to discuss those legal issues," he responded repeatedly. The issue is important because of fears that it undermines the case against Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine. However, Mr Lammy was not even able to answer whether the attack by US B-2 stealth bombers was even 'the right thing to do'. Mr Webb asked him: "Was the (US) military action the right thing to do?" Mr Lammy avoided the question, answering: "I've said that we weren't involved in the military action." Webb asked again: "Was it the right thing to do?" Lammy responded: "What I've said is that ultimately this can only be dealt with in diplomacy." The foreign secretary was not the only senior minister to refuse to answer difficult questions about the rapidly changing international crisis in the Middle East. Earlier, armed forces minister Luke Pollard claimed it is 'not for [him] to comment' on US action in the Middle East, refusing to say whether Britain is supportive of US strikes in Iran. Asked whether the UK was disappointed or pleased about the military intervention, Luke Pollard told Sky News: 'Well, it's not for me to comment on the particular US action, but we're assessing the battle damage at the moment to understand the true extent of the strikes. 'But our focus and the work that we are doing in conjunction with our US allies as well as those across Europe, is to put the pressure on the Iranian regime to get back to negotiating because a diplomatic solution is how we bring this crisis to an end.' When it was put to Mr Pollard that it was specifically his role to comment on military action around the world, he replied: 'I'm not going to be able to comment on that question, but what we can say is that we were not involved in the military action that the US took.' He added that Britain's focus was also on putting 'pressure on the Iranian regime to get back to negotiations because a diplomatic solution is how we bring this crisis to an end, with Iran not able to create a nuclear weapon, handing over their nuclear materials that they possess, and giving commitments that they won't threaten regional stability by developing a nuclear weapon in the future'. Over the weekend, the US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. Ahead of the strikes, the prime minister had been calling for calm, saying he has 'no doubt' that Mr Trump backs the G7's call for a de-escalation of tensions in the Middle East. It is understood there was no British involvement in the action but the government was informed before the US strikes. After the strikes took place, Sir Keir backed Mr Trump's administration describing Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security'. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat', he added. But he later warned there was a risk of the Middle East crisis spiralling beyond the region and urged all sides to return to negotiations.

Telegraph

30 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Palestine Action banned from protesting outside parliament

Palestine Action has been banned from protesting outside Parliament. It comes after Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, said he was 'shocked and frustrated' that the group was planning the demonstration. The force has now imposed an exclusion zone around Parliament, with protesters facing arrest if they enter the area. Police have also said any demonstrations by the group in central London cannot begin before 12pm and must end by 3pm. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is expected to announce plans on Monday to proscribe Palestine Action after activists from the group damaged two planes at RAF Brize Norton, at a potential cost of millions of pounds.

Daily Mail​

37 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS John Textor finally SELLS his Crystal Palace stake as New York Jets owner Woody Johnson invests - in boost for Eagles' Europa League hopes

John Textor has sold his company's stake in Crystal Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson – in a move that is set to clear the way for the club play in Europe next season. The American businessman's Eagle Football Holdings held 43 per cent in the south London club, which qualified for the competition for the first time after a historic victory in the FA Cup Final. However, as Mail Sport revealed, their participation in the Europa League was thrown into jeopardy thanks to Textor's ownership of French side Lyon, and potential issues with UEFA's rules on multi-club ownership. Palace officials, including Textor, jetted to Switzerland earlier this month for a crunch summit with UEFA officials in an attempt to convince them that because Textor only held 25 per cent of voting rights he was not in a position of influence at Selhurst Park. Textor told Mail Sport outside the meeting that he was attempting to sell his company's stake in the club, with Johnson – a former US ambassador to the UK – among the front runners. And now a deal for around £190m has gone through, subject to Premier League approval. UEFA declined to comment, but the hope is that Palace have now done enough to ensure they will not be booted out of the Europa League. Those in Switzerland are aware of what could be a breakthrough development. It is thought that Johnson will be subject to the same set-up as Textor's firm, in that despite owning 43 per cent of the club, he will only have a quarter share of the voting rights, along with chairman Steve Parish, and US investors Josh Harris and David Blitzer. Blitzer's ownership of Danish club Brondby was another potential sticking point should Palace have been 'demoted' from the Europa League to the Europa Conference. A decision from UEFA is expected by the end of this month. Johnson, 78, is an heir to the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceutical empire, a Republican donor and is estimated to be worth around £7.38bn. In 2022 he missed out in a bid to buy Chelsea and is known to be a close friend and financial backer of US President Donald Trump. Johnson, 78, is an heir to the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceutical empire, a Republican donor and is estimated to be worth around £7.38bn. In 2022 he missed out in a bid to buy Chelsea and is known to be a close friend and financial backer of US President Donald Trump, under whom he served. Johnson is known as a philanthropist, especially in the field of medical research and, via the Jets, has donated to Ukraine. Is wife, Suzanne, grew up in a Ukranian neighbourhood of New York. Johnson has controlled the Jets since the year 2000. Under his ownership, they are yet to win a Super Bowl and have gone 14 seasons without appearing in the play-offs, the longest drought in the sport.