logo
NEPRA approves Rs50b write-off for KE

NEPRA approves Rs50b write-off for KE

Express Tribune05-06-2025

Listen to article
The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) approved on Thursday a write-off amount of Rs50.013 billion for K-Electric (KE) under the Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) period of FY2017 to FY2023. While still an acknowledgment, it is much less than what KE had asked for despite meeting NEPRA's strict guidelines on what constitutes prudent cost recovery.
The approved amount is part of the broader claim of Rs76 billion submitted by KE, for which NEPRA hearings were held in December 2024 and April 2025. Ensuring the write-off amount pertaining to unrecovered dues comprised an extensive process of meeting stringent conditions, including verification of essential documents, multiple recovery efforts, disconnections, and KE's Board certifying that all reasonable and best possible recovery efforts were undertaken.
The approved write-offs are strictly based on criteria laid out in KE's NEPRA-approved write-off policy and have undergone rigorous internal and external audits, including physical surveys and consumer-level documentation checks.
During the hearings, KE officials had stressed that these unrecovered amounts were not a result of inefficiency but a reflection of ground realities, such as the presence of unplanned settlements—slums—leading to operational challenges in areas where recoveries are no longer possible due to demolition, migration, or theft. Hearing discussions also included matters like the circular debt, which KE highlighted it had no contribution to.
Interveners and commenters shared their statements and opinions regarding KE's write-off claims. Sheikh M Tehseen, President of the Federal B Area Association of Trade & Industry (FBATI), mentioned that KE's financial sustainability and investment plans were dependent on write-off claims, while emphasising that under the current tariff framework, any such claims should be resolved fairly, recognising that 100% recovery in a city like Karachi is unrealistic.
Similarly, the President of the SITE Association of Industry, in his letter, had expressed support for a timely resolution of KE's write-off claims, emphasising the need to maintain KE's operational stability while protecting industrial stakeholders from additional financial burden, and urging NEPRA to ensure a balanced decision that supported uninterrupted industrial operations and served the greater public interest.
The Secretary General of the Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce & Industry (OICCI) highlighted KE's investments since privatisation and wrote about its performance as a benchmark for future investors, mentioning that NEPRA's decision would set the mood for the privatisation of DISCOs. He stated that a fair evaluation and subsequent decision would support foreign direct investment (FDI) and restore investor confidence in the energy sector.
The last few days have witnessed approvals and decisions by NEPRA for KE's critical matters, including the determination of its transmission, distribution, and supply tariffs, with the write-off decision being the latest in this series.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Petroleum products: Senate body rejects Rs2.50/litre carbon levy
Petroleum products: Senate body rejects Rs2.50/litre carbon levy

Business Recorder

time18 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Petroleum products: Senate body rejects Rs2.50/litre carbon levy

ISLAMABAD: The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue with majority vote rejected the carbon levy of Rs2.5 per litre on petroleum products proposed in the Finance Bill 2025-26, from which the government has projected to generate a revenue of Rs45 billion. Under the ongoing International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme for Resilience and Sustainability Financing (RSF), the government has agreed for the imposition of the carbon levy on petrol, diesel and furnace oil of Rs5 per litre, which will be phased in over two years. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) chairman said that revenue from carbon levy would be increased to Rs90 billion in 2026-27. The levy is a condition of the IMF's RSF programme of $ 1.4 billion. This levy will be imposed on petrol, diesel and furnace oil. Aurangzeb tells Senate body: Govt eyes $2bn loan to boost reserves The parliamentary panel chaired by Senator Saleem Mandviwalla, observed that carbon levy could not implemented through finance bill. The committee observed that the way carbon levy is going to be impose was not correct and rather it should come as carbon tax. The committee also underlined that Petroleum Division has proposed Rs2.5 carbon levy without providing sustainable 'Emission Reduction' plan for the environment. Senator Sherry Rehman opposing the levy said that there is difference between the carbon levy and carbon tax. 'There is no place in the world where carbon levy been imposed but carbon tax used to be enforced'. Sherry Rehman said that carbon taxes been enforced over specific industries with an aim. 'You are imposing all types of levies and that also directly over the public users,' she added. 'It requires an act of law and not enforced with the finance bill,' she added. Senator Mohsin Aziz said that the Supreme Court has restrained imposition of carbon levy in Zafar Iqbal Jhagra case. 'It will be contempt of the court if carbon levy is imposed', he added. After debate the carbon levy was rejected by the government with majority vote. The FBR chairman said that tax on hybrid vehicles is not being increased. The committee also raised questions on the proposed amendment in regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act 1997 agreed with IMF. According to the proposed amendment, the Debt Service Surcharge (DSS) is currently set at 10 percent of the NEPRA-determined revenue requirement, adjusted each year at the time of annual rebasing, per current practice. In the event that DSS revenues fall short of the annual payment requirement, the DSS will be increased to make up for the shortfall and calibrated per any anticipated future shortfalls in the succeeding year. To facilitate this, NEPRA has proposed to adopt legislation to remove the 10 percent. Discussing the power sector initiative for payment of circular debt through refinancing, NEPRA officials stated that, as of now, Rs3.23 per unit is being charged to consumers. However, NEPRA proposed removal of 10 percent cap limit, as it would help in obtaining necessary refinancing needed for the payment of power sector's circular debt. However, the committee objected while saying that authorities concerned wanted blanket power to increase DSS, which would result in power tariff increase for consumers. The committee decided to call minister and secretary for power to brief the committee. Chairman committee said that they need a briefing on the circular debt repayment plan. If permission is given, you will increase this rate with proposed blanket power and if there is no need to increase it, then why is permission being sought, he asked. The joint secretary took the stand that this will not happen and consumers will continue to be charged Rs3.23 per unit. Senator Sherry Rehman opposed it and said that this cannot be allowed. The joint secretary said that there is a 10 percent service surcharge limit and IMF has demanded that the limit on debt service surcharge be removed. The government will use the surcharge to pay off a debt of Rs1,275 billion. The surcharge is used to pay interest on the circular debt. Currently, a debt service surcharge of Rs3.23 per unit is being charged from consumers, he added. Senator Shibli Faraz said that if the levy money is being spent on roads, what would happen to combating climate change. The prime minister says that the funds will be spent on the roads of Balochistan. The government should first determine its priorities, he added. The committee took exception to certain clauses of 'Public Finance Management Act' allowing autonomous bodies to retain money and submit surplus profit into Public account. The committee called for rationalisation of these clauses, as it would only result in financial irregularities. The committee was briefed on the exemptions provided to businesses located in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and newly-merged districts. It was informed that the exemptions for cinema operators have been limited to 2030, granting five years exemptions from the date of operations. However, the FBR has extended the withholding exemption for businesses existing in erstwhile FATA till 2026. Highlighting the significance of newly introduced 'Digital Presence Proceeds Act', the FBR chairman stated that the tax has been imposed on digital platforms providing services within the country without retaining physical footprint. The FBR chairman said that a sunset clauses for SEZs and STZs are included in the finance bill. He said that IMF was stressing to limit this tax exemptions for SEZs and STZs to 2027, however after hectic efforts the deadline was extended to 2035. The committee recommended the proposal. The committee also gave its nod to the budgetary proposals of tax on pension income exceeding Rs10 million for individuals under the age of 70. The committee recommended a proposal of the Federation of All Pakistan Universities Academic Staff Associations (FAPUASA) for continuation of 25 percent tax rebate. FAPUASA representatives strongly asserted that this rebate is an essential incentive to retain top academic talent, attract young scholars to the profession, and prevent brain drain from Pakistan's universities. Removing this rebate, they argued, would undermine academic motivation and weaken the research capacity of the country. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Payment dispute between CPPA-G, KE remains unresolved
Payment dispute between CPPA-G, KE remains unresolved

Business Recorder

time18 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Payment dispute between CPPA-G, KE remains unresolved

ISLAMABAD: The Power Division has reportedly failed to resolve a dispute over an excess payment of Rs 7.43 billion between the Central Power Purchasing Agency – Guaranteed (CPPA-G) and K-Electric (KE), which has been pending for over a year, sources within CPPA-G told Business Recorder. In May 2024, the Power Division released Rs 172.8 billion to CPPA-G on account of Tariff Differential Claims (TDC) for KE. In this regard, KE referred to the Power Purchase Agency Agreement (PPAA) between KE and CPPA-G and the Tariff Differential Subsidy Agreement (TDSA) between KE and the Government of Pakistan, both signed in January 2024. According to KE, since the execution of the PPAA, it has fulfilled its obligations and paid Rs 71.5 billion directly to CPPA-G for power purchases—demonstrating its commitment to enhancing liquidity and sustainability within the power sector. As a result, KE states that there are no outstanding payables to CPPA-G after December 31, 2023. Discos, KE's tariffs: CPPA-G seeks up to Rs1.5 negative adjustment Furthermore, the power utility noted that following the release of the TDC by the Power Division on KE's behalf, all dues to CPPA-G up to December 31, 2023, have been cleared. In fact, KE claims it made an excess payment of Rs 7.43 billion, which it seeks to be adjusted against future invoices under the PPAA. KE has requested CPPA-G to issue a credit note of Rs 7.43 billion, to be made directly to KE rather than CPPA-G, in line with the TDS agreement. The utility has sent multiple letters to the Power Division requesting this credit note and seeking that future TDC disbursements related to the post-December 31, 2023 period be released directly to KE, as per the effective TDSA. Most recently, on June 10, KE sent a letter to Additional Secretary (Power Finance), Mehfooz Bhatti, summarizing previous correspondence and reiterating its demand for a Rs 7.43 billion credit note and direct release of future TDC amounts. Sources reveal that CPPA-G has shown willingness to issue a credit note of Rs 3 billion to KE, suggesting that the remaining amount be discussed with the Power Division. However, a final decision is still pending, and neither the Power Division nor CPPA-G has shared any update on the matter. 'KE contends that since it is paying the full amount against invoices issued by CPPA-G, a credit should be issued to facilitate proper accounting adjustments,' the sources added. KE has also requested that the Power Division release the additional amount before June 30, 2025. For FY 2025-26, the subsidy allocated to KE has been reduced by over 28%—from Rs 174 billion in FY 2024-25 to Rs 125 billion. However, an allocation of Rs 1 billion has been earmarked for agricultural tubewells in Balochistan, up from Rs 500 million in the previous fiscal year. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Tax officials' new powers: FPCCI mulling moving the court
Tax officials' new powers: FPCCI mulling moving the court

Business Recorder

time18 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Tax officials' new powers: FPCCI mulling moving the court

KARACHI: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has unequivocally rejected the new powers granted to tax officials in the recently announced Federal Budget, branding them as 'excessive, overly-subjective, and harassment-prone.' During a press conference in Karachi, FPCCI leadership announced their intention to challenge these authorities in superior courts, specifically those enabling taxmen to withdraw funds from business accounts and conduct raids on business premises without prior notice. The FPCCI leadership urged the federal government to withdraw these stringent measures before the budget's final passage from parliament to restore confidence within the business community. FPCCI President Atif Ikram Sheikh emphasized that tax collection targets can only be met if industrialists and exporters are actively engaged through a comprehensive consultative process. He lamented that the budget largely overlooks the necessary steps to empower the business community to realize the Prime Minister's vision for export-led growth. Sheikh further elaborated on a globally established principle: increased intervention or interaction by tax collectors with taxpayers tends to undermine fairness, transparency, and impartiality, as heightened human-to-human interactions and subjective human judgments become a source of nuisance. Saquib Fayyaz Magoon, Senior Vice President of FPCCI, demanded the restoration of the Fixed Tax Regime (FTR) for exporters in its original form and for a long-term duration. This, he argued, is crucial for bringing clarity, certainty, and consistency to taxation policies, thereby attracting both Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and domestic investment by ensuring Pakistan remains competitive as a country. Magoon also highlighted the necessity of broadening the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) to include local manufacturers, warning that without such inclusion, Pakistani products would face supply line disruptions and a lack of competitiveness in regional and international markets. He further expressed resentment that the FPCCI's recommendations for special incentive packages for the high-growth Information Technology, mines & minerals, and fishing industries were disregarded in the Federal Budget. FPCCI Vice President Asif Sakhi urged tax authorities to cease accusing the business community of tax evasion or theft. Instead, he called for a transformation of the tax machinery into a facilitative body that engages with taxpayers through amicable and respectful behaviour. During the press conference, FPCCI Vice President Aman Paracha proposed the formation of a high-powered fact-finding committee to ascertain the root cause of the FBR's inability to achieve the tax collection target for fiscal year 2025. Vice President Nasir Khan highlighted a concerning trend, stating that many businessmen have already relocated to more lucrative and stable investment, trade, and industrial destinations, while those remaining are struggling to operate their factories without incurring losses. Another concern raised by the FPCCI was the restriction imposed on Special Economic Zones (SEZs) developers for a period of 10 years or until tax year 2035, whichever comes first. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store