logo
Haryana orders probe into village-govt-mining mafia nexus in Nuh

Haryana orders probe into village-govt-mining mafia nexus in Nuh

Hindustan Times13-06-2025

The Haryana government has ordered the State Vigilance Department to probe allegations of criminal collusion between the sarpanch of Basai Meo village, certain government officials, and powerful mining cartels operating in the Aravalli belt of Nuh district. To be sure, the sarpanch was previously suspended for attempting to revive an illegal mining route demolished by the district administration.
The department has been given a deadline of 90 days to complete its investigation and submit a report to the state government, officials said. The findings will be shared with both the Supreme Court-appointed Central Empowered Committee (CEC) and the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) recently filed a case in which seven people, including government officials and village-level leaders, were booked under sections 61 (criminal conspiracy), 329(3) (criminal trespass), 318(2) (cheating), 316(2) (criminal breach of trust), 303 (theft), and 270 (public nuisance) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Provisions of the Punjab Land and Preservation Act (Amendment), the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act, 1986, have also been invoked.
The probe follows recent enforcement action in Basai Meo, where police arrested one person and booked another for attempting to revive an illegal mining route demolished earlier by the district administration. Past CEC reports have led to the suspension of six mining officials and the sarpanch of Basai Meo over similar allegations.
Villages like Basai Meo, Chittaura, Ghata Shamshad, and Rawa have been repeatedly identified as hot spots for illegal mining, where criminals use dynamite to blast through the Aravallis, extract stone illegally, and transport it via overloaded trucks.
Environmentalists welcomed the move. 'For years, we have seen unchecked destruction in the name of development, often backed by invisible hands in power. This probe must go beyond symbolism and lead to real accountability,' said Vaishali Rana, a Gurugram-based environmentalist.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Punjab cops arrest 2 drug smugglers with over 6 kg heroin
Punjab cops arrest 2 drug smugglers with over 6 kg heroin

United News of India

time20 minutes ago

  • United News of India

Punjab cops arrest 2 drug smugglers with over 6 kg heroin

Chandigarh, Jun 21 (UNI) In an intelligence-led operation, Amritsar rural police busted a cross-border drug smuggling racket and apprehended two key suspects, Lovepreet Singh alias Love and Balwinder Singh alias Bobby, said Punjab DGP Gaurav Yadav on Saturday. He said a preliminary investigation revealed the accused were in direct contact with a Pakistan-based smuggler via WhatsApp, indicating a strong cross-border nexus. Police recovered 6.15 kg heroin, 1 PX5 pistol (.30 bore) with 4 live cartridges and Rs 10,000 drug money from them. DGP Yadav said an FIR has been registered at Lopoke police station. Further investigations are ongoing. UNI GS PRS

Trump nominated for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan: Last 10 winners every student must know about
Trump nominated for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan: Last 10 winners every student must know about

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump nominated for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan: Last 10 winners every student must know about

Pakistan nominates Donald Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. In a move that is bound to generate global debate, Pakistan has officially nominated the U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize . The nomination cites his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during the May 2025 India–Pakistan military standoff—a crisis that brought both countries to the brink of conflict before a sudden de-escalation. While some may see this as a bold recognition of diplomacy, others could argue it's a controversial move given Trump's polarizing global reputation. Regardless of where one stands, the nomination has renewed public interest in one of the world's most prestigious honors—the Nobel Peace Prize. For students navigating a world full of crises, activism, and digital noise, it's worth asking: What does it really take to win a Peace Prize? The answer lies in looking back at the past ten years. From survivors to presidents, from journalists to civil society groups, these recipients remind us that peace comes in many forms—and that meaningful impact doesn't always come from the spotlight. Nihon Hidankyo (2024) In 2024, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Nihon Hidankyo, the Japan-based confederation of atomic bomb survivors. For decades, they have advocated for the global elimination of nuclear weapons. Many members are survivors of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and have spent their lives sharing painful personal testimonies in hopes of preventing future nuclear warfare. Their recognition highlighted the power of memory and moral witness, especially in an age where military tensions continue to rise. Narges Mohammadi (2023) Narges Mohammadi, an Iranian journalist and human rights activist, received the award in 2023. Known for her defiance in the face of imprisonment and censorship, Mohammadi has been a leading voice in Iran's fight for women's rights, democracy, and civil liberties. Her activism became globally visible during the 2022 protests following the death of Mahsa Amini. Despite being incarcerated, she continued to write and advocate, becoming a symbol of hope and resistance for student and youth-led movements across the world. Ales Bialiatski, Memorial, and the Center for Civil Liberties (2022) In 2022, the prize was jointly awarded to Ales Bialiatski, the Russian human rights organization Memorial, and the Ukrainian Center for Civil Liberties. Bialiatski, a Belarusian activist, has been imprisoned for documenting state abuses. Memorial, once Russia's leading memory and human rights archive, was shut down by Russian authorities for exposing historical and modern-day repression. The Ukrainian organization, meanwhile, gained global attention for its role in documenting war crimes during the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Together, these three laureates represented civil society's strength in resisting authoritarianism. Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov (2021) The 2021 Nobel Peace Prize recognized Maria Ressa from the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov from Russia for their fearless defense of press freedom. Ressa, co-founder of the digital news outlet Rappler, has faced repeated arrests for her investigative reporting on disinformation and authoritarian practices under the Duterte regime. Muratov, editor-in-chief of Novaya Gazeta, leads one of Russia's last independent newspapers and has seen colleagues assassinated for their work. Their win underscored the critical role of journalism in protecting democracy. World Food Programme (2020) In 2020, the Nobel Peace Prize went to the World Food Programme (WFP), the United Nations agency that works to combat global hunger. With operations in dozens of conflict zones, WFP has long been at the forefront of delivering life-saving food aid to vulnerable populations. The committee praised its efforts to prevent hunger from being used as a weapon of war and its work in building the foundations for peace by stabilizing food security in crisis-affected areas. Abiy Ahmed (2019) Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed was awarded the prize in 2019 for his role in ending a 20-year conflict with neighboring Eritrea. The peace deal, signed soon after he came to power, was celebrated internationally as a historic achievement. However, his tenure would later become more controversial due to internal conflicts, especially in the Tigray region, where human rights abuses have been reported. Still, his initial efforts at diplomacy earned him global recognition for peacemaking. Denis Mukwege and Nadia Murad (2018) In 2018, the prize went to Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege and Yazidi activist Nadia Murad for their work addressing sexual violence in armed conflict. Mukwege has spent his life treating survivors of rape in the Democratic Republic of Congo, running a hospital where thousands of women have found medical and emotional care. Murad, a survivor of ISIS captivity, became a global advocate after escaping and speaking out about the atrocities committed against Yazidi women. Their win emphasized that peace also means justice and healing for survivors. International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (2017) The 2017 laureate, ICAN, played a pivotal role in the adoption of the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. As a coalition of NGOs, the campaign mobilized grassroots support and pressured global leaders to recognize the humanitarian consequences of nuclear arms. ICAN's success showed how organized civil activism, including that led by students and young people, could shape international treaties and policy. Juan Manuel Santos (2016) Juan Manuel Santos, then-president of Colombia, was honored in 2016 for his efforts to end the country's decades-long civil war with the FARC guerrillas. His peace agreement—though narrowly rejected in a public referendum—was ultimately revised and implemented. Santos took political risks to push reconciliation forward, believing that no peace is perfect but that peace is always preferable to continued war. His leadership demonstrated the complexities and patience required for lasting peace. National Dialogue Quartet (2015) In 2015, the award went to Tunisia's National Dialogue Quartet, a coalition of four civil society organizations that helped steer the country through the political crisis following the Arab Spring. When Tunisia's fragile democratic transition nearly collapsed, this quartet stepped in to mediate between opposing factions, preventing violence and ensuring that the constitution-building process stayed on track. Their example highlighted the quiet but crucial role of civil dialogue in preserving democratic gains.

Delhi High Court Protects Domino's Trademark from Unauthorized Pizza Outlets, ET HospitalityWorld
Delhi High Court Protects Domino's Trademark from Unauthorized Pizza Outlets, ET HospitalityWorld

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Delhi High Court Protects Domino's Trademark from Unauthorized Pizza Outlets, ET HospitalityWorld

The Delhi High Court has restrained 15 pizzerias from infringing the popular Domino's trademark, underscoring "disastrous consequences" on human health if it was allowed to continue. Justice Saurabh Banerjee was hearing a suit filed by the popular chain Domino's Pizza, a Delaware-based corporation, seeking an ad interim injunction on 15 entities from using deceptively similar marks, such as "Domnic's Pizza, Dominic Pizza, Dominic's Pizza, Domnik Pizza and Daminic Pizza". On May 28, the court in its order said, "It is prima facie evident that the marks of the defendants (15 entities) are deceptively similar and phonetically identical to the plaintiff no 1 (Domino's intellectual property (IP) holder corporation), erstwhile trade name Dominick's Pizza." Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETHospitalityWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHospitalityWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. As the dispute involved edible products, the court noted, the threshold for establishing deceptive similarity was lower than for other products."In essence, any confusion between such products, if allowed to continue, can lead to disastrous consequences on human health. Therefore, this court has to adopt a more cautious and stringent approach for judging the likelihood of confusion and to exercise greater care," the order in favour of the corporation in the interim, the court restrained the outlets and their agents from using the "nearly identical or deceptively similar marks" till the next date of hearing on September court also directed online food aggregators Zomato and Swiggy to de-list, take down and suspend the identical or similar listings of the 15 entities from their mobile application, website or any other the plea, the corporation said Domino's was founded in the year 1960 in Michigan, USA, by Tom Monaghan and his brother James when the brothers purchased Dominick's Pizza, a pizza store owned by Dominick DiVarti in Ypsilanti, Michigan, and in 1965, after the brothers purchased two more restaurants, the name was changed from Dominick's to Domino's to the plea, there were over 21,000 Domino's Pizza stores across all continents, and the corporation had been continuously and uninterruptedly using the trademarks Domino's and Domino's Pizza. PTI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store