Trump nominated for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan: Last 10 winners every student must know about
Pakistan nominates Donald Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize.
In a move that is bound to generate global debate,
Pakistan
has officially nominated the U.S. President
Donald Trump
for the 2026
Nobel Peace Prize
. The nomination cites his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during the May 2025 India–Pakistan military standoff—a crisis that brought both countries to the brink of conflict before a sudden de-escalation.
While some may see this as a bold recognition of diplomacy, others could argue it's a controversial move given Trump's polarizing global reputation. Regardless of where one stands, the nomination has renewed public interest in one of the world's most prestigious honors—the Nobel Peace Prize.
For students navigating a world full of crises, activism, and digital noise, it's worth asking: What does it really take to win a Peace Prize? The answer lies in looking back at the past ten years.
From survivors to presidents, from journalists to civil society groups, these recipients remind us that peace comes in many forms—and that meaningful impact doesn't always come from the spotlight.
Nihon Hidankyo (2024)
In 2024, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Nihon Hidankyo, the Japan-based confederation of atomic bomb survivors. For decades, they have advocated for the global elimination of nuclear weapons. Many members are survivors of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and have spent their lives sharing painful personal testimonies in hopes of preventing future nuclear warfare.
Their recognition highlighted the power of memory and moral witness, especially in an age where military tensions continue to rise.
Narges Mohammadi (2023)
Narges Mohammadi, an Iranian journalist and human rights activist, received the award in 2023. Known for her defiance in the face of imprisonment and censorship, Mohammadi has been a leading voice in Iran's fight for women's rights, democracy, and civil liberties. Her activism became globally visible during the 2022 protests following the death of Mahsa Amini.
Despite being incarcerated, she continued to write and advocate, becoming a symbol of hope and resistance for student and youth-led movements across the world.
Ales Bialiatski, Memorial, and the Center for Civil Liberties (2022)
In 2022, the prize was jointly awarded to Ales Bialiatski, the Russian human rights organization Memorial, and the Ukrainian Center for Civil Liberties. Bialiatski, a Belarusian activist, has been imprisoned for documenting state abuses. Memorial, once Russia's leading memory and human rights archive, was shut down by Russian authorities for exposing historical and modern-day repression.
The Ukrainian organization, meanwhile, gained global attention for its role in documenting war crimes during the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Together, these three laureates represented civil society's strength in resisting authoritarianism.
Maria Ressa
and Dmitry Muratov (2021)
The 2021 Nobel Peace Prize recognized Maria Ressa from the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov from Russia for their fearless defense of press freedom. Ressa, co-founder of the digital news outlet Rappler, has faced repeated arrests for her investigative reporting on disinformation and authoritarian practices under the Duterte regime.
Muratov, editor-in-chief of Novaya Gazeta, leads one of Russia's last independent newspapers and has seen colleagues assassinated for their work. Their win underscored the critical role of journalism in protecting democracy.
World Food Programme (2020)
In 2020, the Nobel Peace Prize went to the World Food Programme (WFP), the United Nations agency that works to combat global hunger. With operations in dozens of conflict zones, WFP has long been at the forefront of delivering life-saving food aid to vulnerable populations.
The committee praised its efforts to prevent hunger from being used as a weapon of war and its work in building the foundations for peace by stabilizing food security in crisis-affected areas.
Abiy Ahmed (2019)
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed was awarded the prize in 2019 for his role in ending a 20-year conflict with neighboring Eritrea. The peace deal, signed soon after he came to power, was celebrated internationally as a historic achievement.
However, his tenure would later become more controversial due to internal conflicts, especially in the Tigray region, where human rights abuses have been reported. Still, his initial efforts at diplomacy earned him global recognition for peacemaking.
Denis Mukwege and
Nadia Murad
(2018)
In 2018, the prize went to Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege and Yazidi activist Nadia Murad for their work addressing sexual violence in armed conflict. Mukwege has spent his life treating survivors of rape in the Democratic Republic of Congo, running a hospital where thousands of women have found medical and emotional care.
Murad, a survivor of ISIS captivity, became a global advocate after escaping and speaking out about the atrocities committed against Yazidi women. Their win emphasized that peace also means justice and healing for survivors.
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (2017)
The 2017 laureate, ICAN, played a pivotal role in the adoption of the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. As a coalition of NGOs, the campaign mobilized grassroots support and pressured global leaders to recognize the humanitarian consequences of nuclear arms.
ICAN's success showed how organized civil activism, including that led by students and young people, could shape international treaties and policy.
Juan Manuel Santos
(2016)
Juan Manuel Santos, then-president of Colombia, was honored in 2016 for his efforts to end the country's decades-long civil war with the FARC guerrillas. His peace agreement—though narrowly rejected in a public referendum—was ultimately revised and implemented.
Santos took political risks to push reconciliation forward, believing that no peace is perfect but that peace is always preferable to continued war.
His leadership demonstrated the complexities and patience required for lasting peace.
National Dialogue Quartet (2015)
In 2015, the award went to Tunisia's National Dialogue Quartet, a coalition of four civil society organizations that helped steer the country through the political crisis following the Arab Spring. When Tunisia's fragile democratic transition nearly collapsed, this quartet stepped in to mediate between opposing factions, preventing violence and ensuring that the constitution-building process stayed on track.
Their example highlighted the quiet but crucial role of civil dialogue in preserving democratic gains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
Not So ‘Nobel'? Why Pakistan's Push For Trump Reeks Of A Strategic Gamble
Last Updated: Official sources in India said Pakistan's move is aimed at strengthening ties with US, securing economic and technological support, and gaining American backing on Kashmir In a diplomatic move, Pakistan has formally nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Official sources within Pakistan's government have confirmed that the nomination stems from their belief that Trump played a pivotal role in defusing the tensions during the India-Pakistan crisis of May 2025. However, official sources in India told CNN-News18 that Pakistan's move is aimed at strengthening ties with the United States, securing economic and technological support, and gaining American backing for its position on the Kashmir dispute. Pakistan's Desperate Push The Nobel nomination comes after what Islamabad describes as Trump's 'decisive diplomatic intervention" in de-escalating the May 2025 crisis between India and Pakistan. Pakistani officials have credited Trump for averting what could have been a catastrophic nuclear conflict. 'This move is about acknowledging President Trump's key role in ensuring peace during a period of intense crisis," one official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'We believe that Trump's mediation was instrumental in averting escalation, and we are seeking international recognition of his contribution." However, this narrative has been categorically rejected by India. Indian government sources have expressed strong opposition to Pakistan's claims, dismissing them as factually incorrect and misleading. In an official statement, India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri rejected the suggestion that Trump mediated the crisis, stating, 'India did not seek or accept any third-party mediation during the crisis, and Pakistan's attempts to rewrite the history of the events are not based in reality." Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his public remarks, further dismissed Pakistan's narrative, refusing to engage with any external mediation efforts, including those from Trump. 'India has always managed its security concerns on its own and does not require the intervention of any third party," he said. This week, PM Modi also declined Trump's invite to visit the United States on his return journey from Canada, citing his pre-existing schedule. The development came as PM Modi spoke with Trump and set the record straight that India's 'Operation Sindoor' was 'paused" following a request from Pakistan and not due to mediation or offer of a trade deal by the US. According to official sources within the Indian government, the Indian leadership maintained full control over the crisis and managed it without any foreign involvement. Indian Defence Secretary RK Singh provided further details, telling a news agency: 'All communications during the crisis were thoroughly documented, including logs and records that make it clear that India initiated the calls. Any claims of third-party mediation are unfounded." Singh's comments were aimed at countering Pakistan's narrative, which has been widely disseminated in international forums and media. The Kashmir Angle Pakistan's push to nominate Trump is also linked to its long-standing goal of internationalising the Kashmir issue. Islamabad has consistently sought global support for its position on Kashmir, which India maintains is a bilateral issue to be resolved solely between the two countries. Indian government officials have made it clear that any third-party involvement in the Kashmir dispute is unacceptable. 'The Kashmir issue is a bilateral matter, and India will not tolerate any external interference," said a senior Ministry of External Affairs official, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'Pakistan's attempt to gain international support through this Nobel nomination is part of its ongoing campaign to internationalise Kashmir, which India has firmly rejected." In contrast, Pakistan has highlighted Trump's previous offers to mediate the Kashmir dispute as evidence of his willingness to involve himself in the issue. According to Pakistani diplomatic sources, this endorsement of Trump is aimed at pushing the United States to take a more active role in the region. Munir's Ambition The diplomatic push for the Nobel nomination has raised eyebrows in both Pakistan and India. There are reports that General Asim Munir, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, is positioning himself as a potential co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, alongside Trump. While this remains unconfirmed, Indian intelligence sources suggest that Munir's growing role in shaping Pakistan's foreign policy may be influencing the country's decision to publicly support Trump. 'Munir is an ambitious leader," said an Indian security analyst, 'and while the Nobel campaign may seem like a strategic move to secure Pakistani interests, it could also be a personal gambit to raise his own stature on the international stage." Interestingly, the nomination demand came after a rare White House meeting between Trump and Munir in which geo-political issues ranging from the Israel-Iran conflict, and Kashmir to defence purchasing were discussed. The Bigger Picture For Pakistan, the move is seen as a way to potentially gain economic concessions, technological transfers, and a softer US stance on its nuclear programme. In particular, Pakistan hopes that by aligning itself with Trump's leadership, it can secure American backing for its position on Kashmir, despite India's firm objections. top videos View all For India, however, the matter is a reminder that, despite Pakistan's claims, the Kashmir issue remains firmly within India's domain and will not be internationalised through external mediation. The coming months will reveal whether Pakistan's strategic gamble will pay off or whether it will simply be seen as a fleeting diplomatic gesture in the complex web of South Asian geopolitics. tags : Asim Munir donald trump Kashmir Nobel Prize pakistan United states Location : Islamabad, Pakistan First Published: June 21, 2025, 11:36 IST News world Not So 'Nobel'? Why Pakistan's Push For Trump Reeks Of A Strategic Gamble | Exclusive
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
B-2 bombers on route to Guam just before Trump's D.C. arrival — signals mount ahead of U.S strikes on Iran
B-2 stealth bombers are on their way to Guam , just as President Donald Trump prepares for his return to Washington, D.C. The timing of this deployment is raising questions about a possible U.S. military strike on Iran , especially amid growing tensions in the Middle East. The timing couldn't be more critical. As fighting intensifies between Iran and Israel, the U.S. appears to be gearing up for possible direct involvement. Multiple military sources confirmed that six B-2 Spirit bombers, capable of carrying the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), are being moved to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam—a key U.S. outpost in the Pacific. According to flight data reviewed by Fox News, six B-2 Spirit bombers left Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri this week, heading toward Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. These bombers were joined by multiple KC-46 Pegasus tankers , which help them refuel mid-air—extending their global reach. The deployment has sparked serious speculation about U.S. plans, especially since B-2s are the only aircraft that can carry the GBU-57 bunker buster , a 30,000-pound bomb built to destroy deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordow nuclear facility . Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Only 2% Traders Know this Powerful Intraday Strategy thefutureuniversity Learn More Undo Why are B-2 stealth bombers being moved to Guam now? This deployment isn't routine. The B-2 bomber is one of America's most advanced long-range weapons. It's the only aircraft designed to carry the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker buster, which can strike deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordow nuclear facility—one of Tehran's most fortified sites. The flight path and tanker support, including KC-46 Pegasus aerial refueling aircraft, suggest these B-2s are being prepared for missions far beyond Guam. Analysts say the bombers could soon reposition to Diego Garcia, a remote Indian Ocean island base with a clear path toward Iranian targets. Live Events A senior U.S. defense official told Fox News that these bombers are 'positioned to rapidly respond if the President gives the order.' Is the U.S. preparing for direct strikes on Iran? It certainly looks that way. Since the Iran–Israel war broke out earlier this month, U.S. forces in the Middle East have been mobilizing quickly. Fighter jets, missile defense systems, and naval assets have been moved across strategic locations including the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Eastern Mediterranean. Now, the focus has shifted to the skies. The B-2 deployment to Guam brings America's most precise and deadly airstrike capability closer to the conflict zone. Trump, who resumed presidential duties in January 2025, has made it clear in recent statements that Iran's nuclear escalation 'will not be tolerated.' While Washington has publicly called for a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, behind the scenes, military options are being actively reviewed. A source close to U.S. Central Command said, 'The window is narrowing. If Iran crosses the uranium enrichment threshold or hits Israeli civilian targets again, we expect a green light for strikes within days.' Could Diego Garcia be a launch point for Iran strikes? Diego Garcia is often used when the U.S. wants to strike in the Middle East without relying on regional allies' airspace. The island is British territory but leased to the U.S. military and has been a base for bomber operations in previous wars, including the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. If B-2s are shifted from Guam to Diego Garcia, it could be the clearest sign yet that a U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear program is imminent. The Fordow facility is buried under a mountain and would require a powerful weapon like the GBU-57, launched from a stealth platform, to destroy it. That's what makes the B-2 bomber deployment so significant at this moment. Is the U.S. preparing for a strike on Iran's nuclear sites? The signs are pointing that way. The deployment of stealth bombers , along with movements of U.S. Navy carrier strike groups like the USS Nimitz and USS Carl Vinson , show a growing military buildup. Fighter jets like the F-22 Raptor , F-16 , and F-35 have also been repositioned, along with refueling tankers and missile defense systems across key U.S. bases in the Gulf and Middle East. According to The Times, intelligence sources believe Trump could approve limited airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure within the next two weeks. The goal would be to weaken Iran's ability to enrich uranium without starting a full-scale war. Iran has recently warned the U.S. and Israel of 'consequences' if attacks continue. Tensions spiked after Israel reportedly struck several missile sites in Iran, with Tehran promising retaliation. With so many moving parts, Washington appears to be preparing for a worst-case scenario. What next in the Iran–Israel war? The Iran–Israel conflict has already left over 4,000 people dead on both sides, according to regional reports. Missile strikes, drone attacks, and cyber warfare have intensified in recent days. Israel reportedly targeted Iranian missile sites and IRGC positions near Isfahan and Shiraz this week, escalating Tehran's threats of retaliation. With Trump back in D.C. and briefed by top Pentagon officials, decisions are expected quickly. The President may opt for targeted airstrikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure or command centers if Tehran crosses certain 'red lines.' While no U.S. attack has been announced officially, the presence of stealth bombers in Guam , the potential use of Diego Garcia , and the broader U.S. military mobilization all point to a readiness posture—not just a show of force. FAQs: Q1: Why are B-2 stealth bombers moving to Guam now? To prepare for possible strikes on Iran amid rising tensions. Q2: Could Diego Garcia be used for Iran airstrikes? Yes, it's a key U.S. base for long-range missions near the Middle East.
Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Belarus frees key opposition figure Siarhei Tsikhanouski following rare visit from top US envoy
Belarus has freed Siarhei Tsikhanouski, a key dissident figure and the husband of exiled opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, following a rare visit by a senior US official, Tsikhanouskaya's team announced on Saturday. Tsikhanouski, a popular blogger and activist who was jailed in 2020, arrived in Vilnius, Lithuania, alongside 13 other political prisoners, his wife's team said. The release came just hours after Belarusian authorities announced that authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko met with US President Donald Trump's envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, in Minsk. A video published on his wife's official Telegram account showed Tsikhanouski disembarking a white minibus, with a shaved head and broad smile. He pulled Tsikhanouskaya into a long embrace as their supporters applauded. 'My husband is free. It's difficult to describe the joy in my heart,' Tsikhanouskaya told reporters. But she added her team's work is 'not finished' while over 1,100 political prisoners remain behind bars in Belarus. Tsikhanouski was jailed after announcing plans to challenge Lukashenko in the 2020 election. Following his arrest, his wife ran in his stead, rallying large crowds across the country. Official results of the election handed Lukashenko his sixth term in office but were denounced by the opposition and the West as a sham. As unprecedented protests broke out in the aftermath of the vote, Tsikhanouskaya left the country under pressure from the authorities. Her husband was later sentenced to 19 1/2 years in prison on charges of organizing mass riots. Other prominent dissidents remain in Belarusian jails, among them Nobel Peace Prize winner Ales Bialiatski, a human rights advocate serving a 10-year prison sentence on charges widely denounced as politically motivated. Also behind bars is Viktor Babaryka, a former banker who was widely seen in 2020 as Lukashenko's main electoral rival, and Maria Kolesnikova, a charismatic leader of that year's mass protests. Released alongside Tsikhanouski was longtime Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty correspondent Ihar Karnei, the US government-funded broadcaster confirmed. Karnei, who had also worked with prominent Belarusian and Russian newspapers, had been serving a three-year service on extremism charges he rejected as a sham. RFE/RL's Belarusian service had been designated extremist in the country, a common label handed to anyone who criticizes Lukashenko's government. As a result, working for it or spreading its content has become a criminal offense. 'We are deeply grateful to President Trump for securing the release of this brave journalist, who suffered at the hands of the Belarusian authorities,' the broadcaster's CEO Stephen Capus said Saturday in a press release. Karnei was detained several times while covering the 2020 protests. Unlike many of his colleagues, he chose to stay in Belarus despite the ensuing repression. He was arrested again in July 2023, as police raided his apartment seizing phones and computers. Belarus also freed an Estonian national who had set up an NGO to raise funds for Belarusian refugees. According to the Estonian Foreign Ministry, Allan Roio was detained last January, and sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison on charges of establishing an extremist organization.
