Companies are coming to Texas to develop a new generation of nuclear reactors

The West Texas city of Abilene is better known for country music and rodeos than advanced nuclear physics. But that's where scientists are entering the final stretch of a race to boot up the next generation of American atomic energy.
Amid a flurry of nuclear startups around the country, Abilene-based Natura Resources is one of just two companies with permits from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to construct a so-called 'advanced' reactor. It will build its small, one megawatt molten salt reactor beneath a newly-completed laboratory at Abilene Christian University, in an underground trench 25 feet deep and 80 feet long, covered by a concrete lid and serviced by a 40-ton construction crane.
The other company, California-based Kairos Power, is building its 35 megawatt test reactor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, the 80-year capital of American nuclear power science. Both target completion in 2027 and hope to usher in a new chapter of the energy age.
'A company and school no one has heard of has gotten to the forefront of advanced nuclear,' said Rusty Towell, a nuclear physicist at Abilene Christian University and lead developer of Natura's reactor. 'This is going to bless the world.'
The U.S. Department of Energy has been working for years to resuscitate the American nuclear sector, advancing the development of new reactors to meet the enormous incoming electrical demands of big new industrial facilities, from data centers and Bitcoin mines to chemical plants and desalination facilities.
Leaders in Texas, the nation's largest energy producer and consumer, have declared intentions to court the growing nuclear sector and settle it in state. The project at Abilene Christian University is just one of several early advanced reactor deployments already planned here.
Dow Chemical plans to place small reactors made by X-energy at its Seadrift complex on the Gulf Coast. Last month, Natura announced plans to power oilfield infrastructure in the Permian Basin. And in February, Texas A&M University announced that four companies, including Natura and Kairos, would build small, 250 megawatt commercial-scale reactors at a massive new 'proving grounds' near its campus in College Station.
'We need energy in Texas, we need a lot of it and we need it fast,' said state Sen. Charles Perry, chair of the Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs. 'The companies that are coming here are going to need a different type of energy long term.'
During this year's biennial legislative session, state lawmakers are hoping to make billions of dollars of public financing available for new nuclear projects, and to pass other bills in support of the sector.
'If we do what we're asked to do from industry groups out here, if we do what we think we should do and we know we should do, we could actually put a stake in the ground that Texas is the proving ground for these energies,' Perry said, speaking this month in the state Capitol at a nuclear power forum hosted by PowerHouse Texas, a nonprofit that promotes energy innovation.
But, he added, 'Texas is going to have to decide: At what level of risk is it prudent for taxpayer dollars to be risked?'
The first new reactors might be commercially ready within five years, he said; most are 10 to 20 years away.
Dozens of proposed new reactor designs promise improved efficiency and safety over traditional models with less hazardous waste. While existing nuclear reactors use cooling systems filled with water, so-called 'advanced' reactor designs use alternatives like molten salt or metal. It enables them, in theory, to operate at a higher temperature and lower pressure, increasing the energy output while decreasing the risks of leaks or explosions.
Before it can be built, each design is extensively reviewed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a yearslong process to ensure they meet safety requirements.
'We understand how much work we're facing and getting that done means finding every appropriate efficiency in our reviews,' said Scott Burnell, public affairs officer for the NRC.
The commission is also reviewing a permit application by Washington-based TerraPower, founded by Bill Gates in 2006, to build a full commercial nuclear power plant in Wyoming. It expects to receive a construction permit application for the X-energy reactor at Dow in Texas this year, Burnell said.
After construction, the companies will require a separate permit to operate their projects. None have sought an operating license for an advanced nuclear reactor, but Natura plans to file its application this year.
For Towell, an Abilene native and the son of two ACU faculty members, this moment was a decade in the making. In 2015 he founded the NEXT Lab at ACU for advanced nuclear testing, got a $3 million donation from a wealthy West Texas oilman in 2017, entered into partnership with the Energy Department in 2019 and formed the company Natura in 2020. Construction finished in 2023 on NEXT's shimmering new facility. And in 2024, the NRC issued a permit to build the first advanced reactor at an American university.
Towell, a former instructor at the U.S. Naval Nuclear Power School, said these new projects represent the first major advancement in American nuclear power technology in 70 years. While layers and layers of safety systems have been added, the basic reactor design has remained unchanged.
It uses a cooling system of circulating water to avoid overheating, melting down and releasing its radioactive contents into the atmosphere. The system operates at extremely high pressure to keep the water in liquid state far above its boiling point. If circulation stops due to power loss or malfunction, a buildup of pressure can cause an explosion, as it did at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan in 2011.
In contrast, new 'advanced' reactor designs use alternatives to water for cooling, like liquid metal or special gases.
Natura's design, like many others, uses molten salt. It's not table salt but fluoride salt, a corrosive, crystalline substance that melts around 750 degrees Fahrenheit and remains liquid until 2,600 degrees under regular pressure.
As a result, the reactor can operate at extremely high temperatures without high pressure. If the system ruptures, it won't jettison a plume of steam, but instead leak a molten sludge that hardens in place.
'It doesn't poof into the air and drift around the world,' Towell said. 'It drips down to a catch pan and freezes to a solid.'
Rather than solid fuel rods, Natura's design also uses a liquid uranium fuel that is dissolved into the molten coolant. According to Towell, a former research fellow at Los Alamos National Laboratory, that decreases the amount of radioactive waste produced by the reactor and makes it easier to recycle.
The Kairos reactor design uses molten salt coolant with hundreds of thousands of uranium fuel 'pebbles,' while the X-energy design uses fuel pebbles with a gas coolant.
Critically, many new reactor designs are also small and modular. Instead of massive, custom construction projects, they are meant to be built in factories with assembly line efficiency and then shipped out on truck trailers and installed on site. That will allow large industrial facilities or data centers to operate their own power sources independent from public electrical grids.
Natura president Doug Robison, a retired oil company executive who worked 13 years as an ExxonMobil landman, said small reactors could run oilfield infrastructure in the Permian Basin, from pumpjacks to compressor stations.
'By powering the oil and gas industry, which uses a tremendous amount of power for their operations, we're helping alleviate the grid pressure,' he said.
He also wants to power new treatment plants for the enormous quantities of wastewater produced each day in the Permian Basin. In January, Natura announced a partnership with the state-funded Texas Produced Water Consortium at Texas Tech University aimed at using small reactors to purify oilfield wastewater, most of which is currently pumped underground for disposal.
The new reactor projects fit into plans by state leaders to establish Texas as a global leader of advanced nuclear reactor technology. In 2023, Gov. Greg Abbott directed the state's Public Utility Commission to study the question and produce a report.
'Texas is well-positioned to lead the country in the development of ANRs,' said the 78-page report, issued late last year. 'Texas can lead by cutting red tape and establishing incentives to accelerate advanced nuclear deployment, overcome regulator hurdles and attract investment.'
The report made several recommendations, and state lawmakers this year have already filed bills to enact several of them, including the creation of a Texas Advanced Nuclear Authority and a nuclear permitting officer. Most significantly, the report also recommended two new public funds to support nuclear energy deployment, including one modeled after the Texas Energy Fund, which was created in 2023 and made $5 billion in financing available for new gas power plants.
'When I talk to folks, it always gets back to the funding,' said Thomas Gleeson, chair of the Public Utility Commission, during the PowerHouse forum. 'All of those issues are somewhat ancillary to: How are we going to fund this?'
Gleeson said developers will expect the state to put up at least $100 million per project through public-private partnerships in order to help reduce financial risk.
'Given the load growth in this state that we're projecting, if you want clean air and you want a reliable grid, you have to be in favor of nuclear,' he said.
Critics of the plan oppose the use of public money on private projects and worry about safety.
'We don't use tax dollars to fund a bunch of experimental and pie-in-the-sky designs that should be the responsibility of private industry,' said John Umphress, a retired Austin Energy program specialist who is evaluating the nuclear efforts on contract for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen. 'Nobody has really penciled out the cost because there's still a lot of proof of concept that's going to have to be pursued before these things get built.'
Umphress raised concerns over materials in development to withstand the astronomical temperatures and extremely corrosive qualities of molten salt coolants.
He also noted that the U.S. still lacks a permanent repository for nuclear waste following decades of unsuccessful efforts. Most waste today is stored on site in specialized interim facilities at nuclear power plants, which wouldn't be possible if small reactors were deployed to individual industrial projects.
'That's the big issue that we still haven't solved, but it's not stopping some of these developers from pushing forward with their designs,' he said. 'They're hoping the federal government will take ownership of the waste and be responsible for its storage and disposal.'
During the PowerHouse forum, officials expressed hope that the private sector would develop a solution after new reactor projects create demand for waste disposal.
Those reactor projects are still many years away. So far, the NRC has only authorized advanced reactor construction for university research. Next it will issue permits for larger commercial reactors before they can be deployed.
Perhaps the largest early deployment of commercial advanced reactors is set to take place at Texas A&M University. In February, the school announced that four companies had committed to install their commercial reactor designs at a new 2,400-acre 'Energy Proving Ground' near its College Station campus.
The site is an old Army air base, currently home to vehicle crash test facilities and an advanced warfare development complex.
The university will build infrastructure there and help streamline permitting for the reactor projects, said Joe Elabd, vice chancellor for research at the Texas A&M System. The university is requesting $200 million in state appropriations to help develop the site, he said.
'We're providing a little bit more of a plug-and-play site for these companies, as opposed to them going to a true greenfield and having to do everything for themselves,' he said.
Reactors on the site will be connected to Texas' electrical girdle, Elabd said.
A&M began seeking proposals from companies to build at the site last August, and a panel of university experts selected the four finalists, which include Natura and Kairos.
A Kairos spokesperson, Christopher Ortiz, said the company is building a manufacturing facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which will produce the reactors deployed to Texas A&M. He said the company is currently working to identify sites for future commercial reactors, evaluating factors like workforce availability, existing infrastructure and community support.
'The Texas A&M site presents a unique opportunity to site multiple commercial power plants in one location, which makes it particularly attractive,' he said.
The site will also include Terrestrial Energy, a Canadian company. And it will include Aalo Atomics, a 2-year-old investor-funded startup that is currently building a 40,000-square-foot reactor factory in Austin, which it plans to unveil in April.
More than modular reactors, Aalo plans to produce entire modular power plants, called Aalo Pods, including several reactors, a turbine and a generator, which are designed to be installed at data centers.
'It's made in the factory, shipped to the site and assembled like LEGOs,' said Aalo CEO Matt Loszak.
He estimated five to 10 years for deployment at the A&M site but said that depended on continued financial support from investors. Aalo is developing its reactor design at the Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory, a 70-year-old national nuclear research center.
But Loszak, a former software engineer from Canada, decided to locate his factory in Texas, he said, to be close to massive incoming energy demands and to take advantage of the state's business-friendly approach to regulation.
'Politicians here are really pro-nuclear, they want to see nuclear get built, and that's not the case in other places across the country,' he said. 'From a regulatory and permitting perspective, it's a great place to build stuff.'
Disclosure: Dow Chemical, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Texas A&M University and Texas Tech University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Bloomberg

30 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

Fed's Daly Says Central Bank Communication Should Be Flexible

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly said central bankers need to communicate with flexibility at times of uncertainty, given that using strong forward guidance sometimes 'comes with a price.' 'The economy is dynamic, and our communications must match it,' Daly said Sunday in a speech prepared for the Western Economic Association International's 100th Annual Conference. Daly didn't comment on the outlook for the economy or policy in her written remarks, which she also said were not about the Fed's ongoing framework review.

Fox News

an hour ago

• Fox News

Larry Flynt's widow, unshaken by OnlyFans boom, says Hustler is still evolving after its provocative past

The rise of OnlyFans doesn't faze Larry Flynt's widow. As chairwoman of Hustler magazine, Liz Flynt is keeping the legacy of her late husband alive by overseeing his adult entertainment empire. Her new book, "HUSTLER®50: 50 Years of Freedom," aims to capture the salacious brand's journey "through five decades of political and social upheaval." Flynt died in 2021 at age 78. Liz told Fox News Digital she wasn't opposed to the possibility of launching a similar subscription-based service. She previously told the Los Angeles Times that Hustler doesn't offer entertainment created by users, because verifying the age of performers is difficult. She also says that Hustler insists on providing "high-quality content." "It would be nice to come up with something like [OnlyFans]," said Liz. "But right now, I don't have anything in the pipeline. But we're always brainstorming at our monthly meetings and our weekly management meetings. We're always brainstorming on what's new, young and fresh and what else we can do to grow as a company." Many sex workers joined OnlyFans during the pandemic when in-person venues shut down or became more dangerous because of COVID-19. The site has been tremendously lucrative for some people, allowing them to earn thousands per month. In 2021, OnlyFans said it had 130 million users and two million creators who have collectively earned $5 billion. Liz is aware of the competition. "We are still a monthly publication, but we're always finding new ideas to keep the company relevant, like getting into different areas of technology," Liz explained. "In the early '90s, my husband went into video, he went into broadcast, he went into retail stories, he went into gaming. And so, he was able to diversify the company early on. We [now] have 60 Hustler Hollywood retail stores." "Under my leadership, I was able to open 20 more and acquire 40 retail stores from Playboy Enterprises," she shared. "I was able to launch Hustler Casino Live, which is livestream online poker. . . . The newest launch that I was able to [do] was [partner with] DoorDash with all of our Hustler Hollywood stores. We're the first to do that. Of course, Hustler has been known to be the first to do many different things. That's what makes us so different and keeps us relevant." Flynt, a former strip club owner, built Hustler magazine into an adult entertainment juggernaut that included casinos, films, websites and other businesses as he relentlessly championed First Amendment rights. Flynt's far-flung company produced not only Hustler but other niche publications. He also owned a video production company, scores of websites, two Los Angeles-area casinos and dozens of Hustler boutiques selling adult-oriented products. He also licensed the Hustler name to independently owned strip clubs. At the time of his death, Flynt claimed to have video-on-demand operations in more than 55 countries and more than 30 Hustler Hollywood retail stores throughout the United States. Flynt often disgusted the masses for offering one of the most graphic, and at times controversial, publications on newsstands. Unlike Playboy or Penthouse, it published more overtly sexual imagery. Flynt didn't hesitate to push boundaries with raw imagery and biting cartoons. He once declared that "pornography is really the purest form of art." Liz said she believes in her late husband's vision. "Our bodies are the purest form of art," she said. "Women have been photographed over the decades. I see nothing wrong with it. I feel that publishers before [my husband], like Hugh Hefner and Bob Guccione, did pave the way for Larry. And I think there's nothing wrong with photographing beautiful women – all types of women." WATCH: BACHELOR STAR ON WHY SHE'LL STRIP DOWN FOR PLAYBOY OVER ONLYFANS "If you look at some of these women in the Victorian age and some of those beautiful portraits, there's nudity there," she argued. "And there's nothing wrong with it." Flynt offered large sums of money to famous women to pose naked. Although they turned him down, he did manage to publish a photographer's nude sunbathing photos of former first lady Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. He was intensely disliked by both religious and feminist groups, who said he demeaned women and put them at risk with pictures of bondage and other controversial acts. Flynt maintained throughout his life that he was not just a pornographer but also a fierce defender of free-speech rights. But there was a time when even Flynt wondered if he went too far. The magazine famously shocked readers in June 1978 when it published a cover depicting a woman being fed into a meat grinder. "Hustler has always stayed true to its original spirit, meaning we were provocative, explicit and unafraid to challenge authority and offend people," said Liz. "But one particular cover that I'm sure people remember was the meat grinder and having a woman depicted as a piece of meat. But Larry had told me when the cover came out, he was in jail. Therefore, he took the hit. He was the publisher, so he owned it." "He said, 'I'll take the hit,'" Liz shared. "What was he going to do, blame it on somebody else? No, Larry was the owner, the publisher, and you have to stick with what you publish. Unfortunately, he received countless words of criticism. Gloria Steinem attacked him and took a full page out in The New York Times. But he defended the image as satire. . . . And he was always pushing the envelope." Liz said she first met Flynt in 1991 when she went to work for him as a nurse. He had been paralyzed after he was nearly killed in a 1986 assassination attempt. His nephew, Jimmy Flynt Jr., said at the time of his death that his famous uncle suffered decades of health issues. "I remember he was a very quiet guy when I first met him," said Liz. "I didn't see any Hustler magazines in his home. I found him to be very knowledgeable with impeccable vocabulary. It wasn't until two years later that he asked me out. I declined. Then he asked me out again. I said, 'Well, if you'd like to go out with me, come to my home for dinner and meet my family.' And he did." The couple tied the knot in 1998. And being married to one of the world's most famous pornographers was surprisingly ordinary. "Larry was a fun-loving husband," said Liz. "He was very kind and generous. He loved to travel. I always felt that I was well cared for and loved by him. He was just a very loving husband. And he loved animals, too. We always had dogs. We had two German shepherds in the beginning, and then we always had schnauzers, from giant schnauzers to miniatures." As a doting husband, Flynt wasn't shy about giving marital advice. And that's exactly what he did with Woody Harrelson's wife Laura. The actor portrayed Flynt in the 1996 film "The People vs. Larry Flynt." "At one point, Laura and I were having tremendous trouble in our relationship, and, unbeknownst to me, Larry took her to lunch and acted as a marriage counselor," Harrelson, 63, wrote in the book's foreword. "And whatever he said that day really helped. To this day, Laura will cry when she recalls that conversation and Larry's unsolicited, unyielding support. He was always the truest of friends." Today, Liz is determined to make sure that her husband's advocacy for freedom of speech isn't forgotten. "My husband didn't live long enough to write this book," she reflected. "I felt it was so important to capture the five decades of Hustler magazine. . . . As the chairwoman and beneficiary of the company, I feel that I'm in a different pair of shoes. I promised him that I would continue to run the company and make sure it continues to grow. I am doing that right now."

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

These Energy Dividend Stocks Print Money

Fee-based arrangements support 90% of Energy Transfer's earnings. Kinder Morgan gets about 95% of its earnings from stable sources. Williams receives roughly 91% of its earnings from predictable contracts. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Cash flows across the energy sector tend to be more variable due to commodity price volatility. However, some energy stocks just print money because their business models have minimal direct exposure to commodity prices. That gives them the cash to pay lucrative dividends. Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET), Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI), and Williams (NYSE: WMB) operate money-printing energy midstream assets. Because of that, they're ideal options for investors seeking to generate passive income. Energy Transfer operates a nationwide footprint of crucial midstream assets. Its more than 130,000-mile pipeline network moves oil, natural gas, and other commodities from production basins to market centers in the U.S. and beyond through its export terminals. Fee-based contracts and government-regulated rate structures support 90% of its earnings. Because of that, the master limited partnership (MLP) prints cash. The midstream giant generated more than $2.3 billion in distributable cash flow during the first quarter and distributed about $1.1 billion of that money to investors. Energy Transfer used its retained cash flow to invest in expansion projects ($945 million of growth capital spending) and maintain its strong balance sheet. The MLP is investing heavily to expand its already massive midstream footprint. It's spending $5 billion on growth projects this year, which are expected to come online through the end of next year. That should drive a meaningful uptick in its stable cash flows in 2026 and 2027. Energy Transfer's growing sources of stable cash flow should enable the MLP to continue increasing its distribution. It's aiming to raise its more than 7%-yielding payout by 3% to 5% per year. Kinder Morgan owns an irreplaceable energy infrastructure portfolio. It operates one of the largest natural gas pipeline networks in the country and is a leader in handling refined petroleum products and transporting carbon dioxide. Take-or-pay contracts, which entitled Kinder Morgan to payment regardless of volumes or prices, back 64% of the company's cash flow. Meanwhile, hedging contracts that guarantee prices lock in another 5% of its cash flow. Kinder Morgan also gets 26% of its earnings from fee-based sources, most of which have minimal exposure to volume fluctuations. As a result, the company's assets pump out a lot of stable cash flow each quarter. Kinder Morgan generated $1.2 billion in cash flow from operations during the first quarter, covering its dividend outlay of $642 million by roughly 2 times. That enabled it to retain meaningful excess free cash flow to fund expansion projects. The pipeline giant currently has $8.8 billion worth of expansion projects under construction, which are expected to enter commercial service through 2030. They will grow the company's sources of stable cash flow, which should enable it to continue increasing its more than 4%-yielding dividend. Williams operates one of the country's largest natural gas infrastructure platforms. It owns key interstate pipelines (including the Transco system that supplies gas to major markets along the East Coast). It also has gathering and processing (G&P) operations in key production basins, as well as other related infrastructure. Highly regulated transmission and deepwater assets account for 48% of Williams' cash flow, giving it a very stable foundation. Meanwhile, fee-based G&P assets supply it with another 43% of its cash flow. Williams also layers in hedges to backstop its more price-sensitive assets. The gas infrastructure company generated nearly $1.5 billion in available funds from operations during the first quarter. That covered its more than 3%-yielding dividend by a super comfy 2.4 times. Williams' lower dividend payout ratio enabled it to retain lots of cash to fund expansion projects and maintain its financial flexibility. Williams is working on a huge slate of growth projects. It has several projects underway to expand Transco and its other gas transmission pipelines, and it's connecting new deepwater projects in the Gulf to its infrastructure. Williams is also building a natural gas power plant to support the rising power demand of AI data centers. These projects will fuel cash-flow growth through 2030, giving Williams more power to increase its dividend. Energy midstream companies like Energy Transfer, Kinder Morgan, and Williams primarily operate fee-based assets that print cash. Because of that, these energy infrastructure companies can pay attractive and growing dividends. That makes them ideal options for investors seeking stable and steadily rising passive income streams. Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Matt DiLallo has positions in Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. These Energy Dividend Stocks Print Money was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio