Congestion Pricing makes getting into Manhattan faster, if pricier: new data
Drive times into Manhattan have dropped dramatically since the institution of New York's congestion tolling program, according to data released Wednesday by the MTA — with the most significant improvements at the Holland Tunnel.
Average morning travel times at all eight river crossings into the congestion zone have gone down significantly, Juliette Michaelson, MTA's congestion pricing czar, said in a briefing to the agency's board.
'Trip times have fallen by 10% to 30% on average,' she said. 'These are just transformative improvements.'
The largest single decrease in travel time, consistently, has been at the Holland Tunnel, where the average time of a trans-Hudson morning jaunt has been cut by 48% — nearly in half.
Average morning rush commutes at the Williamsburg and Queensboro bridges have sped up by 30%.
Travel through the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel sped up 18%, Lincoln Tunnel commutes got quicker by 17%, and those traversing the Queens-Midtown Tunnel got to Manhattan 15% more quickly.
Brooklyn and Manhattan Bridge travel times fell by 10%.
Michaelson said the speedier commutes are due, in part, to fewer drivers, but also because drivers are choosing a wider range of times to enter the city.
In all, an average weekday saw 553,000 vehicles enter Manhattan south of 60th St. so far since tolling began on Jan. 5 — a 5% drop in traffic compared to historic traffic in the month of January.
Of those, 63,000 entered the zone and immediately got on the FDR drive or West Side Highway and left the congestion zone, leaving an average of 490,000 vehicles within the tolling zone per weekday.
So far, the reduction is less than the 13% reduction officials had predicted the phased-in toll would bring.
But MTA chair Janno Lieber said Wednesday he was satisfied with the results so far.
'The most relevant statistics are the ones about the time savings that are being demonstrably experienced,' Lieber said. 'You're seeing such dramatic time savings and dramatic a increase in speeds.'
'I'm not disappointed at all,' he added.
Transportation | MTA: Ousted transit union boss Richard Davis will be suspended if he returns to work
Transportation | MTA revives Brooklyn's State St. subway power room after December explosion
Transportation | Worker outside Victoria's Secret in Manhattan falls to death when MTA bus hits bucket lift
Transportation | With Richard Davis set to resign, NYC transit union to name new president in February
Transportation | Transit workers union head Richard Davis stepping down amid sexual misconduct claims
The MTA plans to publish its data to a public dashboard Thursday — and will update it weekly, officials said.
The plurality of vehicles entering the tolling zone — 44% — come from points north. Another 40% come across the East River crossings from Queens or Brooklyn. Just 17% of those driving into the tolling zone so far come in from New Jersey.
The majority of vehicles entering the surface streets of the congestion pricing zone —57%— are ordinary passenger vehicles: the cars, pickup trucks or SUVs that get charged the base $9 toll. Taxis, Ubers, Lyfts and other for-hire vehicles make up 36% of the traffic entering the tolling zone.
The toll, which gets higher for larger vehicles like trucks, is required by law to raise enough money to back $15 billion in MTA bonds. Those bonds, in turn, will back a long list of MTA capital projects from the 2020-2024 budget.
Lieber and Michaelson said Wednesday that they were not yet ready to publish any revenue data from the tolls, since Taxi, Uber and Lyft revenue — which is paid through a passenger surcharge — had yet to be compiled.
'Broadly speaking, the level of traffic is in the ballpark of what we projected,' Lieber said when pushed. 'Very, very preliminary, it looks, ballpark, like what we thought it would be.'
The first batch of revenue data is expected to be presented to the MTA's board in February.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Almost a Third of Eurozone's U.S. Trade Surplus Is Due to U.S. Firms, Says ECB
Almost a third of the eurozone's goods trade surplus with the U.S. is accounted for by sales of products manufactured by the affiliates of American businesses, which also account for most of the eurozone's deficit in the trade in services, the European Central Bank said Friday. In its latest Economic Bulletin, economists at the central bank said that should the activities carried out by those affiliates be moved back to the U.S. in response to higher tariffs or changes to U.S. tax policy, the eurozone economy would be smaller, but the impact on employment and incomes would likely be limited. Surging Silver Prices Prompt Americans to Empty Jewelry Boxes and Coin Jars Home Depot Bid Kicks Off Battle for $5 Billion Building-Products Company How Do You Build a $500 Million Coffee Chain? By Selling Matcha to Teens. The Real Message Andy Jassy Is Sending to Employees on AI Don't Fall in Love With AI, and Other Life Rules for Graduates 'Over a longer period, productivity may suffer if the domestic economy is no longer gaining the positive spillovers,' the ECB's economists wrote. The ECB's research highlights the complexity of trade and investment relations between the eurozone and the U.S., and the outsized role played by Ireland in the trans-Atlantic economy. Many of the U.S. firms that contribute to the eurozone's surplus in goods are based in Ireland, and manufacture pharmaceuticals. But they also import services from the U.S. such as the use of intellectual property, while sending large profits back to their American shareowners. The ECB said that in 2024, the flows of goods, services and profits between the U.S. and the eurozone broadly evened out, even if the eurozone had a large surplus in the trade in goods. 'The euro area current account with the United States was nearly balanced in 2024, as the increasing surplus in goods trade was almost entirely offset by deficits in services trade and foreign direct investment income,' the ECB said. The eurozone operations of U.S. multinational enterprises contributed 'significantly' to those flows, the ECB said. Its economists estimated that 30% of the eurozone's surplus in goods was due to the sales of U.S. businesses, while those same companies accounted for 90% of the eurozone's services deficit. 'The widening goods trade surplus vis-à-vis the United States is driven mostly by a pronounced increase in exports of pharmaceutical products, which are mostly attributed to trade flows of Irish affiliates of U.S. MNEs,' the ECB said. While Ireland can offer skilled workers familiar with U.S. regulatory requirements to the pharmaceuticals industry, it is also attractive as a way of lowering their tax bills. President Trump has made it clear that he is unhappy that such a large share of pharmaceutical production for U.S. consumption is located overseas. The ECB's economists warned that higher tariffs on imports from the eurozone could lead U.S. businesses to move some of their production back home or to other locations. However, while that would reduce the size of the eurozone economy, the ECB said it would have a much smaller impact on employment and incomes because those activities are highly capital intensive rather than job-rich, and most of the profits are sent back to the U.S. Write to Paul Hannon at How Hackers Are Turning Tech Support Into a Threat SpaceX's Starship Explodes During Ground Test Oil Prices Rally, Stock Futures Fall in Holiday-Thinned Trading Food, Agriculture Leaders Sound Warnings on MAHA Overreach OpenAI Changes Price Structure for Business Version of ChatGPT Sign in to access your portfolio
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
America's biggest rail service faces peril from both parties after years of ‘Amtrak Joe' Biden
BENEATH THE EAST RIVER, New York — Twelve years after Hurricane Sandy's brackish floodwaters poured into some of the Northeast's busiest rail tunnels, the damage is still apparent from pooling water and crumbling casing. Political leaders who mattered most — from former President Joe Biden to the region's governors — all backed a $1.6 billion repair of the Amtrak tunnels connecting Manhattan and Long Island. But now Donald Trump is president and New York is taking a more adversarial approach to Amtrak. Even though repair work started last month on the Sandy-damaged tunnels beneath the East River, Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and members of her administration threw intense last-minute shade on the project. They suggested Amtrak cannot be trusted, doesn't care about its customers and compared its officials to a used car salesman. The sharp elbows suggest a new peril for the national railroad following the 'Amtrak Joe' Biden years, when the administration showered billions of dollars on the railroad and New York rail projects, including the separate $16 billion project to build new tunnels beneath the Hudson River connecting New Jersey and New York. Amtrak's leader recently stepped down in a peace offering to Trump and the railroad is facing major layoffs and renewed pressure to turn a profit. If Amtrak doesn't have the confidence of Northeastern Democrats like Hochul, whose state is home to the flagship New York Penn Station and its busiest passenger routes, it's not clear who Amtrak can count on. 'Am I confident?' Hochul said during a recent press conference. 'I don't know.' Hochul's recent criticism of the East River rehab, paired with open hostility toward Amtrak from officials at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, are yet another sore spot between the Democratic governor and the Trump administration over transit — one among many. Trump is trying to kill New York's signature congestion pricing program. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy recently seized control of the high-profile overhaul of Penn Station and handed it to Amtrak, under the supervision of former MTA head Andy Byford. But the tunnel clash adds animosity to what was once widely regarded as a slam dunk repair project by Amtrak to its own tunnels. Sandy flooded two of four East River train tunnels, leaving behind a salty residue that's eating away at the concrete casing. Since then, Amtrak has been working on a plan to fix the century-old tubes by closing them one after another for two-and-a-half years of repair work. The closures could prompt delays for Long Island commuters if something goes wrong in any of the other tunnels. Hochul worries those delays could shred public confidence in transit after the state is 'finally getting our footing.' 'The last thing I want to do is have a setback that can go on for years,' Hochul said. 'So I was very clear in my messaging to Amtrak: Don't screw this up.' As the tunnel repair project loomed, Hochul and the MTA asked Amtrak to rip up its closure plans and take a different approach known as 'repair in place,' which would shift the work to nights and weekends and keep the tunnels open during peak commuting times. In doing so, she and her allies have used rhetoric that would have been hard to imagine when Biden was president. 'Amtrak's track record for us is a little terrifying,' MTA CEO Janno Lieber said, citing unrelated problems with Amtrak's system that caused massive headaches for New Jersey commuters last summer. Lisa Daglian, the head of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA, cited a history of Amtrak system problems to suggest that if something went wrong with the East River tunnels, the 2017 'summer of hell' transit crisis in New York City would look like a 'warm spring day.' In New Jersey, Gov. Phil Murphy and members of the state's congressional delegation have expressed frustration with Amtrak, but for other reasons and in more muted terms. Murphy, a Democrat, stepped in to broker a peace between Amtrak and NJ Transit last summer after the two railroads got into a spat over who was to blame for massive delays for Garden State commuters. Now, every few months, Murphy gathers NJ Transit and Amtrak leaders in front of cameras to field reporters' questions about their joint work. Not so in New York. New York's criticism of Amtrak intensified shortly after Duffy announced in mid-April that it would be in charge of Penn Station, a move that sidelined the MTA and Lieber, who has his own particular vision for what should happen there. It's hard to know if the tunnel flare up aimed at Amtrak is part of a tit-for-tat, but it's a theory few people are discounting given that the MTA and Amtrak had been talking about the tunnel work for years. 'We were surprised by this sudden disavowment of a plan that we had worked together on for a long time,' said Laura Mason, Amtrak's executive vice president for capital project delivery. New York contends it has long harbored worries about Amtrak's plan to close one tunnel for 13 months of repairs, reopen it and then close the other for 13 more months. The East River tunnels are used by Amtrak, the MTA's Long Island Rail Road and NJ Transit, which sends trains to Queens so they can be ready to head back to New Jersey during rush hour. NJ Transit has not raised a ruckus over the tunnel project. But LIRR, which is part of the MTA, is the biggest user of the tunnels. And its leader, Rob Free, is worried because it sends more than 450 trains and 125,000 customers through them each day. In early May, Amtrak handed LIRR an easy anecdote to bash it with even before repairs began: Poor quality control meant one of the tunnels wasn't ready to go after an overnight outage, inconveniencing tens of thousands of Long Island commuters. If another tunnel had been closed for repair when that happened, there would have been even more delays and cancellations. 'The governor of New York seems to be more concerned about Amtrak customers than they do,' Free, the head of LIRR, said during a press conference in remarks that echoed Hochul's own. Mason of Amtrak responded that the critique 'didn't hurt because it wasn't true,' but she was frustrated by Free 'misrepresenting the collective effort that went into these plans.' Mason said that while the MTA has had concerns, it has been part of the project for years — the MTA has helped get the money for the project, signed off on the design and participated in the procurement. But there's been a bipartisan group of New York members worried about Amtrak for a while, including everything from Amtrak's service cuts to the full closure of the tunnels. Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's ideas about how to run a railroad also loom over the dispute. To avoid a shutdown of the L subway line in 2019, Cuomo's administration instead shifted most of the work to nights and weekends. He was hailed as a sort of hero at the time and wanted to use that same repair-in-place approach on other projects, including Gateway. Now Hochul wants to use the idea for the East River tunnels. Amtrak recently fought back against it by offering a rare media tour of one of the East River tunnels to show just how fragile the tunnels are and why it considers repair-in-place unworkable. The tour began on a recent Thursday with a descent into Tunnel 2 at 1 a.m. Down there, travelling on the back of a truck in an otherwise empty tunnel dozens of feet below Manhattan's 1st Avenue and the East River itself, Amtrak officials pointed to the extent of the damage done by time and Sandy. Rickety catwalks meant for escape in an emergency seemed questionable at best. Water dripped from the ceiling, pooling near tracks in a way that could force trains to slow or stop. Cast-iron casing crumbled in one Amtrak worker's hand. The tunnel repairs Amtrak is making should ensure people can escape in an emergency. It won't stop all the dripping, but it's expected to prevent puddles from shutting down service and will upgrade the tunnel's interior and electrical work. 'What we're designing is a tunnel that helps itself,' said Liam McQuat, Amtrak's vice president of engineering services. 'This has been 12 years in the making.' The biggest impression Amtrak made was just how hard it would be to cram in work on nights and weekends: It seemed hard enough to get a gaggle of reporters in and out of the tunnel — no trains could travel in the tunnel that had to be blocked off and powered down for safety. The message Amtrak sent was that trying to get hundreds of workers and all their equipment in and out of the tunnel each night and have the tunnel reopened in time for the morning commute would be challenging and inefficient. It could also triple or quadruple the time it would take to make the repairs. In a press conference the next day, Free dismissed Amtrak's tour as the work of a car salesman. 'The salesman pulls the car up, you sit in the car, pulls at your heartstrings, pulls at your emotions,' Free said. 'But at the end of the day, it's about the details, it's about what's the bottom line.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
New Freightos index: Israel-Iran conflict yet to hit shipping
The ongoing Israel-Iran conflict has not severely impacted freight markets yet, but there remains a significant concern regarding the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman. This strategic passage is crucial to Persian Gulf nations exporting 20% of the global oil supply, said analyst Freightos' research chief Judah Levine in a note. A disruption could significantly impact oil prices and international shipping routes. Research shows an adequate global oil supply at present, which might mitigate immediate price surges should the strait close. Yet, any blockage will unquestionably reroute shipping paths and inject volatility into both oil and freight markets. Brent crude oil opened at $72.20 on Wednesday, up from $66.80 on June 12 prior to Israel's attacks on Iran. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $72.92 on the New York Mercantile Exchange; JP Morgan had forecast a peak of $66 per barrel in diesel prices used as the basis for most fuel surcharges made their largest upward move since January and the third-largest increase since the start of 2024. Only 2% to 3% of global container volumes pass through the waterway, so a direct container market impact would primarily affect the Middle East. Levine said a closure, if it occurs, would necessitate the redirection of transshipment volumes, particularly impacting Dubai's Port of Jebel Ali – the busiest hub in the Gulf. This could cause congestion in alternative south Asian ports and elevate freight rates, he said. Israel's Zim on Monday said operations at Haifa and Ashdod in Israel were proceeding normally despite missile attacks by Iran. Container shipping rates on the eastbound trans-Pacific are fluctuating against the backdrop of geopolitical tensions and evolving trade tariff ceasefire between China and the United States shows some easing in demand, according to the Freightos Baltic Index, following a sharp increase in capacity due to restored services by carriers and new sailings which may have overshot actual demand. This may have led to some vessels departing with cargo space unfilled. For the week ending June 13, Asia-U.S. West Coast prices increased 9% to $5,994 per forty foot equivalent unit. Asia-U.S. East Coast rates increased 11% to $7,099 per FEU. This could potentially cause the rates, which experienced a post-May rebound, to ease further, said Levine. Daily rates to the West Coast, despite a brief spike, are already showing a 3% decline from last week's average, indicating market adjustments. Two U.S. companies have sued the Trump administration over the legality of the tariffs, asking the U.S. Supreme Court for an expedited review. A tentative trade agreement between the U.S. and China would maintain a minimum 30% tariff on Chinese goods and 10% levy on American exports. Levine said that the early rush from shippers, driven by anticipation of tariff adjustments, has led to frontloading. Consequently, container volumes spiked, but this may taper as the year progresses, impacting freight demand. The anticipated China-US deal, if confirmed, could stagger shipment volumes over the traditional peak months, reducing the urgency seen earlier in the year. Despite this, the National Retail Federation's forecast predicted a dip in July arrivals compared to April, suggesting some of the frontloading might diminish the volume strength for the rest of 2023, regardless of a finalized trade agreement. The trans-Pacific volatility was reflected in recent peak season surcharges announced by ocean carriers, effective on various dates in July. These range from CMA CGM's $4,100 per container from Asia to Northern Europe; Maersk's $4,000 per container from the Indian Subcontinent and Middle East to North American West Coast; and Hapag-Lloyd's $500 per container for Indian Subcontinent and Middle East to North more articles by Stuart Chirls damage looms without new trade deal, says economist WATCH: 'Dark fleet' tanker collision sparks fire near Strait of Hormuz Los Angeles box volume hits lowest level in two years Israel ports unfazed by new missile strikes The post New Freightos index: Israel-Iran conflict yet to hit shipping appeared first on FreightWaves.
