Electric Vehicle App Engagement Reaches New Highs but Brands Face Pressure to Improve Speed and Reliability, J.D. Power Finds

BUSINESS WIRE)--As the electric vehicle (EV) market matures, companion mobile apps have become a critical part of the ownership experience. From unlocking the vehicle to remotely managing charging and climate, EV apps now serve as an extension of the vehicle itself. According to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. OEM EV App Report SM released today, EV app usage continues to climb, though satisfaction is still held back by connectivity issues, remote command speed and inconsistent feature performance. These usability gaps contrast sharply with rising expectations, as more EV owners are expecting quick and integrated app functionality each time they drive.
'EV owners are telling J.D. Power exactly what they need: reliable performance and connectivity to interact with their vehicles,' said Violet Allmandinger, mobile apps lead at J.D. Power. 'Top-performing apps deliver fast, consistent remote controls and have desired features. However, most other apps are still closing that gap.'
Following are some key findings from the 2025 report:
EV app usage rising: Nearly one-third (32%) of non-Tesla users now use their app on every drive (up from 17% in 2024), while Tesla users are at 79%, up from 69% a year ago. This reflects the growing reliance on apps for routine EV functions such as charge monitoring, pre-conditioning and route planning. However, satisfaction still lags due to slow connections and inconsistent performance.
Distinct advantage in speed: Nearly half (46%) of EV app users say 3-5 seconds is the longest acceptable delay for remote commands, while 40% of Tesla users expect responses in just 1-2 seconds. App speed remains the top driver of satisfaction. Tesla users place higher value on app speed (8.3 on a 10-point scale) than non-Tesla users (7.4) and are more satisfied (7.9) than non-Tesla users (5.5). The small gap between expectation and satisfaction suggests that Tesla has a competitive edge in delivering on customers' needs.
Connectivity issues remain top frustration: Although connectivity has improved slightly, 37% of non-Tesla EV app users still have issues with losing connection or delayed updates, down from 40% in 2024. Tesla, on the other hand, has made significant improvement by reducing connectivity complaints to 19% from 35% year over year. This reinforces the importance of frequent app updates to address issues and transparent communication to customers.
Strong interest in EV features, yet low engagement among app users: While more than 70% of EV app users say they want features like charge scheduling, trip planning with charging stops and in-app payment for public charging, many non-Tesla users do not use these features. In fact, 43% of non-Tesla users have never tried to schedule a charge; 44% have never used the app to plan trips; and 54% have never attempted to pay for charging through the manufacturer's app. This gap suggests a lack of feature availability or limited awareness, both of which represent missed opportunities to improve satisfaction.
Feature desirability continues to evolve: Several advanced features have seen year-over-year increases in desirability. Interest in adjusting driver profiles—such as enabling valet or guest mode—has risen 6.3 percentage points, the largest gain. Other features with rising interest include remote window control (+3.7 percentage points); smartphone key access (+2.2 percentage points); and viewing vehicle cameras or security alerts (+1.7 percentage points). Core features like vehicle status, over-the-air updates and diagnostics/vehicle health checks continue to be desired by more than 90% of EV app users.
Report Rankings
Tesla (864) ranks highest overall and among premium manufacturer EV vehicle mobile apps. Mercedes-Benz (839) ranks second and My BMW (833) ranks third.
MyHyundai with Bluelink ranks highest among mass market manufacturer EV mobile apps with a score of 820 (on a 1,000-point scale). Kia Access (808) ranks second and MINI (797) ranks third.
See the rank chart for each segment at http://www.jdpower.com/pr-id/2025057.
The U.S. OEM EV App Report, now in its fifth year, gauges EV owners' experience with their brand's mobile app. Insights are derived from surveying EV owners and an assessment of the most relevant EV mobile apps. Results are based on a standardized assessment approach relying on more than 350 best practices for vehicle apps that include more than 70 EV-specific attributes.
The report includes apps from the top 28 award-eligible brands that sell EVs in the United States; 10 profiled EV brands in China; and eight profiled EV brands in Europe. Brands from China and Europe are included in this report given their expanding presence in the EV marketplace. Additionally, 1,966 EV owners in the United States were surveyed in March-April 2025 to gather insights on app usage; feature desirability; and app overall execution for the 2025 report.
For more information about the U.S. OEM EV App Report, visit
https://www.jdpower.com/business/us-oem-ev-app-report.
About J.D. Power
J.D. Power is a global leader in automotive data and analytics, and provides industry intelligence, consumer insights and advisory solutions to the automotive industry and selected non-automotive industries. J.D. Power leverages its extensive proprietary datasets and software capabilities combined with advanced analytics and artificial intelligence tools to help its clients optimize business performance.
J.D. Power was founded in 1968 and has offices in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. To learn more about the company's business offerings, visit jdpower.com/business. The J.D. Power auto-shopping tool can be found at jdpower.com.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

an hour ago

• Forbes

Tesla Misses Robotaxi Launch Date, Goes With Safety Drivers

A vehicle Tesla is using for robotaxi testing purposes in Austin, Texas, US, on Friday, June 20, ... More 2025.. Photographer: Eli Hartman/Bloomberg Tesla's much-anticipated June 22 'no one in the vehicle' Robotaxi launch in Austin is not ready. Instead, Tesla has announced to its invite-only passengers that it will operate a limited service with Tesla employees on board the vehicle to maintain safety. Tesla will use an approach that was used in 2019 by Russian robotaxi company Yandex, putting the safety driver in the passengers seat rather than the driver's seat. (Yandex's robotaxi was divested from Russian and now is called AVRide.) Having an employee on board, commonly called a safety driver, is the approach that every robocar company has used for testing, including testing of passenger operations. Most companies spend many years (Waymo spent a decade) testing with safety drivers, and once they are ready to take passengers, there are typically some number of years testing in that mode, though the path to removing the safety driver depends primarily on evaluation of the safety case for the vehicle, and less on the presence of passengers. Tesla has put on some other restrictions--rides will be limited to 6am to midnight (the opposite of Cruise's first operations, which were only at night) and riders come from an invite-only list (as was also the case for Waymo, and Cruise and others in their early days.) Rides will be limited to a restricted service area (often mistakenly called a 'geofence') which avoids complex and difficult streets and intersections. Rides will be unavailable in inclement weather, which also can happen with other vehicles, though fairly rarely today. Tesla FSD is known to disable itself if rain obscures some of its cameras--only the front cameras have a rain wiper. The fleet will be small. Waymo started testing with safety drivers in 2009, gave rides to passengers with safety drivers in 2017, and without safety drivers in 2020 in the Phoenix area. Cruise had a much shorter period with passengers and safety drivers. Motional has given rides for years but has never removed the safety driver. Most Chinese companies spent a few years doing it. Giving passengers rides requires good confidence in the safety of the system+safety driver combination, but taking the passengers does not alter how well the vehicle drives, except perhaps around pick-up and drop-off. (While a vehicle is more at liberty to make hard stops with no passengers on board, I am aware of no vehicle which takes advantage of this.) As such we have no information on whether Tesla will need their safety drivers for a month or a several years, or even forever with current hardware. Passenger's Seat vs. Driver's Seat Almost all vehicles use a safety driver behind the wheel. Tesla's will be in the passenger seat, in a situation similar to that used by driving instructors for student human drivers. While unconfirmed by Tesla, the employee in the passenger seat can grab the wheel and steer. Because stock Teslas have fully computer controlled brake and acceleration, they might equip the driver with electronic pedals. Some reports have suggested they have a hand controller or other ways to command the vehicle to brake. There is no value to putting the safety driver on the passengers side. It is no safer than being behind the wheel, and believed by most to be less safe because of the unusual geometr20 November 2024, Berlin: A prototype of the Tesla Cybercab stands in a showroom in the Mall of Berlin. Photo: Hannes P. Albert/dpa (Photo by Hannes P Albert/picture alliance via Getty Images)y. It's hard to come up with any reason other than just how it looks. Tesla can state the vehicles have 'nobody in the driver's seat' in order to attempt to impress the public. The driving school system works, so it's not overtly dangerous, but in that case there's an obvious reason for it that's not optics. Tesla Cybercab concept. With only 2 seats and no controls, not very suitable for a safety driver. ... More These are not being used in Tesla's Austin pilot. That said, most robocar prototypes, including Tesla supervised FSD, are reasonably safe with capable safety drivers. A negligent and poorly managed safety driver in an Uber ATG test vehicle killed a pedestrian in Tempe, Arizona when the safety driver completely ignored her job, but otherwise these systems have a good record. The combination of Tesla Autopilot and a supervising driver has a reasonable record. (The record is not nearly as good as some people think Tesla claims. Every quarter, Tesla publishes a deeply misleading report comparing the combination of Tesla Autopilot plus supervisor to the general crash rate, but they report airbag deployments for the Teslas mostly on freeways and compare it without general crash numbers on all roads for general drivers. This makes it seem Autopilot is many times safer than regular drivers when it's actually similar, a serious and deceitful misrepresentation.) As noted, Yandex, now AVRide, has used safety drivers in the passenger seat, and has done so in Austin--also speculated to be mostly for optics, though there are some legal jurisdictions where companies shave made this move because the law requires safety drivers and they hope to convey an aura of not needing them. This has also been the case in China.) When Cruise did their first 'driverless' demo ride in San Francisco, they had an employee in the passengers seat. So Tesla has been ready to run with safety drivers for years. What's tested here isn't the safety of the cars, but all the complexity of handling passengers, including the surprising problems of good PuDo (Pick-up/Drop-off.) Whether Teslas can operate a safe robotaxi with nobody onboard, particularly with their much more limited sensor hardware, remains to be seen. Other Paths To Launch Tesla apparently experimented with different paths to getting out on the road before they are ready to run unsupervised. In particular, vehicles were seen with the passenger seat safety driver, and also being followed by a 'chase car' with two on board. Reports also came of Tesla planning for 'lots of tele-ops' including not just remote assistance (as all services do) but remote supervision including remote driving. We may speculate that Tesla evaluated many different approaches: Because Elon Musk promised 'nobody in the car' and 'unsupervised' in the most recent Tesla earnings call, there was great pressure to produce #1, but the Tesla team must have concluded they could not do that yet, and made the right choice, though #3 is a better choice than #4. They also did not feel up to #2, which is commonly speculated to be what other companies have done on their first launch, later graduating to #1 #5 just looks goofy, I think the optics would not work, and it's also challenging. Remote driving is real and doable--in spite of the latency and connectivity issues of modern data networks--but perhap Tesla could not get it ready in time. All teams use remote assistance operators who do not drive the cars, but can give them advice when they get confused by a situation, and stop and ask for advice. Even Waymo recently added a minor remote driving ability for low-speed 'get the car out off the road' sort of operations. I have recommended this for some time. It is worth noting the contrast beween Cruise's 'night only' launch and Tesla's mostly-daytime one. Cruise selected the night because there is less traffic and complexity. LIDARs see very well at night. Tesla's camera-based system has very different constraints at night and many fear it's inferior then. On the other hand Tesla will operate in some night hours and with more cars and pedestrians on the street. The question for Tesla will be whether the use of safety drivers is a very temporary thing, done just because they weren't quite ready but needed to meet the announced date, or a multi-year program as it has been for most teams. Tesla is famous for not meeting the forecast ship dates for its FSD system, so it's not shocking that this pattern continues. The bigger question is whether they can do it at all. Tesla FSD 13, the version available to Tesla owners, isn't even remotely close to robotaxi ready. If Tesla has made a version which is closer, through extra work, training and severe limitations of the problem space, it's still a big accomplishment. This will be seen in the coming months. Two robocar teams had severe interactions with pedestrians. Both those teams, and one pedestrian, are dead. Tesla knows they must not make mistakes.

Forbes

an hour ago

• Forbes

EV U.S. Sales Lag Will Reprieve ICE, Boost Hybrids

ICE versus EV getty Every other new car bought by Americans in 2030 was supposed to be electric, but as the Trump Administration clears away EV incentives and targets, the total is likely to be less than half that and offer a lifeline to gas powered vehicles and hybrids That represents an unexpected new lease of life for the likes of GM , Ford, and Stellantis brands like Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram and their combustion technology. They were highly dependent on internal combustion engines and were either slow or reluctant to embrace EVs. A combination of tax credit rollbacks, emissions standards delays and the removal of the Biden Administration and its call for a 50% share for EVs in the new car market in 2030 is a boost for ICE. Manufacturers will also be busily raising production of hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and extended range electric vehicles*. Consultants Roland Berger put it this way in a recent report. 'Delayed adoption of BEVs (EVs) will have cascading effects on the entire automotive value chain, prolonging profitability challenges for electrification-focused players and extending the window of opportunity for ICE-focused legacy players,' the report said. Analysts have been scrambling to slash their forecasts for U.S. EV sales in 2030. Investment bank UBS says EVs will only reach 24% of the new car market or 2.7 million vehicles. Four months ago UBS was predicting 32%. U.S. EV market share is currently around 10%. BloombergNEF now predicts 27%, down from almost 48%. Investment researcher Jefferies is even lower at about 20% along with Roland Berger. Roland Berger was projecting around 40% under Biden's watch. 'Actions taken by the Trump administration to loosen light vehicle emissions standards have effectively halved our forecast for U.S. electric vehicle adoption by 2030 – We now only expect about 20% BEV sales by 2030,' said Brandon Boyle, Senior Partner and Americas Automotive lead at Roland Berger. This compares starkly with Europe's ambitions. The European Union has decreed EV sales shall reach about 80% of new vehicle sales by 2030 on the way to 100% by 2035. Given current market share is barely 20% in Europe, some major humble-pie eating is on the cards. The Mazda MX-30 R-EV is an extended range electric vehicle equiped with a small rotary gasoline ... More engine (Photo by Sjoerd van) Getty Images / Sjoerd van der Wal 'The U.S. market has different dynamics (than Europe): more rural driving, less dense urban cores, and a political environment that could shift depending on the 2028 (Presidential) election,' said Curt Hopkins, CEO of MCQ Markets . MCQ Market says it is a FinTech firm making high-value assets accessible and investable. 'I wouldn't call it a comeback for ICE, but it's not going away overnight either. Hybrids and plug-in hybrids are still very much part of the transition-especially for consumers who aren't quite ready for a full battery-electric experience. Expect those to play a meaningful but gradually shrinking role through the decade,' Hopkins said. Bernstein Research analyst Daniel Roeska said at some point EV demand will accelerate again. Maybe after the 2028 election or after 2030. 'It (the expectation) won't be 50% for a long while,' Roeska said in an interview. '(General Motors, Ford and Stellantis) agreed that U.S. electrification will take a lot longer. Even if the target picture of high EV share in the U.S. has not changed, (manufacturers) are waking up to the fact that they must improve EV profitability without significant volume growth and maintain investments into legacy products for longer,' Roeska said in a recent report. Hard to bet against Tesla Tesla is the current EV market leader and despite a huge increase in competition and lower expectations for the overall market, is expected to retain its ascendancy, said MCQ's Hopkins. 'It's hard to bet against Tesla. They're vertically integrated, have a dominant brand, and continue to lead on software and over-the-air updates. As long as they maintain that pace of innovation, they'll likely still be the U.S. leader in 2030,' said Hopkins. According to Kelley Blue Book , the Tesla Model Y led the U.S. EV market in 2024 with sales of 373,000 and a market share of 28.6%, the Tesla Model 3 was next with 190,000 (14.6%). Then came the Ford Mustang Mach-E with 52,000 or 4.0%. 'That said, keep an eye on some dark horses. Chinese automakers like BYD and NIO are getting serious about international expansion, and if trade policy allows, they could become a factor in the U.S. by the end of the decade.' The All-Electric Ford Mustang Mach-E (Photo by) Getty Images 'Among the legacy automakers, Ford, GM, and Volkswagen have all shown real progress. Their ability to scale EV production and leverage existing dealer networks could help them close the gap, especially as more affordable models hit the market,' according to Hopkins. Twice the power, half the weight, half the cost He doesn't expect any game-changing battery technology before 2030, just incremental improvements in battery design. The long- promised solid-state battery revolution – twice the power, half the weight, half the cost - isn't close as researchers stumble over mass production techniques. And the trouble is that as consumers hear about this huge, imminent improvement, they are likely to be wary of buying an EV, and risk having its residual value torpedoed by game-changing technology. That could put the skids on EV demand as 2030 approaches. More bad news for EV makers came this week, courtesy of a survey of 15,000 drivers around the world by oil-giant Shell. The survey showed drivers in America are becoming more reluctant to switch to EVs from ICE vehicles. Those considering switching fell three percentage points to 31% compared with a year ago. In Europe, the reluctance was more ominous given the massive EV targets set for 2030. According to the survey, 41% said they would consider switching to an EV, down from 48% last year. Shell operates 75,000 charging points around the world including the U.S., Europe and China. *(Hybrids use computer power to combine for maximum efficiency with gasoline engines, and have relatively small batteries. They provide maybe 1 mile of electric-only driving. PHEVs have bigger batteries which can be charged independently and can provide up to 75 miles of electric-only transport. EREVs, like the Mazda MX30 R-EV, use small combustion engines to charge the battery. The MX30 R-EV is always powered by electricity.)

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

3 No-Brainer EV Stocks to Buy Right Now

China's EV powerhouse, Nio, is in the right place(s) at the right time with the right vehicles at the right price points. Navitas Semiconductor provides power-efficient solutions that the EV industry didn't even know it would eventually need. The EV business's success or failure is ultimately rooted in the lithium batteries all EVs need. QuantumScape stands ready to deliver next-gen battery solutions. 10 stocks we like better than Nio › There's no denying that President Donald Trump isn't as supportive of electric vehicles (EVs) as his recent predecessors were. Then again, U.S. consumers' interest in EVs hasn't exactly remained robust either. Domestic sales of electric vehicles fell 4.4% in April, according to S&P Global Mobility, ending a 14-month growth streak. Separately, AAA (which you know as the travel and road service company "Triple A") reports that the likelihood of an American purchasing an EV has now fallen (for a third consecutive year) to only 16% of the country's car owners. Be careful of jumping to sweeping long-term conclusions based on short-term data, however, or information that only applies within the United States. The EV business is a global one and isn't going away. It's going to continue evolving until electric vehicles become an irresistible choice. With that as the backdrop, here's a rundown of three EV stocks anyone anywhere in the world can get excited about buying. American drivers have never seen an electric vehicle manufactured by Nio (NYSE: NIO) on U.S. roads. That doesn't mean they aren't out there, though. The Chinese company delivered 221,970 cars last year alone. It just delivered most of them within China, with a handful being sold in select parts of Europe. It's looking to establish sales channels in the Middle East soon as well. These are all markets that are not only more supportive of the alternative but also where consumers are increasingly interested. The International Energy Agency expects 80% of China's vehicle sales to be all-electric or plug-in hybrids by 2030, for instance, with Europe not far behind at 57% of its automobile market by then. Globally, that translates into an average annualized growth pace of 11%, led by the Asia-Pacific market through 2034, according to an outlook from Precedence Research. Nio's wide selection of practical sedans, SUVs, and wagons at a range of affordable prices positions it to win at least its fair share of this growth. Nio isn't yet profitable, to be clear. It's making consistent progress to that end, though, and will likely ease out of the red and into the black within the next few years. While that's far from being ideal for interested investors, just bear in mind that Tesla shares also made tremendous gains well before the company was consistently profitable. Sometimes, progress is enough. The analyst community thinks so anyway. Most of them rate this stock as a strong buy right now and support a consensus price target of $4.78 -- that's 40% above the stock's current price. Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ: NVTS) isn't an EV "pure play," for the record. Just as the name suggests, it makes semiconductors that are used in a number of applications, including mobile phones, solar power systems, medical equipment, and more. Its core technological know-how, however, is arguably the most game-changing for electric vehicles. Whereas most semiconductors are ultimately made of simple silicon, Navitas has perfected and patented the science of silicon carbide and gallium nitride integrated circuits. That won't mean much to most people, but this will: These solutions allow for smaller and higher-capacity electrical devices while also consuming less electricity than similarly sized silicon circuitry. In a world where energy-intensive applications like onboard AI and power-hungry data centers are running up the proverbial (and literal) electric bills, even the smallest of efficiency improvements are a pretty big deal. As for its place within the electric vehicle arena, Navitas Semiconductor's gallium nitride semiconductors are well suited for 400-volt EV battery systems, while its silicon carbide semiconductors are aimed at bigger 800-volt vehicles. Its tech can improve an EV battery's range by 5%, but more than that, it can charge an EV battery three times faster with 70% less energy than most charging systems already in use. Those are specs that could help get EVs over the proverbial hump. And it's doing just that. With a market cap of only $1.3 billion, this fairly small company's top line still ebbs and flows from one quarter to the next. However, it reported $450 million worth of new design wins in 2024 and nearly doubled the size of its customer pipeline to $2.4 billion during this same stretch. The business is out there. Investors will just need to be patient while waiting for Navitas to turn it into profitable revenue. Finally, add QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) to your list of no-brainer EV stocks to buy while it's still on sale at a steep discount. It's not a household name. It's also not yet profitable. Indeed, it's not even producing any commercial revenue yet. Give it time, though. It's coming, probably starting sometime in 2026. QuantumScape solves one of the biggest problems holding the electric vehicle industry back -- the lithium-based batteries used in almost every single EV being manufactured at this time. They're good, but not good enough. They're expensive, they lack the range capacity most car owners want, and perhaps worst of all, they're not all that durable given their steep price. You'd be lucky to get 10 years out of one before its performance starts to noticeably suffer. Most EV batteries are only warranted for 10 years or fewer, if that tells you anything. QuantumScape has a simple solution -- make electric vehicle batteries better by making them out of better materials. And that's what it does. Its solid-state lithium batteries can add on the order of 25% more driving range on a single charge and, better still, can go through more than 1,000 charging cycles with only a 5% degradation in their energy-storage capacity. That should make it good for roughly 300,000 miles worth of driving, which is likely longer than the EV it powers will actually remain on the road. They're not cheap, mind you. But neither were the more conventional lithium batteries when the EV industry was in its infancy. The price dropped as production scaled up. So, too, will the cost of solid-state lithium battery packs. For what it's worth, major automaker Volkswagen's battery company, PowerCo, has already partnered with QuantumScape to develop batteries for its aggressive electric vehicle ambitions. In the meantime, although it's not working with QuantumScape, Toyota is now developing its own solid-state lithium batteries, underscoring the technology's potential. This might help make the point: Straits Research believes the world's solid-state lithium battery market is poised to grow from last year's $2 billion to $33.4 billion by 2033. That's an average annualized growth rate of more than 36%. There's no denying that QuantumScape is the riskiest stock of the three EV names here to step into. If you can stomach the risk, though, the potential upside may well be worth it. Before you buy stock in Nio, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nio wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 No-Brainer EV Stocks to Buy Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data