Conservative lawmakers question funding for "woke" colleges

The state's public colleges and universities will soon learn whether their "woke liberal agenda" will affect their state funding.
Why it matters: While it varies by institution, state funding makes up a sizable portion of the budget at public schools like IU, Purdue, Ball State and Ivy Tech.
Cuts to state support could impact everything from staffing to financial aid at a time when the state is trying to increase the number of Hoosiers getting a post-secondary education.
Driving the news: The House Ways and Means Committee is taking public testimony on House Bill 1001, the state's two-year budget, today.
The current version of the bill is Gov. Mike Braun's budget proposal.
House Republicans will introduce their spending plan next week.
State of play: Conservative lawmakers have raised concerns about "liberal" policies or programs on public campuses for years, but this year those concerns are increasingly turning into threats against their state funding.
State comptroller Elise Nieshalla was among a group calling for IU to be defunded over its continued housing of the Kinsey Institute.
IU has said it is complying with a 2023 law that prohibited Kinsey from receiving any state dollars.
Several lawmakers sharply questioned IU and Ball State officials last month during budget presentations over "woke" professors and programming for LGBTQ+ students — including Ball State's gender-affirming clothing closet and IU's Lavender Graduation.
What they're saying:"I get questioned quite regularly, 'Why do we continue to fund these universities at the level we do when they just go against our core values and continue to push a more woke liberal agenda?'" said Rep. J.D. Prescott, R-Union City, during those budget presentations.
Prescott referenced, in particular, social media posts from well-known economist and Ball State professor Michael Hicks.
"What can I say to reassure my constituents that the university is keeping their viewpoints in mind, and how can I justify continuing to fund a university that goes against our core values?" he asked Ball State University president Geoffrey Mearns.
Roughly 40% of Ball State's general fund budget came from state support last year.
The other side: Mearns said the university's values do align with the state's and that Hicks, "like any citizen has the right to express his views, irrespective of whether they align with the values of the institution," Mearns said.
Between the lines: Last year, lawmakers passed Senate Bill 202, which put in place protections against retaliation for tenured faculty's research, regular reviews to ensure the protection of intellectual diversity and prohibitions against professors pushing political views in the classroom.
Mearns said that both SB 202 and the First Amendment protect professors' rights to "express their personal views in their personal time."
Zoom in: Braun's budget proposal, which cuts $700 million in state spending, holds funding for the state's public higher education institutions flat at their current level for the next two years.
It also doesn't carry forward any "one-time" spending from the 2023 budget, including $5 million for Martin Universit y.
The small private school is the state's only predominantly Black institution.
Reality check: It's still early in the process for the budget.
A final compromise likely won't be drafted until the final weeks of the session in April.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

44 minutes ago

• Fox News

SENATE MAJ. LEADER THUNE: A generational opportunity for strength, prosperity

All eyes will be on the United States Senate this week as we endeavor to pass the shared Republican agenda of American strength, security, and prosperity. With the Republican reconciliation bill, we have the opportunity to deliver. It is one that doesn't come around often, and our country stands to benefit greatly by Republicans seizing this moment and getting this bill across the finish line. In large part, this bill is the culmination of President Trump's campaign promises and the promises that Republican senators have made to our voters. Chief among them is keeping the American people safe through strong border security and a military strong enough to deter threats and conflicts around the world before they begin. President Trump has achieved remarkable success in ending the Biden border crisis and removing the criminal illegal aliens that President Biden let walk into our country – but it hasn't been cheap, and the administration has told us that resources are running out. This bill will fully fund the border wall and President Trump's successful policies for the entirety of his presidency, removing any possibility that Democrats will hold those resources hostage to try to increase other government spending. This same principle also applies to defense funding. Recent conflicts around the world should make clear the need to have a modern and lethal fighting force that can keep the American people safe. This means smart, generational investments like President Trump's Golden Dome for America to defend against advanced drones, missiles, and hypersonics, as well as prioritizing building new ships and unmanned vehicles. A nation cannot prosper unless it is secure, and with our borders and defense capabilities bolstered, the next key pillar of this bill is creating prosperity in America. We do this through permanently extending President Trump's signature achievement in his first term, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The American people are facing a hefty $4 trillion tax increase at the end of the year, the largest in American history. If we fail to act, the average family of four making the median income in the United States will face a $1,700 tax increase. Not only does this bill prevent that tax increase, it makes the TCJA's low rates permanent – meaning Democrats can never again try to use a pending expiration as leverage for advancing wasteful government spending. The bill locks in the TCJA's small business provisions for all time, which is crucial for economic growth, and it also delivers on President Trump's tax promises: No tax on tips, no tax on overtime, relief from Social Security taxes for seniors, and no tax on interest for vehicles made in the United States. In the wake of the Biden administration and Democrats exploding the growth of government spending on programs like Medicaid, we will make commonsense reforms to return to a fiscally sustainable path. That means kicking illegal immigrants off of health programs and introducing work requirements that even 50% of Democrats agree with – all to ensure that programs like Medicaid are strengthened and able to deliver for the American citizens the programs were designed to benefit. Senators have worked to develop this bill for well over a year now. Now it is time to act. Border resources are drying up. National security needs have never been more apparent. And with each passing day, we move closer to reaching both our nation's debt limit and the largest-ever tax increase on the American people. Senators return to Washington today and we will remain here until this bill is passed. We know that Democrats will fearmonger and misrepresent our efforts, and we expect them to drag this debate long into the night with unrelated issues. However, I am confident we will get this bill across the finish line. On the Fourth of July, Americans celebrate our freedoms and the work of previous generations to keep this great American experiment going. By placing this historic bill on the president's desk by the Fourth of July, Republicans will be ensuring that future generations of Americans can live in safety and prosperity.

Politico

an hour ago

• Politico

Beshear shows Florida Dems his winning blueprint

Good morning and welcome to Monday. When the Florida Democratic Party invited Kentucky Gov. ANDY BESHEAR to speak at its Leadership Blue gala on Saturday night, it seemed to be sending a loud-and-clear message: We'll have what he's having. What exactly is that? A winning streak they envy. Beshear has won statewide office as a Democrat three times in a row in Kentucky — a place where President DONALD TRUMP dominated in 2024 by 30 points — despite describing himself with terms like 'pro-choice' and 'pro-union.' Compare that to Florida, where Trump won by 13 points but Republicans have eclipsed Democrats in recent cycles to take over the Legislature, every statewide office and a big voter registration advantage. Democrats have been depressed about it, but they say they'll keep fighting. As it turns out, Beshear had a lot of thoughts about what Florida Democrats need to do. And it wasn't just because he enjoys vacationing in the Panhandle. He told Playbook that during the weekend, a lot of Democrats approached him to ask about his political secret sauce. 'I'm here as proof that when Democrats put people first and stand firm on our values, we can — we will — win tough elections,' he said onstage later. Beshear opened up about his blueprint, both onstage at the gala (held at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel in Hollywood), in gaggles with journalists and one-on-one with Playbook. Here are the biggest takeaways: Focus on people's daily lives. Beshear said one of the big reasons Trump won the 2024 election was because he convinced voters that 'the vice president was distracted' while he was focused on issues like high prices and public safety. 'When people wake up in the morning, they're not thinking about the next election,' he said. 'They're thinking about their job and whether they make enough to support their family. They're thinking about the next doctor's appointment for themselves, their parents or their kids. They're thinking about the roads and bridges they drive each day, the school they drop their kids off at, and whether they feel safe in their community. The way that Democrats win is to own that lane.' Talk like a real person. Beshear gently reprimanded Democrats for using terms like justice-involved populations, substance use disorder and food insecurity — word he said he knew were intended to reduce stigma but that also ended up being an attempt at sanitizing difficult issues and taking the emotion out of them. He urged them instead to use the words addiction and hungry. 'I know all of this is important,' he said, 'but we don't change stigma by changing words. You change stigma by changing hearts.' Get dirt on your boots. 'What that means is that we're not just signing something in a rose garden,' Beshear said. 'We are out there making sure that people see the new factory, see the new growth, to see the impact that we're making in their daily lives, to get out in those communities again and again, because showing up shows the people we care.' Explain why. Democrats need to talk about their reasons for making decisions, Beshear said. For him, it's his Christian faith. So when he vetoed sweeping legislation that would have restricted bathrooms for transgender people and banned gender-affirming care for minors, he said it was because of his faith. 'My faith teaches me that every child is a child of God,' he told Kentuckians then, 'and I didn't want people picking on those kids.' The next day, he said, a man came toward him at an event and told him that even though he didn't agree with the veto, he understood the governor was doing what he thought was right. 'Whether people agreed with the decision or not, they knew what I was thinking,' he said. 'It creates the grace and the space to disagree and understand where someone is coming from.' Have a tip, story, suggestion, birthday, anniversary, new job, or any other nugget that Playbook should look at? Get in touch at: kleonard@ CAMPAIGN MODE MORE FROM LEADERSHIP BLUE … — Another quick note on Beshear: These events can also be viewed as an audition of sorts. Beshear is considering running for president, and (to close listeners) there were a couple 2028 Easter eggs in his speech. For instance, he included a dig at Vice President JD VANCE, widely viewed as the very early GOP frontrunner, as not actually being from Kentucky and said Democrats should 'make sure this is the last political job he ever has.' Then he capped off his speech with a resounding, 'Are you ready to elect a Democratic president in 2028?' — A key theme from the party: 'Several elected officials and party leaders agreed on one thing: they have a messaging problem, and President Donald Trump might help them solve it,' report Siena Duncan and Vivienne Serret of the Miami Herald. 'Democrats mentioned immigration, tariffs and potential cuts to healthcare as issues that have caused division in Florida districts that voted Republican. Deportations in South Florida were central to the discussion, with issues like revoking Temporary Protected Status, instating travel bans and targeting immigrants who have not committed crimes roiling Hispanic communities.' — Democratic Sen. CORY BOOKER of New Jersey got the crowd's attention. Mitch Perry of the Florida Phoenix writes: Booker's speech 'began with him calling for the house lights to be put on so he could see all 1,000-plus attendees, and then he waded into the audience, ultimately standing atop a table to address the crowd.' — At one point, Booker said, 'I miss Obama,' then joked that he was referring to the former first lady and not the former president. 'Michelle!' he yelled jokingly into the mic, 'If you married me, I'd be president right now!' — The Florida Phoenix also highlighted NIKKI FRIED's remarks, delivered unknowingly to her as Trump revealed the US had bombed Iran: 'Our message is shit,' she said. 'Our brand is broken. But quitting, hiding, waiting or whining will not fix it. What will? Showing up.' SPOTTED: Reps. SHEILA CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, JARED MOSKOWITZ, DARREN SOTO, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ; gubernatorial candidate DAVID JOLLY; Senate candidate JOSH WEIL; House Democratic leader FENTRICE DRISKELL; state Reps. ANNA ESKAMANI, MICHELE RAYNER, MARIE WOODSON, KEVIN CHAMBLISS, CHRISTINE HUNSCHOFSKY and ASHLEY GANTT; state Sens. SHEVRIN JONES, TRACIE DAVIS; Miami Dade County Mayor DANIELLA LEVINE CAVA; former Florida Democratic Party Chair TERRIE RIZZO. ... DATELINE TALLAHASSEE ... ENVIRONMENTAL SPENDING REVERSAL — 'State legislators this year pivoted away from spending money to buy environmentally sensitive land and instead poured hundreds of millions into paying Florida land owners — including farm owners — from developing their property,' reports POLITICO's Gary Fineout. 'That was one of the biggest environmental spending highlights in this year's $115 billion state budget that also included a significant retreat from a decision made just a year ago to permanently dedicate money from the state's gambling deal with the Seminole Tribe to environmental programs.' WEATHER MANIPULATION BANNED — 'DeSantis signed Senate Bill 56, spearheaded by Sen. Ileana Garcia, R-Miami, which repeals current state law that allowed the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to issue permits to people or groups seeking to change the weather,' reports Michaela Mulligan of the Tampa Bay Times. 'Weather modification is just as it sounds: It's the act of artificially influencing the weather. And in Florida, despite previous legislation, no institutions have ever sought a permit to change the weather, according to state environment officials.' — 'Judge grants partial delay in Carolina Amesty's federal case until next month,' reports Gabrielle Russon of Florida Politics. — Florida Politics is out with its annual list of Tampa Bay's Most Powerful Politicians. PENINSULA AND BEYOND LOOK WHO'S BACK — DeSantis is keeping a familiar face on the University of West Florida trustee board by reappointing ADAM KISSEL, who was rejected by two state Senate committees over his stances on higher education. Kissel, who DeSantis reinstalled on the board Friday, is expected to be a key vote as part of a new majority picked by DeSantis to run UWF alongside Education Commissioner MANNY DIAZ JR., the school's interim president. A visiting fellow on higher education reform for The Heritage Foundation, Kissel was grilled by senators over his past writings, where he signaled support for privatizing universities and claimed military veterans are contributing to an 'overpopulation problem' facing colleges. Kissel, listed as a resident of Charleston, West Virginia, earlier this month suggested the University of Florida should 'consider a path to privatization' in response to state leaders rejecting former University of Michigan President Santa Ono as its prospective president. — Andrew Atterbury VOTING ON ELECTION CHANGES — Miami city commissioners will vote this week on whether to move its municipality elections to even years, which would help improve voter turnout, report Tess Riski and Jay Weaver of the Miami Herald. Should the election get moved, then it would cancel the 2025 election and allow certain officials, such as Miami Mayor FRANCIS SUAREZ, more time in their role regardless of term limits. DeSantis and state Attorney General JAMES UTHMEIER have warned Miami officials they don't have the right to move the elections without voters weighing in. — 'Fort Lauderdale eyeing own emergency reserve in case FEMA goes away,' reports Susannah Bryan of the South Florida Sun Sentinel. TRUMPLANDIA AND THE SWAMP JUDICIARY SCRUTINY — 'A Florida state judge was lobbying for a seat on the federal bench. After he sided with the president in a defamation case, Donald Trump gave him one,' reports POLITICO's Hailey Fuchs. 'Ed Artau, now a nominee to be a district court judge in Florida, met with staff in the office of Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott to angle for the nomination less than two weeks after Trump's election last fall, according to a new Senate disclosure obtained by POLITICO. In the midst of his interviews, Artau was part of a panel of judges that ruled in Trump's favor in the president's case against members of the Pulitzer Prize Board.' DATELINE D.C. REACTIONS TO US BOMBING OF IRAN — Sens. RICK SCOTT and ASHLEY MOODY both issued supportive statements about the president's decision to launch strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday night, reports Drew Dixon of Florida Politics. Over in the House, many Democrats, including Rep. DARREN SOTO, said they were concerned that the president hadn't sought congressional approval before launching the strikes. Soto told Playbook he'd supported the bipartisan War Powers resolution that had been introduced in the House and wanted to look into whether Trump had exceeded his powers. 'It is a lot more offensive than normally the actions that are taken through the use of force,' he said. 'Often, it's done to help protect our allies — like Israel and the region and Kuwait and others. So there's a lot of questions to be asked. We also certainly don't want a nuclear Iran.' Rep. DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ (D-Fla.) had a more nuanced position, saying that Iran now needed to return to engaging in diplomatic negotiations. She said Trump should turn to Congress for any further action on Iran but that in her view the move on Saturday 'was a defensive one.' 'The window had opened with Israel striking their nuclear sites,' she said, 'and when diplomacy appeared to have not been effective, to me, it was essential to not allow that window to close, because this appeared to be the most significant opportunity to be able to prevent them from being able to achieve their nuclear goals.' TELLING HER PERSONAL STORY — Republican Rep. KAT CAMMACK opened up to The Wall Street Journal's Katy Stech Ferek recently to reveal that she had an ectopic pregnancy — a life-threatening condition — after Florida's six-week abortion limit was signed into law. She said the doctors questioned whether they were allowed to treat her by expelling the embryo, and she had to read them the law to persuade them to move ahead. Per WSJ: 'Cammack doesn't fault the Florida law for her experience. Instead, she accuses the left of scaring medical professionals with messaging that stressed that they could face criminal charges for violating the law. She said she feels those efforts gave medical staff reason to fear giving drugs even under legal circumstances.' — 'One Big, Beautiful Bill's changes for Obamacare could be ugly for Florida,' by Christine Sexton of the Florida Phoenix. ODDS, ENDS AND FLORIDA MEN BIRTHDAY: Former state Rep. Joy Goff-Marcil.

Chicago Tribune

2 hours ago

• Chicago Tribune

Dan Tully: I trust my fellow service members will abide by the Constitution

Having served as a captain and judge advocate in the Army Reserve, graduated from Stanford Law School and deployed overseas in Iraq, I have thought deeply about military command and the obligations incurred by swearing an oath to the Constitution. These concerns weigh especially heavily as President Donald Trump deploys active-duty military members as a show of force against peaceful demonstrations in Los Angeles and potentially here in Chicago. I want my fellow citizens to know something important. I trust the common sense and decency of my fellow American service members. I have served alongside them, some who consider themselves to be MAGA Republicans. I know they understand how grave and serious it would be to use force against their countrymen and countrywomen. Let me explain why. All service members swear an oath to 'support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.' Enlisted service members continue swearing to 'obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me,' expressly conditioned by, 'according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).' With that condition, the enlisted oath is not absolute; if an order is unlawful, an enlisted service member is responsible not to obey. The obedience language is absent from the officer oath. Instead, officers swear to 'well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.' In short, while all members of the military must act in accordance with the UCMJ, each officer must exercise an even higher level of responsibility, remaining loyal not to a president but to the Constitution. No service member should ever follow a clearly unlawful command, especially when that command is to harm unarmed, peaceful citizens of their own country. It is infuriating that we are even in this situation. Trump doesn't care about members of the military, referring to fallen soldiers as 'suckers' and 'losers' for not escaping their obligations as he did during the Vietnam War. He denigrates the records of patriots such as the late U.S. Sen. John McCain, degrading his war hero status. He has saddled them with an incompetent secretary of defense in Pete Hegseth. Most dangerously, Trump intentionally disregards centuries of the military's most essential tradition of nonpartisanship, eroding American faith in our most trusted institution. What troubles many of us in the military — something I would advise my fellow soldiers and commanders to consider — is the terrifying prospect of an unlawful order coming down from this reckless president. Trump has openly mused about service members using lethal force to control protesters, portraying them as domestic enemies of the Constitution. In fact, it's the opposite: The protesters are exercising their First Amendment right to free speech and assembly in support of the 14th Amendment rights of people being kidnapped and deported without due process. To the extent that there have been acts of violence and vandalism in the vicinity of the protests, those acts are unlawful. Police in our cities are fully capable of addressing the situation. Protests — even ones that include civil disobedience — should not be met with violence unless there is no other option available. But this president believes violence against our citizens is an acceptable first choice because he doesn't value the rule of law or, by his own admission, his duty to uphold our Constitution. American military members are trained and proficient at understanding the conditions under which it is lawful to use force in the heat and exercise of war. They are taught to obey the chain of command, especially on a battlefield. Unit cohesion and effectiveness depend on the obedience of orders. But a service member is not a robot, blindly obligated to fulfill a command received from a superior with no application of context or thought. Especially if that command is given outside the theater of war, with no imminent danger to personnel, and even more so when present on the streets of an American city where the people those soldiers swore to defend are petitioning the actions of their government. American soldiers have misused lethal force in the past, and they have faced consequences. Second Lt. William L. Calley Jr. was convicted by court martial of the premeditated murder of 22 Vietnamese in the famous My Lai massacre. He was convicted because the threshold for disobeying an order is, according to the Manual for Military Courts-Martial and case law, 'a person of ordinary sense and understanding would have known the orders to be unlawful.' With a president so intent on sowing chaos every day, it must be a difficult position for the American troops who have deployed to Los Angeles and are rumored to be on their way to other cities. But Americans stand up to do what's right in difficult moments all the time. We must not forget that there are numerous institutions available to us all to safeguard our rights. Our military, state and federal criminal justice systems are populated with true patriots who believe in the rule of law. This is, ultimately, why I trust that our service members will do the right thing when the time comes. They have been trained well, and they know their obligations to their country. I have sworn an oath to the Constitution three times — as a lawyer, an Army officer and a federal civil servant. The Constitution is not a suggestion; it is the supreme law of the land. Even if our president won't abide by it, I trust my fellow service members will.