
Too much sleep is more dangerous than not enough
Sleeping for too long is worse for your health than a lack of sleep, a new study has suggested.
Researchers found people who regularly sleep for fewer than seven hours per night or more than nine hours per night were increasing their risk of death.
The study revealed that those sleeping for fewer than seven hours were 14 per cent more likely to die from any cause than those getting the optimal seven to eight hours of shut-eye.
But it also showed the increased risk of death rose to 34 per cent among people who were regularly sleeping for nine hours or more per night.
Experts from the Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary, analysed data from more than 2.1 million participants across 79 separate international studies.
Men were at greater risk of death than women from sleeping too little, while women faced a greater risk than men from sleeping for too long each night, the research said.
The study found men who slept for less than seven hours a night had a 16 per cent higher risk of death, and those who slept for eight hours or more had a 36 per cent increased risk.
Meanwhile, women with short sleep durations had a 14 per cent higher risk, and those sleeping for longer faced a 44 per cent increased risk.
The researchers said the differences were likely due to hormonal, behavioural or cardiovascular differences between men and women.
'A sleep epidemic'
Dr. György Purebl, director of Semmelweis University's Institute of Behavioural Sciences and co-author of the study said: 'As a society, we are experiencing a sleep epidemic. Even though awareness has grown, our behaviour hasn't changed much in the last decade.
'The constant exposure to blue light, pressure to remain available around the clock, and disruption of our natural biological rhythms continue to take a toll on our health.'
The authors of the study warned that sleep deprivation is a growing global health concern, with millions of people regularly sleeping too little because of work demands, exposure to digital screens and stress.
Shift workers and those with irregular schedules are particularly affected, it said.
Chronic sleep loss is not only linked to premature death but also a range of health issues including obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and a worsening immune system.
Sleep and strokes
In a second study the Hungarian researchers looked at the impact of sleep duration on the risk of stroke and subsequent death.
They found that people sleeping for five to six hours per night had a 29 per cent higher risk of stroke than those sleeping for seven to eight hours and were 12 per cent more likely to die because of the stroke.
Those sleeping more than eight hours had a 46 per cent higher risk of stroke and were 45 per cent more likely to die from it.
Dr. Balázs Győrffy, head of the Department of Bioinformatics at Semmelweis University, and senior author of both studies, said: 'Stroke remains one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability worldwide.
'Identifying modifiable risk factors like sleep can offer powerful public health benefits. Our findings make it clear that sleep duration should be considered in stroke prevention strategies to reduce the burden on healthcare systems and improve population health.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Primary Health Properties offers $2.4 billion for Assura
June 23 (Reuters) - Britain's Primary Health Properties (PHP.L), opens new tab on Monday proposed to buy healthcare real estate investor Assura (AGRP.L), opens new tab for 53.3 pence per share, valuing it about 1.79 billion pounds ($2.4 billion), trumping a rival bid from KKR (KKR.N), opens new tab and Stonepeak Partners. ($1 = 0.7444 pounds)


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Doctors revolt against ‘failing' regulator
Doctors want to overthrow the medical regulator because it is 'failing to protect patients'. The majority of medics say they have lost confidence in the General Medical Council (GMC) and want it replaced. Leaders at the British Medical Association (BMA) are calling for a new independent regulator to be set up to focus solely on doctors after the GMC also controversially began regulating physician associates. Prof Philip Banfield, chairman of the BMA council, will tell the union's annual conference on Monday that the GMC has become an 'abject failure'. The doctors' union has been embroiled in a row with the watchdog over the use of the term 'medical professionals' to describe physician associates and anaesthesia associates, and the increasing 'blurring of the lines' between the professions. Physician associates have no medical degree and just two years of postgraduate training. The role was designed to support the work of doctors, but evidence – including that revealed by The Telegraph – has found physician associates are increasingly taking on doctors' tasks and acting beyond their qualifications, such as by replacing doctors on rotas, prescribing medication, ordering scans and diagnosing patients, sometimes leading to fatalities. Review of physician associates Wes Streeting has ordered a review into the role amid NHS plans to increase the number of physician associates employed from the current 3,500 to 10,000 within a decade. It is understood that one of the recommendations from the review by Prof Gillian Leng, president of the Royal Society of Medicine, will be to change the job title of a physician associate, potentially renaming the profession to physician assistant, as it was originally known, in order to reduce public confusion. Earlier this year, a dossier of more than 600 incidents compiled by the BMA revealed examples of physician associates and anaesthesia associates misdiagnosing cancer, impersonating doctors and illegally prescribing medication and ordering scans. Physician associates have also been implicated in several high-profile patient deaths. Emily Chesterton, a 30-year-old actress, died in 2022 after she was misdiagnosed twice by a physician associate she thought was a GP. She was told she had an ankle sprain when she had a blood clot that later travelled from her leg to her lung and killed her. Her parents recently began a legal challenge against the GMC alongside a group called Anaesthetists United because it had not set out a scope of practice for physician associates. Earlier this year, a coroner said physician associates who diagnosed Pamela Marking with a nosebleed, before she died aged 77 at East Surrey Hospital last year, 'had a lack of understanding of the significance of abdominal pain and vomiting, and had undertaken an incomplete abdominal examination'. In April, the BMA lost its High Court challenge over the medical regulator's approach towards associate professions, after which the GMC said it was pleased the court had recognised its single set of standards for all three professions as 'logical and lawful'. But now the BMA is set to take its action further, and will call for a new medical watchdog that regulates doctors alone, and has a statutory duty to protect the public. In his address, Prof Banfield will tell the union's almost 200,000 members that the GMC's approach to regulating physician associates has led to an 'incessant and unsafe blurring of professional boundaries that threaten the very foundations of practising medicine, what it means to be a doctor'. The BMA said it had surveyed more than 1,400 doctors, of whom 82.2 per cent would support the creation of a new watchdog solely focused on doctors. He will also make clear the Health Secretary must 'pay the cost for the medical expertise [he] needs, because it costs infinitely more not to'. The BMA leader will acknowledge the union last year 'won the highest pay awards for a generation – securing over £1 billion for doctors'. But he will also claim that Mr Streeting's 'promises to restore pay fell at the first hurdle'. He said the strike ballot from resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, was 'not simply about pay', adding: 'It's essential that we send a clear message to Government that deals must be honoured.' A Department of Health spokesman said: 'This Government is committed to working hand-in-hand with doctors and health-care professionals to deliver the reform our NHS needs. 'We have already announced a programme to modernise the regulation of health-care professionals across the UK, creating a system that better protects patients and supports our medical workforce through our Plan for Change.' A GMC spokesperson said: 'We take our role working with doctors to support good, safe patient care very seriously. Our aim is to deliver effective, relevant and compassionate regulation. A critical part of how we do this is by actively gathering feedback from doctors and patients about their experiences and using this to change and improve our processes. 'This year, we also welcomed the announcement from Government of much-needed reform of the regulatory framework we operate to. Making further changes to the way we work will continue to benefit patient safety and ensure the public has confidence in the doctors we regulate.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Mounjaro weight loss jab: All you need to know
GPs in England will be able to prescribe weight loss jabs for the first time on the NHS on Monday, as the health service begins its mass rollout. Some 220,000 people with the 'greatest need' are expected to receive Mounjaro, also known as tirzepatide and made by Lilly, through the NHS over the next three years. Here the PA news agency takes a look at the drug and the rollout. – How does tirzepatide work? Tirzepatide, or Mounjaro, is an antidiabetic drug which lowers blood sugar levels and slows down how quickly food is digested. It makes you feel fuller for longer and therefore less hungry. If the jab is recommended by a healthcare professional, those using it will need to eat a balanced, reduced-calorie diet and to exercise regularly while taking it, according to the NHS website. – Who might be eligible for the drug? In the first year of the programme, the drug will be offered to people with a body mass index (BMI) score of more than 40 who have at least four other health problems linked to obesity, such as type 2 diabetes; high blood pressure; heart disease; and obstructive sleep apnoea. It was previously only accessible to patients through a special weight loss service, to severely obese people who also suffer from a range of other health problems. Estimates suggest around 1.5 million people in the UK are already taking weight loss drugs, which may have been prescribed through specialist weight loss services or via private prescription. – How would it be administered? The drug is usually delivered through a self-administered weekly injection which a doctor or nurse will show patients how to use, the NHS website says. – Who cannot take tirzepatide? Mounjaro is not recommended for those who are pregnant or planning to get pregnant, breastfeeding or have certain health conditions, according to the NHS. For those taking the contraceptive pill and using tirzepatide, the NHS recommends using an additional method of contraception, such as a condom, for the first four weeks of treatment and for four weeks after each dose increase as the contraceptive pill may not be absorbed by the body during this time. – What are the potential side effects? Potential side effects of tirzepatide include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation, according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.