City centre store decides to close book department
A city department store has announced a major change to its layout.
Jarrolds has decided to close the book department on the third floor of its long-established London Street store in Norwich.
An internal email sent to staff on Monday, seen by the BBC, explained the decision was made "with a great deal of sadness".
The company, which has operated in Norfolk for more than 200 years, said it was no longer viable to compete with national and online booksellers.
Jarrolds has not yet confirmed if any staff would be made redundant because of the decision but said its book department would likely close at the end of August following a sale of existing stock.
Tim Shattock, the firm's managing director for trading, said: "Jarrolds is proud of its heritage as a printer and bookseller, and we are pleased to have played a significant role in supporting and promoting many local authors and publishers during our long history.
"However, as with every category of retail, the world of book selling has changed dramatically over recent years.
"With large supermarkets and online retailers taking a large proportion of the book market, the sector has grown increasingly challenging, with very tight margins.
"Unfortunately, Jarrolds simply cannot compete with national chains and online stores."
The decision follows the Norfolk company's move to cut the hours of about 70 staff to combat rising costs and the closure of its Wymondham store last September.
Mr Shattock explained that the toy department on the third floor would be extended, alongside the current travel agency and restaurant remaining. Some space will be "repurposed" for storage though.
He added: "This has not been an easy step to take, but it is the right commercial decision for the business."
The business also offers a food hall, wine bars, restaurants, coffee shops, personal shopping services and its Retreat day spa.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Department store wants to cut hours for 70 staff
Prominent former mill could become 88-bed hotel
Store to close after change in High Street - owner
The history of Jarrolds
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
See how much an investor needs in an ISA to fund an £888 monthly passive income
Passive income has always struck me as the holy grail of investing. A regular payment landing in my account, without me having to lift a finger. Ideally, generated inside a Stocks and Shares ISA. To generate £888 a month, or £10,656 a year, I'd need to think carefully about what kind of payout I'm aiming for. Many people use the so-called 4% rule, which assumes investors draws 4% a year from a pot without running it down too fast. That would mean needing a hefty £266,400 to hit my income target. That's quite a chunk of change. But I think it's possible to bring that number down a fair bit, depending on the stocks I pick and the yields they offer. One of my favourite second income stocks is FTSE 100 wealth manager M&G (LSE: MNG). A year ago, it was yielding close to 10%. That's since dipped to around 7.9% as the shares have enjoyed a strong run. They've climbed 25% over 12 months, and 60% over five years. Not bad for a stock many wrote off as purely an income play. Possibly including me. M&G isn't without risk. Markets remain shaky, and the long shift to passive investing is still a threat to its active management model. With interest rates staying higher for longer, income seekers may find cash and bonds more tempting than equity income stocks, where capital is at risk. The dividend is set for modest growth, with the board targeting 2% annual increases. But there's still potential. On 30 May, M&G revealed that Japan's Dai-ichi Life will be taking a 15% stake, bringing an estimated $6bn of new investment into its funds over the next five years. That has given sentiment a lift. I suspect share price growth may slow after its strong run, but I think M&G is still worth considering with a long-term view. Even so, I wouldn't pile everything into a single income stock, no matter how juicy the yield. Instead, I'd spread my money around and aim for a more realistic average yield of 5.5%. With a 5.5% yield, I'd need around £193,745 in my ISA to generate £10,656 of annual income and hit that £888 monthly goal. That assumes I live off the dividends, and leave the capital untouched to keep growing over time. That's almost £195,000 which sounds like a lot, and it is. But over a 40-year working life, I think it's achievable. For example, investing just £75 a month at an average growth rate of 7% – roughly in line with the long-term FTSE 100 average – could do the trick. Naturally, there are risks. Stock markets can go down as well as up. Inflation will nibble away at the buying power of that £888. So I'd encourage anyone with long-term ambitions to save more if they can. But this shows that with patience, consistency and a little know-how, building a decent ISA income pot is far from impossible. I'd say income investors might consider buying high-yield stocks where the fundamentals still stack up, while diversifying to help smooth out the ride. The post See how much an investor needs in an ISA to fund an £888 monthly passive income appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Harvey Jones has positions in M&g Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended M&g Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nike's Brand is Strong, But Pressures Are Mounting
Few would dispute that Nike (NYSE:NKE) remains one of the most iconic brands in athletic fashion, with a track record of defining culture, bringing impressive levels of innovation, and delivering at scale globally. However, 2025 is proving to be a challenging year for many of the world's largest retailers, with mounting pressures from geopolitical tensions, rising threats to supply chains, and uncertain trading conditions. I see shares in the company trading close to fair value, so while Nike is likely going nowhere any time soon, the catalysts that have made it investible over the last few decades are not really working for now. One of the most instantly recognisable brands in the world, Nike has been designing, marketing and selling athletic footwear, clothing, and equipment since 1964. It generally operates across direct to consumer sales channels, delivering just over $50 billion in revenue in FY24. Net margins during this period were a solid 9%, well above the median average of peers at 5%. However, there will be concerns that this growth appears to be faltering, with the share price down over 35% in a year, forward revenues expected to drop by 4%, and EPS sliding 16%. Following the events of the pandemic, a shift towards direct to consumer business was meant to deliver premium margins and a closer relationship with customers. Although there were signs in previous quarters that this was developing, the wider economic landscape globally has taken a significant toll on the balance sheet. Rising costs in logistics, weakening demand, and discounting from competitors have all hit margins more than management would have liked to see. With so much of the company's logistics network in China, Vietnam and Indonesia, the recent tariff tensions have put enormous stress on the profitability analysts are expecting over the coming years, with some suggesting that as much as [url="]95[/url]% of profits could be at risk in the worst case scenario. Of course, Nike is not the only company dealing with this landscape, but with newer brands amassing loyal followings from social media and more dynamic brand campaigns, firms such as Lululemon are seeing surges in key markets, such as women-led athleisure. Nike is clearly making moves to correct this, with a partnership with [url="]Skims[/url] likely to roll out in 2026, but it suggests that the firm is perhaps on the backfoot with these emerging trends. That said, there is enormous strength in the Nike brand, with a track record of cash-generation, innovative campaigns, and huge deals with athletes such as LeBron James and Kylian Mbappe. From an investor perspective, the 2.7% dividend yield adds a decent level of appeal alongside a strong balance sheet, especially in a period of market transition where some of these newcomers appear to be losing share even faster than some of the more established players. From my perspective, the real weakness comes from relatively weak momentum and a rather expensive valuation. With a forward P/E sitting at about 31x, EV/EBITDA at 16x and P/S at about 2x, the company's key metrics are at a decent premium despite not necessarily having the growth to justify them. Following the latest Q4 earnings report, which indicated that inventory clearance is underway, many analysts have slashed expectations, with management forecasting revenue decline of between 8-10%. Digging into the valuation, I've developed a discounted cash flow (DCF) model based on the following inputs: Terminal growth: 2.5% based on industry, WACC: 8% based on industry and peers, Revenue CAGR 5Y: 2%, EBIT Margin: approx. 11%. With these assumptions applied, a fair value of shares comes to about $52 per share. This can be closer to $62 in a more optimistic scenario where top line growth exceeds 5%, and with 13-14% margins, but even in this case, I'd not expect to see much more than 10% returns for investors in the across the market to peers with slightly more appealing valuations, such as Adidas with P/E of 15x, I feel that it is hard to get excited about this premium as a new investor. Of course, there are plenty of reasons to justify both perspectives, and the divided ratings from Wall Street reflect this well. With 63% of analysts now appearing to be behind Buy or Strong Buy ratings, and 35% holding neutral ratings, I appear to be in the relative minority on the bearish side of the spectrum. Recent upgrades in the Nike coverage from analysts match this, with about 23 upward revisions for EPS guidance, and just 4 downgrades, suggesting that cost control and potential products reflect opportunities looking ahead. That said, top-line expectations for revenue forecasts have been much more negative. From my perspective, I have my eye on the next earnings report on June 27th. Investors will be keen to understand the latest inventory levels and strategy for approaching markdowns going forward, but mostly will look to the trend in gross margins. I'd also want to see some more promising performance, particularly in the critical Chinese market, and hear some progress towards new innovations which will keep investors on-side. Investors will likely want to hear exactly where margin targets are landing for management, and the response being taken to fierce competition across multiple sectors. By no means is the investor thesis for Nike broken, but I fear that it is nowhere near as strong as the valuation may justify. It is still an elite brand across multiple markets, with strong profitability and operational discipline during a volatile period. However, I feel that it is far from an automatic pick for investors at present, with growth looking uncertain, and a valuation which leaves little room for error. Investors may be rewarded for patience at this stage, especially if innovation and cost control works out in a negative market backdrop, but I suspect there may be safer opportunities elsewhere. Until management are able to present tangible evidence that revenue is accelerating, and that the brand is moving ahead of leaner competitors, I'll be keeping my distance. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Flights to and from Dubai cancelled after US air strikes on Iran
Flights to Dubai and Doha have been cancelled following the US strikes on Iran. The decision comes after Donald Trump ordered US air strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites. Though not actively involved, the UK Government was briefed before the strikes which saw B-2 stealth bombers and submarine-launched missiles in use. In efforts to calm tensions, the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary David Lammy had attempted to dissuade the US from aligning with Israel's strikes on Iran, advocating for a move towards de-escalation and diplomatic talks. Nevertheless, President Trump proceeded with the strikes, asserting they had completely destroyed pivotal nuclear facilities. In a Pentagon press briefing today it was announced that 14 bunker-busting bombs were dropped across two of the sites. READ MORE: Road closed as five people rushed to hospital after crash READ MORE: I won't divorce my Egyptian toyboy husband but I wish I'd never met him Before the strikes took place, British Airways (BA) flight from London Gatwick to Dubai was diverted to Zurich Saturday night. The BA109 flight departed from the UK at 9.53pm on Saturday and reached Saudi Arabia before the Boeing 787 Dreamliner changed its course, landing in Switzerland, according to flight-tracking website Flightradar24. All of the airline's flights to Dubai and Doha that were scheduled to depart from Heathrow on Sunday have been cancelled, including return flights, the company said. Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. The US struck three nuclear sites in Iran overnight prompting Tehran to launch a retaliatory ballistic missile barrage against Israel. In a statement, British Airways said: 'As a result of recent events, we have adjusted our flight schedule to ensure the safety of our customers and crew, which is always our top priority. 'We are contacting our customers to advise them of their options while we work through this developing situation.' BA is offering a flexible booking policy for customers already booked onto flights to Dubai and Doha between Sunday and Tuesday who wish to change their dates of travel. According to Gatwick's website, flights to and from the airport to Doha and Dubai are continuing as scheduled. For the latest news and breaking news visit Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. Join the Liverpool ECHO Breaking News and Top Stories WhatsApp community to receive the latest news straight to your phone by clicking here.
