How is council tax calculated and how much could it go up?
The government expects council tax in England to rise by the maximum amount every year until 2029, according to a leading economic think tank.
The IFS says a "big chunk" of the funding for local authorities which was set out in the government's Spending Review assumes bills will rise by just under 5% in April 2026, 2027 and 2028.
Most councils in England put council tax up by the maximum amount in April 2025, and average bills also rose in Wales and Scotland.
Council tax is a compulsory charge on properties in England, Scotland and Wales.
It is set by local authorities to raise money for providing services to residents, including:
rubbish collection
street lighting
libraries
police and fire services
youth clubs
parks and recreation facilities
care services
Typically, anyone who is over 18 and owns or rents a home has to pay council tax.
However, there are some exemptions and discounts.
Someone living alone, for example, is entitled to a 25% reduction, and properties occupied only by students are completely exempt.
Some discounts are available if you - or someone you live with - has a disability.
Northern Ireland uses a domestic rates system instead of council tax.
Councils with responsibility for social care can increase bills every year by 4.99% without having to hold a referendum or get approval from central government.
Smaller councils without social care duties can increase bills by up to 2.99%.
Documents about police funding released as part of the government's Spending Review assume councils in England will put bills up by the maximum amount every year during the period covered by the calculations.
IFS director Paul Johnson said that this would mean bills were set to rise "at their fastest rate over any Parliament since 2001-05".
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said there had been no change to the cap rules, which were introduced by the previous Conservative government.
"It is a cap, councils don't have to increase council tax by 5%," she told BBC Breakfast.
But the Local Government Association said council budgets were under "severe financial pressure", and services may have to be cut even if bills do rise by the maximum.
Council tax expected to rise by 5% a year
Seven ways the Spending Review will affect you
Of the 384 councils in England subject to the referendum rules, 294 (77%) put bills up by the maximum amount.
Another 56 (15%) were close to the limit. Eight authorities (2%) either made no change or reduced bills.
The government let six areas introduce bigger rises to help deal with funding pressures.
Bradford Council increased bills by 10% while they rose by 9% in Windsor and Maidenhead, and in Newham.
Birmingham, Somerset and Trafford put bills up by 7.5%.
A number of other councils were not allowed to put up bills by more than the standard maximum, including Hampshire, which had asked for a 15% uplift.
It means the average Band D council tax bill in England for 2025-26 is £2,280, which is an increase of £109 or 5% on the 2024-25 figure of £2,171.
Council tax rates in Scotland had been frozen or had limited increases since 2007, but went up in April. Bills rose by an average of 9.6% in April, with increases of at least 10% in 13 areas.
It means the average Band D council tax bill in Scotland for 2025-26 is £1,543, up from £1,418 in 2024-25.
The country's 32 councils had warned that they faced a potential shortfall of £392m in 2025-26, which could rise to £780m the following year.
The Scottish government said it was giving councils an extra £1bn in 2025-26 to help limit increases.
Why are Scottish councils so short of cash when tax is going up?
Council tax rates in Wales increased by an average of 7.2% in April.
It means the average Band D council tax bill in Wales for 2025-26 is £2,170, up from £2,024 in 2025-25.
Wales' 22 local authorities had been given £253m in December to help reduce increases, but council leaders said more was needed.
How much you pay depends on your property's council tax band. Broadly speaking, the more expensive the property, the higher the band.
In England and Scotland, bands are based on the price the property would have sold for in 1991. Wales uses 2003 prices and Northern Ireland 2005 prices.
You can check your home's band in:
England and Wales
Scotland
Northern Ireland
Council tax bills also include additional charges.
These are used to fund the cost of care homes and other adult social care services. Another is set by local police and fire authorities to help fund their work.
Some cities with mayors, such as London and Manchester, can also add a separate charges for other services.
About half of local authority funding comes from council tax, according to the Institute for Government (IFG).
Councils in England can also raise money by charging for services including parking, swimming pools and planning applications.
Most of the rest comes from a combination of business rates and central government grants.
Labour had promised £2bn of central government funding for English councils in the year from April 2025, an extra £700m on top of the £1.3bn announced in October's Budget.
But £515m of that was earmarked to pay for higher National Insurance (NI) contributions from April.
The local government settlement in the Spending Review provides an additional £3.3bn for local authorities in 2028-29 compared with 2023-24.
The Spending Review also revealed revealed the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government would see a 1.4% cut in its day-to-day budget.
But the government said councils' "core spending power" would still go up, if they increased council tax by the maximum amount.
Separately the government is consulting on directing more money to deprived councils in England from 2026.
Councils cannot technically go bankrupt, but if they cannot balance their budget for the financial year, they can issue what is called a section 114 notice.
This means they cannot commit to most new spending, and residents could see reduced services, such as fewer bin collections or cuts to libraries.
Before 2018, only two councils had issued a section 114. Twelve have been issued since.
Birmingham City Council went bust in 2023, with a £760m black hole. It followed Woking Council, Thurrock and Croydon (for the third time).
A number of local authorities in England have not issued section 114 notices but are receiving so-called "exceptional financial support", to help manage their budgets.
Middlesbrough Council was one of 19 authorities allowed to borrow money to fund day-to-day spending in 2024-25.
Why do councils go bust and what happens when they do?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer Faces Brewing Rebellion Over £5 Billion Benefit Cut
(Bloomberg) -- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is less than 10 days away from the biggest parliamentary challenge to his authority in his not-yet year-long tenure. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown Unpopular cuts to disability benefits unveiled earlier this year as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' efforts to balance the country's books are due before the House of Commons for their first vote on July 1, with a large-scale rebellion brewing on the Labour back benches. So far, at least 150 of the governing party's Members of Parliament have indicated concerns about the cuts in two letters to the government. Other non-signatories have told Bloomberg they also intend to vote against the bill. While Starmer's attention this week was centered on the escalating tensions in the Middle East, the domestic threat was laid bare on Thursday when Vicky Foxcroft, a government whip who would have been tasked with helping quell the revolt, quit, citing her own objections. The rebellion threatens to bruise Starmer's and Reeves' credibility and further damage their stock with the left of their party. In order to avoid falling to what would be an unprecedented defeat for a government enjoying such a large majority so early in its tenure, ministers could at worst be forced into major concessions that reduce the bill's expected cost savings, forcing the Treasury to conjure up money from other cuts or tax rises at the budget in the fall. 'It's a test of Starmer's authority and the way he and Rachel Reeves are running the economy,' Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary University London, said in a phone interview. 'If the rebellion is too big, you start to run into questions about the loyalty of your backbenchers and even perhaps the future of your leadership.' The welfare reforms allowed Reeves to save about £5 billion ($6.5 billion) a year by 2030 by making it harder for disabled people to claim a benefit called the personal independence payment, or PIP. The chancellor factored them into a spring statement as part of spending cuts designed to help meet her self-imposed fiscal rules. Reeves says the changes are necessary because an extra thousand people a day have been signing on for PIP, creating an 'unsustainable' impact on the public finances. PIP payments had been projected to almost double to £41 billion by the end of the decade, within overall spending on disability and incapacity benefits that the Office for Budget Responsibility — the government's fiscal watchdog — sees rising to £100 billion from £65 billion last year. The government has also says there is a moral case for supporting people back into work. But Labour lawmakers are concerned the government announced changes in a rush to deliver savings, without thinking through the impact on vulnerable people. 'There are alternative and more compassionate ways to balance the books, rather than on the backs of disabled people,' one Labour backbencher, Debbie Abrahams, told the House of Commons. There are particular concerns about a new requirement for claimants to score four or above in one of the daily living components of the PIP assessment, meaning people who can't wash half their body or cook a meal will be denied the payments if they have no other impairments. One Labour MP describing the process as letting the OBR tail wag the government dog. Some 45 Labour MPs signed a public letter objecting to the measures, while another letter — arranged in secrecy so that even signatories couldn't see who they were joining — garnered 105 signatures and was sent to the chief whip. While some of the would-be rebels have indicated they could be swayed by the government whips, one of them told Bloomberg they are confident that more than 80 MPs will commit to voting against the government. Given Starmer's working majority is 165, if all opposition parties vote against the bill, it would take 83 Labour rebels to defeat the government. The main opposition Conservative Party is planning to vote against the changes, Danny Kruger, one of the party's work and pensions spokespeople, told parliament in May. Its reasons are different: the Tories argue the measures don't go far enough. One Labour MP told Bloomberg that concerned lawmakers plan to put forward a procedural challenge to the bill. While they don't expect the speaker to select that amendment for debate, the aim is to force further changes from the government, and organize would-be Labour rebels into a coherent group which could eventually vote down the bill. Many in Labour had been waiting to see the bill before making up their minds. When the text was published on Wednesday, the concessions to their concerns were minimal, largely amounting to a 13-week transition period for those losing their PIP. Foxcroft — the whip who had previously served for four years as Starmer's shadow disability minister in opposition — quit within hours of the publication, saying she didn't believe cutting the disability benefits should be part of the solution to tackling ballooning welfare costs. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said Friday that Foxcroft's resignation wasn't a sign of a major rebellion, while conceding that 'of course' there are dissenting voices on such a big reform. 'Vicky is the only front-bencher that I've had a conversation with about resigning,' she said. Nevertheless, many so-called 'red wall' Labour MPs in northern and central England face a tough decision. Health Equity North, a public health institute, found that all the places most affected financially by the PIP reforms are Labour constituencies in northern England. In several areas, the number of people affected by the welfare changes exceeds the Labour majority, meaning those MPs could see a crucial drop in support. The government is gearing up for a fight, indicating it will make no further concessions. On Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner failed to rule out stripping the whip from Labour rebels, while government enforcers are warning MPs that their political career prospects will be ruined if they oppose the bill. Whips and wannabe rebels alike expect the potential revolt to be whittled down as July 1 approaches. Some opponents are weighing whether to abstain at the second reading and wait until the third reading to take a more decisive vote, as whips are encouraging them to do. 'I'd be amazed if he were defeated here,' Anand Menon, director of the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, said. 'If the whips got a whiff they were going to get defeated, they'd give some concessions. The worst of all outcomes is to lose this.' Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
10 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Why Taxing the UK's Rich Less May Make Sense
The Laffer Curve does exist. You may not want it to, but it does. The UK's political class is in the process of learning this lesson. One of the first things Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves did was to make the global assets of those living in the UK but domiciled elsewhere for tax purposes (the 'non-doms') subject to UK inheritance tax. Those people have responded to that incentive exactly as one might expect. They are leaving. Exact numbers aren't available, but many financial advisers will tell you of their fast-vanishing high-net worth clients—heading for the United Arab Emirates, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Malta and maybe even the US (there are some 70,000 applications for information on the new ' gold Trump card ' visa, apparently). Henley and Partners, a global relocation company, backs this up. It reports that inquiries on how to become a resident elsewhere were three times higher in the first three months of 2025 than the same period in 2024.
Bloomberg
11 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Faces Brewing Rebellion Over £5 Billion Benefit Cut
By , Lucy White, and Joe Mayes Save UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is less than 10 days away from the biggest parliamentary challenge to his authority in his not-yet year-long tenure. Unpopular cuts to disability benefits unveiled earlier this year as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' efforts to balance the country's books are due before the House of Commons for their first vote on July 1, with a large-scale rebellion brewing on the Labour back benches.
