Explained: Why holding mutual fund units in demat form makes sense

We live in an age where everything is becoming digital — faster, smarter, and more transparent. The financial sector has been relentlessly trying to innovate to make transactions seamless and investment journeys more efficient.
Those who've witnessed the open outcry system of stock exchanges will gladly recall how the shift to online trading and the dematerialization of securities marked a defining leap. What once took days and physical paperwork, now takes just minutes — with a few clicks on a screen. And now, we are witnessing the logical evolution in this journey:
Mutual Funds
in
demat
form.
Over a decade and a half ago, the Securities and Exchange Board of India ('SEBI') enabled investors to hold Mutual Fund investments — earlier available only as Statement of Account ('SOA') — in demat form through the stock exchange infrastructure.
Best MF to invest
Looking for the best mutual funds to invest? Here are our recommendations.
View
Details
»
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Help abandoned elders today
HelpAge India
Donate Now
Undo
Since then, the depository ecosystem has continually evolved, enabling investors to manage their Mutual Fund holdings with ease. Today, you can convert your Mutual Fund SOA into demat form through your existing account — without the need to open a separate one. This facility is available to the Non-Resident Indians too, offering a unified experience for all investors.
Each mutual fund scheme is assigned a unique ISIN, simplifying tracking and portfolio consolidation. Investors can subscribe to fresh units,
Systematic Investment Plans
, Equity Linked Savings Schemes, and/or New Fund Offers directly through their stockbroker and the units are credited straight into their demat account. Redemption is equally effortless—through your Depository Participants, broker, or electronically via
NSDL
's SPEED-e services.
Live Events
Holding Mutual Fund units in demat form offers several advantages: a single consolidated portfolio view, automatic updates across all holdings, the ability to pledge for margin or loans, simple off-market transfers for gifting, and unified nomination—all within one digital framework.
In a nutshell, this evolution aims to bring greater control, efficiency, and transparency to your mutual fund investments. While investors should factor in demat maintenance charges and brokerage fees.
At NSDL, we remain committed to trying to enhance investor experience by building digital infrastructure that aims to support financial inclusion and
investor empowerment
. We believe holding mutual funds in demat form is not just a technical upgrade—it is the foundation of a more connected, secure, and simplified future of investing.
So, start your
investment journey
by holding mutual fund units in your demat account.
(The author Vijay Chandok is Managing Director and CEO, NSDL. Views are own)
(
Disclaimer
: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

22 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Sebi bans two from markets for 3 yrs; impounds illegal gains of ₹4.83 cr

Markets regulator Sebi has barred two individuals from the securities markets for three years and impounded illegal gains of over Rs 4.83 crore made by them for orchestrating a fraudulent scheme using out of the money (OTM) stock options to misappropriate funds from investors. Apart from the securities market ban, the regulator also slapped a penalty of Rs 25 lakh each on Shivprasad Pattiya and Alkesh Narware and directed them them to pay the fine within 45 days, Sebi said in the order passed on Friday. Further, Sebi directed Pattiya and Narware to disgorge unlawful gains worth Rs 4.83 crore with an interest of 12 per cent per annum jointly and severally from February 2022. In the final order, Sebi found that the front entities had opened the trading accounts under the instructions of the operator group (Shivprasad Pattiya and Alkesh Narware) and these trading accounts and bank accounts were under the control of the operator group. Sebi observed that the caller group had identified prospective investors (complainants) which had credit balance in their ledger and obtained their credentials in the name of Algo/software trades and the same were also under the control of the Shivprasad Pattiya and Alkesh Narware. The trades executed through the mobile in the accounts of the complainants and the front entities were also under the control of the Pattiya and Narware, Sebi said. "...it is established that the entire fraudulent scheme is attributable solely and squarely to the noticees (operator group) and they were the controlling minds and beneficiaries of the fraudulent arrangement. "The acts of the noticee amounts to manipulative, deceptive device and artifice to defraud while dealing in securities," Sebi's Quasi Judicial Authority N Murugan said in the order. Pattiya and Narware were found to have violated the provisions of PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) rules. The order came after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) received alerts on suspicious trades in illiquid 'Out of the Money' stock options with unusual price variations. NSE also got complaints from investors who suffered losses after sharing trading credentials for Algo-based trading via WhatsApp groups. Thereafter, Sebi conducted a probe to look into the role of a group of entities led Shivprasad Pattiya and Alkesh Narware allegedly misused online trading kits, promised guaranteed returns, and executed manipulative trades. The investigation covered the period from January 2021 to February 2022.

Time of India

31 minutes ago

• Time of India

World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency

The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap , he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.

Time of India

32 minutes ago

• Time of India

'Have supplies of several weeks': Puri assures fuel stability amid US-Iran strikes; India leans on Russian Crude

NEW DELHI: As military conflict escalates between Israel and Iran, Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri on Sunday assured citizens that India's fuel supplies remain secure despite growing volatility in the Middle East. 'We have diversified our supplies in the past few years, and a large volume of our energy no longer passes through the Strait of Hormuz,' Puri posted on X, adding that Oil Marketing Companies have 'supplies for several weeks' and continue to receive fuel from multiple routes. His comments come as India dramatically increased Russian oil imports in June, buying more crude from Moscow than from all Middle Eastern suppliers combined. According to preliminary data from Kpler, Indian refiners are set to import 2 to 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) from Russia, up from 1.96 million bpd in May. In comparison, total imports from traditional Gulf partners like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait are projected to be slightly lower at around 2 million bpd. US strikes add to region's instability The latest geopolitical instability stems from a direct US military intervention in Iran. Yesterday, American forces bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel's June 13 attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Tehran has responded with strong warnings, including threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global chokepoint through which 40% of India's oil and 50% of its gas transits. Analysts believe a full closure is unlikely. 'Iran would risk hurting allies like China and Gulf neighbours, as well as provoke military retaliation,' said Sumit Ritolia of Kpler. 'At most, isolated disruptions could occur for 24–48 hours.' India's energy strategy pivots India's import strategy has shifted significantly since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Russian oil now makes up about 40-44% of India's crude basket, compared to under 1% before the war. US oil imports have also jumped, from 280,000 bpd in May to 439,000 bpd in June. Ritolia says India is now better prepared for supply shocks. 'Russian barrels come via routes detached from Hormuz. India is also sourcing more from the US, West Africa, and Latin America,' he noted. In the event of disruption, India may dip into its strategic reserves, which can cover around 9–10 days of imports. For now, Puri reiterated the government's commitment: 'We will take all necessary steps to ensure the stability of fuel supplies for our citizens.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now