Former DWP employee warns of two-tier State Pension payments for older people
Sandra Wrench worked at the DWP for 42 years and warns of a widening gap between the New and Basic State Pensions.
Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible?
The latest figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show there are now 13 million people of State Pension age across Great Britain, including 1.1m in Scotland. Of that total, 34 per cent are in receipt of the New State Pension while 66 per cent receive the Basic/Old State Pension.
Under the Triple Lock guarantee, the New and Basic State Pensions increase each year in-line with whichever is the highest between the average annual earnings growth from May to July, Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate in the year to September, or 2.5 per cent.
However, additional elements of the State Pension, including deferred amounts, rise by the September CPI rate, something a former DWP employee warns is creating a 'two-tier uprating system for pensioners'.
Sandra Wrench has 42 years experience in dealing with State Pensions and benefits delivered by the DWP and previously wrote to DWP Ministers in 2023 expressing her concerns.
Mrs Wrench told the Daily Record how some pensioners may not be aware that this year's Triple Lock uprating of 4.1 per cent only applies to the New and Basic State Pension payment rates; additional components h
The ex-DWP employee said: 'The Triple Lock guarantee only covers the BASIC State Pension and not all components, the other components being Additional Pension (the scheme which existed between 1978-April 5, 2016 and which you could contract out of), Graduated Pension (1961-1975), increments for deferring your State Pension, and the protected pension which is any amount in excess of the 100 per cent rate of the new 100 per cent State Pension which you might be entitled to at April 6, 2016.
'With the calculation of the New State Pension at April 6, 2016, in most cases, all the components of the old State Pension have been added together to give a basic State Pension, and where applicable a protected pension, which is the excess above the 100 per cent rate of the New State Pension.
'So by adding all the components together this has brought components such as additional pension, within the scope of the Triple Lock, which was 4.1 per cent. Under the old scheme, additional pension would have just been increased by the CPI rate of 1.7 per cent.'
Mrs Wrench warned: 'With The Triple Lock relating to the basic rates of the State Pension only, this has created a two-tier uprating system for those who reached State Pension Age before April 2016 where the 100 per cent rate of the Old/Basic State Pension is currently £176.45 a week and those who reached retirement age after April 2016 where the 100 per cent rate of the New State Pension is higher at £230.25.'
She shared an example to help illustrate the difference:
A person who was State Pension Age before April 2016, has a weekly amount of State Pension as £240.00, consisting of 100 per cent Old/Basic State Pension of £176.45, additional pension of £59.75 and graduated pension of £3.80.
Compare this with a person who reached State Pension Age after April 2016, who also has a weekly pension of £240.00, but this consists of 100 per cent New State Pension of £230.25 and a protected payment of £9.75.
In April 2026, the person who reached State Pension Age before April 2016, will only have £176.45 increased by the Triple Lock, compared with a person who reached State Pension Age after April 2016, who will have a higher amount of £230.25 increased by the Triple Lock.
Mrs Wrench continued: 'You can see how a person who reached State Pension Age before April 2016 has a lower percentage of their State Pension uprated by the Triple Lock compared with those who reached State Pension Age after April 2016.
'Because of this difference in basic pension and the Triple lock only relating to the basic rate of the State Pension, this will inevitably lead to those who reached State Pension Age before April 2016 falling further behind with every annual uprating.'
The insider explained that when the Triple Lock was introduced in 2011, there was only one State Pension system (Old/Basic), but the introduction of the New State Pension in April 2016, calls into question whether it should also be uprated under the Triple Lock.
However, she warns that any future adjustment to the Triple Lock 'will particularly affect poorer pensioners, such as those who do not have other sources of income, those who are disabled and not able to work full time, and women with caring responsibilities who have had to work part time and who may not have had the opportunity to build up any private or work pension'.
Mrs Wrench added: 'The DWP have confirmed they cannot means-test the State Pension, so possibly the only way that the increased costs for State Pension can be addressed is through some adjustment to the Triple Lock, and to reassess the annual uprating of the State Pension.
Mrs Wrench shared two examples to help highlight the uprating impact:
From April 6, 2016, a woman, who is State Pension Age after April 2016. has a Basic State Pension of £63.63, and Additional Pension of £24.82. These two components were added together on April 6, 2016 to give her a starting amount of £88.45 for the New State Pension, and this £88.45 is now all Basic State Pension under the new scheme.
If you were State Pension Age before April 2016, under the old scheme the basic State Pension of £63.63 would have increased by the Triple Lock, and the additional pension of £24.82 increased by the lower CPI rate , but by adding the two together for the New State Pension from April 6, 2016, this means that all this amount is basic state Pension and increases by the Triple Lock. So those who are State Pension Age after April 2016 are at an advantage compared to those who reached retirement age before April 2016, as regards the Triple Lock increase.
A person who reached State Pension Age after April 6, 2016 has the full 100 per cent rate of the basic State Pension which was then £119.30 (under the old scheme) and Additional Pension of £75.00.
Basic £119.30 plus AP £75.00 is equal to £194.30 at April 6, 2016, which was converted into the 100 per cent rate of the New State Pension of £155.65 (the 100% rate at April 6, 2016) plus a protected payment of £38.65.
Basic State Pension increases by the Triple Lock, but protected payment increases by CPI rate, so some of the additional pension has been converted into Basic State Pension and brought within the scope of The Triple Lock.
State Pension payments 2025/26
Full New State Pension
Weekly payment: £230.25
Fortnightly payment: £460.50
Four-weekly payment: £921
Annual amount: £11,973
Full Basic State Pension
Weekly payment: £176.45
Fortnightly payment: £352.90
Four-weekly payment: £705.80
Annual amount: £9,175
Future State Pension increases
The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases:
2025/26 - 4.1%, the forecast was 4%
2026/27 - 2.5%
2027/28 - 2.5%
2028/29 - 2.5%
2029/30 - 2.5%
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
New call to cut income tax rate in half for people earning under £50,000
An online petition is also urging the UK Government to increase the Personal Allowance to £15,000. Income tax rises for Scots in April - how the changes affect you A new online petition is calling for the basic rate of tax to be cut from 20 per cent to 10 per cent for all workers earning less than £50,000 per year. Petition creator Holly Millar is also urging the UK Government to increase the Personal Allowance from £12,500 to £15,000. The petition, posted on the Petitions Parliament website, states: 'We believe many are struggling financially. In our view, prices are too high, food and basic necessities cost too much, bills are increasing, people are having to choose between having a warm house or food. 'We believe young people can't afford to live independently as this could due to the current Personal Allowance. We believe the government needs to start thinking about the public and their needs.' The Personal Allowance has been frozen at £12,570 since the start of the 2021/22 financial year, however, earlier this year the UK Government announced it will rise with inflation from April 2028. A recent online petition calling for an increase to £20,000 received 281,792 signatures of support from across the UK and was debated by MPs in Parliament last month. It's also important to be aware there are different tax banding rates in Scotland and England. The Scottish Government now has six tax bands while there are four south of the border. Scottish tax bands 2025/26 Personal Allowance - up to £12,570, 0% Starter rate - £12,571 to £15,397, 19% Basic rate - £14,877 to £27,491, 20% Intermediate rate - £26,562 to £43,662, 21% Higher rate - £43,663 to £75,000, 42% Advanced rate - £75,001 to £125,140, 45% Top rate - over £125,140, 48% Tax thresholds in England and Wales 2025/26 Personal Allowance - up to £12,570, 0% Basic Rate - £12,571 to £50,270, 20% Higher Rate - £50,271 to £125,140, 40% Additional Rate - over £125,140, 45% At 10,000 signatures of support the petition will be entitled to a written response from the UK Government. At 100,000 it would be considered by the Petitions Committee for debate in Parliament. National Insurance deductions A separate online petition is calling on the UK Government to scrap National Insurance contribution deductions for workers over the age of 60. People automatically stop seeing NICs deducted from payslips when they reach State Pension age, which is currently 66, but set to rise to 67 over 2026 and 2028. However, petition creator Mike Haynes argues making workers over 60 exempt from paying National Insurance would 'make it easier financially for older people to survive'. He added: 'We are calling for this as many over-60s are struggling to survive due to what we believe has been incompetent government spending over the past 30 years.' The 'exempt workers over 60 from National Insurance payments' petition has been posted on the UK Government's Petitions Parliament website. At 10,000 signatures of support, it would be entitled to a written response from the UK Government, most-likely The Treasury. At 100,000 signatures, it would be considered by the Petitions Committee for debate in Parliament - you can read it in full here.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Councillors propose limit on Airbnb-style holiday lets in Scottish Highlands
Holiday lets would not be banned completely, but extra restrictions would be introduced. A control zone across the entire Highland region to limit Airbnb-style lets has been proposed as a way of tackling a shortage of homes in the area. The restrictions, which are already in place in a small part of the region, would not ban holiday lets completely - but would require operators to have planning permission as well as a short-term let licence. Michael Gregson and Duncan Macpherson, the local councillors who put forward the proposal, said the Highlands needed over 24,000 homes over the next 10 years. They added 7,011 short-term let licences had been granted across the region, but only four refused. They said the powers could be implemented where local demand called for them, reports the BBC. In a paper going out to next week's meeting of the full Highland Council, they said: "The private long-term rental market has shrunk disastrously: estate agents are withdrawing from letting out properties because of the shortage of properties available. "Even taking into account the efforts of Highland Council and the housing associations, there is a shortage of affordable housing." Council officials have said implementing the control status across the entire area would first require research, and could mean increased costs and workload for its planning department. The councillors explained the local authority should first ask the Scottish Government to revisit its original plan to have a policy for over-provision within short-term lets legislation. If this was not possible, they said approval for Highland control area status should be sought. Officials said in response both suggestions brought financial implications for the council, as well as potential challenges in extending the controls to the whole region. Highland Council's first control zone was approved in December 2023 and covers the areas of Badenoch and Strathspey. Councillors who supported it being implemented said it was needed because workers and local young people were having difficulties in finding affordable homes. However, the Association of Scotland's Self-Caterers (ASSC) said at the time targeting legitimate small businesses to address longstanding housing issues showed "a muddled sense of priorities". Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A law requiring operators to have a licence was enforced across Scotland in October 2023. However, the introduction of control policies in other areas has also not been without its challenges. The City of Edinburgh Council previously had to amend its licensing scheme following a court ruling. The entire local authority area was designated as Scotland's first short-term let control area in September 2022. However, the following August, parts of the policy were deemed to be unlawful. This applied in particular to presumptions against allowing whole tenement flats being used for short-term lets, unless their owners could prove exemption. Opponents accused the council of attempting to "shut down the sector". Another change to the policy came in February this year, when costs of "home sharing" were reduced and some requirements, such as legionella testing, for homes rented with a temporary exemption to the scheme were scrapped. It was hoped this would help to ease the accommodation crisis during the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, which continues to affect visiting performers and audiences. This May, councillors in Perth and Kinross voted to begin creating Scotland's third control area, despite previously rejecting the move.
Daily Record
3 hours ago
- Daily Record
State Pension age compensation scheme for millions of WASPI women to be debated next week
An estimated 3.6 million women were financially impacted by the increase to the State Pension age. The Chair of the Backbench Business Committee has announced there will be a parliamentary debate on a motion over 'financial redress for 1950s women impacted by the Department for Work and Pensions' (DWP) maladministration of the State Pension ' next week. Bob Blackman confirmed the debate will take place on Thursday, July 3 during the weekly 'Business of the House' session in the Commons last week. The debate will be of keen interest to the WASPI women (Women Against State Pension Inequality) campaign who announced on Monday they have secured a vital legal safeguard in their bid for a compensation scheme for an estimated 3.6 million women after the High Court approved a limit on the campaign's liability for DWP defence costs. WASPI is seeking a judicial review to force the UK Government to reconsider its decision to rule out a compensation package for women affected by the way changes to the State Pension age were communicated. The DWP has agreed to a costs capping order, protecting each side in the event they lose. The agreement limits WASPI's liability for UK Government legal costs to £60,000, and caps the UK Government's liability for WASPI's legal costs at £90,000. WASPI has welcomed the breakthrough as a 'major milestone' in their fight to secure a lawful Government response to the Ombudsman's compensation proposals for 1950s-born women. However, campaigners stress the order does not reduce the actual legal costs of the case, which will be much higher. Earlier this month, Mr Justice Swift, a senior High Court judge ruled that the case is 'arguable' and 'ought to be considered at a final hearing', meaning ministers could be ordered to re-think their position on compensation if WASPI wins the argument in court. But arguing the case involves submitting thousands of pages of evidence, and winning key legal arguments on a complex body of case law. The campaign continues to ask supporters to contribute to its legal fighting fund as preparations begin for a full hearing later this year - they must raise enough to cover not only the capped UK Government costs, but those of the legal team fighting the case. The judicial review will examine the Government's rejection of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's (PHSO) recommendations for compensation, ranging between £1,000 and £2,950, despite ministers' acceptance that maladministration had occurred. In December 2024, the UK Government said that, while it accepted the Ombudsman's finding of maladministration and apologised for there being a delay in writing to 1950s-born women, a blanket compensation scheme, which could cost taxpayers up to £10.5 billion, cannot be justified. Angela Madden, Chair of Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI), said: 'This agreement - fully approved by the court - is a vital step forward in our legal campaign. 'We now have the certainty we need to press on, but the costs of fighting this case remain very real. Our expert legal team is showing they can and do win victories against the government but it takes time and forensic presentation of our evidence, and that costs money. 'This is the fight of our lives and we can't win it without public support.' Earlier this month, WASPI launched a new interactive tool which shows the UK-wide state of play of MP support for a compensation scheme for women affected by changes to their retirement age. The new analysis shows 179 MPs have publicly blasted the UK Government's decision not to compensate WASPI women in recent months. WASPI said that of these, 56 Labour MPs have openly criticised Downing Street's failure to deliver justice, while dozens more are thought to be supportive behind the scenes, including several senior ministers. The map shows how smaller parties are almost unanimous in their support, with a strong coalition of Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru and DUP MPs backing calls to compensate WASPI women. The smaller parties are almost unanimous in their support, with a strong coalition of Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru and DUP MPs backing calls to compensate WASPI women. Around a dozen Conservative MPs have also recently reaffirmed their support for compensation. The findings come at the launch of WASPI's new website, which has new resources to enable supporters to write to their MP and join the campaign for as little as £15 per year. Some of the strongest advocates for WASPI women include members of the State Pension Inequality for Women APPG, chaired by Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey. The cross-party group of MPs is one of the largest in Parliament and includes representatives from across the major political parties who have vowed to continue the fight for justice. However, WASPI campaigners say 134 MPs previously backed calls for compensation but have failed to reaffirm their support since the Labour Government's announcement in December. The figures do not include serving government ministers or whips, at least 80 of whom have previously pledged their support for the campaign. All MPs' positions on compensation can be found on WASPI's interactive 'state of the nation' map, alongside new campaign resources, here.
