Skydiver who jumped to her death ‘split with boyfriend day before'
A skydiver who fell 10,000ft to her death had reportedly split up with her boyfriend shortly before the tragedy.
Jade Damarell, 32, a parachutist who had made more than 400 jumps, died instantly after the fall during a jump in Shotton Colliery, County Durham,last month.
According to the Mail, Ms Damarell, from Caerphilly, south Wales, had broken up with her boyfriend the day before going on the jump. She had undertaken more than 80 jumps this year.
The 32-year-old, a marketing manager, had been in a relationship with skydiver Ben Goodfellow, 26, for about six to eight months.
One friend told the newspaper: 'The two of them were inseparable. They spent all their time together, they didn't really engage with anyone else. They did skydives together all the time.'
Another friend claimed a suicide note referencing the break-up had been found by police, saying: 'I know Jade had broken it off with Ben a few times, but the Saturday was the first time he had called it off with her.
'Chose not to open her parachute'
A third friend of Ms Damarell claimed she 'chose not to open her parachute' during the fatal descent. They said: 'This wasn't a skydiving accident. We believe she intended to take her life, sadly. She skydived with someone else, broke off and turned onto her back and impacted. She chose not to open her parachute, and she landed on her back.'
It was originally assumed Ms Damarell's death on April 27 was an accident, but SkyHigh Skydiving later issued a statement saying that her death was suspected to have been 'a deliberate act'.
A spokesman said: 'It is with great sadness that we confirm a tragic incident involving a valued member of our community. All indications from the police and British Skydiving are that this was a deliberate act.
'This heartbreaking news has deeply affected all who knew her, and our thoughts are with her family and friends as they face this unimaginable loss. At this incredibly difficult time, we ask for privacy and compassion for those grieving.'
Police and emergency services were called to Wreford's Farm in Shotton Colliery, where Ms Damarell landed. She was pronounced dead at the scene. One person was believed to have witnessed the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man suffers life-changing injuries in South Yorkshire M1 crash
A man has suffered life-changing injuries in a crash between two vehicles on the M1 near Barnsley in South Yorkshire. Police said both drivers - a 45-year-old man and a 52-year-old woman - were taken to hospital following the incident, which happened between Junctions 36 and 37 shortly after 13:30 BST on Sunday. A section of the motorway was closed for about four hours while emergency services attended the scene. The woman involved suffered minor injuries, officers added. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour backlash at plan to ban Palestine Action after vandalism of RAF planes - amid outrage at protest in Westminster today
Yvette Cooper is facing a Labour backlash at plans to ban Palestine Action in the wake of RAF planes being vandalised. The Home Secretary is due to update MPs later on proposals to make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group. But Labour politicians have criticised the step as too far - while police have voiced concerns about a protest against the move due in Westminster later. Ms Cooper is acting after Palestine Action posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. The incident is being investigated by counter-terror police. The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Proscription will require Ms Cooper to lay an order in Parliament, which must then be debated and approved by both MPs and peers. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group. Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Former shadow attorney general Baroness Shami Chakrabarti has suggested the definition of terrorism was being set too broadly. She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'They certainly committed acts of criminal trespass and criminal damage, painting planes at Brize Norton and so on, but I think that's not what most people would understand as terrorism, and to proscribe Palestine Action on the information that we have all seen, I think would be a new departure. 'It is one thing to be a threat to property, to be a nuisance, to be prosecuted, and in some cases even imprisoned for those criminal offences, but it's another thing altogether to proscribe a whole group, and that means anybody fairly vaguely associated with it, to ban them (as) terrorists.' However, Lady Chakrabarti stressed she did not have access to secret intelligence on the group. Former justice secretary Lord Charlie Falconer said yesterday that vandalising aircraft at RAF Brize Norton would not alone provide legal justification for proscribing the group. Asked whether the group's actions were commensurate with proscription, Lord Falconer told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton, they may have done other things I didn't know. 'But generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn't justify proscription so there must be something else that I don't know about.' Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf said the Government was 'abusing' anti-terror laws against pro-Palestine activists. In a statement yesterday, Met Police commissioner Mark Rowley condemned the planned protest in Westminster. 'I'm sure many people will be as shocked and frustrated as I am to see a protest taking place tomorrow in support of Palestine Action,' he said. 'This is an organised extremist criminal group, whose proscription as terrorists is being actively considered. 'Members are alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage, assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer and last week claimed responsibility for breaking into an airbase and damaging aircraft. Multiple members of the group are awaiting trial accused of serious offences. 'The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest. 'Thousands of people attend protests of a different character every week without clashing with the law or with the police. The criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, in contrast, represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public rejects. 'We have laid out to Government the operational basis on which to consider proscribing this group. If that happens we will be determined to target those who continue to act in its name and those who show support for it. 'Until then we have no power in law to prevent tomorrow's protest taking place. We do, however, have the power to impose conditions on it to prevent disorder, damage, and serious disruption to the community, including to Parliament, to elected representatives moving around Westminster and to ordinary Londoners. 'Breaches of the law will be dealt with robustly.' A spokesman for Palestine Action previously accused the UK of failing to meet its obligation to prevent or punish genocide. The spokesperson said: 'When our Government fails to uphold their moral and legal obligations, it is the responsibility of ordinary citizens to take direct action. The terrorists are the ones committing a genocide, not those who break the tools used to commit it.'
The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
Britain BANS ‘dangerous' porn trend to help tackle violence against women
THE Government will ban porn that shows strangulation in a bid to tackle violence against women after a shocking rise in men choking their partners during sex. A review found that porn has made choking into a "sexual norm" despite it being "dangerous and degrading". 2 Tory peer Baroness Bertin made the recommendation in a review for the Government. She said men believe that choking their partner is "safe" during sex because it isn't fatal. But there is no safe way to strangle a person. Lady Bertin also recommended that online porn which is violent, harmful and misogynistic should be banned if it is being sold in high street shops. Legal changes will be made as an amendment to the Crime and Policing bill which is going through Parliament right now. This means the ban will likely be in place by the end of the year. The Government's Independent Porn Review reads: "Non-fatal strangulation pornography (commonly known as 'choking' in pornography) should be illegal to possess, distribute, and publish. "Non-fatal strangulation or 'choking' sex is perhaps the starkest example of where online violent pornography has changed 'offline' behaviour. Toxic influencer Andrew Tate blamed for alarming rise in young men choking partners during sex By Julia Atherley TOXIC influencer Andrew Tate and other 'masculinity influencers' are being blamed for an alarming rise in young men choking partners during sex. The trend is most common in those aged 16 to 34 — with 35 per cent of females reporting being throttled during consensual sex, a government-funded study found. Tate often promotes the idea of male dominance and sexual control online. A recent survey by the government-funded charity the Institute For Addressing Strangulation, found that strangling is most common in the 16-34 age group, with 35 per cent responding that they had been choked by a partner during consensual sex. Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) was made a specific offence in 2022, and can lead to a five year prison sentence. In the year up to 2023, around 700 offenders were sentenced for the offence. "Choking sex is now being normalised with a survey showing 38 per cent of women aged 18-39 have been choked during sex. "So-called 'choking' content is rife on platforms that host pornography and is a very popular category of content. "The review has evidence to show the influence that media sources, including pornography, have had in establishing choking as a sexual norm. "People acting it out in their sex lives may face devastating consequences. "Evidence shows that even a small amount of pressure to the neck can harm the brain, and there is no safe way to strangle a person." It comes after abusers who strangle their partners will now face jail sentences of up to five years. New rules also now require porn websites to have "robust" age verification in place by July at the latest. Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) was made a specific offence in 2022, and can lead to a five year prison sentence. In the year up to 2023, around 700 offenders were sentenced for the offence. Many blame "masculinity influencers" and those like Andrew Tate for the rise in choking being seen as a normal thing to do during sex. Michael Conroy, from anti-misogyny training firm Men At Work, said: 'The rise in choking comes from porn and I see Andrew Tate as part of the porn world. "He is part of porn world. He is the idea of porn made flesh. 'There's a visual grammar of heterosexual porn, which is that you - the man - are dominant, you are the controller, you are the one who tells them what to do. "You are at the top and she is at the bottom. And then Andrew Tate says it and reinforces it. 'He is responsible for fuelling the fire of sexual violence by putting that feeling in their stomach. And he refuses to acknowledge accountability and responsibility and that is attractive.' 2
