logo
Documentary uncovers identity of Israeli soldier who shot Shireen Abu Akleh

Documentary uncovers identity of Israeli soldier who shot Shireen Abu Akleh

Yahoo08-05-2025

Filmmakers behind a new documentary on the killing of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh by Israeli forces say they have uncovered the identity of the soldier who pulled the trigger.
Who Killed Shireen?, a 40-minute investigative documentary released on Thursday by Washington, DC-based media company Zeteo, identifies the killer as a 20-year-old Israeli soldier who was on his first combat tour in the occupied West Bank and lifts the lid on attempts by the United States to avoid holding ally Israel accountable for the murder.
Dion Nissenbaum, the executive producer of the documentary, told Al Jazeera that its makers had set out to uncover exactly who was behind the killing – a secret closely guarded by Israel up to now, according to Zeteo – and that they hoped the findings would lead to further investigations by the US.
The administration of former US President Joe Biden had 'concluded early on that an Israeli soldier had intentionally targeted her, but that conclusion was overruled internally', he said.
'We found some concerning evidence that both Israel and the Biden administration had covered up Shireen's killing and allowed the soldier to get away without any accountability,' he added.
Anton Abu Akleh, Shireen's brother, said the documentary was 'really important' for her family. 'I'm sure it will shed more light and prove that she was systematically targeted like other journalists in Palestine by the Israeli army,' he said.
The documentary features exclusive interviews not just with ex-US officials but also former top Israeli officials and soldiers, as well as journalists who knew Shireen personally.
'We hope that people will be reminded of what an icon Shireen was,' said Nissenbaum.
Abu Akleh was wearing a helmet and a clearly marked press vest when she was killed while covering an Israeli raid on the Jenin refugee camp on May 11, 2022, an act that the Al Jazeera Media Network condemned as a 'cold-blooded assassination'.
Investigations into her killing carried out by news agencies, rights groups and the United Nations have all concluded that Abu Akleh was killed – likely deliberately – by Israeli soldiers.
Israel initially tried to deflect blame for the incident and suggested that Palestinian fighters killed the journalist, but it eventually walked back that claim and acknowledged its troops were responsible for her death, saying it was 'an accident'.
A year later, Israel's military said it was 'deeply sorry' for the death of Abu Akleh, but said it would not launch criminal proceedings against the soldiers believed to be behind the killing.
The US dropped its request for an Israeli criminal investigation after Israel's apology.
Abu Akleh's death shocked the world and focused an international spotlight on Israeli killings of Palestinian journalists.
Reporters Without Borders said on Friday that Israeli forces killed nearly 200 journalists in the first 18 months of Israel's all-out assault on Gaza, at least 42 of whom were slain while doing their job.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How regime change in Iran could affect global oil prices
How regime change in Iran could affect global oil prices

CNBC

time17 minutes ago

  • CNBC

How regime change in Iran could affect global oil prices

Senior Israeli officials said this week that their military campaign against Iran could trigger the fall of the regime, an event that would have enormous implications for the global oil market. The oil market has reacted with remarkable restraint as Israel has bombed the third-largest crude producer in OPEC for eight straight days, with no clear sign the conflict will end anytime soon. Oil prices are up about 10% since Israel launched its attack on Iran a week ago, but with oil supplies so far undisturbed, both U.S. crude oil and the global benchmark Brent remain below $80 per barrel. Still, the risk of a supply disruption that triggers a big spike in prices is growing the longer the conflict rages on, according to energy analysts. President Donald Trump has threatened the life of Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and is considering helping Israel destroy the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. For its part, Iran's leadership is more likely to target regional oil facilities if it feels its very existence is at stake, the analysts said. Israel's primary aim is to degrade Iran's nuclear program, said Scott Modell, CEO of the consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group. But Jerusalem also appears to have a secondary goal of damaging Iran's security establishment to such an extent that the country's domestic opposition can rise up against the regime, Modell said. "They're not calling it regime change from without, they're calling it regime change from within," said Modell, a former CIA officer and Iran expert who served in the Middle East. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denies that regime change is Israel's official goal, telling a public broadcaster on Thursday that domestic governance is an internal Iranian decision. But the prime minister ascknowledged Khamenei's regime could fall as a consequence of the conflict. Defense Minister Israel Katz on Friday ordered Israel's military to intensify strikes on Iran with a goal to "destabilize the regime" by attacking the "foundations of its power." Israel reportedly sought to kill Khamenei in the opening days of its campaign, but Trump vetoed the plan. There are no signs that the regime in Iran is on the verge of collapse, Modell said. But further political destabilization in Iran "could lead to significantly higher oil prices sustained over extended periods," said Natasha Kaneva, head of global commodities research at JPMorgan, in a note to clients this week. There have been eight cases of regime change in major oil producing countries since 1979, according to JPMorgan. Oil prices spiked 76% on average at their peak in the wake of these changes, before pulling back to stabilize at a price about 30% higher compared to pre-crisis levels, according to the bank. For example, oil prices nearly tripled from mid-1979 to mid-1980 after the Iranian revolution deposed the Shah and brought the Islamic Republic to power, according to JPMorgan. That triggered a worldwide economic recession. More recently, the revolution in Libya that overthrew Muammar Gaddafi jolted oil prices from $93 per barrel in January 2011 to $130 per barrel by April that year, according to JPMorgan. That price spike coincided with the European debt crisis and nearly caused a global recession, according to the bank. Regime change in Iran would have a much bigger impact on the global oil market than the 2011 revolution in Libya because Iran is far bigger producer, Modell said. "We would need to see some strong indicators that the state is coming to a halt, that regime change is starting to look real before the market would really start pricing in three plus million barrels a day going offline," Modell said. If the regime in Iran believes it is facing an existential crisis, it could use its stockpile of short-range missiles to target energy facilities in the region and oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets. Tehran could also try to mine the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow body of water between Iran and Oman through which about 20% of the world's oil flows, Croft said. "We're already getting reports that Iran is jamming ship transponders very, very aggressively," Croft told CNBC's "Fast Money" on Wednesday. QatarEnergy and the Greek Shipping Ministry have already warned their vessels to avoid the strait as much as possible, Croft said. "These are not calm waters even though we have not had missiles flying in the straits," she said. Rapidan sees a 70% chance the U.S. will join Israeli airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. Oil prices would probably rally $4 to $6 per barrel if Iran's key uranium enrichment facility at Fordow is hit, Modell said. Iran will likely respond in a limited fashion to ensure the regime's survival, he said. But there is also a 30% risk of Iran disrupting energy supplies by retaliating against infrastructure in the Gulf or vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, according to Rapidan. Oil prices could surge above $100 per barrel if Iran fully mobilizes to disrupt shipping in the strait, according to the firm. "They could disrupt, in our view, shipping through Hormuz by a lot longer than the market thinks," said Bob Bob McNally, Rapidan's founder and former energy advisor to President George W. Bush. Shipping could be interrupted for weeks or months, McNally said, rather than the oil market's view that the United States Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, would resolve the situation in hours or days. "It would not be a cakewalk," he said.

Hegseth orders ‘additional capabilities' to Middle East
Hegseth orders ‘additional capabilities' to Middle East

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hegseth orders ‘additional capabilities' to Middle East

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Monday that he has directed 'the deployment of additional capabilities' to the Middle East amid escalating tensions in the region. 'Protecting US forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region,' Hegseth said in a post on social platform X. He did not name the additional capabilities, though earlier on Monday a U.S. official confirmed to NewsNation, The Hill's sister network, that the U.S. military has moved a large number of refueling tanker aircraft to Europe. The move is intended to 'provide options' to Trump amid the escalating tensions, the official added. Pentagon and White House officials have declined to say how many aircraft have been moved, but the flight tracking website AirNav Systems counted more than 31 Air Force refueling aircraft such as KC-135s and KC-46s leaving the United States on Sunday and flying east. The military flights eventually landed at Ramstein Air Base in Germany and in the United Kingdom, Estonia and Greece, according to the website. A Defense official also confirmed to The Hill that Hegseth directed the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group be sent to the Middle East 'to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel.' Multiple outlets have reported that the action was a pre-planned deployment that had been expedited. The vessel is able to hold some 5,000 personnel and more than 60 aircraft, including fighter jets. U.S. European Command also deployed two destroyers to the eastern Mediterranean Sea on Friday. The vessels can help defend against guided missile strikes. The Navy 'continues to conduct operations in the Eastern Mediterranean in support of U.S. national security objectives,' the official said. The shifted U.S. military assets and personnel comes as the conflict between Israel and Iran has entered its fourth day, with both sides intensifying their assaults following Israel's initial strike on Tehran on Friday. Israel and Iran have taken part in tit-for-tat attacks, open warfare that Israeli officials have said could last 'weeks, not days' and threatens to spark a wider war in the Middle East. Israel last week moved forward with its strikes after accusing Iran of being on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Since then, the two sides have traded large scale missile attacks back and forth in what has become the deadliest confrontation between the countries, with at least 24 people killed in Israel and more than 220 killed in Iran. White House and Israeli officials have said Israel began the strikes after approval from the U.S. — which has helped defend Israel from Iranian-fired missiles. But even as President Trump has voiced support for Israel, he appears wary of any U.S. involvement in its conflict. The president sidestepped a question Monday as to what it would take for the U.S. military to get involved, telling reporters: 'I don't want to talk about that.' He also urged Tehran to return to talks with the U.S. over its nuclear program 'before it's too late.' 'They should talk, and they should talk immediately,' he said while attending the Group of Seven summit of leading industrialized nations in Canada. Trump a day prior said the United States is not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran, but 'it's possible we could get involved.' He also has made clear Washington's support for Israel, warning that 'if we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Israel, meanwhile, had reportedly urged Washington to help it in eliminating Iran's nuclear program, with its targets including energy installations, missile sites, nuclear infrastructure, command centers and Iran's state television station. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News's Rachel Scott. The U.S. military already has a large footprint in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops, air defense systems, fighter aircraft and ships. Updated at 7:26 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump sets deadline of two weeks to decide if US will join Israel's war on Iran
Trump sets deadline of two weeks to decide if US will join Israel's war on Iran

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump sets deadline of two weeks to decide if US will join Israel's war on Iran

Donald Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide whether the US will join Israel's war with Iran, allowing time to seek a negotiated end to the conflict, the White House has said. The decision to leave a window for diplomacy came after Israel's defence minister openly embraced regime change in Tehran as a war aim. On a visit to a hospital hit by an Iranian missile, Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 'cannot be allowed to exist' and that he had ordered a surge in attacks to 'undermine' the Iranian government. The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, later insisted that toppling Iran's leaders was 'not a stated or formal goal', as the conflict entered its seventh day. The White House said on Thursday that the US president would 'make a decision on whether to attack Iran within two weeks'. It added that correspondence with Tehran had continued and there was still hope of negotiations. Trump's decision on whether to join the assault against Iran hinged in part on whether America's most powerful conventional 'bunker buster' bombs would be able to take out Iran's most heavily protected nuclear facility, sources familiar with the deliberations said. Israel does not have weapons capable of destroying the Fordow complex, which is buried up to 100 metres below a mountain near the holy city of Qom. Netanyahu and his allies have been encouraging the US to shift from backing Israel's defence to joining the attack, telling Trump that he alone can 'finish off' Iran's nuclear project. Strike plans have been drawn up, but Trump is waiting to see if Tehran will make a last-minute deal to abandon its nuclear programme, sources said. Amid global warnings against further escalation, Europe is pushing for a diplomatic solution to the war. Iran's foreign minister is travelling to Geneva to meet his British, French and German counterparts on Friday. There have also been offers of mediation from the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, and regional powers including Oman. On Thursday the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, met his US counterpart, Marco Rubio, at the White House, with the focus on the Middle East. They were joined by the British ambassador, Lord Mandelson, and Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, for the meeting. Lammy said later: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon … we discussed how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution.' He added: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' When Israel launched the conflict a week ago, Netanyahu described it as a focused operation to halt Iran's progress towards making a nuclear bomb, but he has been increasingly vocal about his desire for the government in Tehran to fall. On a visit to the Soroka hospital in Beersheba on Thursday, after it was hit by an Iranian missile overnight, Netanyahu said Israel was creating conditions for regime change but that Iranians needed to rise up. Referencing a story from the Bible about the Persian emperor Cyrus the Great liberating Jewish people enslaved in Babylon, Netanyahu told journalists: 'Today, a Jewish state is creating the means to liberate the Persian people.' Netanyahu later said the fall of the Iranian regime was for the country's people to decide. 'It could be a result, but it's not a stated or formal goal that we have,' he told Israeli public broadcaster Kan. Iranians have repeatedly attempted to topple or reform their government over decades, and thousands have paid with their lives or freedom. Many opposition figures, including political prisoners, have rejected the idea that an Israeli war which has already killed hundreds of civilians represents a path to liberation for their country. They have a grim warning in the fate of neighbouring Iraq after US forces toppled Saddam Hussein. His downfall was celebrated by many Iraqis, but was followed by decades of extreme and often sectarian violence which paved the way for the rise of Islamic State. Katz visited Soroka hospital before Netanyahu and effectively called for Khamenei's assassination. He had earlier said he ordered increased attacks on government targets to undermine the regime. 'Khamenei openly declares that he wants Israel destroyed, he personally gives the order to fire on hospitals. He considers the destruction of the state of Israel to be a goal,' Katz told journalists. 'Such a man can no longer be allowed to exist.' After its initial focus on military and nuclear sites, Israel recently attacked targets, including the state broadcaster, with no links to the nuclear project, but which Katz described as 'symbols of the regime'. Iran's early morning hit on Soroka hospital in Beersheba did not cause any serious injuries because all staff and patients were in protected areas, the director, Shlomi Kodesh, said. But images of shattered wards and stunned medics examining the damage caused outrage in Israel. Other missiles landed around Tel Aviv, injuring more than 200 people across the country as a whole, four of them seriously. One hit the base of a skyscraper in Ramat Gan, close to central Tel Aviv and about 200 metres from the city's diamond exchange. 'It was like an atom bomb. An earthquake,' said Asher Adiv, 69, who lives in a nearby block of flats. His mother was an Iranian Jew from Isfahan and Asher grew up speaking Farsi. 'The Iranian people should make a revolution, and kick out the ayatollahs,' he said. 'We are not just fighting for Israel. We are fighting for the whole world. We ask Trump to go inside and finish the problem.' Trump, who initially distanced himself from the conflict, has increased the US military presence in the region as he weighs up ordering US forces to join attacks on Iran. The US president was the first subject most Tel Aviv residents wanted to discuss, as they gathered at the police cordon to watch first responders work among the rubble and shattered glass. Adiv's wife, Anny, who immigrated from Morocco in 1969, said: 'Tell Donald Trump to be beside us. He has to bomb them to finish the nuclear sites.' Khamenei warned on Wednesday that the US would face 'irreparable damage' if it shifted from supporting Israel's defence to an active role in assaults on its territory. Iran's military has moved missiles to prepare for attacks on US assets if it joins the war, and officials are considering other options to respond to one of the most serious threats since the 1979 revolution that brought the country under the control of clerics. A member of the national security committee in Iran's parliament, Behnam Saeedi, said Iran could attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz, Reuters reported. The narrow passage is used by vessels carrying a fifth of the world's daily oil needs. Israeli planes bombed a partly built heavy-water reactor near Arak on Thursday and returned to strike the Natanz nuclear complex. There was no radiation risk from the strike on the reactor, state TV said. Israeli warnings meant the area had been evacuated. Heavy-water reactors are considered a proliferation risk because they can produce plutonium, an alternative to enriched uranium for the core of a nuclear weapon. Israel also targeted the Natanz site, which has been hit several times. Iran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. It was censured by the International Atomic Energy Agency just before the war began and is the only state without nuclear weapons that enriches uranium to 60%, one technical step away from weapons-grade levels. Israel, which has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, is the only nuclear-armed power in the region. It has never officially confirmed or denied having nuclear weapons but its status has been an open secret for years. Several countries are preparing to evacuate their citizens from Iran and Israel, while flights to bring back tens of thousands of Israelis stranded outside the country get under way. Israel's main airport has been closed since the first attacks on Iran. Quique Kierszenbaum contributed to the reporting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store